Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Identification of LiH and nanocrystalline LiF in the solid–electrolyte interphase of lithium metal anodes

Nature Nanotechnology volume 16, pages 549–554 (2021)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

A comprehensive understanding of the solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) composition is crucial to developing high-energy batteries based on lithium metal anodes. A particularly contentious issue concerns the presence of LiH in the SEI. Here we report on the use of synchrotron-based X-ray diffraction and pair distribution function analysis to identify and differentiate two elusive components, LiH and LiF, in the SEI of lithium metal anodes. LiH is identified as a component of the SEI in high abundance, and the possibility of its misidentification as LiF in the literature is discussed. LiF in the SEI is found to have different structural features from LiF in the bulk phase, including a larger lattice parameter and a smaller grain size (<3 nm). These characteristics favour Li+ transport and explain why an ionic insulator, like LiF, has been found to be a favoured component for the SEI. Finally, pair distribution function analysis reveals key amorphous components in the SEI.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Characterization of the interphase by XRD.
Fig. 2: Air-exposure experiment of the interphase sample.
Fig. 3: Analysis of amorphous components and relative quantification of crystalline components in the interphase.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All relevant data in the article are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Whittingham, M. S. Ultimate limits to intercalation reactions for lithium batteries. Chem. Rev. 114, 11414–11443 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu, J. et al. Pathways for practical high-energy long-cycling lithium metal batteries. Nat. Energy 4, 180–186 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lin, D., Liu, Y. & Cui, Y. Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 194–206 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Aurbach, D. & Weissman, I. On the possibility of LiH formation on Li surfaces in wet electrolyte solutions. Electrochem. Commun. 1, 324–331 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Xiao, J. How lithium dendrites form in liquid batteries. Science 366, 426–427 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu, B., Zhang, J.-G. & Xu, W. Advancing lithium metal batteries. Joule 2, 833–845 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zachman, M. J., Tu, Z., Choudhury, S., Archer, L. A. & Kourkoutis, L. F. Cryo-STEM mapping of solid–liquid interfaces and dendrites in lithium-metal batteries. Nature 560, 345–349 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fang, C. et al. Quantifying inactive lithium in lithium metal batteries. Nature 572, 511–515 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng, X.-B. et al. A review of solid electrolyte interphases on lithium metal anode. Adv. Sci. 3, 1500213 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Borodin, O. et al. Uncharted waters: super-concentrated electrolytes. Joule 4, 69–100 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, X. et al. New insights on the structure of electrochemically deposited lithium metal and its solid electrolyte interphases via cryogenic TEM. Nano Lett. 17, 7606–7612 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, Y. et al. Atomic structure of sensitive battery materials and interfaces revealed by cryo-electron microscopy. Science 358, 506–510 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, X. et al. Cryogenic electron microscopy for characterizing and diagnosing batteries. Joule 2, 2225–2234 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wood, K. N. et al. Operando X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of solid electrolyte interphase formation and evolution in Li2S-P2S5 solid-state electrolytes. Nat. Commun. 9, 2490 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nandasiri, M. I. et al. In situ chemical imaging of solid-electrolyte interphase layer evolution in Li−S batteries. Chem. Mater. 29, 4728–4737 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wan, C. et al. Multinuclear NMR study of the solid electrolyte interface formed in lithium metal batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 14741–14748 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, L. et al. Identifying the components of the solid–electrolyte interphase in Li-ion batteries. Nat. Chem. 11, 789–796 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ota, H., Sakata, Y., Wang, X., Sasahara, J. & Yasukawa, E. Characterization of lithium electrode in lithium imides/ethylene carbonate and cyclic ether electrolytes: II. surface chemistry. J. Electrochem. Soc. 151, A437–A446 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shen, C. et al. Direct observation of the growth of lithium dendrites on graphite anodes by operando EC-AFM. Small Methods 2, 1700298 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, T. et al. In situ quantification of interphasial chemistry in Li-ion battery. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 50–56 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun, Y. & Ren, Y. In situ synchrotron X-ray techniques for real-time probing of colloidal nanoparticle synthesis. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 30, 399–419 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. David, W. I. F. et al. A mechanism for non-stoichiometry in the lithium amide/lithium imide hydrogen storage reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 1594–1601 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zimmerman, W. B. Lattice-constant dependence on isotopic composition in the 7Li (H, D) system. Phys. Rev. B 5, 4704–4707 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tyutyunnik, O. I. et al. Lithium hydride single crystal growth by bridgman-stockbarger method using ultrasound. J. Cryst. Growth 68, 741–746 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Srivastava, K.-K. & Merchant, H. D. Thermal expansion of alkali halides above 300°K. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 34, 2069–2073 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ben Yahia, H. et al. Synthesis and characterization of the crystal structure, the magnetic and the electrochemical properties of the new fluorophosphate LiNaFe[PO4]F. Dalton Trans. 41, 11692–11699 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dong, H. et al. Compression of lithium fluoride to 92 GPa. High Press. Res. 34, 39–48 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fukuhara, M. Lattice expansion of nanoscale compound particles. Phys. Lett. A 313, 427–430 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ahmad, M. I. & Bhattacharya, S. S. Size effect on the lattice parameters of nanocrystalline anatase. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 191906 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tsunekawa, S., Ishikawa, K., Li, Z. Q., Kawazoe, Y. & Kasuya, A. Origin of anomalous lattice expansion in oxide nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3440–3443 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Szczȩśniak, M. M. & Ratajczak, H. Ab initio calculations on the lithium fluoride–ethylene complex. J. Chem. Phys. 67, 5400–5401 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hahn, H. & Strick, G. Zur Mischkristallbildung zwischen Lithiumfluorid und Lithiumhydrid. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 372, 248–251 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Varotsos, P. A. & Mourikis, S. Difference in conductivity between LiD and LiH crystals. Phys. Rev. B 10, 5220–5224 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Niu, C. et al. High-energy lithium metal pouch cells with limited anode swelling and long stable cycles. Nat. Energy 4, 551–559 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Neuhaus, J., von Harbou, E. & Hasse, H. Physico-chemical properties of solutions of lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI) in dimethyl carbonate, ethylene carbonate, and propylene carbonate. J. Power Sources 394, 148–159 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hammersley, A. P., Svensson, S. O., Hanfland, M., Fitch, A. N. & Hausermann, D. Two-dimensional detector software: from real detector to idealised image or two-theta scan. High Press. Res. 14, 235–248 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Qiu, X., Thompson, J. W. & Billinge, S. J. L. PDFgetX2: a GUI-driven program to obtain the pair distribution function from X-ray powder diffraction data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 37, 678 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work done at Brookhaven National Laboratory was supported by the Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Vehicle Technology Office of the US Department of Energy (DOE) through the Advanced Battery Materials Research (BMR) Program, including Battery500 Consortium under contract no. DE-SC0012704. The work done at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory was supported by the Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Vehicle Technologies of the US DOE through the Advanced Battery Materials Research (BMR) Program (Battery500 Consortium) under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231. The work at the Army Research Laboratory was performed under JCESR, an Energy Research Hub funded by Basic Energy Sciences, US DOE. This research used beamline 28-ID-2 of the National Synchrotron Light Source II, a US DOE Office of Science user facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Brookhaven National Laboratory under contract no. DE-SC0012704.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Hongkyung Lee

    Present address: Department of Energy Science and Engineering, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (DGIST), Daegu, Republic of Korea

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chemistry Division, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, USA

    Zulipiya Shadike, Xuelong Wang, Ruoqian Lin, Seong-Min Bak, Xiao-Qing Yang & Enyuan Hu

  2. Energy and Environment Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA

    Hongkyung Lee, Xia Cao, Jun Liu & Jie Xiao

  3. Battery Science Branch, Energy and Biomaterials Division, Sensor and Electron Devices Directorate, US Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, MD, USA

    Oleg Borodin & Kang Xu

  4. Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA

    Xiulin Fan & Chunsheng Wang

  5. National Synchrotron Light Source II, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, USA

    Sanjit Ghose

  6. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Jun Liu & Jie Xiao

Authors
  1. Zulipiya Shadike
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hongkyung Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Oleg Borodin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xia Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiulin Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xuelong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ruoqian Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Seong-Min Bak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Sanjit Ghose
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Kang Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Chunsheng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Jun Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Jie Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Xiao-Qing Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Enyuan Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.X., E.H. and X.-Q.Y. proposed the research. J.X., J.L. and X.-Q.Y. organized and guided scientific discussions. H.L. and X.C. performed electrochemical characterization and SEI sample preparation. Z.S., X.W., O.B., S.G., C.W., X.F., S.-M.B., R.L. and E. H. performed XRD and PDF measurements and carried out the analysis. Z.S., J.X., E.H., K.X. and X.-Q.Y. prepared the manuscript with critical input from all other authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jie Xiao, Xiao-Qing Yang or Enyuan Hu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Nanotechnology thanks Marcella Bini, Donal Finegan and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–5, Tables 1–14, note and refs. 1 and 2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shadike, Z., Lee, H., Borodin, O. et al. Identification of LiH and nanocrystalline LiF in the solid–electrolyte interphase of lithium metal anodes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 549–554 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-020-00845-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-020-00845-5

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing