Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85236-z, published online 02 April 2021
The original version of this Article contained an error in the legend of Figure 4, where the minus sign was missing in the P values.
“Differences between low-stimulus and high-stimulus groups. (A) Densities of Alpha (relative alpha power) for low-stimulus and high-stimulus groups shows 1.23 × difference in means with P < 2.9E04 (K–S test). (B) Densities for Ea (peak alpha energy) shows 4.8 × difference in means with P < 3.9E05 (K–S test). (C) Densities for CV_Alpha shows 3.5 × difference in means with P < 5.8E04 (K–S test). (D) Densities for Theta/Beta ratio shows 1.13 × difference in means (here decrease, P < 5.4E05 (K–S test). (E) Densities for Complexity shows 1.17 × difference in means with P < 7.5E05 (K–S test). (F) Average power spectrums of low- and high- stimulus groups. Error bars: average spatial variability across individuals.”
now reads:
“Differences between low-stimulus and high-stimulus groups. (A) Densities of Alpha (relative alpha power) for low-stimulus and high-stimulus groups shows 1.23 × difference in means with P < 2.9E-04 (K–S test). (B) Densities for Ea (peak alpha energy) shows 4.8 × difference in means with P < 3.9E-05 (K–S test). (C) Densities for CV_Alpha shows 3.5 × difference in means with P < 5.8E-04 (K–S test). (D) Densities for Theta/Beta ratio shows 1.13 × difference in means (here decrease, P < 5.4E-05 (K–S test). (E) Densities for Complexity shows 1.17 × difference in means with P < 7.5E-05 (K–S test). (F) Average power spectrums of low- and high- stimulus groups. Error bars: average spatial variability across individuals.”
The original Article has been corrected.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Parameshwaran, D., Sathishkumar, S. & Thiagarajan, T.C. Author Correction: The impact of socioeconomic and stimulus inequality on human brain physiology. Sci Rep 11, 12863 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92234-8
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92234-8
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
