Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Diffusion-defining atomic-scale spinodal decomposition within nanoprecipitates

Nature Materials volume 17, pages 1101–1107 (2018)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Stoichiometric precipitates owe their fixed composition to an ordered crystal structure. Deviations from that nominal value, however, are encountered at times. Here we investigate composition, structure and diffusion phenomena of ordered precipitates that form during heat treatment in an industrially cast Al–Mg–Sc–Zr alloy system. Experimental investigations based on aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy and analytical tomography reveal the temporal evolution of precipitate ordering and formation of non-equilibrium structures with unprecedented spatial resolution, supported by thermodynamic calculations and diffusion simulations. This detailed view reveals atomic-scale spinodal decomposition to majorly define the ongoing diffusion process. It is illustrated that even small deviations in composition and ordering can have a considerable impact on a system’s evolution, due to the interplay of Gibbs energies, atomic jump activation energies and phase ordering, which may play an important role for multicomponent alloys.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Structure and composition of short-aged and long-aged precipitates.
Fig. 2: Analysis of radial compositional variation of a precipitate in a long-aged EBRS-treated sample.
Fig. 3: Comparison of HAADF images and simulations of L12 precipitates with different numbers of Al atoms on Sc sites.
Fig. 4: Gibbs free energy calculations.
Fig. 5: Results of 3D atomistic diffusion simulation showing the evolution of diffusion channels.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data sets generated and/or analysed during the current study as well as any custom code used during this study are available from the authors on reasonable request.

References

  1. Clouet, E. et al. Complex precipitation pathways in multicomponent alloys. Nat. Mater. 5, 482–488 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hald, J. Prospects for martensitic 12 % Cr steels for advanced steam power plants. Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 69, 183–188 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Danielsen, H. K. Review of Z phase precipitation in 9–12 wt-%Cr steels. Mater. Sci. Technol. 32, 126–137 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Taendl, J., Orthacker, A., Amenitsch, H., Kothleitner, G. & Poletti, C. Influence of the degree of scandium supersaturation on the precipitation kinetics of rapidly solidified Al-Mg-Sc-Zr alloys. Acta Mater. 117, 43–50 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Taendl, J. et al. In-situ observation of recrystallization in an AlMgScZr alloy using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Mater. Charact. 108, 137–144 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Williams, J. C. & Starke, E. A. Progress in structural materials for aerospace systems. Acta Mater. 51, 5775–5799 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cavanaugh, M. K., Birbilis, N., Buchheit, R. G. & Bovard, F. Investigating localized corrosion susceptibility arising from Sc containing intermetallic Al3Sc in high strength Al-alloys. Scr. Mater. 56, 995–998 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sawtell, R. R. & Jensen, C. L. Mechanical properties and microstructures of Al-Mg-Sc alloys. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 21, 421–430 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Filatov, Y., Yelagin, V. & Zakharov, V. New Al–Mg–Sc alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 280, 97–101 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Taendl, J., Palm, F., Anders, K., Gradinger, R. & Poletti, C. Investigation of the precipitation kinetics of a new Al-Mg-Sc-Zr alloy. Mater. Sci. Forum 794–796, 1038–1043 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Novotny, G. M. & Ardell, A. J. Precipitation of Al3Sc in binary Al-Sc alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 318, 144–154 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Røyset, J. & Ryum, N. Kinetics and mechanisms of precipitation in an Al-0.2wt.% Sc alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 396, 409–422 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Røyset, J. & Ryum, N. Scandium in aluminium alloys. Int. Mater. Rev. 50, 19–44 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Clouet, E., Barbu, A., Laé, L. & Martin, G. Precipitation kinetics of Al3Zr and Al3Sc in aluminum alloys modeled with cluster dynamics. Acta Mater. 53, 2313–2325 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tolley, A., Radmilovic, V. & Dahmen, U. Segregation in Al3(Sc,Zr) precipitates in Al-Sc-Zr alloys. Scr. Mater. 52, 621–625 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Forbord, B., Lefebvre, W., Danoix, F., Hallem, H. & Marthinsen, K. Three dimensional atom probe investigation on the formation of Al3(Sc,Zr)-dispersoids in aluminium alloys. Scr. Mater. 51, 333–337 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Haberfehlner, G., Orthacker, A., Albu, M., Li, J. & Kothleitner, G. Nanoscale voxel spectroscopy by simultaneous EELS and EDS tomography. Nanoscale 6, 14563–14569 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Allen, L. J., D’Alfonso, A. J. & Findlay, S. D. Modelling the inelastic scattering of fast electrons. Ultramicroscopy 151, 11–22 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kozeschnik, E. Modeling Solid-State Precipitation (Momentum, New York, 2012).

  20. Jones, R. A. L. Soft Condensed Matter (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2002).

  21. Fuller, C. B., Murray, J. L. & Seidman, D. N. Temporal evolution of the nanostructure of Al(Sc,Zr) alloys: Part I-Chemical compositions of Al3(Sc1−xZrx) precipitates. Acta Mater. 53, 5415–5428 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gubbens, A. et al. The GIF Quantum, a next generation post-column imaging energy filter. Ultramicroscopy 110, 962–970 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schlossmacher, P., Klenov, D. O., Freitag, B. & von Harrach, H. S. Enhanced detection sensitivity with a new windowless XEDS system for AEM based on silicon drift detector technology. Micros. Today 18, 14–20 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kramers, H. A. XCIII. On the theory of X-ray absorption and of the continuous X-ray spectrum. Philos. Mag. 46, 836–871 (1923).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Azevedo, S. G., Schneberk, D. J., Fitch, J. P. & Martz, H. E. Calculation of the rotational centers in computed tomography sinograms. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 37, 1525–1540 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Uusimäki, T. et al. Three dimensional quantitative characterization of magnetite nanoparticles embedded in mesoporous silicon: local curvature, demagnetizing factors and magnetic Monte Carlo simulations. Nanoscale 5, 11944–11953 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Leary, R., Saghi, Z., Midgley, P. A. & Holland, D. J. Compressed sensing electron tomography. Ultramicroscopy 131, 70–91 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Saghi, Z. et al. Compressed sensing electron tomography of needle-shaped biological specimens - potential for improved reconstruction fidelity with reduced dose. Ultramicroscopy 160, 230–238 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Simmons, R. O. & Balluffi, R. W. Measurements of equilibrium vacancy concentrations in aluminum. Phys. Rev. 117, 52–61 (1960).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mommaa, K. & Izumia, F. VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272–1276 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Austrian Cooperative Research Facility, the Austrian Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Technology (project GZ BMVIT- 612.011/0001-III/I1/2015) and the Austrian Research Promotion Agency FFG (TAKE OFF project 839002) for funding. We would like to express our gratitude to F. Hofer for supporting the project and to W. Sprengel for advice concerning the manuscript. Furthermore, we would like to thank L. Allen and his group for support with µSTEM and M. Weyland, J. Etheridge and S. Findlay for support concerning quantitative STEM.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Electron Microscopy and Nanoanalysis, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria

    Angelina Orthacker, Georg Haberfehlner & Gerald Kothleitner

  2. Graz Centre for Electron Microscopy, Graz, Austria

    Angelina Orthacker, Georg Haberfehlner & Gerald Kothleitner

  3. Institute of Materials Science, Joining and Forming , Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria

    Johannes Taendl, Maria C. Poletti & Bernhard Sonderegger

Authors
  1. Angelina Orthacker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Georg Haberfehlner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Johannes Taendl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maria C. Poletti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bernhard Sonderegger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gerald Kothleitner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.O. performed all STEM investigations including sample preparation for tomography and STEM HAADF simulations, interpreted the results and wrote the bigger part of the manuscript. G.H. provided the software for tomographic alignment and reconstruction and supported its application. J.T. and M.C.P. provided the samples and information and performed the re-solidification and ageing process. B.S. coded the Gibbs energy calculation and the 3D atomistic diffusion simulation and wrote the parts of the manuscript treating them. G.K. supervised the project and the writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Angelina Orthacker or Gerald Kothleitner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures: Supplementary Figures 1–5 Supplementary Reference 1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Orthacker, A., Haberfehlner, G., Taendl, J. et al. Diffusion-defining atomic-scale spinodal decomposition within nanoprecipitates. Nature Mater 17, 1101–1107 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-018-0209-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-018-0209-z

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing