Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Autografting

Fixed-dose single administration of Pegfilgrastim vs daily Filgrastim in patients with haematological malignancies undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Summary:

Infectious complications are frequent events in patients undergoing high-dose cytotoxic chemotherapy with subsequent autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). To evaluate whether a single subcutaneous injection of pegfilgrastim (6 mg) is as safe and effective as daily filgrastim (5 μg/kg/day), 60 consecutive autologous stem cell transplantations performed for various haematological malignancies have been analysed. In total, 24 patients undergoing 30 consecutive PBSCT received a single subcutaneous injection of 6 mg pegfilgrastim on day 5 after transplantation and were compared retrospectively with 30 patients receiving 5 μg/kg/day of filgrastim starting from day 7 post transplantation. The mean duration of grade 4 neutropenia in the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim groups was 8.3 and 9.5 days, respectively (P=0.047). The results of the two groups were not significantly different for incidence of febrile neutropenia and toxicity profile. However, duration of febrile neutropenia (1.6 vs 3.0 days) and total days of fever (1.73 vs 4.1) were different (P=0.017 and 0.003, respectively), favouring the pegfilgrastim arm. Consequently, a higher incidence of transplants with documented infectious complications associated with the filgrastim group could be observed (56 vs 26%) (P=0.02). A single injection of pegfilgrastim administered at day 5 post transplant shows comparable safety and efficacy profiles to daily injections of filgrastim.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Philip T, Armitage JO, Spitzer G et al. High-dose therapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation after failure of conventional chemotherapy in adults with intermediate-grade or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med 1987; 316: 1493–1498.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Crump M, Smith AM, Brandwein J et al. High-dose etoposide and melphalan, and autologous bone marrow transplantation for patients with advanced Hodgkin's disease: importance of disease status at transplant. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 704–711.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vose JM, Anderson JR, Kessinger A et al. High-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 1846–1851.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Attal M, Harousseau JL, Stoppa AM et al. A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. Intergroupe Francais du Myelome. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 91–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lowenberg B, Verdonck LJ, Dekker AW et al. Autologous bone marrow transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: results of a Dutch prospective study. J Clin Oncol 1990; 8: 287–294.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kirk Jr JL, Greenfield RA, Slease RB et al. Analysis of early infectious complications after autologous bone marrow transplantation. Cancer 1988; 62: 2445–2450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Welte K, Gabrilove J, Bronchud MH et al. Filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF): the first 10 years. Blood 1996; 88: 1907–1929 Review.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schmitz N, Dreger P, Zander AR et al. Results of a randomised, controlled, multicentre study of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) in patients with Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma undergoing autologous bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995; 15: 261–266.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Klumpp TR, Mangan KF, Goldberg SL et al. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor accelerates neutrophil engraftment following peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation: a prospective, randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 1323–1327.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Linch DC, Milligan DW, Winfield DA et al. G-CSF after peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in lymphoma patients significantly accelerated neutrophil recovery and shortened time in hospital: results of a randomized BNLI trial. Br J Haematol 1997; 99: 933–938.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Molineux G, Kinstler O, Briddell B et al. A new form of Filgrastim with sustained duration in vivo and enhanced ability to mobilize PBPC in both mice and humans. Exp Hematol 1999; 27: 1724–1734.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Layton JE, Hockman H, Sheridan WP et al. Evidence for a novel in vivo control mechanism of granulopoiesis: mature cell-related control of a regulatory growth factor. Blood 1989; 74: 1303–1307.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Buchheidt D, Bohme A, Cornely OA et al. Diagnosis and treatment of documented infections in neutropenic patients – recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO). Ann Hematol 2003; 82 (Suppl. 2): S127–S132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Link H, Bohme A, Cornely OA et al. Antimicrobial therapy of unexplained fever in neutropenic patients –– guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO), Study Group Interventional Therapy of Unexplained Fever, (DKG-German Cancer Society). Ann Hematol 2003; 82 (Suppl. 2): S105–117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nademanee A, Sniecinski I, Schmidt GM et al. High-dose therapy followed by autologous peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation for patients with Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma using unprimed and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized peripheral-blood stem cells. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12: 2176–2186.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee SM, Radford JA, Dobson L et al. Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) following high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood progenitor cell rescue in high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: clinical benefits at no extra cost. Br J Cancer 1998; 77: 1294–1299.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schmitz N, Dreger P, Zander AR et al. Results of a randomised, controlled, multicentre study of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) in patients with Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma undergoing autologous bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995; 15: 261–266.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bence-Bruckler I, Bredeson C, Atkins H et al. A randomized trial of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (Neupogen) starting day 1 vs day 7 post-autologous stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998; 22: 965–969.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bolwell BJ, Pohlman B, Andresen S et al. Delayed G-CSF after autologous progenitor cell transplantation: a prospective randomized trial. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998; 21: 369–373.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Johnston E, Crawford J, Blackwell S et al. Randomized, dose-escalation study of SD/01 compared with daily filgrastim in patients receiving chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 2522–2528.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Holmes FA, O'Shaughnessy JA, Vukelja S et al. Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 727–731.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Green MD, Koelbl H, Baselga J et al. A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 2003; 14: 29–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vose JM, Crump M, Lazarus H et al. Randomized, multicenter, open-label study of pegfilgrastim compared with daily filgrastim after chemotherapy for lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 514–519.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Holmes FA, Jones SE, O'Shaughnessy J et al. Comparable efficacy and safety profiles of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim and daily injection filgrastim in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a multicenter dose-finding study in women with breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2002; 13: 903–909.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kubista E, Glaspy J, Holmes FA et al. Bone pain associated with once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim is similar to daily filgrastim in patients with breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2003; 3: 391–398.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P Neumeister.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Staber, P., Holub, R., Linkesch, W. et al. Fixed-dose single administration of Pegfilgrastim vs daily Filgrastim in patients with haematological malignancies undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 35, 889–893 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704927

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704927

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links