Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Human bias in algorithm design

Algorithms are designed to learn user preferences by observing user behaviour. This causes algorithms to fail to reflect user preferences when psychological biases affect user decision making. For algorithms to enhance social welfare, algorithm design needs to be psychologically informed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Allcott, H., Braghieri, L., Eichmeyer, S. & Gentzkow, M. Am. Econ. Rev. 110, 629–676 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Agan, A. Y., Davenport, D., Ludwig, J. & Mullainathan, S. Automating Automaticity: How the Context of Human Choice Affects the Extent of Algorithmic Bias (No. w30981) (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2023).

  3. Lee, D. & Hosanagar, K. Inf. Syst. Res. 30, 239–259 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. GPAI. Transparency Mechanisms for Social Media Recommender Algorithms: From Proposals to Action. Tracking GPAI’s Proposed Fact Finding Study in This Year’s Regulatory Discussions (Global Partnership on AI, 2022).

  5. Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C. & Mullainathan, S. Science 366, 447–453 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Beshears, J., Choi, J. J., Laibson, D. & Madrian, B. C. J. Public Econ. 92, 1787–1794 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Morewedge, C. K. & Kahneman, D. Trends Cogn. Sci. 14, 435–440 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Logg, J. M. Using algorithms to understand the biases in your organization. Harv. Bus. Rev., https://hbr.org/2019/08/using-algorithms-to-understand-the-biases-in-your-organization (9 August 2019).

  9. Milkman, K. L., Rogers, T. & Bazerman, M. H. Manage. Sci. 55, 1047–1059 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Block, N. Philos. Rev. 90, 5–43 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ray, P. P. Internet Things Cyber-Phys. Syst. 3, 121–154 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McKenna, N. et al. Preprint at arXiv, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.14552 (2023).

  13. Kleinberg, J., Ludwig, J., Raghavan, M. & Mullainathan, S. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. (in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carey K. Morewedge.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morewedge, C.K., Mullainathan, S., Naushan, H.F. et al. Human bias in algorithm design. Nat Hum Behav 7, 1822–1824 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01724-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01724-4

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing