Introduction

Although the pathogenesis of Graves' ophthalmopathy (GO) remains incompletely understood, cytokines appear to play a major role in the initiation and maintenance of this disorder.1 One of these cytokines, tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), has been shown to be of importance in GO2, 3 and in other autoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA).4

Clinical trials have shown a beneficial effect of anti-TNF treatment in RA5, 6 and, recently, in acute uveitis.7 However, another study on patients with uveitis treated with methotrexate showed that relapse of the disease could not be prevented by anti-TNF treatment.8 To date, there has been no published report on the effect of such treatment in GO. This prompted us to perform a pilot trial in a small series of patients.

We used etanercept (Enbrel®), which is a dimeric fusion protein consisting of the extracellular ligand-binding portion of the human 75 kDa (p75) tumour necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) linked to the Fc portion of human IgG1. It is produced by recombinant-DNA technology and consists of 934 amino acids and has a molecular weight of approximately 150 kDa. Etanercept binds specifically to TNF and blocks its interaction with cell surface TNF receptors.5, 6 The clinical use of etanercept is contraindicated in patients with sepsis and a known hypersensitivity to this drug or any of its components. Treatment with etanercept may result in the formation of autoimmune antibodies. It has been shown to cause intestinal obstruction in patients suffering from Crohn's disease.5 Anti-TNF treatment may affect host defences against infections and malignancies since TNF mediates inflammation and modulates cellular immune responses.

Methods

We treated 10 patients with mild or moderately severe GO with subcutaneous injections of 25 mg etanercept (Enbrel®) twice weekly during 12 weeks. We included patients who were at least 2 months euthyroid with medication (suppression–substitution therapy), who had developed their eye signs during the last six months and who showed active ophthalmopathy, that is, who scored at least three points in the clinical activity score (CAS).9 In this score, each of the following 10 symptoms and signs is assigned one point: orbital pain at rest, pain during eye movements, redness of the eyelid(s), redness of the conjunctiva, eyelid swelling, conjunctival oedema, swelling of the caruncle, >2 mm proptosis, >1 line decrease of visual acuity, >5 degrees decrease of ocular motility.

We excluded patients with a known allergy to etanercept, with infections, with sepsis, with other autoimmune disorders, with a (history of) malignancy, patients below 18 years of age, pregnant patients, and patients who had been treated with immunosuppressive drugs or retrobulbar irradiation. Patients were excluded if during the study period thyroid surgery or a therapeutic dosage of radioactive iodine was indicated, or if during the study period hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism (plasma T3, T4, and TSH values outside the normal reference values) developed. We also excluded patients who showed signs of advanced optic nerve compression, such as a decreased (pinhole) vision, a relative afferent papillary defect, decreased colour vision, abnormal visual field findings, or visual-evoked potentials (VEP).

The study was approved by the institutional review board, and patients gave informed consent for their participation.

Ophthalmic examination included visual acuity measurement, assessment of periocular changes, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, intraocular pressure measurement, and fundus examination. Exophthalmometry was performed with a Hertel exophthalmometer (Rodenstock). In addition, visual fields, and VEP were assessed. Orbital computerized tomography (CT) scans were made. Orthoptic examination included assessment of diplopia and ductions.

Efficacy of treatment was determined using the following scoring systems:

  1. 1

    Clinical activity score (CAS).9

  2. 2

    Ophthalmomopathy index (OI),10 based on the NOSPECS classification. Each category of class 2–6 is scored as follows: grade a=1, b=2, c=3. The sum=OI.

  3. 3

    Exophthalmometry values.

  4. 4

    Patient self-assessment. Patients were asked to evaluate subjectively whether their situation after treatment showed deterioration (marked, moderate, minimal), no change, or improvement (minimal, moderate, marked).

Full ophthalmic and orthoptic examination, including assessment of the CAS, OI, and exophthalmometry values, was performed at intake, after 6 weeks, and after 12 weeks of treatment.

Results

We included seven female and three male patients with an average age of 50 years (range: 39–59 years). The mean CAS, OI, and exophthalmometry values at intake, at 6 weeks and at 12 weeks of treatment are summarized in Table 1. After treatment, the CAS had decreased by, on average 60%, and the OI by 24%. The difference was particularly evident on soft-tissue changes, including periocular chemosis and redness (Figure 1). All patients reported improvement, especially during the first 6 weeks of treatment: two patients had marked improvement, four had moderate improvement, and four had minimal improvement. At intake, six patients suffered from diplopia. In two of them, the degree of diplopia diminished from continuous to discontinuous diplopia. In one patient, the discontinuous diplopia resolved after treatment. In the other three, there was no improvement of continous diplopia. None of the four patients without diplopia at intake developed diplopia during treatment. After treatment, an improvement of elevation up to 10 degrees was noted in two patients, deterioration in one (4 degrees), and no change in the other seven. Overall, there was no change of the other ductions (depression, adduction, and abduction).

Table 1 Clinical findings before and after etanercept treatment in 10 patients with mild-to-moderate, active Graves' ophthalmopathy
Figure 1
figure 1

(a) Pretreatment appearance of a 54-year-old male patient with recent-onset, active Graves' ophthalmopathy. I: frontal view; II: lateral view right eye; III: frontal view left eye. (b) Appearance after 12 weeks of treatment with etanercept. Note the reduction of periocular swelling and redness. I: frontal view; II: lateral view right eye; III: frontal view left eye.

In all 10 patients, the visual acuity did not change during treatment. Two patients showed early signs of optic nerve compression at intake (normal visual acuity but a slightly abnormal VEP and slight visual field changes). In both patients, the VEP as well as the visual fields proved normal after 3 months. We found no average change in exophthalmometry after treatment.

No (serious) adverse events related to the administration of etanercept occurred during or following treatment, with a mean follow-up of 18 months.11 None of the 10 patients were discontinued from the study. One patient experienced mild, transient injection site reaction (erythema). After cessation of treatment, periocular inflammatory signs recurred within 2–6 weeks in three patients. One of these was euthyroid at the end of treatment but became hypothyroid shortly after.

Discussion

This is, to our knowledge, the first report on the clinical use of a TNF-α antagonist in GO. In the majority of patients with active, recent-onset disease, who were treated with etanercept during 12 weeks, we noted a clinical improvement, with an emphasis on the soft-tissue signs. This improvement occurred mainly in the first 6 weeks and remained stable until the end of treatment. Since this was an uncontrolled study, we cannot rule out that the improvement was due to the natural course of this disease. This, however, seems unlikely for two reasons: Firstly, 60% of patients treated with etanercept showed moderate to marked clinical improvement. In a small, controlled study on the effect of antioxidant agents in GO12 it was found that only about 30% of patients using placebo treatment clinically improved in the study period of 3 months. Secondly, the disease activity increased after cessation of treatment in three out of 10 cases, albeit that one of these three became hypothyroid.

While treatment with corticosteroids may be even more effective in reducing the inflammatory symptoms in patients with GO, prolonged use often causes side-effects, such as diabetes, osteoporosis, and Cushing's syndrome. Therefore, there is a need for alternative medication that causes fewer side effects. Patients in this study showed a good tolerance to etanercept without noticeable adverse reactions. However, with a follow-up of 18 months, long-term side effects may still develop. It is important to realize that the long-term effects of etanercept treatment on serious infections, autoimmune diseases, and malignancies are unknown.

In conclusion, this pilot study on a small series of patients with GO strongly suggests that etanercept suppresses the clinical signs in patients with active ophthalmopathy without noticeable short-term side effects. A randomized prospective study is needed to see if etanercept (or other TNF-antagonists) prove sufficiently effective in reducing the inflammatory symptoms of GO, if they can be administered safely for a prolonged period, and if these side effects compare favourably to those of corticosteroids.