Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Myeloma

Salvage autologous or allogeneic transplantation for multiple myeloma refractory to or relapsing after a first-line autograft?

Abstract

Forty-two patients allografted for multiple myeloma after not having attained at least a partial remission (n = 19) or after having experienced disease progression (n = 23) following one autograft were compared with 42 pair-matched controls who underwent salvage autotransplantation under identical conditions. Autografted controls were matched closely for albumin, C-reactive protein, creatinine, disease sensitivity, duration of standard therapy prior to the first transplant, Ig isotype, karyotype, LDH, and response to the first transplant, but, in comparison to allografted patients, were older, had higher β2-microglobulin, and had a shorter interval between the two transplants. The complete remission rate was 41% after allogeneic and 33% after autologous transplantation (P = NS). The 3-year probability of event-free survival was comparable for the two groups (25 ± 8% after autografting and 20 ± 8% after allografting). The 3-year probability of survival was significantly higher after autologous transplantation (54 ± 8% vs 29 ± 9%; P = 0.01). Twenty-one patients in the autograft group were alive 11–59 months (median 32) following the second transplant, while 15 patients in the allograft group were alive at 10–53 months (median 20). The 3-year probability of disease progression was significantly lower after allogeneic transplantation (31 ± 10% vs 72 ± 9%, P = 0.03). The 1-year probability of transplant-related mortality was significantly higher after allografting (43 ± 8% vs 10 ± 5%; P = 0.0001). We conclude that while autografting appears to be superior to allografting for salvage therapy of myeloma persisting or relapsing after one previous autotransplant in terms of overall survival, event-free survival is comparable due to significantly lower disease progression after allografting. Reduction in allograft-related toxicity can potentially improve the results of allogeneic transplantation significantly.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mehta, J., Tricot, G., Jagannath, S. et al. Salvage autologous or allogeneic transplantation for multiple myeloma refractory to or relapsing after a first-line autograft?. Bone Marrow Transplant 21, 887–892 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1701208

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1701208

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links