Usp7 regulates Hippo pathway through deubiquitinating the transcriptional coactivator Yorkie

Sun, Xiaohan; Ding, Yan; Zhan, Meixiao; Li, Yan; Gao, Dongqing; Wang, Guiping; Gao, Yang; Li, Yong; Wu, Shian; Lu, Ligong; Liu, Qingxin; Zhou, Zizhang

doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08334-7

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 24 January 2019

Usp7 regulates Hippo pathway through deubiquitinating the transcriptional coactivator Yorkie

Xiaohan Sun¹^na1,
Yan Ding¹^na1,
Meixiao Zhan²^na1,
Yan Li¹,
Dongqing Gao¹,
Guiping Wang³,
Yang Gao³,
Yong Li²,
Shian Wu³,
Ligong Lu²,
Qingxin Liu¹ &
…
Zizhang Zhou¹

Nature Communications volume 10, Article number: 411 (2019) Cite this article

7996 Accesses
49 Citations
1 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

The Hippo pathway plays an important role in organ development and adult tissue homeostasis, and its deregulation has been implicated in many cancers. The Hippo signaling relies on a core kinase cascade culminating in phosphorylation of the transcription coactivator Yorkie (Yki). Although Yki is the key effector of Hippo pathway, the regulation of its protein stability is still unclear. Here, we show that Hippo pathway attenuates the binding of a ubiquitin-specific protease Usp7 to Yki, which regulates Hippo signaling through deubiquitinating Yki. Furthermore, the mammalian homolog of Usp7, HAUSP plays a conserved role in regulating Hippo pathway by modulating Yap ubiquitination and degradation. Finally, we find that the expression of HAUSP is positively correlated with that of Yap, both showing upregulated levels in clinical hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) specimens. In summary, our findings demonstrate that Yki/Yap is stabilized by Usp7/HAUSP, and provide HAUSP as a potential therapeutic target for HCC.

Targeting DCAF5 suppresses SMARCB1-mutant cancer by stabilizing SWI/SNF

Article 27 March 2024

Sandi Radko-Juettner, Hong Yue, … Charles W. M. Roberts

The JAK/STAT signaling pathway: from bench to clinic

Article Open access 26 November 2021

Xiaoyi Hu, Jing li, … Wei Wang

Non-canonical functions of UHRF1 maintain DNA methylation homeostasis in cancer cells

Article Open access 05 April 2024

Kosuke Yamaguchi, Xiaoying Chen, … Pierre-Antoine Defossez

Introduction

The Hippo (Hpo) pathway is known to play essential roles in modulating cell proliferation and apoptosis, thus contributing to organ size control, development, and tumorigenesis¹. The Hpo pathway was initially discovered in Drosophila for its critical roles in restricting cell growth and promoting cell death^2,3,4. The previous data have clearly demonstrated that Hpo pathway comprises several tumor-suppressor proteins, which form a core kinase cascade⁵. In Drosophila, the Ste20-like kinase Hpo, facilitated by a WW-domain-containing protein Salvador (Sav), phosphorylates and activates the kinase Warts (Wts), which then phosphorylates the downstream target protein Yorkie (Yki) with the assistance of its adaptor Mats⁶. Yki is a transcriptional coactivator that governs the expression of target genes through associating with the transcription factor Scalloped (Sd) in the nucleus⁷. Well-known Yki-Sd target genes include diap1 and cyclin E, which respectively hampers apoptosis and promotes cell proliferation². Therefore, inactivation of Hpo or Wts, or ectopic expression of Yki, results in substantial tissue overgrowth featured by excessive cell proliferation and decreased apoptosis^2,8. The critical mechanism in the Hpo signaling transduction is regulation of Yki protein subcellular localization by phosphorylating Yki^2,8,9. Activation of Hpo pathway results in Hpo/Wts-mediated Yki phosphorylation. 14-3-3 proteins bind the phosphorylated Yki in the cytoplasm and prevent its nuclear accumulation, culminating in suppressing Yki target gene expression¹⁰. Besides phosphorylation, whether Yki protein undergoes other modifications is still unclear. On the other hand, how the nuclear Yki terminates its signal is also a long-standing puzzle.

The Hpo pathway is evolutionarily conserved from Drosophila to mammals, as the core components and regulatory mechanisms are similar with few exceptions. In mammals, MST1/2 (Hpo orthologs) and the adaptor SAV1 (Sav ortholog) phosphorylates and activates the downstream kinase LATS1/2 (Wts orthologs). Then, LATS1/2 forms a complex with MOB1A/B (Mats orthologs) to phosphorylate the co-transcription factor Yap/TAZ (Yki orthologs)^9,11. Yap functions together with TEAD1/2/3/4 (Sd orthologs) in the nucleus to turn on the transcription of target genes. Analogous to the case in Drosophila, Hpo pathway in mammals leads Last1/2-dependent Yap/TAZ phosphorylation, which results in Yap/TAZ cytoplasmic retention and inactivation through interacting with 14-3-3 proteins¹². Otherwise, when Hpo pathway is off, Yap and TAZ enter into the nucleus to trigger the expression of pro-proliferative and anti-apoptotic genes¹³. Therefore, Yap has been shown to be critical for cancer initiation and growth^14,15.

Ubiquitination is one of the well-studied posttranslational protein modifications (PTMs) that plays important roles in many cellular processes, such as embryonic development, cell cycle, tumorigenesis, and signaling transduction^16,17. The main outcome of ubiquitination modification is promoting protein degradation¹⁷. Many key components of Hpo pathway are revealed to be degraded by ubiquitination, including Yap¹⁸, Lats1^19,20, Lats2^21,22, and Expanded (Ex)^23,24. Ubiquitin-mediated protein modification is a reversible process due to the function of deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs). Based on the mechanism of catalysis, previous studies have classified DUBs into six families^25,26. Recently, a seventh family DUBs (ZUFSP family) has been discovered^27,28,29. Usp7, also known as herpes virus-associated ubiquitin-specific protease (HAUSP), belongs to the USPs subfamily³⁰. Increasing substrates of Usp7 have been identified, such as P53³¹, Ci/Gli³², and N-Myc³³. Through deubiquitinating a wide range of targets, Usp7 regulates many physiological and pathological processes, including embryonic development and tumorigenesis^34,35.

Although recent studies have clearly demonstrated that various E3 ligases are involved in regulating the Hpo pathway, few DUBs have been implicated. In this study, via both loss-of-function and gain-of-function analyses, we identify that Usp7 regulates Hpo pathway through its deubiquitinase activity. We provide evidence that Usp7 binds Yki to counteract Yki ubiquitination and increase Yki protein level. HAUSP, the mammalian ortholog of Usp7, can functionally substitute Usp7 to modulate Hpo signaling in Drosophila. Furthermore, HAUSP also regulates Yap ubiquitination and Hpo pathway activity in mammalian systems. Finally, we found that the expression of HAUSP is upregulated in clinical hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) specimens, positively correlated with Yap, providing HAUSP as a potential target for HCC treatment.

Results

Usp7 promotes the expression of Hpo target genes

To explore the DUB that regulates Hpo-Yki pathway, we carried out a RNA interference (RNAi)-mediated screen, in which RNAi lines targeting DUBs were expressed in wings. Knockdown of usp7 resulted in a small wing (Supplementary Fig. 1a), phenocopying activation of Hpo pathway. First of all, we generated mouse anti-Usp7 antibody and found that knockdown of usp7 apparently decreased Usp7 signals, whereas overexpression of usp7 elevated Usp7 signals (Figs. 1a, b), indicating that this antibody can specifically recognize Usp7 protein. Meanwhile, we found that usp7 evenly expressed in the wing and eye discs (Supplementary Fig. 1b), and Usp7 protein mainly localized in the nucleus (Supplementary Fig. 1c). To investigate whether Usp7 modulates Hpo pathway, we silenced usp7 in wing discs and checked the expression of Hpo pathway target genes. Knockdown of usp7 apparently decreased diap1-lacZ expression (Figs. 1c, d, q). In addition, we also examined other well-known target genes. Compared with control discs (Figs. 1e, g), knockdown of usp7 attenuated the expression of CycE and ban-lacZ (Figs. 1f, h, q). Furthermore, knockdown of usp7 in the eye disc also decreased CycE level (Supplementary Fig. 1d). We also employed another usp7 RNAi line, which targets distinct region of usp7 gene, to validate this result (Supplementary Fig. 1e). Since previous reports have demonstrated that some interactions exist between Hpo and Hh pathway^36,37, we should test whether Usp7 regulates Hpo signaling activity through Hh pathway. In the wing disc, ci only expresses in the anterior (A) compartment, whereas hh exclusively expresses in the posterior (P) compartment³⁸. Knockdown of usp7 in the wing disc via ApG4, which expresses across the A and P compartments, equally decreased A- and P-compartmental diap1-lacZ levels (Supplementary Fig. 1f), removing the possibility that Usp7 modulates Hpo pathway through Hh signaling. Overall, these results suggest that Usp7 is involved in Hpo-Yki signaling regulation.

To avoid the off-target effect of RNAi, further experiments were performed using a null allele of usp7, usp7^KG06814 (Supplementary Fig. 1g)³⁹. Due to usp7^KG06814 homozygote was embryonic lethal, we employed Flp recombinase/Flp recombinase target (FLP/FRT) technique to generate usp7^KG06814 mutant clones in wing and eye discs and examined Yki target gene expression. usp7^KG06814 clones, marked by the loss of green fluorescent protein (GFP) signals, showed decreased Drosophila inhibitor of apoptosis 1 (DIAP1) and ban-lacZ staining in wing discs (Figs. 1i, j). We also found that CycE protein was decreased in usp7^KG06814 clones in the eye disc (Fig. 1k). Interestingly, we found that the areas of usp7^KG06814 mutant clones were smaller than those of the neighbor twin spots, indicating that loss of usp7 possibly hampers tissue growth. To validate this result, we generated some large usp7^KG06814 clones and analyzed the area ratios of clones/twin spots. Compared with control clones, usp7^KG06814 clones showed apparent growth defect both in wing discs and in eye discs (Supplementary Fig. 1h).

Given that loss of usp7 attenuated Yki target gene expression, we next wanted to examine whether ectopic expression of usp7 could turn on these target genes. Overexpression of usp7 substantially increased the levels of diap1-lacZ (Figs. 1l, q), CycE (Figs.1m, q), and ban-lacZ (Figs. 1n, q). Furthermore, we found that overexpression of exogenous Fg-tagged usp7 could effectively restore the decreased diap1-lacZ (Figs. 1o, q), ban-lacZ (Figs. 1p, q), and small wing caused by usp7 RNAi (Supplementary Fig. 1a). On the other hand, we found that usp7 steadily expressed in different development stages from egg to adult (Supplementary Fig. 1i), and hyperactivated Yki did not affect usp7 expression (Supplementary Fig. 1j), indicating that the expression of usp7 is independent of Hpo-Yki pathway. Taken together, these findings suggest that Usp7 is a bona fide and constitutive regulator for Hpo-Yki signaling transduction.

Usp7 acts downstream of Wts, upstream of Yki

Hpo pathway is defined as a kinase cascade whereby Hpo phosphorylates and activates Wts, in turn, Wts phosphorylates and inactivates the transcriptional cofactor Yki to suppress target gene expression^1,11. Through both loss-of-function assays and gain-of-function assays, we have clearly demonstrated that Usp7 is involved in regulating Hpo pathway. We next wanted to ask whether Usp7 genetically interacts with any components of Hpo signaling. Knockdown of hpo increased CycE protein level (Fig. 2a), which was reversed by usp7 RNAi (Fig. 2b). Additionally, another target diap1-lacZ showed the similar result (Figs. 2c, d), indicating that Usp7 sits downstream of Hpo to control Hpo pathway. Analogous to hpo, the elevated CycE and diap1-lacZ caused by wts RNAi were overcome by usp7 knockdown (Figs. 2e–h). As Hpo pathway is a major regulator of cell cycle, we also monitored cell proliferation in eye discs. In eye discs, cells posterior to the morphogenetic furrow (MF) undergo a synchronous second mitotic wave (SMW) that can be labeled by Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation⁴⁰. Few BrdU-positive cells are found posterior to the SMW. Knockdown of usp7 decreased (Supplementary Fig. 2a, b), whereas overexpression of usp7 increased BrdU-positive cells (Supplementary Fig. 2c) in UAS-wts background, suggesting that Usp7 acts downstream of Wts.

As Usp7 regulates Hpo signaling downstream of Hpo and Wts, it is worthy to test the relationship between Yki and Usp7. Knockdown of yki decreased diap1-lacZ expression (Fig. 2i), which failed to be restored by usp7 overexpression (Fig. 2j). On the other hand, the upregulated CycE induced by yki overexpression could not be remitted by silencing usp7 (Figs. 2k, l). We found that knockdown of usp7 decreased Yki protein (Fig. 2m). Furthermore, loss of usp7 also downregulated Yki level (Fig. 2n and Supplementary Fig. 2d), without affecting the transcription of yki (Supplementary Fig. 2e).

The Yki protein contains two WW domains, which are required for its transcriptional activity⁴¹. Overexpression of a low activity form, yki-1w, which only harbors one WW domain, increased ban-lacZ level (Fig. 2o). However, simultaneous overexpression of usp7 and yki-1w further elevated ban-lacZ level and resulted in serious overgrowth (Fig. 2p). Furthermore, we employed flp-out method to generate GFP-positive clones. Compared with usp7 or yki-1w overexpression alone (Supplementary Fig. 2f, g), simultaneous expressing yki-1w and usp7 produced larger and rounder clones (Supplementary Fig. 2h). Collectively, these results indicate that Usp7 regulates Hpo pathway downstream of Hpo and Wts, upstream of Yki.

Usp7 interacts with Yki

Given that the deubiquitinase plays its roles always through binding and deubiquitinating substrates^42,43, we speculated that interaction with a component of Hpo pathway was essential for Usp7 controlling Hpo signaling. To test this possibility, co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) experiments were performed in S2 cells. Consistent with above epistasis analysis, we found that Usp7 reciprocally bound Yki (Figs. 3c–f), but not other Hpo pathway components (Supplementary Fig. 3a–i), suggesting that Usp7 possibly regulates Hpo pathway through direct targeting Yki.

Usp7 contains a MATH domain in its N-terminus (Fig. 3a), which is responsible for binding some substrates, including Ci and P53^31,32. Yki protein harbors two WW domains in its C-terminal region (Fig. 3b), which is important for its interaction with several partners, including Ex and Taiman^44,45. Most regulating events in the Hpo pathway are mediated by WW-domain–PPxY interactions⁴⁶. Intringuingly, a search in Usp7 protein revealed one PPxY degron (¹²¹PPV¹²⁴Y) just located in the MATH domain. To test whether Yki binds Usp7 via WW-domain–PPVY interaction, we generated Usp7-ΔMATH truncated construct and performed co-IP experiment. The co-IP results showed that both Usp7 and Usp7-ΔMATH could pull-down Myc-Yki (Fig. 3g), indicating that Usp7 binds Yki in a MATH-independent manner. Furthermore, Yki did not affect the interaction between Usp7 and Ci, a substrate of Usp7 that binds its MATH domain (Fig. 3h). This is consistent with the fact that Usp7 binds Yki not via MATH domain. On the other hand, we revealed that the N-terminus, but not C-terminus of Yki was responsible for its interaction with Usp7 through both co-IP and glutathione-S-transferase (GST) pull-down assays (Figs. 3i–k). To map which region of Usp7 is responsible for Yki interaction, we generated various Usp7 truncated mutants. The co-IP result showed that Usp7 bound Yki-N through its C-terminal fragment (Supplementary Fig. 3j). In sum, our findings demonstrate that Usp7 binds Yki through a MATH-domain- and WW-domain-independent manner.

We next tested whether Hpo signaling affects Usp7-Yki interaction. Wild-type Hpo substantially blocked Usp7-Yki association, whereas a kinase dead form of Hpo (Hpo-KD) exerted an opposite effect (Fig. 3l). Consistently, the other kinase Wts played a similar role in regulating Usp7–Yki interaction (Fig. 3m). These results indicate that Hpo pathway likely decrease Yki protein by attenuating Usp7–Yki association. Consistently, overexpression of hpo or wts indeed decreased Yki protein level (Supplementary Fig. 3k). Contrarily, knockdown of hpo or wts elevated Yki, which was restored by usp7 RNAi (Supplementary Fig. 3l).

The deubiquitinase activity is essential for Usp7-regulating Hpo pathway

Although above biochemical data showed that Usp7 binds Yki not through its MATH domain, we should confirm this result via in vivo assay. Overexpression of usp7-ΔMATH, in which the MATH domain was deleted, still elavated the expresssion of diap1-lacZ (Fig. 4a), ban-lacZ (Fig. 4b), and CycE (Supplementary Fig. 4b), supporting that the MATH domian is dispensable for Usp7-regulating Hpo pathway.

Each member of ubiquitin specific proteases (UBPs) family always contains a characteristic cysteine (Cys) site at the core catalytic domain⁴⁷. Substitution of this Cys with alanine (Ala) often destroys its deubiquitinase capability. To examine the importance of Usp7 deubiquitinase activity for its regulation of Hpo pathway, we generated a deubiquitinase deficiency mutant of Usp7 with Cys250 replaced by Ala (usp7-CA). Co-IP result showed that this point mutation on Usp7 did not affect its interaction with Yki (Supplementary Fig. 4a). Overexpression of usp7-CA decreased the expression of diap1-lacZ (Fig. 4c), ban-lacZ (Fig. 4d), and CycE (Supplementary Fig. 4c), suggesting that Usp7-CA possibly plays a dominant negative role. In addition, rescue experiments revealed that usp7-CA failed to restore the decrease of ban-lacZ caused by usp7 knockdown (Fig. 4e). However, usp7-ΔMATH could rescue ban-lacZ level under usp7 knockdown (Fig. 4f).

As the activity of Hpo pathway closely links eye size, we turned to examine whether Usp7 modulates eye size under Hpo-activated background. Compared with the control eye (GMR-gal4 > UAS-wts), knockdown of usp7 or overexpression of usp7-CA led to a smaller eye (Fig. 4g), whereas usp7 or usp7-ΔMATH overexpression increased the eye size (Fig. 4g). In addition, we got the similar result under yki heterozygous mutant background (yki^B5/ + ) (Fig. 4h). Overall, Usp7 modulates Hpo pathway activity in a deubiquitinase-dependent, but MATH-independent manner.

Usp7 deubiquitinates Yki

At present, not much is known about the homeostatic regulation of Yki protein. To address this issue, we carried out pulse-chase experiments in S2 cells and found that both exogenous Myc-Yki protein and endogenous Yki protein were unstable primarily due to lysosome-mediated protein turnover because lysosome inhibitor NH₄Cl effectively blocked Yki protein degradation (Figs. 5a, b). Given that Yki protein mainly localized in the cytoplasm (Supplementary Fig. 4c) and entered into the nucleus when Hpo pathway was closed, we then asked whether the nuclear Yki and cytoplasmic Yki underwent degradation in the same manner. We separated the cytoplasmic and nuclear protein, and tested the degradation of Yki protein. Interestingly, the cytoplasmic Yki was destabilized via lysosome, whereas the nuclear Yki was degraded by proteasome (Fig. 5c). To further validate this result, we fused a nuclear localization sequence (NLS) on the C-terminus of Yki to generate a Myc-Yki-NLS variant, which was predominantly localized in the nucleus (Supplementary Fig. 4d), and found that it was destabilized mainly by proteasome (Fig. 5d and Supplementary Fig. 4j). On the other hand, we also generated a membrane-tethered form of Yki by adding a myristoylation signal at its N-terminus (Myc-Myr-Yki), which exclusively localized in the cytoplasm (Supplementary Fig. 4e), and found that it was degraded by lysosome (Fig. 5e and Supplementary Fig. 4k). Taken together, these results suggest that the cytoplasmic Yki protein undergoes lysosome-mediated turnover, whereas the nuclear Yki mainly undergoes proteasome-mediated proteolysis.

Usp7 specifically binds to Yki and its deubiquitinase activity is indispensable for Usp7-regulating Hpo pathway, implying that Usp7 may be required for the maintenance of Yki protein stability. In line with this, Usp7 indeed prevented Yki and Yki-NLS degradation (Fig. 5f and Supplementary Fig. 4l). In contrast, knockdown of usp7 quickened Yki degradation (Fig. 5g). Given that Usp7 protein mainly localized in the nucleus, it is necessary to test whether Usp7 stabilizes nuclear Yki protein. Consistently, Usp7 increased the nuclear Yki abundance in a deubiquitinase activity-dependent manner, without obvious effect on the cytoplasmic Yki protein (Figs. 5h, i). Knockdown of usp7 decreased nuclear Yki protein regardless of hpo-dsRNA/wts-dsRNA treatment (Fig. 5j), suggesting that Usp7 sits downstream of Hpo/Wts to stabilize nuclear Yki. Cell staining assays also showed that Usp7 promoted Yki nuclear accumulation (Supplementary Fig. 4f). As a matter of fact, nuclear accumulation of Yki protein upon Usp7 co-transfection is compatible with two possibilities. First, Usp7 tethers Yki protein in the nucleus through protein–protein interaction. Alternatively, Usp7 stabilizes the nuclear Yki via deubiquitinating Yki. Compared with control cells (Supplementary Fig. 4c, g), both Usp7 and Usp7-ΔMATH promoted Yki nuclear accumulation (Supplementary Fig. 4f, i), whereas Usp7-CA had no effect (Supplementary Fig. 4h). These results showed that the deubiquitinase activity is essential for Usp7 promoting Yki nuclear accumulation, supporting the latter possibility.

We next sought to determine whether Usp7 deubiquitinates Yki using a cell-based ubiquitination assay⁴⁸. We found that knockdown of usp7 increased Yki ubiquitination (Fig. 5k). In contrast, both Usp7 and Usp7-ΔMATH decreased Yki ubiquitination, whereas Usp7-CA promoted Yki ubiquitination (Fig. 5l). Furthermore, Usp7 also decreased the ubiquitination levels of Yki-NLS, whereas Usp7-CA increased them (Fig. 5m). As Usp7 mainly localizes in the nucleus, it likely deubiquitinates nuclear Yki. We separated the cytoplasmic and nuclear protein for ubiquitination assay, and found that Usp7 robustly deubiquitinated nuclear Yki, not cytoplasmic Yki (Supplementary Fig. 5a). In line with this result, Usp7 effectively removed ubiquitins from Yki-NLS, not Myr-Yki (Supplementary Fig. 5b), supporting that Usp7 mainly deubiquitinates nuclear Yki. Hpo pathway governs Yki subcellular localization via Wts-mediated Yki phosphorylation on S168⁹. We generated phosphorylation-mimic (Yki-SD, Yki-S168D) and phosphorylation-deficient (Yki-SA, Yki-S168A) Yki mutants, and performed the ubiquitination assay. It showed that Usp7 robustly deubiquitinated Yki-SA, not Yki-SD (Supplementary Fig. 5c).

During protein ubiquitination, ubiquitin is always attached to the lysine residue of the substrate. To examine whether the ubiquitin modification of Yki occurs on lysine, we first replaced all 14 lysines by arginines to generate Myc-Yki-KallR mutant. Yki-KallR was stable and failed to be ubiquitination (Supplementary Fig. 5d, e), supporting that ubiquitins attach to lysine residues on Yki protein. To further figure out which lysines are responsible for ubiquitination, we carried out a prediction via an online web server (http://bdmpub.biocuckoo.org) and identified five potential ubiquitination sites (K52, K82, K93, K246, and K274). Compared with wild-type Yki, only mutation of K93 (K93R) significantly blocked Yki degradation and ubiquitination (Supplementary Fig. 5f–h), providing K93 of Yki is the ubiquitination site. Taken together, these findings suggest that the nuclear Yki protein undergoes ubiquitination-mediated turnover, which is antagonized by Usp7.

Mammalian Usp7 is functionally conserved

It has been demonstrated that the mammalian ortholog of Yki, Yap undergoes β-transducin repeat-containing protein (β-TrCP)-mediated ubiquitination and proteasome-dependent proteolysis¹⁸. To test whether the regulation of Usp7 on Yki is functionally conserved, we cloned hausp, the ortholog of usp7 in human, into the UAS-Fg backbone vector to generate UAS-Fg-hausp transgenic flies. At first, the co-IP assay showed that human HAUSP could pull-down Drosophila Yki (Fig. 6e). Misexpression of hausp by En-gal4 upregulated ban-lacZ (Fig. 6a) and diap1-lacZ (Fig. 6b) levels, implying that HAUSP also serves as a positive regulator for Yki target genes. Furthermore, overexpression of hausp rescued the decreased ban-lacZ (Fig. 6c), diap1-lacZ (Fig. 6d), and small wing (Supplementary Fig. 1a) caused by usp7 knockdown, suggesting that HAUSP could substitute Drosophila Usp7 to regulate Hpo signaling. The mutant usp7^KG06814 is a null allele, which the homozygote is lethal before the first instar larvae (Supplementary Fig. 6a). Overexpression of hausp using actin-gal4 could rescue the lethality of usp7^KG06814 homozygotes (Supplementary Fig. 6a), further implying that HAUSP could functional replace Drosophila Usp7.

We next determined whether HAUSP modulates Yap stability and Hpo pathway activity in mammalian cells. The co-IP result showed that exogenous Myc-Yap interacted with exogenous Fg-HAUSP in 293T cells (Fig. 6f). In addition, endogenous Yap could pull-down endogenous HAUSP and vice versa in 293T cells (Figs. 6g, h). The interaction of Yap and HAUSP was attenuated by LATS1/2 and MST1/2 (Figs. 6i, j). Overexpression of hausp substantially increased Yap protein level (Fig. 6k), whereas knockdown of hausp decreased Yap protein (Fig. 6l). Furthermore, we found that either knockdown or overexpression of the known HAUSP target genes (p53, gli1, gli2, gli3, and N-Myc) did not show any detectable effect on Yap protein level (Supplementary Fig. 6b–d), removing the possibility that HAUSP indirectly stabilizes Yap through these transcription factors. Consistent with the previous study¹⁸, β-TrCP did degrade Yap in a dose-dependent manner, which was blocked by HAUSP, but not by HAUSP-CA (a deubiquitinase-deficiency form) (Fig. 6m).

We next sought to test whether HAUSP deubiquitinates Yap in mammalian cells. As expected, HAUSP indeed decreased Yap ubiquitination level, whereas HAUSP-CA exerted an opposite effect (Fig. 6n). In addition, we further revealed that HAUSP blocked β-TrCP-mediated Yap ubiquitination in a deubiquitinase-dependent manner (Figs. 6o, p). Intriguingly, the ubiquitination site (K93) of Yki was evolutionarily conserved between Drosophila and human (Supplementary Fig. 6e). Mutation of the corresponding lysine (K90) to arginine blocked Yap degradation (Supplementary Fig. 6f) and ubiquitination (Supplementary Fig. 6g). Meanwhile, we found that Yap-K90R showed higher efficiency in promoting cell proliferation than wild-type Yap (Supplementary Fig. 6h), together suggesting that K90 is a potential ubiquitination site of Yap protein.

The ability of HAUSP to antagonize Yap ubiquitination and degradation implies that HAUSP possibly affects Hpo pathway activity. To test this hypothesis, we carried out real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) experiments and revealed that knockdown of hausp decreased, whereas overexpression of hausp elevated the expression of Yap target genes, including AREG, CTGF, and Cyr61 (Figs. 6q, r). The CTGF-luciferase reporter assay in 293T cells further confirmed this result (Fig. 6s). Moreover, neither knockdown nor overexpression of hausp affected yap mRNA levels (Figs. 6q, r), supporting that HAUSP regulates Yap through stabilizing Yap protein.

HAUSP is upregulated in HCC tissues, and positively correlates with Yap

Our above studies have demonstrated Usp7/HAUSP regulates Yki/Yap stability and Hpo pathway outputs in Drosophila and mammalian cells. To test whether HAUSP contributes tumorigenesis, we chose HCC specimens since liver is particularly sensitive to changes of Hpo signaling and deregulation of Hpo pathway closely links to liver cancers^9,49,50,51. To address this question, we assessed HAUSP protein levels in 60 pairs of matched liver tissue samples. Consistent with the previous findings⁵², HAUSP was upregulated in 49 of 60 HCC tumors compared with corresponding normal liver counterparts (Fig. 7a and Supplementary Fig. 7a). We further checked the levels of Yap in these samples and revealed that Yap was higher (51 of 60) in HCC samples than that in matched nontumor tissues (Fig. 7b and Supplementary Fig. 7a). Furthermore, a strong positive correlation was found between HAUSP and Yap at the protein level (Fig. 7c). Consistently, RT-qPCR results showed that the expression of Yap target genes was indeed elevated in HCC samples (Fig. 7d).

To explore whether HAUSP is involved in regulating Hpo pathway and tumorigenesis in HCC, we employed a HCC cell line, Huh7. Transfection of HAUSP apparently increased mRNA levels of Yap target genes, where HAUSP-CA had no such effect (Fig. 7e). On the other hand, knockdown of hausp inhibited the expression of Yap target genes (Fig. 7f). In addition, we performed 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) experiments to analyze the proliferation of Huh7 cells after distinct treatments. Transfection of HAUSP promoted Huh7 cell proliferation, whereas HAUSP-CA did not show any effect (Fig. 7g). Knockdown of hausp hampered Huh7 cell proliferation, which was restored by yap overexpression (Fig. 7g), suggesting that HAUSP promotes proliferation of Huh7 cells through Yap. The expression of indicated constructs and the knockdown efficiency of indicated small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) were checked via immunoblotting (IB) (Supplementary Fig. 7b).

As a matter of fact, several inhibitors of HAUSP have been under preclinical experiments. P5091 triggers cell apoptosis in multiple myeloma cells and overcomes bortezomib resistance by inhibiting HAUSP activity⁵³. In addition, P5091 treatment blocked medulloblastoma cell proliferation and metastasis through antagonizing HAUSP-mediated Gli stabilization⁵⁴. We next wanted to test whether the inhibitor regulates Yap protein abundance and then the proliferation of HCC cells. Huh7 cells were treated with different concentrations of P5091 for 24 h, and then were harvested for western blot and RT-qPCR assays. P5091 decreased Yap protein in a concentration-dependent manner, but did not affect HAUSP protein (Fig. 7h). Consistently, P5091 treatment also downregulated the protein levels of Yap targets, including AREG and Cyr61 (Fig. 7h). We validated these results via RT-qPCR and found that P5091 indeed decreased Yap target genes expression, without affecting yap mRNA level (Fig. 7i). Furthermore, we carried out MTT experiments and found that P5091 attenuated Huh7 cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 7j). We chose another HCC cell line to confirm this result, and found that P5091 also inhibited 7721 cell proliferation in a dose-related manner (Supplementary Fig. 7c). Since the previous studies have demonstrated that P5091 also inhibits Usp47 activity, we chose other specific Usp7 inhibitors (Usp7-IN-1⁵⁵ and HBX-19818⁵⁶) to validate our results. Similar to P5091, Usp7-IN-1 and HBX-19818 decreased Yap protein in a dose-dependent manner, without affecting HAUSP levels (Fig. 7k). Furthermore, Both Usp7-IN-1 and HBX-19818 blocked HCC cell proliferation (Supplementary Fig. 7d). Consistently, these inhibitors could relieve the deubiquitinating effect of HAUSP upon Yap (Fig. 7l). In sum, our results reveal that HAUSP positively regulates HCC tumorigenesis via stabilizing Yap, providing the HAUSP inhibitor as a potential drug for HCC clinical treatment.

Discussion

The Hpo signaling has emerged as a critical and conserved mechanism that governs organ size and tumorigenesis⁹. Hpo pathway exerts its roles mainly through modulating the subcellular localization of the downstream co-transcriptional factor Yki^9,10. Whether and how Hpo signaling regulates the abundance of Yki protein is still unknown. In this study, we demonstrated that the deubiquitinase Usp7 positively regulates Yki target gene expression via deubiquitinating Yki (Fig. 8). We provided biochemical evidence that Usp7 bound Yki, which was inhibited by Hpo or Wts (Fig. 8). These results implicate that Hpo signaling not only prevents Yki nuclear accumulation, but also promotes nuclear Yki degradation via attenuating Yki-Usp7 interaction. In addition, the mammalian ortholog HAUSP played a conserved role in controlling Hpo pathway transduction. Finally, we revealed that the clinical HCC samples showed increased HAUSP protein and Yap protein, and that hausp-siRNA or HAUSP inhibitors treatment hampered proliferation of HCC cell lines. Our findings thus unveiled a conserved mechanism by which a DUB stabilizes Yki to achieve optimal Hpo pathway output, and provide HAUSP as a potential drug target for Hpo-related cancer treatment.

In this study, we found that usp7 steadily expressed throughout different developmental stages of Drosophila in a Hpo pathway-independent manner, indicating that Usp7 is likely a constitutive regulator of Yki without context specificity. Our data argue that the homeostasis of Yki protein is governed by Hpo pathway activity. When Hpo signaling is closed, Usp7 stabilizes the nuclear Yki to turn on target genes expression (Fig. 8). Once Hpo pathway is activated, it not only inhibits Yki nuclear translocation via phosphorylating Yki, but also decreases nuclear Yki protein via attenuating Usp7-Yki affinity (Fig. 8). Therefore, Hpo pathway weakens the function of Yki possibly through dual mechanisms (Fig. 8).

Although the previous findings have revealed that Yap undergoes β-TrCP-mediated ubiquitination and proteasome-dependent proteolysis¹⁸, the Yki protein fails to be recognized by Slimb, the ortholog of β-TrCP in Drosophila. Our results implicated that the nuclear Yki was mainly degraded via proteasome, whereas the cytoplasmic Yki protein was destabilized by lysosome. These finding provided a possible explanation that the nuclear Yki terminates its signals via proteasome-mediated Yki destabilization. Consistently, the previous data have demonstrated that the cytoplasmic Yki binds and co-localizes with the arrestin domain-containing protein Leash, culminating in lysosome-mediated Yki degradation⁵⁷. In mammalian cells, Yap is also targeted for lysosomal destabilization in some contexts^58,59. Taken together, these results suggest that lysosome-dependent Yki/Yap proteolysis is likely a general mechanism.

The process of ubiquitination is triggered by the coordinated action of three classes of enzymes, including E1 ubiquitin-activating enzyme, E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, and E3 ubiquitin ligase⁶⁰. In these enzymes, the E3 ligase determines the substrate specificity of the process. Although our studies have demonstrated that Yki undergoes ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis and Usp7 stabilizes Yki via deubiquitinating it, which E3 ligase accounts for Yki ubiquitination is still unknown. It will be fruitful to identify this E3 ligase.

Usp7 contains an N-terminally localized meprin and TRAF homology (MATH) domain, which is always responsible for protein interaction⁶¹. Previous studies have clearly demonstrated that Usp7 uses its MATH domain to bind several substrates, such as P53, Ci/Gli^31,32. However, co-IP results in this study showed that the MATH domain of Usp7 was not essential for its interaction with Yki. In addition, overexpression of a truncated form Usp7-ΔMATH, in which the MATH domain is deleted, could effectively rescue the phenotypes caused by usp7 knockdown. Our findings suggest that the MATH domain of Usp7 is dispensable for deubiquitinating some substrates. Although the C-terminal WW domains of Yki play important roles for it interacting with various partners, they were not involved in binding Usp7 because deletion of WW domains did not weaken its interaction with Usp7.

Increasing studies have implicated that HAUSP possibly plays contradictory roles in tumorigenesis. For instance, HAUSP stabilizes the P53 protein to act as a tumor suppressor³¹. However, our previous studies show that HAUSP promotes medulloblastoma cell survival and metastasis via deubiquitinating the Gli⁵⁴. It is accepted that HAUSP plays an oncogenic role or a tumor-suppressor role possibly depends on the context. In this study, we found that HAUSP was upregulated in HCC samples and it positively regulated the proliferation of HCC cells via stabilizing Yap, suggesting that HAUSP acts as an oncogene in liver tumorigenesis. Consistently, a recent study revealed that HAUSP promoted HCC progression via deubiquitinating thyroid hormone receptor-interacting protein 12 (TRIP12)⁵². Through this study, we could cautiously add that, in addition to TRIP12, Yap was another target in HCC. Furthermore, HAUSP inhibitors apparently inhibited the proliferation of HCC cell lines, providing these inhibitors as potential drugs for HCC clinical treatment. It will be interesting to explore whether HAUSP inhibitors suppress liver tumorigenesis in vivo using mouse models.

Methods

DNA constructs

To generate Myc-Yki, Myc-Mer, Myc-Ex, Myc-Kibra, Myc-Sav, Myc-Wts, Myc-Mats, Myc-14-3-3, HA-Hpo, HA-Wts, Myc-Sd, HA-Ub, and HA-Ci constructs, we amplified the corresponding complementary DNA (cDNA) fragments using Vazyme DNA polymerase (P505), and cloned them into the pUAST-Myc or pUAST-HA backbone vectors. HA-Hpo-KD, HA-Wts-KD constructs were kinase dead mutants^7,8. Fg-Usp7 plasmid was a gift from Dr. Qing Zhang lab. Fg-Usp7-CA, Myc-Yki-SA, Myc-Yki-SD, Myc-Yki-KallR, Myc-Yki-K52R, Myc-Yki-K82R, Myc-Yki-K93R, Myc-Yki-K246R, and Myc-Yki-K274R were generated via PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis. Truncated constructs including Yki-N, Yki-C, Usp7-N, Usp7-M, Usp7-C, and Usp7-ΔMATH were generated by inserting the corresponding coding sequences into the backbone vectors. A nuclear localization signal (NLS) from SV40 (PPKKKRKV) was inserted at the C-terminus to generate Myc-Yki-NLS. A myristoylation signal (MGSSKSKPKDPSQRRRSLE) was inserted at the N-terminus to generate Myc-Myr-Yki. To generate Fg-HAUSP, Fg-HAUSP-CA, HA-β-TrCP, Myc-Yap, Myc-P53, Myc-Gli1, Myc-Gli2, and Myc-Gli3 for mammalian cell expression, we amplified these genes via cDNA pool from HCC samples and cloned them into CMV-Fg, pET-HA, or pcDNA3.1-Myc vectors. Myc-Yap-K90R was generated via PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis. Myc-LAST1, Myc-LAST2, Fg-MST1, and Fg-MST2 constructs have been described previously²¹.

Drosophila stocks

Some stocks in this study are kindly provided from Dr. Qing Zhang lab³², such as Fg-usp7, usp7^KG06814, and usp7-RNAi (#18231, VDRC). The mutant KG06814 (#14505, BDSC) is a P-element insertional allele of usp7 (Flybase). It is a lethal mutation caused by an insertion of P{SUPor-P} at the 5ʹ-region of usp7 gene. P{SUPor-P} was inserted in the opposite orientation relative to usp7 transcription. En-gal4, Ay-gal4, ApG4, diap1-lacZ, ban-lacZ, yki-RNAi, hpo-RNAi, wts-RNAi, GMR-gal4, ptc-gal4, usp7-RNAi-2 (#34708, BDSC), and UAS-GFP were obtained from BDSC or VDRC. UAS-wts, UAS-hpo, and UAS-yki were from Dr. Jianhua Huang lab. UAS-yki-SA and yki^B5 had been described previously^8,9. The Fg-usp7-CA, Fg-usp7-ΔMATH, Fg-hausp, and UAS-yki-1w transgenic flies were generated by injection of corresponding constructs into Drosophila embryos according to the standard methods³². To knockdown or overexpress genes, the male flies of RNAi or transgenes were crossed with indicated gal4 virgin flies at 25 °C. All stocks used in this study were maintained and raised under standard conditions.

Immunostaining

Immunostaining of imaginal discs were performed with previous protocols⁴⁸. In brief, third-instar larvae were dissected in PBS and fixed in freshly made 4% formaldehyde in phosphate buffered solution (PBS) at room temperature for 20 min, then washed three times with PBT (PBS plus 0.1% Triton X-100). Larvae were incubated overnight with needed primary antibodies in PBT at 4 °C, then washed with PBT for three times and incubated with corresponding fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody 2 h at room temperature. After washing for three times in PBT, discs were dissected and mounted in 40% glycerol. For immunostaining of S2 cells, cells were transfected with indicated constructs and stained with previous protocols⁶². Images were captured with Zeiss confocal microscope. Antibodies used in this study were as follows: rat anti-Ci (1:50; DSHB); mouse anti-β Gal (1:500; Santa Cruz); goat anti-CycE (1:100; Santa Cruz); mouse anti-FgM2 (1:1000; Sigma); mouse anti-BrdU (1:10; DSHB); rabbit anti-Yki (1:1000), mouse anti-Myc (1:200; Santa Cruz), and DAPI (1:1000; Santa Cruz). Rabbit anti-DIAP1 antibody (1:100) was from Dr. Shigeo Hayashi lab. Mouse anti-Usp7 (1:100) was generated using aa1-234 as the antigen. Secondary antibodies used in this study were bought from Jackson ImmunoResearch, and were diluted at 1:500.

Cell culture, transfection, immunoprecipitation, IB, luciferase reporter assay

S2 cells (gift from Erjun Ling lab) were maintained in Schneider’s Drosophila Medium (Gibco) with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Sangon Biotech). 293T and Huh7 cells were purchased from the ATCC and cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Gibco) containing 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. In all, 7721 cells were cultured in 1640 medium (Gibco) containing 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Cells were transfected using lipo2000 (Invitrogen) or polyetherimide (Sigma) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were harvested for immunoprecipitation (IP) and IB analysis with standard protocols. Uncropped versions of IBs are shown in Supplementary Figure 8. The following antibodies were used for IP and IB: mouse anti-HA (1:2000; Santa Cruz); mouse anti-Myc (1:2000 for IB, 1:200 for IP); rabbit anti-Myc (1:2000 for IB, 1:200 for IP; ABclonal); mouse anti-FgM2 (1:5000 for IB, 1:500 for IP); mouse anti-Ub (1:1000; Santa Cruz); mouse anti-Actin (1:5000; Genscript); mouse anti-Lamin C (1:1000; DSHB); mouse anti-β-Tubulin (1:1000; ABclonal); rabbit anti-Yki (1:10000); rabbit anti-Wts (1:5000), rabbit anti-Hpo (1:5000), mouse anti-Usp7 (1:2000 for IB, 1:200 for IP), mouse anti-Yap (1:1000 for IB, 1:100 for IP; Santa Cruz); rabbit anti-HAUSP (1:1000 for IB, 1:100 for IP; Santa Cruz); rabbit anti-TEAD (1:1000; Abcam); rabbit anti-AREG (1:1000; ABclonal); rabbit anti-Cyr61 (1:1000; ABclonal); rabbit anti-N-Myc (1:1000; ABclonal); rabbit anti-P53 (1:1000; ABclonal); rabbit anti-Gli1 (1:1000; ABclonal); rabbit anti-Gli2 (1:1000; ABclonal); rabbit anti-Gli3 (1:1000; ABclonal); goat anti-mouse HRP (1:10,000; Abmax), and goat anti-rabbit HRP (1:10,000; Abmax). Mouse anti-Yki (1:200 for IP) was generated using aa1-250 as the antigen. For dual luciferase reporter assay, 293T cells were transfected with the plasmids of CTGF-firefly luciferase and Pol III-Renilla luciferase. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were lysed in passive lysis buffer and luciferase activity was measured using a Dual Luciferase Assay Kit (Promega) according to manufacturer’s instructions. For Usp7 inhibitors treatment, cells were treated by P5091 (#SML0070, Sigma), Usp7-IN (#HY-16709, MedChemExpress), or HBX-19818 (#HY-17540, MedChemExpress) at indicated concentrations for 24 h. All luciferase activity data are presented as means ± SEM of values from at least three experiments.

Generating clones

Clones were generated by FLP/FRT-mediated mitotic recombination⁶³. Genotypes of the generated clones were as follows: usp7 mutant clones in wing discs and eye discs: usp7^KG06814 FRT19A/hs-flp ubi-GFP FRT19A; control clones in wing discs and eye discs: FRT19A/hs-flp ubi-GFP FRT19A. The areas of clones and twin spots were measured by Image J. Ratios of clones to twin spots are presented as means ± SEM of values from at least 20 discs.

GST fusion protein pull-down assay

GST pull-down assays were carried out according to standard protocol³². Fusion proteins were induced by isopropyl β-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG) in Escherichia coli BL21, and purified with Beaver beads GSH (Beaverbio). GST fusion protein-loaded beads were incubated with cell lysates derived from S2 cells expressing corresponding proteins at 4 °C for 2 h. The beads were washed three times with PBS, followed by IB experiment.

RNA interference

To knockdown indicated genes in S2 cells, the double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) was generated by MEGAscript High Yield Transcription Kit (Ambion) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA templates targeting usp7 (aa34-267 and aa981-1097), wts (aa1-177), and hpo (aa1-181) were generated by PCR and used for generating dsRNA. dsRNA targeting the gfp full-length coding sequence was used as a negative control. The indicated dsRNAs were transfected into S2 cells by ExFect 2000 (Vazyme) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To silence indicated genes in mammalian cells, siRNAs were transfected at a final concentration of 100 nM via lipo2000 according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For hausp knockdown, a mixture of two different siRNAs was used. The siRNA sequences were as follows: mock-siRNA: 5ʹ-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUdTdT-3ʹ; hausp-siRNA-1: 5ʹ-ACCCUUGGACAAUAUUCCUdTdT-3ʹ; hausp-siRNA-2: 5ʹ-AGUCGUUCAGUCGUCGUAUdTdT-3ʹ; yap-siRNA: 5ʹ-GACAUCUUCUGGUCAGAGAdTdT-3ʹ; p53-siRNA-1: 5ʹ-AAGGAAAUUUGCGUGUGGAdTdT-3ʹ; p53-siRNA-2: 5ʹ-GAUGAUUUGAUGCUGUCCCdTdT-3ʹ; gli1-siRNA-1: 5ʹ-AGCUUUCAUCAACUCGCGAdTdT-3ʹ; gli1-siRNA-2: 5ʹ-UCUGCCUAUACUGUCAGCCdTdT-3ʹ; gli2-siRNA-1: 5ʹ-GCGGUAGCUGCCCAAGGAGdTdT-3ʹ; gli2-siRNA-2: 5ʹ-AGCGGGUGCCCUCAGCCCAdTdT-3ʹ; gli3-siRNA-1: 5ʹ-AAAGUCCUGGACAGACUUAdTdT-3ʹ; gli3-siRNA-2: 5ʹ-GGGCUGAGCCCUACAGAUGdTdT-3ʹ; N-Myc-siRNA-1: 5ʹ-AAGAAGUUUGAGCUGCUGCdTdT-3ʹ; N-Myc-siRNA-2: 5ʹ-GCUGAUCCUCAAACGAUGCdTdT-3ʹ.

Protein stability assay and ubiquitination assay

For protein stability assay, S2 cells were plated in 10-cm dishes and transfected with indicated plasmids. After 24 h, the cells were transferred into 12-well cell culture plates at equivalent densities. Cells were treated with 20 μg/ml CHX (Calbiochem) for the indicated intervals before harvesting. IB experiments were carried out to examine the levels of indicated proteins. In some experiments, MG132 (50 μM; Calbiochem) or ALLN (50 μM; Santa Cruz) was added to cultured cells to inhibit proteasome activity, whereas NH₄Cl (10 mM), leupeptin (500 μM; MedChenExpress), or chloroquine (15 μM; MedChenExpress) was used to block lysosome function. To separate the cytoplasmic and nuclear protein, we used nuclear and cytoplasmic protein extraction kit (#78833, Thermo Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For cell-based ubiquitination assays, S2 or 293T cells were transiently transfected with the indicated combinations of vectors. Four hours before cells harvesting, MG132 and NH₄Cl were added to the media to block proteasome-mediated and lysosome-mediated proteolysis. For cell-based ubiquitination assays, cells were lysed with denaturing buffer (1% SDS, 50 mM Tris-base, pH 7.5, 0.5 mM EDTA, and 1 mM DTT) and incubated at 100 °C for 5 min. The lysates were then diluted 10-fold with regular lysis buffer (50 mM Tris pH8.0, 0.1 M NaCl, 10 mM NaF, 1 mM Na₃VO₄, 0.5% NP-40, 10% Glycerol and 1 mM EDTA pH8.0) and subject to IP and IB analysis. In all IB experiments, the band intensity was measured by Image J. For quantitation, data are presented as means ± SEM of values from at least three independent experiments.

RNA isolation, reverse transcription, and real-time PCR

Cells or HCC samples were lysed in TRIzol (Invitrogen) for RNA isolation following standard protocols³². In all, 1 μg RNA was used for reverse transcription by HiScript^® Q RT SuperMix with gDNA wiper (Vazyme) according to the instructions. Real-time PCR was performed on BIO-RAD CFX96^TM with ChamQ SYBR^® Color qPCR Master Mix (Q411, Vazyme). 2-∆∆Ct method was used for relative quantification. The primer pairs used were as follows: hausp, 5ʹ-GGAAGCGGGAGATACAGATGA-3ʹ (forward) and 5ʹ-AAGGACCGACTCACTCAGTCT-3ʹ (reverse); AREG, 5ʹ-TCACTTTCCGTCTTGTTTTGG-3ʹ (forward) and 5ʹ-CGGGAGCCGACTATGACTAC-3ʹ (reverse); CTGF, 5ʹ-TAGGCTTGGAGATTTTGGGA-3ʹ (forward) and 5ʹ-GGTTACCAATGACAACGCCT-3ʹ (reverse); Cyr61, 5ʹ-TATTCACAGGGTCTGCCCTC-3ʹ (forward) and 5ʹ-AACGAGGACTGCAGCAAAA-3ʹ (reverse); AKD1, 5ʹ-GTGTAGCACCAGATCCATCG-3ʹ (forward) and 5ʹ-CGGTGAGACTGAACCGCTAT-3ʹ (reverse); yap, 5ʹ-GCAACTCCAACCAGCAGCAACA-3ʹ (forward) and 5ʹ-CGCAGCCTCTCCTTCTCCATCTG-3ʹ (reverse); actin, 5ʹ-GATCATTGCTCCTCCTGAGC-3ʹ (forward) and 5ʹ-ACTCCTGCTTGCTGATCCAC-3ʹ (reverse). Data are presented as means ± SEM of values from at least three experiments.

MTT assay

After indicated treatments, log-phase cells were seeded onto 96-well plates (1 × 10³–10 × 10³ cells per well). At 48 h after transfection, 10 μl MTT (5 mg/ml) was added, followed by additional incubation at 37 °C for 4 h before discarding supernatants. Then, 100 μl dimethylsulfoxide was added to each well before shaking gently for 10 min to dissolve crystals. The absorbance of each well was measured at 490 nm using microplate reader. Data are presented as means ± SEM of values from at least three experiments.

Patient samples

Fresh-frozen primary HCC tissues and their paired normal samples were obtained from patients undergoing surgical resection at Zhuhai People’s Hospital (Zhuhai, China) after consent was obtained from the patients. None of the patients received any prior radiochemotherapy. For total protein extraction, place the equal amount tissues (40 mg) in tubes and grind the tissue with a plastic rod for 50–60 times with twisting force on ice. Then, add five times cell lysis buffer (50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 0.1 M NaCl, 10 mM NaF, 1 mM Na₃VO₄, 0.5% NP-40, 10% Glycerol and 1 mM EDTA pH8.0) and continue to grind for 50–60 times. Cap the tube and incubate on ice for 10–15 min. Centrifuge at 12,000 rpm for 15 min. The supernatant was subject to IB assay following standard protocols.

Statistical analysis

The density of IB band was measured by Image J software. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism software. The data shown in the figures were representative of three or more independent experiments and were analyzed by one way Student’s t-test, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Where exact P-values are not shown, statistical significance is shown as with ^*P < 0.05, ^**P < 0.01, and ^***P < 0.001.

Data availability

All relevant data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Pan, D. The hippo signaling pathway in development and cancer. Dev. Cell. 19, 491–505 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Wu, S., Huang, J., Dong, J. & Pan, D. hippo encodes a Ste-20 family protein kinase that restricts cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis in conjunction with salvador and warts. Cell 114, 445–456 (2003).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Pantalacci, S., Tapon, N. & Leopold, P. The Salvador partner Hippo promotes apoptosis and cell-cycle exit in Drosophila. Nat. Cell Biol. 5, 921–927 (2003).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Harvey, K. F., Pfleger, C. M. & Hariharan, I. K. The Drosophila Mst ortholog, hippo, restricts growth and cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis. Cell 114, 457–467 (2003).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Harvey, K. & Tapon, N. The Salvador-Warts-Hippo pathway - an emerging tumour-suppressor network. Nat. Rev. Cancer 7, 182–191 (2007).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Oh, H. & Irvine, K. D. Yorkie: the final destination of Hippo signaling. Trends Cell Biol. 20, 410–417 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Wu, S., Liu, Y., Zheng, Y., Dong, J. & Pan, D. The TEAD/TEF family protein Scalloped mediates transcriptional output of the Hippo growth-regulatory pathway. Dev. Cell. 14, 388–398 (2008).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Huang, J., Wu, S., Barrera, J., Matthews, K. & Pan, D. The Hippo signaling pathway coordinately regulates cell proliferation and apoptosis by inactivating Yorkie, the Drosophila Homolog of YAP. Cell 122, 421–434 (2005).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Dong, J. et al. Elucidation of a universal size-control mechanism in Drosophila and mammals. Cell 130, 1120–1133 (2007).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ren, F., Zhang, L. & Jiang, J. Hippo signaling regulates Yorkie nuclear localization and activity through 14-3-3 dependent and independent mechanisms. Dev. Biol. 337, 303–312 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Yu, F. X., Zhao, B. & Guan, K. L. Hippo pathway in organ size control, tissue homeostasis, and cancer. Cell 163, 811–828 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Meng, Z. et al. MAP4K family kinases act in parallel to MST1/2 to activate LATS1/2 in the Hippo pathway. Nat. Commun. 6, 8357 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zanconato, F., Cordenonsi, M. & Piccolo, S. YAP/TAZ at the roots of cancer. Cancer Cell. 29, 783–803 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Harvey, K. F., Zhang, X. & Thomas, D. M. The Hippo pathway and human cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 13, 246–257 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zanconato, F., Battilana, G., Cordenonsi, M. & Piccolo, S. YAP/TAZ as therapeutic targets in cancer. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 29, 26–33 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Craney, A. & Rape, M. Dynamic regulation of ubiquitin-dependent cell cycle control. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 25, 704–710 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hochstrasser, M. Ubiquitin, proteasomes, and the regulation of intracellular protein degradation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7, 215–223 (1995).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zhao, B., Li, L., Tumaneng, K., Wang, C. Y. & Guan, K. L. A coordinated phosphorylation by Lats and CK1 regulates YAP stability through SCF(beta-TRCP). Genes Dev. 24, 72–85 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ho, K. C. et al. Itch E3 ubiquitin ligase regulates large tumor suppressor 1 stability [corrected]. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4870–4875 (2011).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Salah, Z., Melino, G. & Aqeilan, R. I. Negative regulation of the Hippo pathway by E3 ubiquitin ligase ITCH is sufficient to promote tumorigenicity. Cancer Res. 71, 2010–2020 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ma, B. et al. Hypoxia regulates Hippo signalling through the SIAH2 ubiquitin E3 ligase. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 95–103 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Li, W. et al. Merlin/NF2 loss-driven tumorigenesis linked to CRL4(DCAF1)-mediated inhibition of the hippo pathway kinases Lats1 and 2 in the nucleus. Cancer Cell. 26, 48–60 (2014).
Article Google Scholar
Ribeiro, P., Holder, M., Frith, D., Snijders, A. P. & Tapon, N. Crumbs promotes expanded recognition and degradation by the SCF(Slimb/beta-TrCP) ubiquitin ligase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, E1980–E1989 (2014).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Ma, X., Guo, X., Richardson, H. E., Xu, T. & Xue, L. POSH regulates Hippo signaling through ubiquitin-mediated expanded degradation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 2150–2155 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Mevissen, T. E. T. & Komander, D. Mechanisms of deubiquitinase specificity and regulation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 86, 159–192 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Abdul Rehman, S. A. et al. MINDY-1 is a member of an evolutionarily conserved and structurally distinct new family of deubiquitinating enzymes. Mol. Cell 63, 146–155 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kwasna, D. et al. Discovery and characterization of ZUFSP/ZUP1, a distinct deubiquitinase class important for genome stability. Mol. Cell 70, 150–164 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Haahr, P. et al. ZUFSP deubiquitylates K63-linked polyubiquitin chains to promote genome stability. Mol. Cell 70, 165–174 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hermanns, T. et al. A family of unconventional deubiquitinases with modular chain specificity determinants. Nat. Commun. 9, 799 (2018).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Everett, R. D. et al. A novel ubiquitin-specific protease is dynamically associated with the PML nuclear domain and binds to a herpesvirus regulatory protein. EMBO J. 16, 1519–1530 (1997).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Li, M. et al. Deubiquitination of p53 by HAUSP is an important pathway for p53 stabilization. Nature 416, 648–653 (2002).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Zhou, Z. et al. Deubiquitination of Ci/Gli by Usp7/HAUSP regulates Hedgehog signaling. Dev. Cell. 34, 58–72 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Tavana, O. et al. HAUSP deubiquitinates and stabilizes N-Myc in neuroblastoma. Nat. Med. 22, 1180–1186 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kon, N. et al. Inactivation of HAUSP in vivo modulates p53 function. Oncogene 29, 1270–1279 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Masuya, D. et al. The HAUSP gene plays an important role in non-small cell lung carcinogenesis through p53-dependent pathways. J. Pathol. 208, 724–732 (2006).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kagey, J. D., Brown, J. A. & Moberg, K. H. Regulation of Yorkie activity in Drosophila imaginal discs by the Hedgehog receptor gene patched. Mech. Dev. 129, 339–349 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Li, C. et al. Ci antagonizes Hippo signaling in the somatic cells of the ovary to drive germline stem cell differentiation. Cell Res. 25, 1152–1170 (2015).
Article Google Scholar
Ingham, P. W. & McMahon, A. P. Hedgehog signaling in animal development: paradigms and principles. Genes & Dev. 15, 3059–3087 (2001).
Article CAS Google Scholar
van der Knaap, J. A. et al. GMP synthetase stimulates histone H2B deubiquitylation by the epigenetic silencer USP7. Mol. Cell 17, 695–707 (2005).
Article Google Scholar
Liu, Q. X. et al. Evolutionarily conserved transcription factor Apontic controls the G1/S progression by inducing cyclin E during eye development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 9497–9502 (2014).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Oh, H. & Irvine, K. D. In vivo analysis of Yorkie phosphorylation sites. Oncogene 28, 1916–1927 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Huang, O. W. & Cochran, A. G. Regulation of deubiquitinase proteolytic activity. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 23, 806–811 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Nijman, S. M. et al. A genomic and functional inventory of deubiquitinating enzymes. Cell 123, 773–786 (2005).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Badouel, C. et al. The FERM-domain protein expanded regulates Hippo pathway activity via direct interactions with the transcriptional activator Yorkie. Dev. Cell. 16, 411–420 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zhang, C. et al. The ecdysone receptor coactivator Taiman links Yorkie to transcriptional control of germline stem cell factors in somatic tissue. Dev. Cell. 34, 168–180 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Wang, W. et al. Defining the protein-protein interaction network of the human hippo pathway. Mol. & Cell. Proteom.: MCP 13, 119–131 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hu, M. et al. Crystal structure of a UBP-family deubiquitinating enzyme in isolation and in complex with ubiquitin aldehyde. Cell 111, 1041–1054 (2002).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zhou, Z. et al. Stability of HIB-Cul3 E3 ligase adaptor HIB is regulated by self-degradation and availability of its substrates. Sci. Rep. 5, 12709 (2015).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Yimlamai, D. et al. Hippo pathway activity influences liver cell fate. Cell 157, 1324–1338 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zhou, D. et al. Mst1 and Mst2 maintain hepatocyte quiescence and suppress hepatocellular carcinoma development through inactivation of the Yap1 oncogene. Cancer Cell. 16, 425–438 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Yimlamai, D., Fowl, B. H. & Camargo, F. D. Emerging evidence on the role of the Hippo/YAP pathway in liver physiology and cancer. J. Hepatol. 63, 1491–1501 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Cai, J. B. et al. Ubiquitin-specific protease 7 accelerates p14(ARF) degradation by deubiquitinating thyroid hormone receptor-interacting protein 12 and promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Hepatology 61, 1603–1614 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Chauhan, D. et al. A small molecule inhibitor of ubiquitin-specific protease-7 induces apoptosis in multiple myeloma cells and overcomes bortezomib resistance. Cancer Cell. 22, 345–358 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zhan, M. et al. Usp7 promotes medulloblastoma cell survival and metastasis by activating Shh pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 484, 429–434 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kessler, B. M. Selective and reversible inhibitors of ubiquitin-specific protease 7: a patent evaluation (WO2013030218). Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 24, 597–602 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Reverdy, C. et al. Discovery of specific inhibitors of human USP7/HAUSP deubiquitinating enzyme. Chem. & Biol. 19, 467–477 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kwon, Y. et al. The Hippo signaling pathway interactome. Science 342, 737–740 (2013).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Wang, S. et al. YAP antagonizes innate antiviral immunity and is targeted for lysosomal degradation through IKKvarepsilon-mediated phosphorylation. Nat. Immunol. 18, 733–743 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Shen, X. et al. ARRDC3 suppresses colorectal cancer progression through destabilizing the oncoprotein YAP. FEBS Lett. 592, 599–609 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hochstrasser, M. Ubiquitin and intracellular protein degradation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 4, 1024–1031 (1992).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sunnerhagen, M., Pursglove, S. & Fladvad, M. The new MATH: homology suggests shared binding surfaces in meprin tetramers and TRAF trimers. FEBS Lett. 530, 1–3 (2002).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zhou, Z. et al. The deubiquitinase UCHL5/UCH37 positively regulates Hedgehog signaling by deubiquitinating Smoothened. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 243–257 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Theodosiou, N. A. & Xu, T. Use of FLP/FRT system to study Drosophila development. Methods 14, 355–365 (1998).
Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank Dr. Qing Zhang (Nanjing University, China) for generous providing some stocks and plasmids. We also thank Dr. Erjun Ling (Shanghai Institute for Biological Sciences, China), Dr. Jianhua Huang (Zhejiang University, China), and Dr. Shigeo Hayashi (RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Japan) for providing reagents. We also appreciate National Institute of Genetics of Japan (NIG), Bloomington Stock Center (BSC), and Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank at the University of Iowa for providing fly stocks and reagents. We thank Dr. Susumu Hirose (National Institute of Genetics, Japan) and Yasushi Hiromi (National Institute of Genetics, Japan) for discussions and comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Shandong Agricultural University talent fund (72119), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2017MC014), Funds of “Shandong Double Tops” Program (SYL2017YSTD09), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31802012, 31602011, 31571502, 31471319), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFA0205200), and grant from the Construction Engineering Special Fund of “Taishan Scholars” (no. ts201712022).

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Xiaohan Sun, Yan Ding, Meixiao Zhan.

Authors and Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shandong Agricultural University, 271018, Tai’an, China
Xiaohan Sun, Yan Ding, Yan Li, Dongqing Gao, Qingxin Liu & Zizhang Zhou
Center of Intervention radiology, Zhuhai Precision Medicine Center, Zhuhai People’s Hospital, 519000, Zhuhai, China
Meixiao Zhan, Yong Li & Ligong Lu
State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, 300071, Tianjin, China
Guiping Wang, Yang Gao & Shian Wu

Authors

Xiaohan Sun
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yan Ding
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Meixiao Zhan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yan Li
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Dongqing Gao
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Guiping Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yang Gao
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yong Li
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Shian Wu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ligong Lu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Qingxin Liu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zizhang Zhou
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The author(s) have made the following declarations about their contributions: Z.Z., Q.L., and L.L. designed the experiments. X.S., Y.D., M.Z., Yan Li, D.G., G.W., Y.G., and Yong Li performed the experiments. L.L. and M.Z. provided the patient samples. Z.Z. and S.W. carried out data analysis. Z.Z. wrote the manuscript with the help of all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ligong Lu, Qingxin Liu or Zizhang Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks Claire Heride and the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sun, X., Ding, Y., Zhan, M. et al. Usp7 regulates Hippo pathway through deubiquitinating the transcriptional coactivator Yorkie. Nat Commun 10, 411 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08334-7

Download citation

Received: 08 July 2018
Accepted: 03 January 2019
Published: 24 January 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08334-7

This article is cited by

SPOP point mutations regulate substrate preference and affect its function
- Yanran Deng
- Wenhao Ding
- Ligong Lu
Cell Death & Disease (2024)
Inhibition of the transcription factor ZNF281 by SUFU to suppress tumor cell migration
- Yanran Deng
- Dezhen Peng
- Meixiao Zhan
Cell Death & Differentiation (2023)
USP1 modulates hepatocellular carcinoma progression via the Hippo/TAZ axis
- Dongyi Liu
- Quanhui Li
- Yinlu Ding
Cell Death & Disease (2023)
USP35 promotes HCC development by stabilizing ABHD17C and activating the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway
- Linpei Wang
- Jiawei Wang
- Jian Wu
Cell Death Discovery (2023)
De-ubiquitination of SAMHD1 by USP7 promotes DNA damage repair to overcome oncogenic stress and affect chemotherapy sensitivity
- Jingwei Liu
- Tingting Zhou
- Liu Cao
Oncogene (2023)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.