Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Stem Cell Sources

Ancestim (recombinant human stem cell factor, SCF) in association with filgrastim does not enhance chemotherapy and/or growth factor-induced peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization in patients with a prior insufficient PBPC collection

Summary:

Up to a third of autologous transplantation candidates fail to mobilize hematopoietic progenitors into the peripheral blood with chemotherapy and/or growth factor treatment, thus requiring innovative mobilization strategies. In total, 20 cancer patients unable to provide adequate PBPC products after a previous mobilization attempt were treated with ancestim (20 μg/kg/day s.c.) and filgrastim (10 μg/kg/day s.c.). In 16 patients, the pre-study mobilization was with filgrastim alone. Eight patients underwent single large volume leukapheresis (LVL) and 12 multiple standard volume leukaphereses (SVL) in both mobilizations. Pairwise comparison of peripheral blood CD34+ cell concentrations on the day of first leukapheresis failed to document synergism – median CD34+/μl of 3.2 (<0.1 to 15.4) and 4.5 (1–28.56) for the pre-study and on-study mobilizations (P=0.79, sign test), and 4.2 (<0.1–15.4) and 5 (1–28.56), respectively, for the 16 patients previously mobilized with filgrastim alone (P=1, sign test). The number of CD34+ cells/kg collected per unit of blood volume (BV) processed was similar in both mobilizations – median 0.1 × 106/kg/BV and 0.09 × 106/kg/BV, respectively (P=1, sign test). In this phase II study, the combination of ancestim and filgrastim did not allow adequate PBPC mobilization and collection in patients with a previous suboptimal PBPC collection.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gale RP, Henon P, Juttner C . Blood stem cell transplants come of age. Bone Marrow Transplant 1992; 9: 151–155.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chopra R . High dose therapy: the third UCH meeting. Br J Cancer 1994; 69: 788–791.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Gratwohl A, Baldomero H, Passweg J et al. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for hematological malignancies in Europe. Leukemia 2003; 17: 941–959.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sheridan WP, Begley CG, Juttner CA et al. Effect of peripheral blood progenitor cells mobilized by filgrastim (G-CSF) on platelet recovery after high dose chemotherapy. Lancet 1992; 339: 640–644.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Faucher C, Le Corroller AG, Blaise D et al. Comparison of G-CSF-primed peripheral blood progenitor cells and bone marrow auto-transplantation: clinical assessment and cost-effectiveness. Bone Marrow Transplant 1994; 14: 895–901.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hartmann O, Le Corroller AG, Blaise D et al. Peripheral blood stem cell and bone marrow transplantation for solid tumors and lymphomas: hematological recovery and costs. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126: 600–607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. To LB, Roberts MM, Haylock DN et al. Comparison of hematological recovery times and supportive care requirements of autologous recovery phase peripheral blood stem cell transplants, autologous bone marrow transplants and allogeneic bone marrow transplants. Bone Marrow Transplant 1992; 9: 277–284.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Myers SE, Williams SF, Geller RB . Cyclophosphamide mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells for use in autologous transplantation after high-dose chemotherapy: clinical results in patients with contaminated or hypocellular bone marrow. J Hematotherapy 1992; 1: 27–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Boiron J-M, Marit G, Faberes C et al. Collection of peripheral blood stem cells in multiple myeloma following single high-dose cyclophosphamide with and without recombinant human granulocyte–macrophage colony stimulating factor (rh-GM-CSF). Bone Marrow Transplant 1993; 12: 49–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Passos-Coelho JL, Machado MA, Lucio P et al. Large-volume leukapheresis may be more efficient than standard-volume leukapheresis for collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells. J Hematotherapy 1997; 6: 465–474.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Comenzo RL, Vosburgh E, Weintraub LR et al. Collection of mobilized blood progenitor cells for hematopoietic rescue by large-volume leukapheresis. Transfusion 1995; 35: 493–497.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Malachowski ME, Comenzo RL, Hillyer CD et al. Large-volume leukapheresis for peripheral blood stem cell collection in patients with hematological malignancies. Transfusion 1992; 32: 732–735.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hillyer CD, Lackey III DA, Hart KK et al. CD34+ progenitors and colony-forming units-granulocyte macrophage are recruited during large volume leukapheresis and concentrated by counterflow centrifugal elutriation. Transfusion 1993; 33: 316–321.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Passos-Coelho JL, Braine HG, Wright SK et al. Large volume leukapheresis using regional citrate anticoagulation to collect peripheral blood progenitor cells. J Hematother 1995; 4: 11–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Korbling M, Fliedner TM, Pflieger H . Collection of large quantities of granulocyte/macrophage progenitor cells (CFUc) in man by means of a continuous flow leukapheresis. Scand J Haematol 1980; 24: 22–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lasky LC, Smith JA, McCullough J et al. Three-hour collection of committed and multipotent hematopoietic progenitor cells by apheresis. Transfusion 1987; 26: 276–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Narayanasami U, Kanteti R, Morelli J et al. Randomized trial of filgrastim versus chemotherapy and filgrastim mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells for rescue in autologous transplantation. Blood 2001; 98: 2059–2064.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moskowitz C, Stiff P, Gordon MS et al. The influence of extensive prior chemotherapy on the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) using stem cell factor (rhSCF) and filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF) and on hematologic recovery post cyclophosphamide, BCNU and VP16 (CBV) in patients (pts) with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL): an interim analysis. Blood 1994; 84: 107a (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Glaspy JA, Shpall EJ, LeMaistre CF et al. Peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization using stem cell factor in combination with filgrastim in breast cancer patients. Blood 1997; 90: 2939–2951.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chabannon C, Le Coroller AG, Faucher C et al. Patient condition affects the collection of peripheral blood progenitors after priming with recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. J Hematother 1995; 4: 171–179.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Grigg AP, Roberts AW, Raunow H et al. Optimizing dose and schedule of filgrastim (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) for mobilization and collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells in normal volunteers. Blood 1995; 86: 4437–4445.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bensinger WI, Applebaum FR, Rowley SD et al. Factors that influence collection and engraftment of autologous peripheral blood stem cells. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 2547–2555.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tricot G, Jagannath S, Vesole DH et al. Peripheral blood stem cell transplants for multiple myeloma: identification of favorable variables for rapid engraftment in 225 patients. Blood 1995; 85: 588–596.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Weaver CH, Hazelton B, Birch R et al. An analysis of engraftment kinetics as a function of CD34+ cell content of peripheral blood progenitor cell collections in 692 patients after the administration of myeloablative therapy. Blood 1995; 86: 3961–3969.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Passos-Coelho JL, Braine HG, Davis JM et al. Similar breast cancer cell contamination of single-day peripheral blood progenitor cell collections obtained after priming with hematopoietic growth factor alone or after cyclophosphamide followed by growth factor. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 2569–2575.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Silva MRG, Passos-Coelho JL, Leal da Costa F et al. Use of peripheral blood progenitor cells as hematopoietic support for high-dose chemotherapy – the experience of the hematological intensive care unit of the Instituto Português de Oncologia de Francisco Gentil. Acta Med Portuguesa 1999; 12: 275–281.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. To LB, Bashford J, Durrant S et al. Successful mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells after addition of ancestim (stem cell factor) in patients who had failed a prior mobilization with filgrastim (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) alone or with chemotherapy plus filgrastim. Bone Marrow Transplant 2003; 31: 371–378.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Molineaux G, Migdarska A, Szmitkowski M et al. The effects on hemopoiesis of recombinant stem cell factor (ligand for c-kit) administered in vivo to mice either alone or in combination with G-CSF. Blood 1991; 78: 961–966.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shpall EJ, Wheeler CA, Turner AS et al. A randomized phase III study of peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization with stem cell factor and filgrastim in high risk breast cancer patients. Blood 1999; 93: 2491–2501.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Facon T, Harrousseau JL, Maloisel F et al. Stem cell factor in combination with filgrastim after chemotherapy improves peripheral blood progenitor cell yield and reduces apheresis requirements in multiple myeloma patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Blood 1999; 94: 1218–1225.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Stiff P, Gingrich R, Luger S et al. A randomized phase II study of PBPC mobilization by stem cell factor and filgrastim in heavily pretreated patients with Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000; 26: 471–481.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M G da Silva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

da Silva, M., Pimentel, P., Carvalhais, A. et al. Ancestim (recombinant human stem cell factor, SCF) in association with filgrastim does not enhance chemotherapy and/or growth factor-induced peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization in patients with a prior insufficient PBPC collection. Bone Marrow Transplant 34, 683–691 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704602

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704602

Keywords

Search

Quick links