Abstract
Immunotherapy, designed to exploit the functions of the host immune system against tumors, has shown considerable potential against several malignancies. However, the utility of immunotherapy is heavily limited due to the low response rate and various side effects in the clinical setting. Immune escape of tumor cells may be a critical reason for such low response rates. Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) have been identified as key regulatory factors in tumors and the immune system. Consequently, ncRNAs show promise as targets to improve the efficacy of immunotherapy in tumors. However, the relationship between ncRNAs and tumor immune escape (TIE) has not yet been comprehensively summarized. In this review, we provide a detailed account of the current knowledge on ncRNAs associated with TIE and their potential roles in tumor growth and survival mechanisms. This review bridges the gap between ncRNAs and TIE and broadens our understanding of their relationship, providing new insights and strategies to improve immunotherapy response rates by specifically targeting the ncRNAs involved in TIE.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
According to the immunoediting theory, immune escape is the key to tumor survival.1 There are many mechanisms of tumor immune escape (TIE), including defects in tumor antigen presentation to escape recognition by the immune system, alterations in the tumor death pathways to achieve increased resistance to cytotoxic immune responses, metabolic alterations to promote TIE, and acquisition of stem cell-like phenotypes to escape immune-based recognition and destruction. In addition, some cytokines in the tumor microenvironment (TME), abnormal expression of immune checkpoint molecules on tumor or immune cell surfaces, and some immunosuppressive cells are all involved in TIE. Collectively, these factors may enable TIE, leading to a low response rate to immunotherapy in different malignancies.
Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), which cannot be translated into proteins, comprise 98% of the transcriptome. Generally, ncRNAs less than 50 nucleotides in length are defined as small ncRNAs (sncRNAs), including microRNAs (miRNAs), Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs), transfer RNAs (tRNAs), small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs).2 A recent study reported the presence of partial sncRNAs derived from tRNAs, such as tRNA halves (tiRNAs) and tRNA fragments (tRFs).3 ncRNAs with more than 200 nucleotides are defined as long ncRNAs (lncRNAs), including long or large intergenic ncRNAs (lincRNAs), some circular RNAs (circRNAs), and ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs).4 The biological functions of ncRNAs, such as regulating gene expression at the transcriptional and translational levels, guiding DNA synthesis or gene rearrangement, and protecting the genome from foreign nucleic acids, have been gradually elucidated.5 An increasing number of studies indicate that ncRNAs are indispensable in tumorigenesis by regulating the expression of tumor-related genes. Mechanistically, lncRNAs regulate gene expression mainly by acting as transcription factors, regulating chromatin remodeling, or participating in posttranscriptional regulation as ceRNAs.6 circRNAs can regulate gene expression at epigenetic, transcriptional, and posttranscriptional levels (primarily as ceRNAs).7 miRNAs mostly regulate gene expression at the posttranscriptional level through RNA interference by binding to the 3′-untranslated region (3′UTR) (rarely 5′UTR or coding sequence) of protein-coding mRNAs.8,9,10 In addition, some TRFs and tiRNAs can participate in gene regulation and gene silencing via complementary binding with target genes, and the mechanism is similar to that of miRNA.11
Currently, ncRNAs involved in TIE are gradually emerging and are promising potential targets of antitumor therapy. Several studies have reported that ncRNAs play pivotal roles in TIE.12,13 Therefore, it is essential to systematically elaborate the complex regulatory network of TIE regulated by ncRNAs. In this review, we provide a detailed account of the molecular regulatory mechanisms underlying ncRNA involvement in TIE. We hope this review will broaden our understanding of the relationship between ncRNAs and TIE and provide new insights to target ncRNAs in TIE-associated therapeutic strategies.
Defective antigen presentation and TIE
Tumor cells can achieve TIE by inhibiting antigen presentation, which enables T cells and/or natural killer (NK) cells to recognize and destroy target tumor cells. The regulation of the antigen processing and presenting machinery (APM) in tumor cells is dependent on the ubiquitin-protease system and the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class Ι molecules. The mediation of the APM by MHC class Ι molecules is divided into four steps: (i) peptide generation and modification; (ii) peptide transport; (iii) assembly of the peptide-MHC class I complex; and (iv) antigen presentation (Fig. 1). ncRNAs have been reported to regulate the APM in tumors during these four steps. First, peptide generation and modification can be inhibited by low molecular mass protein 2 (LMP2), LMP7, and LMP10 in tumor cells.14,15,16 In liver cancer17 and gastric cancer,18 miR-23a and miR-502-5p, respectively, can inhibit the expression of LMP7 by interfering with interferon regulatory factor-1 (IRF-1), which is an essential factor in the INF-γ-mediated increase in LMP7;19 miR-451 has also been found to be able to directly regulate LMP7 in diabetic nephropathy,20 but whether such a regulatory relationship exists in tumors remains to be studied. Next, the expression of transporters associated with antigen processing (TAP) is blocked in tumors, thereby preventing peptide transport to the endoplasmic reticulum.15,21 miR-125a-5p and miR-148a-3p can reduce the levels of TAP2 and MHC molecules by binding to the 3′UTR of TAP2 mRNA in esophageal adenocarcinoma.22 miR-346 has been shown to bind to the 3′UTR of TAP1 mRNA and decrease TAP1 expression.23 Moreover, formation of the peptide-MHC class I complex is prevented via suppression of the expression of chaperone proteins (calnexin, ERp57, calreticulin, and tapasin) and the subsequent loading of peptides on MHC class I molecules.21 lncRNA RB1 can positively regulate calreticulin in multiple tumor cell lines.24 miR-27a has been found to downregulate the expression of calreticulin and MHC class I molecules in colorectal cancer, and the infiltration and cytotoxic activity of CD8+ T cells (the release of perforin) are inhibited.25 Furthermore, defective surface expression of MHC class I molecules, which would repress the APM, has been shown in other tumors.26,27,28 miR-27a, miR-148a-3p, miR-125a-5p and miR-9 have been found to inhibit the surface expression of MHC class I molecules in colorectal cancer, esophageal adenocarcinoma and nasopharyngeal carcinoma.22,25,29 ncRNAs participating in the inhibition of tumor antigen presentation by repressing key proteins provide direct evidence that these ncRNAs play important roles in the development of TIE. Interfering with the roles of ncRNAs in tumor antigen presentation may provide a new direction for improving the effect of tumor immunotherapy.
Regulation of ncRNAs in the four steps of MHC class Ι molecule-mediated APM
Tumor death pathways and TIE
By changing the balance between pro-death signals and anti-death signals, tumor cells can gain resistance to cytotoxic immune responses and thus achieve TIE. First, increased expression of various antiapoptotic proteins (BCL-2, BCL-xL, and MCL-1) in tumor cells can enhance the apoptotic resistance of tumor cells.30,31,32 Second, inhibition of the expression of apoptosis-related receptors (FAS, DR4, and DR5) and ligands (FASL and TRAIL) can also enable tumor cells to escape apoptotic pathway-induced cell death.33,34 Third, tumor cells can escape cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL)- and NK cell-mediated death by blocking the perforin/granzyme pathway in immune cells. For example, tumor cells can escape CTL-mediated cytotoxicity by overexpressing inhibitors of the perforin/granzyme pathway.35 Moreover, one study identified a receptor that acts as a decoy ligand, thereby protecting tumor cells from apoptosis.36
Several studies have confirmed that ncRNAs can assist tumors in achieving TIE by regulating the abovementioned molecules and proteins, which could disrupt the balance between anti-death and pro-death signals (Table 1). For example, miR-195, miR-24-2 and miR-365 can downregulate the expression of Bcl-2 and promote the apoptosis of tumor cells in breast cancer,37 while miR-125b and miR-106a can upregulate the expression of Bcl-2 to inhibit the apoptosis of leukemia cells and breast cancer cells and promote their proliferation and infiltration.38,39 miR-133a targets and inhibits the expression of Bcl-xL and Mcl-1, promoting apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells.40 Similarly, miR-25 inhibits DR4 expression in cholangiocarcinoma cells, thereby enabling these cells to escape apoptosis induced via TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL).41 In addition, lncRNA MAGI2-AS3 upregulates the expression of FAS and FASL and promotes apoptosis in breast cancer cells.42 In CTLs extracted from the pleural effusion of lung cancer patients, miR-23a was highly expressed and could inhibit the antitumor ability of CTLs by repressing the expression of granzyme B.43 These ncRNAs regulate the expression of death signal-related molecules and further help tumors achieve immune escape. Targeting these ncRNAs to reduce the interference of death signals may be of great significance to improve the efficiency of antitumor therapy.
Abnormal metabolism and TIE
Aerobic glycolysis and TIE
Owing to mitochondrial dysfunction and despite being in an aerobic environment, tumor cells prefer to produce energy through glycolysis, which is accompanied by the production of a large amount of lactate. Such aerobic glycolysis phenomenon is termed the Warburg effect.44 This particular mode of metabolism provides the energy and macromolecules essential for the rapid growth and invasion of tumor cells. Lactate produced by aerobic glycolysis acidifies the TME, which can lead to the dysfunction of immune cells [cytotoxic T cells, dendritic cells (DCs), NK cells, and macrophages] and inhibit the secretion and function of several antitumor response cytokines. These alterations can subsequently lead to immunosuppression and promote tumor cells to escape destruction by the immune system.45,46 An increasing number of studies have found that ncRNAs can regulate tumor aerobic glycolysis directly (by targeting enzymes related to aerobic glycolysis) or indirectly (by targeting HIF-1α or tricarboxylic acid cycle (TAC)-related enzymes) to help tumors achieve TIE.
Glucose transporters (GLUTs) are membrane proteins that transport glucose into cells. Abnormal GLUT expression on the tumor cell surface promotes glucose transport into the cell and increases aerobic glycolysis. ncRNAs have been found to be involved in the regulation of GLUTs in human cancers (Table 2, Fig. 2). For example, miR-340, miR-1291, miR-495, miR-22, and miR-132 downregulate GLUT1 expression in various tumors,47,48,49,50,51 whereas miR-130b, miR-301a, miR-19a/b, lncRNA p23154, lncRNA NBR2, and lncRNA p21 promote GLUT1 expression.52,53,54,55 miR-150 and miR-195-5p downregulation promotes GLUT4 and GLUT3 expression in pancreatic cancer and bladder cancer, respectively.56,57
Overview of the regulation of TIE-associated glycolytic enzymes by ncRNAs in tumor cells
Several enzymes, such as hexokinase (HK), aldose enzyme, glucose phosphate isomerase (GPI), phosphofructokinase (PFK), aldolase (Aldo), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), phosphoglycerate mutase (PGM), enolase (Eno), pyruvate kinase (PK), pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), are involved in glycolysis reactions. Abnormal expression of ncRNAs has been reported to alter the expression of these enzymes, thus accelerating the process of tumor glycolysis (Table 2, Fig. 2). miR-138 and miR-143 were found to regulate aerobic glycolysis in different types of tumor cells by directly targeting HK1 and HK2, respectively.58,59 miR-155 and lncRNA urothelial cancer associated 1 (lncRNA UCA1) can increase HK2 expression by inhibiting miR-143 in breast cancer and bladder cancer, respectively.60,61 In liver cancer, miR-199a-5p can directly target HK2 and repress HK2 expression to inhibit glycolysis.62 Moreover, miR-122 targets the aldose enzyme in liver cells,63 and miR-326 downregulation is associated with increased PK2 expression in glioblastoma cells,64 both of which can inhibit aerobic glycolysis of tumor cells. PDH is the key enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA. Under conditions of aerobic glycolysis in tumor cells, such conversion of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA is inhibited, and pyruvate is converted to lactate by LDH, thus promoting TME acidification and TIE. LDHB is regulated by miR-375 and is increased in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma,65 whereas LDHA, which is also overexpressed in tumor cells, is regulated by miR-34a, miR-34c, miR-369-3p, miR-374a, and miR-4524a/b in colorectal cancer, leading to more lactate production.66 lncRNA p21 positively regulates LDHA, pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 4 (PDK4), pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDHX), PK2, and GPI simultaneously in different tumor cells to promote aerobic glycolysis and lactate production.67 PDH inhibition can reduce the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, thus promoting the conversion of pyruvate into lactic acid. miR-23a, miR-375, and miR-138-1* upregulate PDH expression by inhibiting PDK, which is a negative regulator of PDH.68,69
In most tumor cells, the TAC is inhibited, which results in pyruvate being unable to be metabolized through TAC and only converted to lactic acid, exacerbating the acidification of TME. miRNAs can target and inhibit enzymes involved in the TCA cycle and several components of the electron transport chain, thereby inhibiting mitochondrial function and further promoting aerobic glycolysis (Table 2). For example, miR-18370 and miR-21071 can, respectively, target key enzymes isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) and succinic acid dehydrogenase (SDH) of the TCA cycle in glioma and lung cancer. miR-181c72 and miR-33873 downregulate cytochrome c oxidase 1/2, respectively, which are components of the electron transport chain.
Recent studies demonstrated that hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) can promote aerobic glycolysis in tumor cells74 and then promote TME acidification and TIE. First, activated HIF-1α can directly or indirectly increase the expression of all glycolysis-related enzymes and promote glycolysis.75 Second, HIF-1α prevents the conversion of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA, the raw material of the TCA cycle, by inhibiting PDH activity.74,75 Moreover, HIF-1α indirectly promotes glycolysis by inhibiting mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation.76 ncRNAs have been found to regulate HIF-1α in tumors, which could promote aerobic glycolysis and TIE (Table 2). For example, the miR-17-92 cluster,77 miR-22,78 miR-33a,79 and circRNA EPHB480 have been reported to downregulate HIF-1α expression in different types of tumors, while miR-21 can promote the expression of HIF-1α in prostate cancer cells; lncRNA SNHG1,81 lncRNA 0015282 and circRNA PIP5KA83 function as molecular sponges for miR-18a, miR-138 and miR-600, respectively, to promote HIF-1α expression in different tumors. It has not been reported that ncRNAs and HIF-1α can directly affect the immune escape of tumor cells through complex molecular networks, but this indirect evidence also suggests that this idea merits further exploration.
Arachidonic acid metabolism and TIE
Altered metabolism of arachidonic acid, an unsaturated fatty acid, is also a characteristic of tumors, especially those associated with inflammation, such as colorectal cancer, lung cancer and bladder cancer.84 Most of these tumors show increased expression of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), two key molecules of the arachidonic acid metabolic pathway. PGE2 and COX-2 overexpression in tumors may be one of the potential mechanisms underlying TIE. First, COX-2 induces DCs to secrete interleukin-10 (IL-10) and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), which in turn activate regulatory T cells (Tregs) and promote immunosuppression.85 Second, PGE2 and COX-2 induce the expression of the Treg-specific transcription factor forkhead box P3 (FOXP3), thus increasing the activity of Tregs.86 In addition, PGE2 directly inhibits lymphocyte function by increasing cellular cAMP levels.87 miRNAs have been found to regulate COX-2 and PGE2 in tumors (Table 2). For example, miR-206 inhibits PGE2-induced proliferation and metastasis of colon cancer cells by targeting the transmembrane 4 L six family member 1 (TM4SF1) protein,88 while miR-128,89 miR-146a,90 miR-101,91 and miR-14392 can inhibit tumor progression by decreasing COX-2. The involvement of ncRNAs other than miRNAs in the regulation of COX-2 and PGE2 has not yet been reported. Therefore, the idea that ncRNAs directly regulate the metabolism of arachidonic acid and affect immune escape may be a potential mechanism of TIE.
Tryptophan metabolism and TIE
Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) and tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (TDO) are the two key enzymes involved in tryptophan metabolism, and they can be manipulated by tumors to evade immune surveillance. IDO and TDO are highly expressed in tumor cells and can promote the recruitment of Tregs in the TME and induce immunosuppression via increased secretion of the immunosuppressive factors IL-6, IL-10, and TGF-β,93,94,95 which can help tumors achieve TIE. ncRNAs have been reported to regulate IDO and TDO expression in tumor cells (Table 2). High expression of lncRNA SNHG1 in breast cancer specifically inhibits miR-448, thereby increasing the expression of IDO, promoting Treg differentiation, enhancing immunosuppression, and promoting tumor proliferation and metastasis,96 also providing an advantage for the occurrence of TIE. lncRNA MALAT1 promotes immunosuppression by inducing IDO expression.97 In addition, studies confirmed that miR-153-3p specifically inhibits IDO expression and participates in the development of acute graft-versus-host disease in vitro and in vivo.98 All of the above findings are based on protein level regulation research. Whether ncRNAs can regulate tryptophan metabolism at the functional level and further affect TIE may also become a new potential target research mechanism.
Cancer stem cell-like phenotype and TIE
Acquiring a stem cell-like phenotype is considered another strategy adopted by tumors to achieve TIE. This is attributed to the low immunogenicity of cancer stem cells, and their immunoregulatory properties can inhibit the antitumor immune response and help them evade immune recognition.99 The WNT, Notch, and Hedgehog signaling pathways are closely associated with the development of stem cell-like phenotypes in most tumor cells. These three signaling pathways are abnormally activated in tumors to promote the transcription of target genes, thus improving the tumor stem cell-like phenotype (Fig. 3).100 ncRNAs were found to activate these signaling pathways by regulating key proteins involved in these pathways, thereby promoting stem cell-like phenotypes in tumor cells (Table 3, Fig. 3), which is also advantageous for the occurrence of TIE. miR-1246 activates the WNT pathway and promotes tumor stemness by inhibiting two components of the WNT pathway, Axin2 and glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK-3β), in liver cancer.101 In colorectal cancer and glioma, circRNA 100290 and circRNA 0000177 upregulate Frizzled receptor expression by acting as molecular sponges for miR-516b and miR-638, respectively, thereby activating the WNT pathway and promoting the stem-cell phenotype of tumor cells.102,103 miR-34a targets Notch1, an important membrane surface receptor of the Notch pathway, thereby inhibiting the stem cell-like phenotype of breast cancer cells.104 miR-324-5p has been found to significantly reduce the activation of the Hedgehog pathway by inhibiting Smoothened (Smo) and Gli zinc‐finger transcription factor-1 (Gli1), thereby inhibiting the stem-cell phenotype of multiple myeloma cells.105
Regulation of TIE-associated stem cell signaling pathways by ncRNAs. The pathways include the following: 1. WNT signaling pathway; 2. Hedgehog signaling pathway; and 3. Notch signaling pathway
Octamer transcription factor-3/4 (OCT3/4), SRY-box 2 (SOX2), Nanog and LIN28 are genes related to the tumor stem cell-like phenotype that have been proven to be related to TIE.106,107 ncRNAs can also promote the tumor stem cell-like phenotype by directly or indirectly regulating those genes (Table 3). For example, miR-34a targets and inhibits the expression of SOX2, Nanog, and OCT3/4, thereby inhibiting the stem cell-like phenotype of head and neck squamous carcinoma cells.108 lncRNA H19 acts as a molecular sponge for let-7 to upregulate LIN28 and promote the stem cell-like phenotype of breast cancer cells.109 In a study of multiple myeloma, granulocyte-MDCSs increased the expression of SOX2, OCT4, and Nanog in multiple myeloma stem cells by promoting the expression of piRNA-823, which controlled tumor stemness through DNMT3B activation, thereby promoting the tumor stemness phenotype.110 The above research results provide preliminary evidence that these ncRNAs promote the development of TIE by targeting tumor stem cell-like phenotype-related pathways and genes. By inhibiting this process, we may be able to improve resistance to immunotherapy.
Epithelial–mesenchymal transformation (EMT) and TIE
EMT involves molecular changes that transform epithelial cells into mesenchymal cells, and such transformation enables the cells to lose cell-cell adhesion and apical-basal polarity. Therefore, EMT in tumor cells is essential to promote the metastasis of epithelial tumors.111,112 Several studies have reported that EMT may also induce immunosuppression and help tumors achieve TIE. Snail-induced EMT stimulates the production of immunosuppressive factors such as TGF-β and thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1), which could damage DCs, decrease the expression of costimulatory molecules, and increase the expression of IDO, thus indirectly inducing Treg differentiation and promoting immunosuppression.113 A study also proved that Snail-induced EMT in melanoma cells are resistant to CTL lysis.113 Furthermore, compared with breast cancer epithelial cells, mesenchymal cells generated via EMT in breast cancer cells show low expression of MHC class Ι molecules and high expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), thereby inducing immune resistance and promoting TIE.114 Therefore, tumor cell EMT can promote immunosuppression in many ways and become one of the potential driving forces of TIE.
EMT is mainly mediated by three transcription factors: zinc-finger E-box-binding 1 (ZEB1), Snail, and Twist1.115 These transcription factors can decrease epithelial cadherin (E-cadherin) and increase neural cadherin (N-cadherin) and vimentin, thereby promoting the occurrence of EMT.112 There is also evidence that these transcription factors are associated with immune escape.113,116 miRNAs such as miR-21, miR-137, miR-34a, and miR-106a/b are known to regulate EMT by targeting these transcription factors (Table 4). In colorectal cancer, miR-21 can downregulate the expression of Snail and E-cadherin to inhibit EMT.117 In ovarian cancer, miR-137 and miR-34a can also downregulate Snail expression to inhibit EMT,118 while miR-106a can upregulate the expression of Snail and promote EMT in glioma cells.119 In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), miR-106a/b can inhibit EMT by downregulating Twist1.120 In contrast, miR-23a can upregulate Twist1 expression and promote EMT and cisplatin resistance in tongue squamous cell carcinoma.121 In addition to miRNAs, other ncRNAs have also been found to modulate EMT by targeting these transcription factors. In pancreatic cancer, lncRNA PVT1 promotes EMT by upregulating the expression of ZEB1, Snail, and N-cadherin and downregulating E-cadherin expression.122 In bladder cancer, lncRNA UCA1 can promote EMT by upregulating the expression of N-cadherin, vimentin, and Snail and downregulating the expression of E-cadherin; however, as a competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) of miR-145, it also upregulates the expression of ZEB1.123 In melanoma, circRNA 0084043 upregulates Snail expression by acting as a ceRNA of miR-153-3p, thus promoting EMT.124 These dysregulated ncRNAs accelerate EMT by regulating transcription factors in tumors, but their further impact on TIE remains unknown. Whether blocking the mechanism by which these ncRNAs regulate EMT can be conducive to inhibiting TIE and improving the effect of immunotherapy is worth further study.
Immunosuppressive cells and TIE
Tregs
Tregs, cells that act as immunosuppressive agents in the body, play important roles in TIE. First, Tregs produce immunosuppressive factors such as IL-10, IL-35, and TGF-β, which inhibit the function of antitumor T cells.125 Second, Tregs inhibit T cell function by expressing coinhibitory factors such as cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), and PD-L1.126 In addition to directly affecting T cells, Tregs can also inhibit T cell activation by targeting the maturation and activity of DCs.125 miRNAs play an essential role in Treg maintenance and function. Foxp3-dependent regulation of miR-155 contributes to the proliferative activity and competitive fitness of Tregs.127 miR-146a, highly expressed in Tregs, was found to be able to regulate Treg function, and loss of miR-146a led to increased production of the proinflammatory Th1 cytokine IFN-γ by Foxp3+ Tregs, and transferring purified miR-146a-deficient Tregs together with Foxp3 KO CD4+ effector T cells into lymphopenic recipients failed to repress Th1 responses.128 In tumors, abnormally expressed ncRNAs have been found to regulate Tregs. The miR-17-92 cluster is expressed in many human blood tumors, and studies have shown that the miR-17-92 cluster can regulate the number of Tregs by targeting Bim.129 Some lncRNAs are also involved in Treg regulation. lncRNA HULC, which is highly expressed in HCC, downregulates p18 in liver cirrhosis to affect Treg differentiation.130 In gastric cancer, lncRNA POU3F3 promotes the distribution of Tregs among surrounding T cells by recruiting TGF-β and activating the TGF-β pathway.131 lncRNA SNHG1 regulates Treg differentiation by targeting miR-448/IDO in breast cancer.96
Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs)
As a group of heterogeneous cells derived from the bone marrow, MDSCs are precursors of DCs, macrophages, and/or granulocytes. MDSCs can significantly inhibit the cellular immune response and are one of the important driving forces of TIE. First, MDSCs induced by HMGB1 and those with myeloid differentiation potential can mediate TIE by producing high levels of IL-10, inhibiting the activation of antigen-driven CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and the expression of L-selectin in circulating naive T cells.132 Second, tumor cells can also inhibit the function of T cells, NK cells, and DCs by altering the expression of cellular stress sensor C/EBP homologous protein (Chop) and the secretion of IL-6 by MDSCs.133 Moreover, the proliferation of CXCR2+CD11b+Ly6Ghi MDSCs induced by CXCR2 ligands produced by tumor cells inhibits T cell proliferation by L-arginine depletion and exerts local immunosuppressive effects.134 Furthermore, MDSCs can inhibit the host antitumor immune response by inducing Tregs.135 MDSC-derived NO reacts with superoxide to produce peroxynitrite (PNT), which directly inhibits T cells by nitrating the T cell receptors (TCRs) present on the surface of tumor-specific T cells and reducing the reactivity of the associated antigen-MHC complexes.136 ncRNAs have been found to be involved in regulating the immunosuppressive activity of MDSCs. In tumor-bearing mice, lncRNA PVT1 regulates the immunosuppressive activity of MDSCs, and lncRNA PVT1 knockdown significantly inhibits the immunosuppressive activity of MDSCs.137 Similarly, lncRNA HOTAIRM1 negatively regulates the immunosuppressive activity of MDSCs by targeting HOXA1 in lung cancer.138 In addition, some ncRNAs regulate the proliferation, differentiation, and recruitment of MDSCs. miR-34a promotes the proliferation of MDSCs by inhibiting their apoptosis,139 whereas miR-9 regulates the differentiation and function of MDSCs by targeting runt-related transcription factor 1 (Runx1).140 Conversely, the lack of miR-155 in B16-F10 melanoma and Lewis lung carcinoma cell lines leads to the recruitment of MDSCs in the TME and subsequently enhances immunosuppression.141
Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs)
TAMs have been proven to be the most significant immune cells in the tumor stroma, accounting for more than 50% of the total number of immune cells in the tumor stroma, which are divided into two groups, M1 and M2. M1 macrophages play an important role in the innate immune response to pathogen invasion, whereas M2 macrophages are alternately activated by IL-4, IL-10, IL-13, and glucocorticoids. Studies have found that macrophages in tumor tissues mostly have the phenotype and function of M2 macrophages, which is one of the important driving forces for TIE. First, M2 macrophages produce high levels of the immunosuppressive factor IL-10 in breast tumors, which can inhibit IL-12 expression in tumor DCs and subsequent IL-12-mediated CTL activation, thereby blocking the CTL-dependent antitumor immune response.142 Second, M2 macrophages directly inhibit the activity of CD8+ T cells via the expression of coinhibitory factors such as PD-L1 and B7-H4 but indirectly play an antitumor role by promoting the recruitment of CCL22-mediated Tregs.143 Tumor cells can secrete certain cytokines (CCL2, CSF1, and CXCL12) to promote M2 macrophage recruitment in the TME, thus inducing immunosuppression. In the mouse sarcoma MS-K cell line, miR-342 inhibits the expression of CXCL12 and reduces the recruitment and activation of M2 macrophages.144 lncRNA NIFK-AS1 inhibits the M2 polarization of macrophages by targeting miR-146a, thus reducing immunosuppression and inhibiting the proliferation, migration, and invasion of endometrial cancer.145
In conclusion, immunosuppressive Tregs, MDSCs and M2 macrophages can achieve immunosuppression in many ways, thus reducing the recognition and killing of tumors by the immune system. However, these functions are utilized by ncRNAs to help tumors achieve TIE, which may be effective targets to prevent TIE and improve tumor immunotherapy.
Immune checkpoint molecules and TIE
Immune checkpoints refer to a plethora of inhibitory pathways hardwired into the immune system that are crucial for maintaining self-tolerance and modulating the duration and amplitude of physiological immune responses in peripheral tissues to minimize collateral tissue damage. It is now clear that tumors coopt certain immune checkpoint pathways as a major mechanism of tumoral immune resistance, particularly against T cells that are specific for tumor antigens.146 The expression of immune checkpoint proteins can be dysregulated in tumors as an important TIE mechanism.147 Therefore, the study of immune checkpoints is particularly essential to prevent TIE. The currently known TIE-related immune checkpoint molecules are CTLA-4, PD-1, PD-L1, T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing protein 3 (TIM-3), and B and T lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA) (Fig. 4). Next, we will summarize the research progress on ncRNAs in the regulation of immune checkpoints (Table 5).
TIE and immune checkpoint molecules regulated by ncRNAs. PD-L1 expression induced by the IFN-γ signaling pathway and PTEN/PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, as well as the regulation of these pathways by ncRNAs (left).T-cell-activated receptors/ligands (TCR/MHC-I and CD28/B7-1/2) and immune checkpoint molecular receptor-ligands (PD-1/PD-L1, CTLA-4/B7-1/2, BTLA/HVEM and TIM3/Gal-9) regulated by ncRNAs (middle and upper right). The red “T” symbol represents inhibitory modification
CTLA-4
Activated T cells play vital roles in antitumor immunity, and T cell activation depends on two signals: one involving an interaction between TCR and MHC molecules and another involving the costimulatory signal between CD28 and B7-1/2. To ensure a balance in the function of the immune system, CTLA-4, a homolog of CD28, binds to B7-1/2 and forms an inhibitory signal for T lymphocytes with activated TCRs.148 CTLA-4 binds to B7-1/2 with an affinity higher than that of CD28 and inhibits AKT phosphorylation by activating phosphatase protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), thereby inhibiting subsequent T cell activation and function (Fig. 4).149 In addition, CTLA-4 inhibits the formation of ζ chain-associated protein kinase 70 (Zap70), thereby affecting TCR signaling and ultimately inhibiting T cell function and promoting T cell apoptosis (Fig. 4).150 Therefore, overexpression of CTLA-4 on the surface of tumor-infiltrating T cells will enhance immune suppression by inhibiting the activation and function of T cells and promoting T cell apoptosis, thus helping tumor cells achieve TIE. Some miRNAs with abnormal expression in tumor cells can regulate the surface expression of CTLA-4 in tumor-infiltrating T cells, thereby inhibiting the antitumor immune response mediated by T cells and promoting TIE (Table 5, Fig. 4). In mice with glioma, miR-138 significantly reduces the expression of CTLA-4 and PD-1 on the surface of tumor-infiltrating T cells.151 In mice with melanoma, miR-155 inhibits CTLA-4 expression on the surface of tumor-infiltrating T cells and promotes the host antitumor immune response.152
PD-L1
PD-L1 (B7-H1) is a transmembrane protein expressed by T cells, B cells, and various tumor cells.153 Binding of PD-L1 with PD-1 on the surface of CTLs can inhibit the proliferation of CTLs and suppress the secretion of CTL cytokines such as IL-2, thereby affecting the function of CTLs and promoting TIE.146 The overexpression of PD-L1 on the surface of tumor cells through different mechanisms can enhance immunosuppression and promote immune escape. Currently, PD-L1 is the main target for tumor immunotherapy, and some PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies, such as durvalumab and atezolizumab, have shown good clinical therapeutic effects.154,155 In addition to factors that directly regulate PD-L1 mRNA, studies have shown that the transcription and expression of PD-L1 in tumor cells are strongly dependent on the interferon-γ (IFN–γ) signaling pathway (Fig. 4).156,157 In addition, PD-L1 is also regulated by the phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome ten (PTEN)/phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway in tumor cells (Fig. 4).158 The absence of PTEN promotes AKT and mTOR phosphorylation, which in turn leads to increased PD-L1 translation (Fig. 4).158 miRNAs can affect PD-L1 expression in tumor cells by directly targeting the PD-L1 mRNA or targeting the intermediate links of related signaling pathways (Table 5, Fig. 4). miRNAs such as miR-34a,159 miR-138-5p,160 miR-142-5p,161 miR-152,162 miR-200,163 and miR-424164 directly inhibit PD-L1 by targeting PD-L1 mRNA in different tumor cells. In addition, miRNAs such as miR-24-2,165 miR-186,166 miR-27a,165 and miR-145167 alter PD-L1 expression by regulating the IFN-γ signaling-mediated transcription and expression of PD-L1. Other miRNAs, such as miR-10a,168 miR-221,169 miR-100,170 and miR-216a,171 alter PD-L1 expression by targeting the PTEN/PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. In addition to miRNAs, a number of lncRNAs and circRNAs are also involved in regulating the expression of PD-L1 (Table 5, Fig. 4). lncRNA SNHG14 activates PD-L1 expression at the transcriptional level via ZEB1 and miR-5590-3p, thus promoting immune escape of diffuse large B cell lymphoma.172 circRNA CDR1-AS positively regulates PD-L1 levels and leads to poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer.173 lncRNA NKX2-1-AS1 inhibits PD-L1 expression in tumor cells at the transcriptional level, thus inhibiting immunosuppression and preventing TIE in lung carcinoma cells.174
PD-1
PD-1 is mainly expressed on the surface of activated T cells, B cells, and DCs.175 The interaction between PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibits TCR-mediated T cell activation (Fig. 4) and is a significant mechanism of TIE. Mechanistically, when PD-L1 and PD-1 interact, intracellular tyrosine of the ligand-bound PD-1 is phosphorylated and thus activated. Src homology 2-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase 1 (SHP-1) and SHP-2 are then recruited to the C-terminal immunoreceptor tyrosine-based switch motif (ITSM) of PD-1, and they inhibit the activation of the RAS/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling pathway via ZAP70 dephosphorylation (TCR activation signals). This promotes T cell apoptosis and inhibits the proliferation of T cells and secretion of cytokines such as IL-2 (Fig. 4).176,177 In addition, PD-1 can also activate PTEN, indirectly inhibiting the TCR-mediated PI3K/AKT signaling pathway (Fig. 4).178 Multiple miRNAs and lncRNAs have been found to regulate PD-1 expression on the surface of tumor-infiltrating T cells and promote immunosuppression, thus promoting TIE (Table 5, Fig. 4). In melanoma-bearing mice, miR-28 was found to specifically inhibit PD-1 expression on tumor-infiltrating T cells and prevent T cell exhaustion, which can enhance the antitumor immune response, whereas transfection with miR-28 inhibitors increased the number of PD-1-positive exhausted T cells.179miR-138 inhibits the expression of PD-1 and CTLA-4 on tumor-infiltrating T cells, promotes the activity and function of T cells, and inhibits tumor development in mouse GL261 glioma cells.151 miR-4717 was found to inhibit PD-1 expression in the lymphocytes of patients with chronic HBV infection, the leading cause of HCC.180 In addition, lncRNA AFAP1-AS1 positively regulates PD-1 expression on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.181
TIM-3
TIM-3 is an immune checkpoint molecule expressed on the surface of DCs, NK cells, Tregs, macrophages, and IFN-γ-producing T cells.182 TIM-3 inhibits the function of type 1T helper cells and the secretion of several immune factors, such as IFN-γ and TNF.182 In addition, as an immune checkpoint molecule, TIM-3 can also inhibit antitumor immunity by depleting tumor-infiltrating T cells.183 Therefore, in tumors, regulating the expression of TIM-3 is also one of the mechanisms to achieve TIE, and ncRNAs are significant players in this regulation. For example, in HCC, lncRNA Tim3 can stimulate CD8+ T cell exhaustion and promote the survival of these exhausted CD8+ T cells by specifically binding to TIM-3, thereby inhibiting the T cell-mediated antitumor immune response and promoting TIE.184 In melanoma, miR-28 inhibits the expression of TIM-3, PD-1, and CTLA-4, thereby reducing T cell exhaustion and increasing TNF-α and IL-2 secretion, which could enhance the antitumor immune response and inhibit TIE (Table 5).179
BTLA
Similar to PD-1 and CTLA-4, BTLA is also an inhibitory receptor on the surface of T cells, which could be used by tumors to achieve immune escape. It is expressed on both type 1 and type 2 T helper cells but is not expressed on highly polarized type 2 T helper cells.185 BTLA reduces IL-12 secretion by cross-linking with the antigen receptor, inducing its phosphorylation, and binding to the tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1/2 containing the Src homology 2 (SH2) domain.185 Moreover, BTLA-deficient T cells show increased proliferation.185 As mentioned in the previous section, in melanoma, miR-28 can inhibit the expression of BTLA, PD-1, and CTLA-4 in T cells, which could enhance the antitumor immune response and inhibit TIE.179 In addition, miR-155 can also inhibit BTLA expression, thereby weakening the inhibitory effect of BTLA on T cell activation (Table 5).186
In summary, regulating the expression of immune checkpoints on the surface of tumor cells or immune cells is a significant strategy for tumors to achieve immune escape, and ncRNAs play essential roles in this process. It may be an important strategy to inhibit TIE and improve the efficiency of immunotherapy by inhibiting the expression of these ncRNAs. At present, anti-immune checkpoint molecular targeting drugs have been used in the clinic, and good results have been achieved.154,155 However, targeted therapy for these ncRNAs has not been reported and needs further study.
Cytokines in tme and TIE
TGF-β
The role of TGF-β in tumorigenesis and development is contradictory. The TGF-β signaling pathway can inhibit tumor growth because the downstream signals of TGF-β family receptors can regulate the expression of DAPK, GADD45β, BIM, SHIP and other apoptosis genes, which can induce apoptosis of tumor cells.187 However, some studies have indicated that TGF-β signaling pathway activation can promote tumor growth and invasion and is critical for TIE.188 The mechanism is as follows: the TGF-β signaling pathway can induce the transcription of relevant target genes to inhibit the activation and/or functions of NK cells, DCs, and T cells and induce the differentiation of Tregs (Fig. 5).187 In NK cells, TGF-β signaling inhibits the expression of the transcription factor TBET, which inhibits IFN-γ expression, thereby inhibiting the function of NK cells.189,190 In DCs, TGF-β signaling inhibits MHC class II gene expression, thus inhibiting its antigen-presenting function.191 In T cells, TGF-β signaling silences the expression of TBET, thereby inhibiting the production of INF-γ.192 TGF-β signaling also inhibits the expression of IL-2 and granzyme B,193,194 thereby preventing the antitumor immune function of T cells. TGF-β signaling can also induce Treg differentiation by inducing the expression of FOXP3, the main transcription factor essential for the Treg phenotype, and then increase immunosuppression.195 Moreover, the TGF-β signaling pathway can also induce the expression of the transcription factor Snail in tumor cells and promote EMT, which may be another mechanism of TGF-β-induced immune escape (Fig. 5).196 Recent research has demonstrated that TGF-β promotes TIE via a mechanism independent of the canonical TGF-β signaling pathway. Tumor progression results in the downregulation of TGFBRII in T cells, enabling TGF-β to directly enter T cells. Once inside the cell, TGF-β molecules bind the Smad protein in mitochondria and disrupt the ATP-coupled respiration of T cells, thereby inhibiting their function and promoting TIE.197
TIE and the canonical TGF-β signaling pathway regulated by ncRNAs
TGF-β receptors are serine/threonine kinase receptors divided into type I and type II (TGFBR Ι and TGFBR II) receptors. Binding of the ligand TGF-β to TGFBR II induces the assembly of TGFBRΙ and TGFBR II complexes, and TGFBR II phosphorylates and activates TGFBR I, which then phosphorylates the two C-terminal serine residues of smad2 and Smad3. Phosphorylated Smad2 and Smad3 form heterotrimeric complexes with Smad4; this activated Smad complex enters the nucleus, interacts with other transcription factors, and regulates the expression of the corresponding target genes. Smad7 can form a complex with Smurf1/2 to inhibit the activity of TGFBR I, thereby inhibiting the activity of the pathway (Fig. 5).
ncRNAs in tumors can target components of the TGF-β signaling pathway or directly regulate TGF-β target gene transcription in different tumors, thus inhibiting the antitumor immune response and promoting TIE (Table 6, Fig. 5). For example, miR-133,198 miR-141,199 lncRNA ANRIL,200 and lncRNA 00974201 regulate the expression of TGF-β; Let-7,202 miR-141, and the miR-200 family203 target and regulate TGFBR Ι; miR-106b,204 miR-17-5p,205 miR-204,206 miR-20a,207 miR-21,208 miR-590209 and lncRNA MEG3210 target and regulate TGFBR II; miR-141, miR-200a/c, miR-30d203 and miR-155211 regulate Smad2; miR-140212 and lncRNA PVT1213 regulate the expression of Smad3 and Smad4, respectively; and miR-21 regulates the expression of Smad7 in cervical cancer.214 The abnormal expression of these ncRNAs in tumors can activate the TGF-β signaling pathway in different stages and then help tumors achieve immune escape by inhibiting a variety of immune cells, inducing the differentiation of immune cells and promoting EMT. According to this characteristic of tumors, blocking the activation of the TGF-β signaling pathway by targeting these ncRNAs may become a new direction for tumor immunotherapy.
IL‐6
IL-6, commonly secreted by macrophages, DCs, MDSCs, and tumor cells, is a pleiotropic proinflammatory cytokine that is involved in almost all aspects of the immune system, from the infiltration of neutrophils at the site of infection to the generation of T cell responses. IL-6 can be rapidly induced and expressed in large quantities under the conditions of infection and autoimmunity and plays a key role in host defense by stimulating various cell populations (including promoting cytotoxic T cell differentiation, T cell population expansion and activation, and B cell differentiation).215 However, in addition to immune-stimulating effects, IL-6 can also lead to immunosuppression and TIE, most of which are mediated through the IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway. For example, the IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway can make the TME tend towards immunosuppress by attracting and activating MDSCs, TANs, and Tregs.216 In addition, the IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway has also been found to promote the tumor stem cell-like phenotype and EMT.217,218,219 In tumors, abnormal expression of ncRNAs can promote TIE by regulating the expression of IL-6 or the molecules involved in the IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway (Table 6). miR-33a,220 miR-218,221 miR-125a,222 miR-34a,223 miR-217,224 miR-26a,225 miR-98,226 miR-9,227 lncRNA HOTTIP,228 lncRNA 00460,229 and lncRNA UICC230 directly regulate IL-6 in different cancers. miR-551b-3p directly downregulates STAT3 expression in ovarian cancer cells,231 whereas miR-18a inhibits STAT3 by negatively regulating the expression of the E3 SUMO protein ligase PIAS3 in gastric adenocarcinogenesis.232 miR-221 and miR-222 inhibit STAT3 expression by targeting PDZ and LIM domain protein 2 (PDLIM2) in colorectal cancer.233 Moreover, miR-30 promotes the activation of the JAK/STAT3 pathway by inhibiting the expression of suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3) in glioma stem cells.234 lncRNA 00518, lncRNA AB073614, and lncRNA HOST2 activate the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway in cervical cancer, colorectal cancer, and HCC, respectively.235,236,237 These ncRNAs enhance the immunosuppression of the TME by regulating IL-6 expression and activating the IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 pathway, thus helping tumors achieve immune escape, which may be another target to block TIE and improve the effect of immunotherapy.
IL-10
IL-10 is an immune cytokine produced by immune cells that plays a dual role in tumorigenesis and development.238 In the early tumor stage, the main role of IL-10 is to activate the immune system to kill tumor cells by stimulating NK cell- and CTL cell-mediated antitumor responses. However, with tumor development, some tumors (melanoma,239 lung cancer240 and bladder cancer241) have been found to be able to utilize the immunosuppressive effects of IL-10 to achieve TIE.242 Specific mechanisms are described below. First, IL-10 can inhibit the expression of MHC class II molecules on antigen-presenting cells and MHC class I molecules in tumor cells to inhibit tumor antigen presentation.243,244 Second, IL-10 can inhibit the activation of the CD28 costimulatory pathway in T cells, resulting in T cell dysfunction.245 Finally, tumor cells express IL-10 and IL-10 receptors by themselves, activate the downstream STAT3/Twist pathway by autocrine signaling, and promote EMT of tumor cells.246 It has been revealed that ncRNAs such as miR-98,247 miR-193b,248 miR-194,249 and lncRNA CCAT1250 can directly or indirectly regulate IL-10 expression in different tumors to help achieve TIE (Table 6). Therefore, IL-10 may be considered another important target for ncRNA-mediated regulation of TIE. Through the abnormal expression of ncRNAs in tumors, the regulation of IL-10 is likely to be a strategy of tumors to achieve TIE. Therefore, we need to further study these mechanisms, which may become effective targets for cancer treatment in the future.
VEGF
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an endothelial cell-specific mitogen that is an angiogenesis inducer in a variety of in vivo models and has important physiological functions.251 In addition, plenty of evidence shows that VEGF is also an important regulator of pathological angiogenesis. In situ hybridization studies have shown that VEGF mRNA is expressed in most human tumors and can promote tumor progression and help tumors achieve TIE.252 Mechanistically, VEGF promotes the proliferation of immunosuppressive cells, inhibits the recruitment of T cells in the TME, and promotes the exhaustion of T cells, thus promoting TIE.252 VEGF can also act as a chemokine to recruit Tregs into the TME, thereby affecting the antitumor immune response of immune cells.253 In many tumors, it has been found that some abnormally expressed ncRNAs can directly or indirectly regulate the expression of VEGF to promote the development of tumors (Table 6). For example, miR-638,254 miR-503,255 miR-497,256 miR-203,257 miR-200,258 miR-195,259 miR-190,260 miR-126,261,262 miR-93,263,264 miR-29b,265 miR-20,266 lncRNA TDRG1267 and lncRNA HOTAIR268 directly up/downregulate VEGF expression in various tumors. In contrast, miR-22,78 miR-107,269 miR-519c,270 miR-26a,271 miR-145,272 lncRNA H19,273 and lncRNA GAS5274 were found indirectly to up/downregulate VEGF expression in different tumors. Therefore, similar to TGF-β, IL-6 and IL-10, tumors are likely to utilize the immunosuppressive function of VEGF through ncRNAs to finally achieve TIE. This is likely to become another target of antitumor immunotherapy.
Tumor exosomes (TEX) and TIE
Exosomes are extracellular vesicles 40–150 nm in diameter that participate in intercellular communication. TEX can transport various ncRNAs and support the associated immunosuppressive functions.12,275 Currently, ncRNAs transported by exosomes from various tumor cells have been reported to be associated with immunosuppression and TIE (Table 7). For example, in HCC, miR-23a in TEX can inhibit the expression of PTEN and upregulate PD-L1 expression in macrophages, decrease antitumor immunity and promote TIE.276 Furthermore, miR-23a derived from hypoxic TEX can also act as an immunosuppressive factor that directly targets CD107 in NK cells, thus inhibiting the killing function of NK cells on tumors.277 Similarly, miR-24-3p, miR-891a, miR-106a-5p, miR-20a-5p, and miR-1980 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma-derived TEX were also found to promote immunosuppression and TIE. These miRNAs can induce the differentiation of Tregs and cause T cell dysfunction, including dysregulation of proliferation, differentiation, and cytokine secretion, by targeting the downregulation of the MAPK1 and JAK/STAT pathways.278 In mouse models of lung cancer and sarcoma, TEX-derived miR-214 inhibits PTEN and the signals downstream of PTEN (to some extent) in T cells, thereby promoting the differentiation of Tregs and enhancing immunosuppression.279 TEX-derived lncRNAs were also found to be associated with immunosuppression and TIE. lncRNA ZFAS1 from gastric cancer-derived TEX can suppress tumor cell apoptosis and promote EMT, which may help gastric cancer to achieve TIE.280 TEX isolated from the bladder cancer cell line 5637 show high lncRNA UCA1 expression, which promotes bladder cancer progression by promoting EMT in tumor cells.281 In add ition, TEX derived from lung cancer show increased lncRNA MALAT1 expression, which promotes tumor growth and metastasis and inhibits tumor cell apoptosis.282 These TEX-derived ncRNAs can promote immunosuppression, inhibit tumor apoptosis and promote tumor EMT through a variety of mechanisms, which are significant driving forces for TIE. This may also be one of the potential causes of immunotherapy tolerance, which needs to be studied in depth.
Conclusions and perspectives
In this review, we discussed the different TIE mechanisms and summarized the regulatory roles of ncRNAs involved in these mechanisms. Although ncRNAs have been confirmed to be directly associated with TIE, the precise molecular mechanisms underlying such regulation are yet to be elucidated. Immunotherapy often results in low response rates owing to the multiple TIE mechanisms active in tumor cells, and the role of ncRNAs in TIE may be underestimated. Thus, ncRNAs may be considered potential candidates to therapeutically target such TIE mechanisms and are expected to be the key to overcoming the challenges associated with immunotherapy.
Several recent studies have reported the role of ncRNAs in tumor therapy, demonstrating the therapeutic potential of ncRNAs.283,284,285,286 For example, miR-122 expression is low in liver cancer cells, and delivery of miR-122 in liver tumor cells using LNP-DP1, a cationic lipid nanoparticle formulation, can effectively suppress tumor growth by inhibiting target genes and angiogenesis.287 Although the potential of ncRNAs as tumor therapeutic targets has been reported, no study or clinical experiment has reported whether ncRNAs can be considered targets to inhibit TIE. Therefore, considering the key role of ncRNAs in TIE, further research is warranted to explore such therapeutic approaches to improve the efficiency of tumor immunotherapy and reduce the associated side effects. Because ncRNAs are critical in promoting TIE, the potential of ncRNAs as targets for TIE therapy should not be underestimated.
This review summarizes the complex regulatory network of ncRNAs specific to TIE. Some studies provide direct evidence of the involvement of certain ncRNAs in TIE, whereas other studies report observations suggestive of the involvement of certain ncRNAs in the regulation of immune escape-related mechanisms. Although not conclusively investigated, these ncRNAs may be indirectly involved in TIE and can also be explored as potential targets for TIE therapy. Some ncRNAs have both tumorigenic and antitumorigenic properties, and studies involving such ncRNAs may provide new insights into TIE mechanisms and immunotherapy. Further studies verifying the regulatory relationship between ncRNAs and TIE will provide a direction for future studies aimed at developing novel cancer therapeutic approaches. Aside from miRNAs, lncRNAs, and circRNAs, other ncRNAs, such as tRNAs (including their derived tiRNAs and tRFs), rRNAs, and snRNAs, have not been reported to be involved in the regulation of TIE, and further research in this area is essential.
References
Dunn, G. P. et al. Cancer immunoediting: from immunosurveillance to tumor escape. Nat. Immunol.3, 991–998 (2002).
Shahrouki, P. & Larsson, E. The non-coding oncogene: a case of missing DNA evidence? Front Genet.3, 170 (2012).
Green, D., Fraser, W. D. & Dalmay, T. Transfer RNA-derived small RNAs in the cancer transcriptome. Pflug. Arch.468, 1041–1047 (2016).
Gibb, E. A., Brown, C. J. & Lam, W. L. The functional role of long non-coding RNA in human carcinomas. Mol. Cancer10, 38 (2011).
Cech, T. R. & Steitz, J. A. The noncoding RNA revolution-trashing old rules to forge new ones. Cell157, 77–94 (2014).
Yang, L., Froberg, J. E. & Lee, J. T. Long noncoding RNAs: fresh perspectives into the RNA world. Trends Biochem. Sci.39, 35–43 (2014).
Fu, L., et al. Circular RNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma: functions and implications. Cancer Med. 7, 3101–3109 (2018).
Ambros, V. The functions of animal microRNAs. Nature431, 350–355 (2004).
Huang, S. et al. MicroRNA-181a modulates gene expression of zinc finger family members by directly targeting their coding regions. Nucleic Acids Res.38, 7211–7218 (2010).
Orom, U. A., Nielsen, F. C. & Lund, A. H. MicroRNA-10a binds the 5’UTR of ribosomal protein mRNAs and enhances their translation. Mol. Cell.30, 460–471 (2008).
Shen, Y. et al. Transfer RNA-derived fragments and tRNA halves: biogenesis, biological functions and their roles in diseases. J. Mol. Med. (Berl.)96, 1167–1176 (2018).
Eichmuller, S. B., Osen, W., Mandelboim, O. & Seliger, B. Immune modulatory microRNAs involved in tumor attack and tumor immune escape. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 109, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djx034 (2017).
Ding, L., Lu, S. & Li, Y. Regulation of PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in cancer by noncoding RNAs. Pathol. Oncol Res. 26, 651–663 (2019).
Hoves, S. et al. In situ analysis of the antigen-processing machinery in acute myeloid leukaemic blasts by tissue microarray. Leukemia23, 877–885 (2009).
Meissner, M. et al. Defects in the human leukocyte antigen class I antigen processing machinery in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: association with clinical outcome. Clin. Cancer Res.11, 2552–2560 (2005).
Ogino, T. et al. HLA class I antigen down-regulation in primary laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma lesions as a poor prognostic marker. Cancer Res.66, 9281–9289 (2006).
Yan, Y. et al. MicroRNA-23a downregulates the expression of interferon regulatory factor-1 in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Oncol. Rep.36, 633–640 (2016).
Wang, B. et al. Rs56288038 (C/G) in 3’UTR of IRF-1 regulated by MiR-502-5p promotes gastric cancer development. Cell Physiol. Biochem.40, 391–399 (2016).
Namiki, S. et al. IRF-1 mediates upregulation of LMP7 by IFN-gamma and concerted expression of immunosubunits of the proteasome. FEBS Lett.579, 2781–2787 (2005).
Sun, Y. et al. miR-451 suppresses the NF-kappaB-mediated proinflammatory molecules expression through inhibiting LMP7 in diabetic nephropathy. Mol. Cell Endocrinol.433, 75–86 (2016).
Hirata, T. et al. Characterization of the immune escape phenotype of human gastric cancers with and without high-frequency microsatellite instability. J. Pathol.211, 516–523 (2007).
Mari, L. et al. microRNA 125a regulates MHC-I expression on esophageal adenocarcinoma cells, associated with suppression of antitumor immune response and poor outcomes of patients. Gastroenterology155, 784–798 (2018).
Bartoszewski, R. et al. The unfolded protein response (UPR)-activated transcription factor X-box-binding protein 1 (XBP1) induces microRNA-346 expression that targets the human antigen peptide transporter 1 (TAP1) mRNA and governs immune regulatory genes. J. Biol. Chem.286, 41862–41870 (2011).
Musahl, A. S. et al. A long non-coding RNA links calreticulin-mediated immunogenic cell removal to RB1 transcription. Oncogene34, 5046–5054 (2015).
Colangelo, T. et al. Proteomic screening identifies calreticulin as a miR-27a direct target repressing MHC class I cell surface exposure in colorectal cancer. Cell Death Dis.7, e2120 (2016).
Maleno, I. et al. Distribution of HLA class I altered phenotypes in colorectal carcinomas: high frequency of HLA haplotype loss associated with loss of heterozygosity in chromosome region 6p21. Immunogenetics56, 244–253 (2004).
Menon, A. G. et al. Down-regulation of HLA-A expression correlates with a better prognosis in colorectal cancer patients. Lab Invest.82, 1725–1733 (2002).
Browning, M. et al. Mechanisms of loss of HLA class I expression on colorectal tumor cells. Tissue Antigens47, 364–371 (1996).
Gao, F. et al. miR-9 modulates the expression of interferon-regulated genes and MHC class I molecules in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res Commun.431, 610–616 (2013).
Juin, P. et al. Decoding and unlocking the BCL-2 dependency of cancer cells. Nat. Rev. Cancer13, 455–465 (2013).
Espana, L. et al. Overexpression of Bcl-xL in human breast cancer cells enhances organ-selective lymph node metastasis. Breast Cancer Res. Treat.87, 33–44 (2004).
Goncharenko-Khaider, N. et al. Ovarian cancer ascites increase Mcl-1 expression in tumor cells through ERK1/2-Elk-1 signaling to attenuate TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Mol. Cancer11, 84 (2012).
Li, Y. et al. Significance of Fas and FasL protein expression in cardiac carcinoma and local lymph node tissues. Int J. Clin. Exp. Pathol.8, 11915–11920 (2015).
Twomey, J. D. et al. Spatial dynamics of TRAIL death receptors in cancer cells. Drug Resist Updat19, 13–21 (2015).
Soriano, C. et al. Increased proteinase inhibitor-9 (PI-9) and reduced granzyme B in lung cancer: mechanism for immune evasion? Lung Cancer77, 38–45 (2012).
Zhou, X. N. et al. Knockdown of decoy receptor 3 impairs growth and invasiveness of hepatocellular carcinoma cell line of HepG2. Chin. Med. J. (Engl.)129, 2623–2629 (2016).
Singh, R. & Saini, N. Downregulation of BCL2 by miRNAs augments drug-induced apoptosis–a combined computational and experimental approach. J. Cell Sci.125, 1568–1578 (2012).
Liu, J. & Tong, C. Q. Inhibitory effect of miR-125b down-regulation on proliferation of leukemia cell K562. Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi26, 336–340 (2018).
You, F. et al. miRNA-106a promotes breast cancer cell proliferation, clonogenicity, migration, and invasion through inhibiting apoptosis and chemosensitivity. DNA Cell Biol.38, 198–207 (2019).
Ji, F. et al. MicroRNA-133a, downregulated in osteosarcoma, suppresses proliferation and promotes apoptosis by targeting Bcl-xL and Mcl-1. Bone56, 220–226 (2013).
Razumilava, N. et al. miR-25 targets TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL) death receptor-4 and promotes apoptosis resistance in cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology55, 465–475 (2012).
Yang, Y. et al. Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) MAGI2-AS3 inhibits breast cancer cell growth by targeting the Fas/FasL signalling pathway. Hum. Cell.31, 232–241 (2018).
Lin, R. et al. Targeting miR-23a in CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes prevents tumor-dependent immunosuppression. J. Clin. Invest.124, 5352–5367 (2014).
Warburg, O., Wind, F. & Negelein, E. The metabolism of tumors in the body. J. Gen. Physiol.8, 519–530 (1927).
Choi, S. Y., Collins, C. C., Gout, P. W. & Wang, Y. Cancer-generated lactic acid: a regulatory, immunosuppressive metabolite? J. Pathol.230, 350–355 (2013).
Bellone, M. et al. The acidity of the tumor microenvironment is a mechanism of immune escape that can be overcome by proton pump inhibitors. Oncoimmunology2, e22058 (2013).
Xu, P. et al. MicroRNA-340 mediates metabolic shift in oral squamous cell carcinoma by targeting glucose transporter-1. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg.74, 844–850 (2016).
Yamasaki, T. et al. Tumor-suppressive microRNA-1291 directly regulates glucose transporter 1 in renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci.104, 1411–1419 (2013).
Nie, S. et al. miR-495 mediates metabolic shift in glioma cells via targeting Glut1. J. Craniofac. Surg.26, e155–e158 (2015).
Chen, B. et al. miR-22 as a prognostic factor targets glucose transporter protein type 1 in breast cancer. Cancer Lett.356, 410–417 (2015).
Qu, W. et al. miR-132 mediates a metabolic shift in prostate cancer cells by targeting Glut1. FEBS Open Bio6, 735–741 (2016).
Yang, F., Zhang, H., Mei, Y. & Wu, M. Reciprocal regulation of HIF-1alpha and lincRNA-p21 modulates the Warburg effect. Mol. Cell.53, 88–100 (2014).
Wang, Y. et al. LncRNA-p23154 promotes the invasion-metastasis potential of oral squamous cell carcinoma by regulating Glut1-mediated glycolysis. Cancer Lett.434, 172–183 (2018).
Liu, X. & Gan, B. lncRNA NBR2 modulates cancer cell sensitivity to phenformin through GLUT1. Cell Cycle15, 3471–3481 (2016).
Chow, T. F. et al. The miR-17-92 cluster is over expressed in and has an oncogenic effect on renal cell carcinoma. J. Urol.183, 743–751 (2010).
Srivastava, S. K. et al. MicroRNA-150 directly targets MUC4 and suppresses growth and malignant behavior of pancreatic cancer cells. Carcinogenesis32, 1832–1839 (2011).
Fei, X. et al. MicroRNA-195-5p suppresses glucose uptake and proliferation of human bladder cancer T24 cells by regulating GLUT3 expression. FEBS Lett.586, 392–397 (2012).
Fang, R. et al. MicroRNA-143 (miR-143) regulates cancer glycolysis via targeting hexokinase 2 gene. J. Biol. Chem.287, 23227–23235 (2012).
Peschiaroli, A. et al. miR-143 regulates hexokinase 2 expression in cancer cells. Oncogene32, 797–802 (2013).
Jiang, S. et al. A novel miR-155/miR-143 cascade controls glycolysis by regulating hexokinase 2 in breast cancer cells. EMBO J.31, 1985–1998 (2012).
Li, Z. et al. Long non-coding RNA UCA1 promotes glycolysis by upregulating hexokinase 2 through the mTOR-STAT3/microRNA143 pathway. Cancer Sci.105, 951–955 (2014).
Guo, W. et al. MiR-199a-5p is negatively associated with malignancies and regulates glycolysis and lactate production by targeting hexokinase 2 in liver cancer. Hepatology62, 1132–1144 (2015).
Fabani, M. M. & Gait, M. J. miR-122 targeting with LNA/2’-O-methyl oligonucleotide mixmers, peptide nucleic acids (PNA), and PNA-peptide conjugates. RNA14, 336–346 (2008).
Kefas, B. et al. Pyruvate kinase M2 is a target of the tumor-suppressive microRNA-326 and regulates the survival of glioma cells. Neuro Oncol.12, 1102–1112 (2010).
Kinoshita, T. et al. Tumor suppressive microRNA-375 regulates lactate dehydrogenase B in maxillary sinus squamous cell carcinoma. Int J. Oncol.40, 185–193 (2012).
Wang, J. et al. Lactate dehydrogenase A negatively regulated by miRNAs promotes aerobic glycolysis and is increased in colorectal cancer. Oncotarget6, 19456–19468 (2015).
Hung, C. L. et al. A long noncoding RNA connects c-Myc to tumor metabolism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA111, 18697–18702 (2014).
Wang, J. & Sun, X. MicroRNA-375 inhibits the proliferation, migration and invasion of kidney cancer cells by triggering apoptosis and modulation of PDK1 expression. Environ. Toxicol. Pharm.62, 227–233 (2018).
Wang, Y. et al. miR-138-1* regulates aflatoxin B1-induced malignant transformation of BEAS-2B cells by targeting PDK1. Arch. Toxicol.90, 1239–1249 (2016).
Tanaka, H. et al. MicroRNA-183 upregulates HIF-1alpha by targeting isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) in glioma cells. J. Neurooncol.111, 273–283 (2013).
Puissegur, M. P. et al. miR-210 is overexpressed in late stages of lung cancer and mediates mitochondrial alterations associated with modulation of HIF-1 activity. Cell Death Differ.18, 465–478 (2011).
Jung, K. A., Lee, S. & Kwak, M. K. NFE2L2/NRF2 activity is linked to mitochondria and AMP-activated protein kinase signaling in cancers through miR-181c/mitochondria-encoded cytochrome c oxidase regulation. Antioxid. Redox Signal27, 945–961 (2017).
Aschrafi, A. et al. MicroRNA-338 regulates local cytochrome c oxidase IV mRNA levels and oxidative phosphorylation in the axons of sympathetic neurons. J. Neurosci.28, 12581–12590 (2008).
Semenza, G. L. Hypoxia-inducible factors: mediators of cancer progression and targets for cancer therapy. Trends Pharm. Sci.33, 207–214 (2012).
Sutendra, G. et al. Mitochondrial activation by inhibition of PDKII suppresses HIF1a signaling and angiogenesis in cancer. Oncogene32, 1638–1650 (2013).
Fukuda, R. et al. HIF-1 regulates cytochrome oxidase subunits to optimize efficiency of respiration in hypoxic cells. Cell129, 111–122 (2007).
Taguchi, A. et al. Identification of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha as a novel target for miR-17-92 microRNA cluster. Cancer Res.68, 5540–5545 (2008).
Yamakuchi, M., Yagi, S., Ito, T. & Lowenstein, C. J. MicroRNA-22 regulates hypoxia signaling in colon cancer cells. PLoS ONE6, e20291 (2011).
Zhou, J. et al. miR-33a functions as a tumor suppressor in melanoma by targeting HIF-1alpha. Cancer Biol. Ther.16, 846–855 (2015).
Tan, Y. et al. Antitumor effects of circ-EPHB4 in hepatocellular carcinoma via inhibition of HIF-1alpha. Mol. Carcinog.58, 875–886 (2019).
Zhang, L. et al. LncRNA SNHG1 regulates cerebrovascular pathologies as a competing endogenous RNA through HIF-1alpha/VEGF signaling in ischemic stroke. J. Cell Biochem.119, 5460–5472 (2018).
Cai, Q. et al. Long non-coding RNA LINC00152 promotes gallbladder cancer metastasis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition by regulating HIF-1alpha via miR-138. Open Biol. 7, 160247 (2017).
Chi, Y. et al. Circular RNA circPIP5K1A promotes non-small cell lung cancer proliferation and metastasis through miR-600/HIF-1alpha regulation. J. Cell Biochem.120, 19019–19030 (2019).
Sharma, S. et al. Tumor cyclooxygenase 2-dependent suppression of dendritic cell function. Clin. Cancer Res.9, 961–968 (2003).
Akasaki, Y. et al. Induction of a CD4+ T regulatory type 1 response by cyclooxygenase-2-overexpressing glioma. J. Immunol.173, 4352–4359 (2004).
Sharma, S. et al. Tumor cyclooxygenase-2/prostaglandin E2-dependent promotion of FOXP3 expression and CD4+ CD25+ T regulatory cell activities in lung cancer. Cancer Res.65, 5211–5220 (2005).
Uotila, P. The role of cyclic AMP and oxygen intermediates in the inhibition of cellular immunity in cancer. Cancer Immunol. Immunother.43, 1–9 (1996).
Park, Y. R. et al. MiRNA-206 suppresses PGE2-induced colorectal cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion by targetting TM4SF1. Biosci Rep. 38, BSR20180664 (2018).
Lin, Y. & Wu, Z. MicroRNA-128 inhibits proliferation and invasion of glioma cells by targeting COX-2. Gene658, 63–69 (2018).
Cornett, A. L. & Lutz, C. S. Regulation of COX-2 expression by miR-146a in lung cancer cells. RNA20, 1419–1430 (2014).
Liu, Y., Li, H., Zhao, C. & Jia, H. MicroRNA-101 inhibits angiogenesis via COX-2 in endometrial carcinoma. Mol. Cell Biochem.448, 61–69 (2018).
Pham, H. et al. miR-143 decreases COX-2 mRNA stability and expression in pancreatic cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.439, 6–11 (2013).
Wainwright, D. A. et al. IDO expression in brain tumors increases the recruitment of regulatory T cells and negatively impacts survival. Clin. Cancer Res.18, 6110–6121 (2012).
Uyttenhove, C. et al. Evidence for a tumoral immune resistance mechanism based on tryptophan degradation by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase. Nat. Med.9, 1269–1274 (2003).
Prendergast, G. C., Metz, R. & Muller, A. J. Towards a genetic definition of cancer-associated inflammation: role of the IDO pathway. Am. J. Pathol.176, 2082–2087 (2010).
Pei, X., Wang, X. & Li, H. LncRNA SNHG1 regulates the differentiation of Treg cells and affects the immune escape of breast cancer via regulating miR-448/IDO. Int J. Biol. Macromol.118, 24–30 (2018).
Li, X. et al. Long non-coding RNA MALAT1 promotes proliferation, angiogenesis, and immunosuppressive properties of mesenchymal stem cells by inducing VEGF and IDO. J. Cell Biochem.118, 2780–2791 (2017).
Zhao, X. S. et al. miR-153-3p, a new bio-target, is involved in the pathogenesis of acute graft-versus-host disease via inhibition of indoleamine- 2,3-dioxygenase. Oncotarget7, 48321–48334 (2016).
Maccalli, C., Rasul, K. I., Elawad, M. & Ferrone, S. The role of cancer stem cells in the modulation of anti-tumor immune responses. Semin Cancer Biol.53, 189–200 (2018).
Takebe, N. et al. Targeting Notch, Hedgehog, and Wnt pathways in cancer stem cells: clinical update. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol.12, 445–464 (2015).
Chai, S. et al. Octamer 4/microRNA-1246 signaling axis drives Wnt/beta-catenin activation in liver cancer stem cells. Hepatology64, 2062–2076 (2016).
Fang, G. et al. CircRNA_100290 promotes colorectal cancer progression through miR-516b-induced downregulation of FZD4 expression and Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.504, 184–189 (2018).
Chen, Z. & Duan, X. hsa_circ_0000177-miR-638-FZD7-Wnt signaling cascade contributes to the malignant behaviors in glioma. DNA Cell Biol.37, 791–797 (2018).
Kang, L. et al. MicroRNA-34a suppresses the breast cancer stem cell-like characteristics by downregulating Notch1 pathway. Cancer Sci.106, 700–708 (2015).
Tang, B. et al. MicroRNA-324-5p regulates stemness, pathogenesis and sensitivity to bortezomib in multiple myeloma cells by targeting hedgehog signaling. Int J. Cancer142, 109–120 (2018).
Miller, T. J. et al. Expression of PD-L1 and SOX2 during rectal tumourigenesis: potential mechanisms for immune escape and tumour cell invasion. Oncol. Lett.16, 5761–5768 (2018).
Noh, K. H. et al. Nanog signaling in cancer promotes stem-like phenotype and immune evasion. J. Clin. Invest122, 4077–4093 (2012).
Sun, Z. et al. MicroRNA-34a regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell phenotype of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in vitro. Int J. Oncol.47, 1339–1350 (2015).
Peng, F. et al. H19/let-7/LIN28 reciprocal negative regulatory circuit promotes breast cancer stem cell maintenance. Cell Death Dis.8, e2569 (2017).
Ai, L. et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells endow stem-like qualities to multiple myeloma cells by inducing piRNA-823 expression and DNMT3B activation. Mol. Cancer18, 88 (2019).
Savagner, P. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenomenon. Ann. Oncol.21(Suppl 7), 89–92 (2010).
Lamouille, S., Xu, J. & Derynck, R. Molecular mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.15, 178–196 (2014).
Kudo-Saito, C. Shirako, H. Takeuchi, T. & Kawakami, Y. Cancer metastasis is accelerated through immunosuppression during Snail-induced EMT of cancer cells. Cancer Cell.15, 195–206 (2009).
Dongre, A. et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition contributes to immunosuppression in breast carcinomas. Cancer Res.77, 3982–3989 (2017).
Sanchez-Tillo, E. et al. EMT-activating transcription factors in cancer: beyond EMT and tumor invasiveness. Cell Mol. Life Sci.69, 3429–3456 (2012).
Block, C. J. et al. A stroma-corrected ZEB1 transcriptional signature is inversely associated with antitumor immune activity in breast cancer. Sci. Rep.9, 17807 (2019).
Jaca, A., Govender, P., Locketz, M. & Naidoo, R. The role of miRNA-21 and epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) process in colorectal cancer. J. Clin. Pathol.70, 331–356 (2017).
Dong, P. et al. MiR-137 and miR-34a directly target Snail and inhibit EMT, invasion and sphere-forming ability of ovarian cancer cells. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res.35, 132 (2016).
Wang, Q. et al. The effects and molecular mechanisms of MiR-106a in multidrug resistance reversal in human glioma U87/DDP and U251/G cell lines. PLoS ONE10, e0125473 (2015).
Dong, P. et al. MicroRNA-106b modulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition by targeting TWIST1 in invasive endometrial cancer cell lines. Mol. Carcinog.53, 349–359 (2014).
Peng, F., Zhang, H., Du, Y. & Tan, P. miR-23a promotes cisplatin chemoresistance and protects against cisplatin-induced apoptosis in tongue squamous cell carcinoma cells through Twist. Oncol. Rep.33, 942–950 (2015).
Wu, B. Q. et al. Long noncoding RNA PVT1 promotes EMT and cell proliferation and migration through downregulating p21 in pancreatic cancer cells. Technol Cancer Res. Treat. 16, 819–827 (2017).
Xue, M. et al. Long non-coding RNA urothelial cancer-associated 1 promotes bladder cancer cell migration and invasion by way of the hsa-miR-145-ZEB1/2-FSCN1 pathway. Cancer Sci.107, 18–27 (2016).
Luan, W. et al. circRNA_0084043 promote malignant melanoma progression via miR-153-3p/Snail axis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.502, 22–29 (2018).
Vignali, D. A. A., Collison, L. W., & Workman, C. J. How regulatory T cells work. Nat. Rev. Immunol.8, 523–532 (2008).
Colonna, M. Immunology: an innate regulatory cell. Nature498, 42–43 (2013).
Lu, L. F. et al. Foxp3-dependent microRNA155 confers competitive fitness to regulatory T cells by targeting SOCS1 protein. Immunity30, 80–91 (2009).
Lu, L. F. et al. Function of miR-146a in controlling Treg cell-mediated regulation of Th1 responses. Cell142, 914–929 (2010).
Barron, L. et al. Cutting edge: mechanisms of IL-2-dependent maintenance of functional regulatory T cells. J. Immunol.185, 6426–6430 (2010).
Zhao, J. et al. LncRNA HULC affects the differentiation of Treg in HBV-related liver cirrhosis. Int. Immunopharmacol.28, 901–905 (2015).
Xiong, G., Yang, L., Chen, Y. & Fan, Z. Linc-POU3F3 promotes cell proliferation in gastric cancer via increasing T-reg distribution. Am. J. Transl. Res.7, 2262–2269 (2015).
Parker, K. H. et al. HMGB1 enhances immune suppression by facilitating the differentiation and suppressive activity of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Cancer Res.74, 5723–5733 (2014).
Thevenot, P. T. et al. The stress-response sensor chop regulates the function and accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in tumors. Immunity41, 389–401 (2014).
Highfill, S. L. et al. Disruption of CXCR2-mediated MDSC tumor trafficking enhances anti-PD1 efficacy. Sci. Transl. Med.6, 237ra267 (2014).
Lindau, D. et al. The immunosuppressive tumour network: myeloid-derived suppressor cells, regulatory T cells and natural killer T cells. Immunology138, 105–115 (2013).
Nagaraj, S. et al. Altered recognition of antigen is a mechanism of CD8+ T cell tolerance in cancer. Nat. Med.13, 828–835 (2007).
Zheng, Y. et al. Long noncoding RNA Pvt1 regulates the immunosuppression activity of granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells in tumor-bearing mice. Mol. Cancer18, 61 (2019).
Tian, X. et al. Long non-coding RNA HOXA transcript antisense RNA myeloid-specific 1-HOXA1 axis downregulates the immunosuppressive activity of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in lung cancer. Front Immunol.9, 473 (2018).
Huang, A. et al. miR-34a expands myeloid-derived suppressor cells via apoptosis inhibition. Exp. Cell Res.326, 259–266 (2014).
Tian, J. et al. MicroRNA-9 regulates the differentiation and function of myeloid-derived suppressor cells via targeting Runx1. J. Immunol.195, 1301–1311 (2015).
Wang, J. et al. MicroRNA-155 deficiency enhances the recruitment and functions of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in tumor microenvironment and promotes solid tumor growth. Int. J. Cancer136, E602–E613 (2015).
Ruffell, B. et al. Macrophage IL-10 blocks CD8+ T cell-dependent responses to chemotherapy by suppressing IL-12 expression in intratumoral dendritic cells. Cancer Cell.26, 623–637 (2014).
Alderton, G. K. Resistance: turning macrophages on, off and on again. Nat. Rev. Cancer14, 154–155 (2014).
Tian, Y. et al. MicroRNA-342 inhibits tumor growth via targeting chemokine CXCL12 involved in macrophages recruitment/activation. Genes Cells23, 1009–1022 (2018).
Zhou, Y. X. et al. Long non-coding RNA NIFK-AS1 inhibits M2 polarization of macrophages in endometrial cancer through targeting miR-146a. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.104, 25–33 (2018).
Pardoll, D. M. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer12, 252–264 (2012).
Topalian, S. L., Taube, J. M., Anders, R. A. & Pardoll, D. M. Mechanism-driven biomarkers to guide immune checkpoint blockade in cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer16, 275–287 (2016).
Krummel, M. F. & Allison, J. P. CD28 and CTLA-4 have opposing effects on the response of T cells to stimulation. J. Exp. Med.182, 459–465 (1995).
Parry, R. V. et al. CTLA-4 and PD-1 receptors inhibit T-cell activation by distinct mechanisms. Mol. Cell Biol.25, 9543–9553 (2005).
Schneider, H. et al. CTLA-4 disrupts ZAP70 microcluster formation with reduced T cell/APC dwell times and calcium mobilization. Eur. J. Immunol.38, 40–47 (2008).
Wei, J. et al. MiR-138 exerts anti-glioma efficacy by targeting immune checkpoints. Neuro Oncol.18, 639–648 (2016).
Huffaker, T. B. et al. Antitumor immunity is defective in T cell-specific microRNA-155-deficient mice and is rescued by immune checkpoint blockade. J. Biol. Chem.292, 18530–18541 (2017).
Wainwright, D. A. et al. Durable therapeutic efficacy utilizing combinatorial blockade against IDO, CTLA-4, and PD-L1 in mice with brain tumors. Clin. Cancer Res.20, 5290–5301 (2014).
Alvarez-Argote, J. & Dasanu, C. A. Durvalumab in cancer medicine: a comprehensive review. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther.19, 927–935 (2019).
Horn, L. et al. First-line atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med.379, 2220–2229 (2018).
Eppihimer, M. J. et al. Expression and regulation of the PD-L1 immunoinhibitory molecule on microvascular endothelial cells. Microcirculation9, 133–145 (2002).
Muhlbauer, M. et al. PD-L1 is induced in hepatocytes by viral infection and by interferon-alpha and -gamma and mediates T cell apoptosis. J. Hepatol.45, 520–528 (2006).
Parsa, A. T. et al. Loss of tumor suppressor PTEN function increases B7-H1 expression and immunoresistance in glioma. Nat. Med.13, 84–88 (2007).
Wang, X. et al. Tumor suppressor miR-34a targets PD-L1 and functions as a potential immunotherapeutic target in acute myeloid leukemia. Cell Signal.27, 443–452 (2015).
Zhao, L. et al. The tumor suppressor miR-138-5p targets PD-L1 in colorectal cancer. Oncotarget7, 45370–45384 (2016).
Jia, L. et al. miR-142-5p regulates tumor cell PD-L1 expression and enhances anti-tumor immunity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.488, 425–431 (2017).
Wang, Y. et al. MicroRNA-152 regulates immune response via targeting B7-H1 in gastric carcinoma. Oncotarget8, 28125–28134 (2017).
Chen, L. et al. Metastasis is regulated via microRNA-200/ZEB1 axis control of tumour cell PD-L1 expression and intratumoral immunosuppression. Nat. Commun.5, 5241 (2014).
Xu, S. et al. miR-424(322) reverses chemoresistance via T-cell immune response activation by blocking the PD-L1 immune checkpoint. Nat. Commun.7, 11406 (2016).
Wang, G. et al. Signal transducers and activators of transcription-1 (STAT1) regulates microRNA transcription in interferon gamma-stimulated HeLa cells. PLoS ONE5, e11794 (2010).
Cai, Z., Hao, X. Y. & Liu, F. X. MicroRNA-186 serves as a tumor suppressor in oral squamous cell carcinoma by negatively regulating the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 expression. Arch. Oral. Biol.89, 20–25 (2018).
Gregersen, L. H. et al. MicroRNA-145 targets YES and STAT1 in colon cancer cells. PLoS ONE5, e8836 (2010).
Yu, T. et al. MiRNA-10a is upregulated in NSCLC and may promote cancer by targeting PTEN. Oncotarget6, 30239–30250 (2015).
Chun-Zhi, Z. et al. MicroRNA-221 and microRNA-222 regulate gastric carcinoma cell proliferation and radioresistance by targeting PTEN. BMC Cancer10, 367 (2010).
Xu, C. et al. miRNA-100 inhibits human bladder urothelial carcinogenesis by directly targeting mTOR. Mol. Cancer Ther.12, 207–219 (2013).
Wang, R. T. et al. Decreased expression of miR216a contributes to non-small-cell lung cancer progression. Clin. Cancer Res.20, 4705–4716 (2014).
Zhao, L. et al. LncRNA SNHG14/miR-5590-3p/ZEB1 positive feedback loop promoted diffuse large B cell lymphoma progression and immune evasion through regulating PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint. Cell Death Dis.10, 731 (2019).
Tanaka, E. et al. Expression of circular RNA CDR1AS in colon cancer cells increases cell surface PDL1 protein levels. Oncol. Rep.42, 1459–1466 (2019).
Kathuria, H. et al. NKX2-1-AS1 negatively regulates CD274/PD-L1, cell-cell interaction genes, and limits human lung carcinoma cell migration. Sci. Rep.8, 14418 (2018).
Agata, Y. et al. Expression of the PD-1 antigen on the surface of stimulated mouse T and B lymphocytes. Int Immunol.8, 765–772 (1996).
Patsoukis, N. et al. Selective effects of PD-1 on Akt and Ras pathways regulate molecular components of the cell cycle and inhibit T cell proliferation. Sci. Signal.5, ra46 (2012).
Hofmeyer, K. A., Jeon, H. & Zang, X. The PD-1/PD-L1 (B7-H1) pathway in chronic infection-induced cytotoxic T lymphocyte exhaustion. J. Biomed. Biotechnol.2011, 451694 (2011).
Patsoukis, N. et al. PD-1 increases PTEN phosphatase activity while decreasing PTEN protein stability by inhibiting casein kinase 2. Mol. Cell Biol.33, 3091–3098 (2013).
Li, Q. et al. miR-28 modulates exhaustive differentiation of T cells through silencing programmed cell death-1 and regulating cytokine secretion. Oncotarget7, 53735–53750 (2016).
Zhang, G. et al. microRNA-4717 differentially interacts with its polymorphic target in the PD1 3’ untranslated region: a mechanism for regulating PD-1 expression and function in HBV-associated liver diseases. Oncotarget6, 18933–18944 (2015).
Tang, Y. et al. Co-expression of AFAP1-AS1 and PD-1 predicts poor prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncotarget8, 39001–39011 (2017).
Das, M., Zhu, C. & Kuchroo, V. K. Tim-3 and its role in regulating anti-tumor immunity. Immunol. Rev.276, 97–111 (2017).
Fourcade, J. et al. Upregulation of Tim-3 and PD-1 expression is associated with tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cell dysfunction in melanoma patients. J. Exp. Med.207, 2175–2186 (2010).
Ji, J. et al. Long non-coding RNA Lnc-Tim3 exacerbates CD8 T cell exhaustion via binding to Tim-3 and inducing nuclear translocation of Bat3 in HCC. Cell Death Dis.9, 478 (2018).
Watanabe, N. et al. BTLA is a lymphocyte inhibitory receptor with similarities to CTLA-4 and PD-1. Nat. Immunol.4, 670–679 (2003).
Liu, Y. et al. B and T lymphocyte attenuator is a target of miR-155 during naive CD4+ T cell activation. Iran. J. Immunol.13, 89–99 (2016).
Batlle, E. & Massague, J. Transforming growth factor-beta signaling in immunity and cancer. Immunity50, 924–940 (2019).
Li, Z. et al. Tumor-derived transforming growth factor-beta is critical for tumor progression and evasion from immune surveillance. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev.15, 5181–5186 (2014).
Yu, J. et al. Pro- and antiinflammatory cytokine signaling: reciprocal antagonism regulates interferon-gamma production by human natural killer cells. Immunity24, 575–590 (2006).
Laouar, Y., Sutterwala, F. S., Gorelik, L. & Flavell, R. A. Transforming growth factor-beta controls T helper type 1 cell development through regulation of natural killer cell interferon-gamma. Nat. Immunol.6, 600–607 (2005).
Nandan, D. & Reiner, N. E. TGF-beta attenuates the class II transactivator and reveals an accessory pathway of IFN-gamma action. J. Immunol.158, 1095–1101 (1997).
Gorelik, L., Constant, S. & Flavell, R. A. Mechanism of transforming growth factor beta-induced inhibition of T helper type 1 differentiation. J. Exp. Med.195, 1499–1505 (2002).
Brabletz, T. et al. Transforming growth factor beta and cyclosporin A inhibit the inducible activity of the interleukin-2 gene in T cells through a noncanonical octamer-binding site. Mol. Cell Biol.13, 1155–1162 (1993).
Thomas, D. A. & Massague, J. TGF-beta directly targets cytotoxic T cell functions during tumor evasion of immune surveillance. Cancer Cell.8, 369–380 (2005).
Chen, W. et al. Conversion of peripheral CD4+CD25- naive T cells to CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells by TGF-beta induction of transcription factor Foxp3. J. Exp. Med.198, 1875–1886 (2003).
Xu, J., Lamouille, S. & Derynck, R. TGF-beta-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Cell Res.19, 156–172 (2009).
Dimeloe, S. et al. Tumor-derived TGF-beta inhibits mitochondrial respiration to suppress IFN-gamma production by human CD4(+) T cells. Sci Signal. 12, eaav3334 (2019).
Chen, X. B., Li, W. & Chu, A. X. MicroRNA-133a inhibits gastric cancer cells growth, migration, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition process by targeting presenilin 1. J. Cell Biochem.120, 470–480 (2019).
Zhou, B. & Yu, J. W. A novel identified circular RNA, circRNA_010567, promotes myocardial fibrosis via suppressing miR-141 by targeting TGF-beta1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.487, 769–775 (2017).
Chen, D. et al. ANRIL inhibits p15(INK4b) through the TGFbeta1 signaling pathway in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Immunol.289, 91–96 (2014).
Tang, J. et al. A novel biomarker Linc00974 interacting with KRT19 promotes proliferation and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Dis.5, e1549 (2014).
Tzur, G. et al. Comprehensive gene and microRNA expression profiling reveals a role for microRNAs in human liver development. PLoS ONE4, e7511 (2009).
Braun, J., Hoang-Vu, C., Dralle, H. & Huttelmaier, S. Downregulation of microRNAs directs the EMT and invasive potential of anaplastic thyroid carcinomas. Oncogene29, 4237–4244 (2010).
Wang, H. et al. miR-106b aberrantly expressed in a double transgenic mouse model for Alzheimer’s disease targets TGF-beta type II receptor. Brain Res.1357, 166–174 (2010).
Korpal, M. & Kang, Y. Targeting the transforming growth factor-beta signalling pathway in metastatic cancer. Eur. J. Cancer46, 1232–1240 (2010).
Wang, F. E. et al. MicroRNA-204/211 alters epithelial physiology. FASEB J.24, 1552–1571 (2010).
Volinia, S. et al. A microRNA expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer gene targets. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA103, 2257–2261 (2006).
Pan, Q., Luo, X. & Chegini, N. microRNA 21: response to hormonal therapies and regulatory function in leiomyoma, transformed leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma cells. Mol. Hum. Reprod.16, 215–227 (2010).
Shan, H. et al. Downregulation of miR-133 and miR-590 contributes to nicotine-induced atrial remodelling in canines. Cardiovasc. Res.83, 465–472 (2009).
Chen, K., Zhu, H., Zheng, M. Q. & Dong, Q. R. LncRNA MEG3 Inhibits the degradation of the extracellular matrix of chondrocytes in osteoarthritis via targeting miR-93/TGFBR2 axis. Cartilage https://doi.org/10.1177/1947603519855759 (2019).
Louafi, F., Martinez-Nunez, R. T. & Sanchez-Elsner, T. MicroRNA-155 targets SMAD2 and modulates the response of macrophages to transforming growth factor-{beta}. J. Biol. Chem.285, 41328–41336 (2010).
Pais, H. et al. Analyzing mRNA expression identifies Smad3 as a microRNA-140 target regulated only at protein level. RNA16, 489–494 (2010).
Takahashi, Y. et al. Amplification of PVT-1 is involved in poor prognosis via apoptosis inhibition in colorectal cancers. Br. J. Cancer110, 164–171 (2014).
Liu, Q., Liu, S. & Wang, D. Overexpression of microRNA-21 decreased the sensitivity of advanced cervical cancer to chemoradiotherapy through SMAD7. Anticancer Drugs 31, 272–281 (2019).
Hunter, C. A. & Jones, S. A. IL-6 as a keystone cytokine in health and disease. Nat. Immunol.16, 448–457 (2015).
Liu, Q. et al. Targeting interlukin-6 to relieve immunosuppression in tumor microenvironment. Tumour Biol.39, 1010428317712445 (2017).
Wang, H. et al. Targeting interleukin 6 signaling suppresses glioma stem cell survival and tumor growth. Stem Cells27, 2393–2404 (2009).
Sansone, P. et al. IL-6 triggers malignant features in mammospheres from human ductal breast carcinoma and normal mammary gland. J. Clin. Invest.117, 3988–4002 (2007).
Cheng, G. Z. et al. Twist is transcriptionally induced by activation of STAT3 and mediates STAT3 oncogenic function. J. Biol. Chem.283, 14665–14673 (2008).
Zhang, M. et al. The microRNA miR-33a suppresses IL-6-induced tumor progression by binding Twist in gallbladder cancer. Oncotarget7, 78640–78652 (2016).
Yang, Y. et al. MicroRNA-218 functions as a tumor suppressor in lung cancer by targeting IL-6/STAT3 and negatively correlates with poor prognosis. Mol. Cancer16, 141 (2017).
Park, Y. & Kim, J. Regulation of IL-6 signaling by miR-125a and let-7e in endothelial cells controls vasculogenic mimicry formation of breast cancer cells. BMB Rep.52, 214–219 (2019).
Weng, Y. S. et al. MCT-1/miR-34a/IL-6/IL-6R signaling axis promotes EMT progression, cancer stemness and M2 macrophage polarization in triple-negative breast cancer. Mol. Cancer18, 42 (2019).
Zhang, J., Wang, C. & Xu, H. miR-217 suppresses proliferation and promotes apoptosis in cardiac myxoma by targeting Interleukin-6. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.490, 713–718 (2017).
Yang, X. et al. MicroRNA-26a suppresses tumor growth and metastasis of human hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting interleukin-6-Stat3 pathway. Hepatology58, 158–170 (2013).
Li, F. et al. miR-98 suppresses melanoma metastasis through a negative feedback loop with its target gene IL-6. Exp. Mol. Med.46, e116 (2014).
Zhang, J. et al. Down-regulation of microRNA-9 leads to activation of IL-6/Jak/STAT3 pathway through directly targeting IL-6 in HeLa cell. Mol. Carcinog.55, 732–742 (2016).
Shang, A. et al. Long non-coding RNA HOTTIP enhances IL-6 expression to potentiate immune escape of ovarian cancer cells by upregulating the expression of PD-L1 in neutrophils. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res.38, 411 (2019).
Kong, Y. G. et al. LncRNA-LINC00460 facilitates nasopharyngeal carcinoma tumorigenesis through sponging miR-149-5p to up-regulate IL6. Gene639, 77–84 (2018).
Su, K. et al. A novel positive feedback regulation between long noncoding RNA UICC and IL-6/STAT3 signaling promotes cervical cancer progression. Am. J. Cancer Res.8, 1176–1189 (2018).
Chaluvally-Raghavan, P. et al. Direct upregulation of STAT3 by MicroRNA-551b-3p deregulates growth and metastasis of ovarian cancer. Cell Rep.15, 1493–1504 (2016).
Wu, W. et al. MicroRNA-18a modulates STAT3 activity through negative regulation of PIAS3 during gastric adenocarcinogenesis. Br. J. Cancer108, 653–661 (2013).
Liu, S. et al. A microRNA 221- and 222-mediated feedback loop maintains constitutive activation of NFkappaB and STAT3 in colorectal cancer cells. Gastroenterology147, 847–859 e811 (2014).
Che, S. et al. miR-30 overexpression promotes glioma stem cells by regulating Jak/STAT3 signaling pathway. Tumour Biol.36, 6805–6811 (2015).
Wang, D. W., You, D., Dong, J. & Liu, T. F. Knockdown of long non-coding RNA LINC00518 inhibits cervical cancer proliferation and metastasis by modulating JAK/STAT3 signaling. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharm. Sci.23, 496–506 (2019).
Xue, J. et al. LncRNA AB073614 induces epithelial- mesenchymal transition of colorectal cancer cells via regulating the JAK/STAT3 pathway. Cancer Biomark.21, 849–858 (2018).
Wu, Y. et al. Long noncoding RNA HOST2 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition, proliferation, invasion and migration of hepatocellular carcinoma cells by activating the JAK2-STAT3 Signaling Pathway. Cell Physiol. Biochem.51, 301–314 (2018).
Edwards, J. P., Zhang, X., Frauwirth, K. A. & Mosser, D. M. Biochemical and functional characterization of three activated macrophage populations. J. Leukoc. Biol.80, 1298–1307 (2006).
Huang, S., Ullrich, S. E. & Bar-Eli, M. Regulation of tumor growth and metastasis by interleukin-10: the melanoma experience. J. Interferon Cytokine Res.19, 697–703 (1999).
Li, C. et al. TLR4 signaling pathway in mouse Lewis lung cancer cells promotes the expression of TGF-beta1 and IL-10 and tumor cells migration. Biomed. Mater. Eng.24, 869–875 (2014).
Wang, X. et al. Bladder cancer cells induce immunosuppression of T cells by supporting PD-L1 expression in tumour macrophages partially through interleukin 10. Cell Biol. Int41, 177–186 (2017).
Mannino, M. H. et al. The paradoxical role of IL-10 in immunity and cancer. Cancer Lett.367, 103–107 (2015).
Steinbrink, K. et al. Interleukin-10-treated human dendritic cells induce a melanoma-antigen-specific anergy in CD8(+) T cells resulting in a failure to lyse tumor cells. Blood93, 1634–1642 (1999).
Adris, S. et al. IL-10 expression by CT26 colon carcinoma cells inhibits their malignant phenotype and induces a T cell-mediated tumor rejection in the context of a systemic Th2 response. Gene Ther.6, 1705–1712 (1999).
Akdis, C. A. & Blaser, K. Mechanisms of interleukin-10-mediated immune suppression. Immunology103, 131–136 (2001).
Lo, H. W. et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor cooperates with signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 to induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer cells via up-regulation of TWIST gene expression. Cancer Res.67, 9066–9076 (2007).
Li, L. et al. MiR-98 suppresses the effects of tumor-associated macrophages on promoting migration and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells by regulating IL-10. Biochimie150, 23–30 (2018).
Zhang, S. et al. Primary laryngeal cancer-derived miR-193b induces interleukin-10-expression monocytes. Cancer Invest.33, 29–33 (2015).
Harris-Arnold, A. et al. Epstein-Barr virus modulates host cell microRNA-194 to promote IL-10 production and B lymphoma cell survival. Am. J. Transpl.15, 2814–2824 (2015).
Liu, J. et al. Long non-coding RNA CCAT1/miR-148a/PKCzeta prevents cell migration of prostate cancer by altering macrophage polarization. Prostate79, 105–112 (2019).
Ferrara, N. Vascular endothelial growth factor: basic science and clinical progress. Endocr. Rev.25, 581–611 (2004).
Lapeyre-Prost, A. et al. Immunomodulatory Activity of VEGF in Cancer. Int Rev. Cell Mol. Biol.330, 295–342 (2017).
Hansen, W. et al. Neuropilin 1 deficiency on CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells impairs mouse melanoma growth. J. Exp. Med.209, 2001–2016 (2012).
Cheng, J. et al. Downregulation of miRNA-638 promotes angiogenesis and growth of hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting VEGF. Oncotarget7, 30702–30711 (2016).
Zhou, B. et al. MicroRNA-503 targets FGF2 and VEGFA and inhibits tumor angiogenesis and growth. Cancer Lett.333, 159–169 (2013).
Yan, J. J. et al. MiR-497 suppresses angiogenesis and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by inhibiting VEGFA and AEG-1. Oncotarget6, 29527–29542 (2015).
Zhu, X. et al. miR-203 suppresses tumor growth and angiogenesis by targeting VEGFA in cervical cancer. Cell Physiol. Biochem.32, 64–73 (2013).
Choi, Y. C. et al. Regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor signaling by miR-200b. Mol. Cells32, 77–82 (2011).
Wang, R. et al. MicroRNA-195 suppresses angiogenesis and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by inhibiting the expression of VEGF, VAV2, and CDC42. Hepatology58, 642–653 (2013).
Hao, Y. et al. The synergistic regulation of VEGF-mediated angiogenesis through miR-190 and target genes. RNA20, 1328–1336 (2014).
Liu, B. et al. MiR-126 restoration down-regulate VEGF and inhibit the growth of lung cancer cell lines in vitro and in vivo. Lung Cancer66, 169–175 (2009).
Sasahira, T. et al. Downregulation of miR-126 induces angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis by activation of VEGF-A in oral cancer. Br. J. Cancer107, 700–706 (2012).
Li, F. et al. Role of microRNA-93 in regulation of angiogenesis. Tumour Biol.35, 10609–10613 (2014).
Long, J. et al. Identification of microRNA-93 as a novel regulator of vascular endothelial growth factor in hyperglycemic conditions. J. Biol. Chem.285, 23457–23465 (2010).
Chou, J. et al. GATA3 suppresses metastasis and modulates the tumour microenvironment by regulating microRNA-29b expression. Nat. Cell Biol.15, 201–213 (2013).
Lei, Z. et al. Regulation of HIF-1alpha and VEGF by miR-20b tunes tumor cells to adapt to the alteration of oxygen concentration. PLoS ONE4, e7629 (2009).
Chen, S. et al. LncRNA TDRG1 enhances tumorigenicity in endometrial carcinoma by binding and targeting VEGF-A protein. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis.1864, 3013–3021 (2018).
Fu, W. M. et al. Long noncoding RNA Hotair mediated angiogenesis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by direct and indirect signaling pathways. Oncotarget7, 4712–4723 (2016).
Yamakuchi, M. et al. P53-induced microRNA-107 inhibits HIF-1 and tumor angiogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA107, 6334–6339 (2010).
Cha, S. T. et al. MicroRNA-519c suppresses hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha expression and tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Res.70, 2675–2685 (2010).
Chai, Z. T. et al. MicroRNA-26a inhibits angiogenesis by down-regulating VEGFA through the PIK3C2alpha/Akt/HIF-1alpha pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS ONE8, e77957 (2013).
Yin, Y. et al. Downregulation of miR-145 associated with cancer progression and VEGF transcriptional activation by targeting N-RAS and IRS1. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1829, 239–247 (2013).
Hou, J. et al. Long noncoding RNA H19 upregulates vascular endothelial growth factor A to enhance mesenchymal stem cells survival and angiogenic capacity by inhibiting miR-199a-5p. Stem Cell Res. Ther.9, 109 (2018).
Li, Y. et al. Long non-coding RNA growth arrest specific transcript 5 acts as a tumour suppressor in colorectal cancer by inhibiting interleukin-10 and vascular endothelial growth factor expression. Oncotarget8, 13690–13702 (2017).
Sato-Kuwabara, Y., Melo, S. A., Soares, F. A. & Calin, G. A. The fusion of two worlds: non-coding RNAs and extracellular vesicles–diagnostic and therapeutic implications (Review). Int. J. Oncol.46, 17–27 (2015).
Liu, J. et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress causes liver cancer cells to release exosomal miR-23a-3p and up-regulate programmed death ligand 1 expression in macrophages. Hepatology70, 241–258 (2019).
Berchem, G. et al. Hypoxic tumor-derived microvesicles negatively regulate NK cell function by a mechanism involving TGF-beta and miR23a transfer. Oncoimmunology5, e1062968 (2016).
Ye, S. B. et al. Tumor-derived exosomes promote tumor progression and T-cell dysfunction through the regulation of enriched exosomal microRNAs in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncotarget5, 5439–5452 (2014).
Walsh, P. T. et al. PTEN inhibits IL-2 receptor-mediated expansion of CD4+ CD25+ Tregs. J. Clin. Invest.116, 2521–2531 (2006).
Pan, L. et al. Exosomes-mediated transfer of long noncoding RNA ZFAS1 promotes gastric cancer progression. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol.143, 991–1004 (2017).
Xue, M. et al. Hypoxic exosomes facilitate bladder tumor growth and development through transferring long non-coding RNA-UCA1. Mol. Cancer16, 143 (2017).
Zhang, R. et al. Serum long non coding RNA MALAT-1 protected by exosomes is up-regulated and promotes cell proliferation and migration in non-small cell lung cancer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.490, 406–414 (2017).
Shah, M. Y. et al. microRNA therapeutics in cancer—an emerging concept. EBioMedicine12, 34–42 (2016).
Smolle, M. A., Calin, H. N., Pichler, M. & Calin, G. A. Noncoding RNAs and immune checkpoints-clinical implications as cancer therapeutics. FEBS J.284, 1952–1966 (2017).
Barata, P., Sood, A. K. & Hong, D. S. RNA-targeted therapeutics in cancer clinical trials: Current status and future directions. Cancer Treat. Rev.50, 35–47 (2016).
Bakhtiyari, S., Haghani, K., Basati, G. & Karimfar, M. H. siRNA therapeutics in the treatment of diseases. Ther. Deliv.4, 45–57 (2013).
Hsu, S. H. et al. Cationic lipid nanoparticles for therapeutic delivery of siRNA and miRNA to murine liver tumor. Nanomedicine9, 1169–1180 (2013).
Cui, C. et al. Long noncoding RNA HEIH promotes colorectal cancer tumorigenesis via counteracting miR-939Mediated transcriptional repression of Bcl-xL. Cancer Res. Treat.50, 992–1008 (2018).
Chen, J. et al. The long noncoding RNA ASNR regulates degradation of Bcl-2 mRNA through its interaction with AUF1. Sci. Rep.6, 32189 (2016).
Deng, J. et al. Long non-coding RNA OIP5-AS1 functions as an oncogene in lung adenocarcinoma through targeting miR-448/Bcl-2. Biomed. Pharmacother.98, 102–110 (2018).
Gao, J. et al. MiR-26a inhibits proliferation and migration of breast cancer through repression of MCL-1. PLoS ONE8, e65138 (2013).
Long, J. et al. miR-193b modulates resistance to doxorubicin in human breast cancer cells by downregulating MCL-1. Biomed. Res. Int.2015, 373574 (2015).
Zhang, R. et al. MiR-363 sensitizes cisplatin-induced apoptosis targeting in Mcl-1 in breast cancer. Med. Oncol.31, 347 (2014).
Liu, X. et al. MicroRNA-101 inhibits cell progression and increases paclitaxel sensitivity by suppressing MCL-1 expression in human triple-negative breast cancer. Oncotarget6, 20070–20083 (2015).
Desjobert, C. et al. MiR-29a down-regulation in ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphomas contributes to apoptosis blockade through MCL-1 overexpression. Blood117, 6627–6637 (2011).
Zhang, Y. K. et al. Overexpression of microRNA-29b induces apoptosis of multiple myeloma cells through down regulating Mcl-1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.414, 233–239 (2011).
Rao, Y. M., Shi, H. R., Ji, M. & Chen, C. H. MiR-106a targets Mcl-1 to suppress cisplatin resistance of ovarian cancer A2780 cells. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. Med. Sci.33, 567–572 (2013).
Lu, F. et al. miR-181b increases drug sensitivity in acute myeloid leukemia via targeting HMGB1 and Mcl-1. Int J. Oncol.45, 383–392 (2014).
Cai, D. et al. MicroRNA-302b enhances the sensitivity of hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines to 5-FU via targeting Mcl-1 and DPYD. Int J. Mol. Sci.16, 23668–23682 (2015).
Zhang, T. et al. Down-regulation of miR-320 associated with cancer progression and cell apoptosis via targeting Mcl-1 in cervical cancer. Tumour Biol.37, 8931–8940 (2016).
Tong, Z. et al. miR-125a-5p inhibits cell proliferation and induces apoptosis in colon cancer via targeting BCL2, BCL2L12 and MCL1. Biomed. Pharmacother.75, 129–136 (2015).
Zarogoulidis, P. et al. MiR-205 and miR-218 expression is associated with carboplatin chemoresistance and regulation of apoptosis via Mcl-1 and Survivin in lung cancer cells. Cell Signal.27, 1576–1588 (2015).
Crawford, M. et al. MicroRNA 133B targets pro-survival molecules MCL-1 and BCL2L2 in lung cancer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.388, 483–489 (2009).
Patron, J. P. et al. MiR-133b targets antiapoptotic genes and enhances death receptor-induced apoptosis. PLoS ONE7, e35345 (2012).
Liu, N. et al. miR-942 decreases TRAIL-induced apoptosis through ISG12a downregulation and is regulated by AKT. Oncotarget5, 4959–4971 (2014).
Garofalo, M. et al. MicroRNA signatures of TRAIL resistance in human non-small cell lung cancer. Oncogene27, 3845–3855 (2008).
Incoronato, M. et al. miR-212 increases tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand sensitivity in non-small cell lung cancer by targeting the antiapoptotic protein PED. Cancer Res.70, 3638–3646 (2010).
Acunzo, M. et al. miR-130a targets MET and induces TRAIL-sensitivity in NSCLC by downregulating miR-221 and 222. Oncogene31, 634–642 (2012).
Ovcharenko, D. et al. Genome-scale microRNA and small interfering RNA screens identify small RNA modulators of TRAIL-induced apoptosis pathway. Cancer Res.67, 10782–10788 (2007).
Schickel, R., Park, S. M., Murmann, A. E. & Peter, M. E. miR-200c regulates induction of apoptosis through CD95 by targeting FAP-1. Mol. Cell.38, 908–915 (2010).
Wang, P. et al. The serum miR-21 level serves as a predictor for the chemosensitivity of advanced pancreatic cancer, and miR-21 expression confers chemoresistance by targeting FasL. Mol. Oncol.7, 334–345 (2013).
Huang, G. et al. miR-20a encoded by the miR-17-92 cluster increases the metastatic potential of osteosarcoma cells by regulating Fas expression. Cancer Res.72, 908–916 (2012).
Yamada, N. et al. Epigenetic regulation of microRNA-128a expression contributes to the apoptosis-resistance of human T-cell leukaemia jurkat cells by modulating expression of fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD). Biochim. Biophys. Acta1843, 590–602 (2014).
Kim, T. D. et al. Human microRNA-27a* targets Prf1 and GzmB expression to regulate NK-cell cytotoxicity. Blood118, 5476–5486 (2011).
King, B. C. et al. CD46 activation regulates miR-150-mediated control of GLUT1 expression and cytokine secretion in human CD4+ T cells. J. Immunol.196, 1636–1645 (2016).
Li, P. et al. MicroRNA-218 increases the sensitivity of bladder cancer to cisplatin by targeting Glut1. Cell Physiol. Biochem.41, 921–932 (2017).
Guo, H. et al. miRNA-451 inhibits glioma cell proliferation and invasion by downregulating glucose transporter 1. Tumour Biol.37, 13751–13761 (2016).
Trakooljul, N., Hicks, J. A. & Liu, H. C. Identification of target genes and pathways associated with chicken microRNA miR-143. Anim. Genet.41, 357–364 (2010).
Dai, D. W. et al. Decreased miR-106a inhibits glioma cell glucose uptake and proliferation by targeting SLC2A3 in GBM. BMC Cancer13, 478 (2013).
Lauer, V. et al. Hypoxia drives glucose transporter 3 expression through HIF-mediated induction of the long non-coding RNA NICI. J. Biol. Chem. 295, 4065–4078 (2019).
Lu, H., Buchan, R. J. & Cook, S. A. MicroRNA-223 regulates Glut4 expression and cardiomyocyte glucose metabolism. Cardiovasc. Res.86, 410–420 (2010).
Karolina, D. S. et al. MicroRNA 144 impairs insulin signaling by inhibiting the expression of insulin receptor substrate 1 in type 2 diabetes mellitus. PLoS ONE6, e22839 (2011).
Chen, Y. H. et al. miRNA-93 inhibits GLUT4 and is overexpressed in adipose tissue of polycystic ovary syndrome patients and women with insulin resistance. Diabetes62, 2278–2286 (2013).
Zhou, T. et al. Regulation of insulin resistance by multiple MiRNAs via targeting the GLUT4 signalling pathway. Cell Physiol. Biochem.38, 2063–2078 (2016).
Zhao, S. et al. miR-143 inhibits glycolysis and depletes stemness of glioblastoma stem-like cells. Cancer Lett.333, 253–260 (2013).
Jiang, J. X. et al. Overexpression of microRNA-125b sensitizes human hepatocellular carcinoma cells to 5-fluorouracil through inhibition of glycolysis by targeting hexokinase II. Mol. Med. Rep.10, 995–1002 (2014).
Song, J. et al. Long non-coding RNA PVT1 promotes glycolysis and tumor progression by regulating miR-497/HK2 axis in osteosarcoma. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.490, 217–224 (2017).
Li, W. et al. Astragalin reduces hexokinase 2 through Increasing miR-125b to Inhibit the proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo. J. Agric. Food Chem.65, 5961–5972 (2017).
Tao, T. et al. Involvement of EZH2 in aerobic glycolysis of prostate cancer through miR-181b/HK2 axis. Oncol. Rep.37, 1430–1436 (2017).
Zhu, W. et al. MicroRNA-98 suppress warburg effect by targeting HK2 in colon cancer cells. Dig. Dis. Sci.62, 660–668 (2017).
Qin, Y., Cheng, C., Lu, H. & Wang, Y. miR-4458 suppresses glycolysis and lactate production by directly targeting hexokinase2 in colon cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.469, 37–43 (2016).
Lan, H. et al. [miR-181c inhibits glycolysis by targeting hexokinase 2 in cancer-associated fibroblasts]. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao35, 1619–1623 (2015).
Kim, H. R. et al. p53 regulates glucose metabolism by miR-34a. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.437, 225–231 (2013).
Rengaraj, D. et al. Regulation of glucose phosphate isomerase by the 3'UTR-specific miRNAs miR-302b and miR-17-5p in chicken primordial germ cells. Biol. Reprod.89, 33 (2013).
Ahmad, A. et al. Phosphoglucose isomerase/autocrine motility factor mediates epithelial-mesenchymal transition regulated by miR-200 in breast cancer cells. Cancer Res.71, 3400–3409 (2011).
Park, Y. Y. et al. Tat-activating regulatory DNA-binding protein regulates glycolysis in hepatocellular carcinoma by regulating the platelet isoform of phosphofructokinase through microRNA 520. Hepatology58, 182–191 (2013).
Tang, H. et al. Oxidative stress-responsive microRNA-320 regulates glycolysis in diverse biological systems. FASEB J.26, 4710–4721 (2012).
White, N. M. et al. Dysregulation of kallikrein-related peptidases in renal cell carcinoma: potential targets of miRNAs. Biol. Chem.391, 411–423 (2010).
Du, J. Y., Wang, L. F., Wang, Q. & Yu, L. D. miR-26b inhibits proliferation, migration, invasion and apoptosis induction via the downregulation of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase-3 driven glycolysis in osteosarcoma cells. Oncol. Rep.33, 1890–1898 (2015).
Seliger, B. et al. Linkage of microRNA and proteome-based profiling data sets: a perspective for the priorization of candidate biomarkers in renal cell carcinoma? J. Proteome Res.10, 191–199 (2011).
Ge, X. et al. Overexpression of miR-206 suppresses glycolysis, proliferation and migration in breast cancer cells via PFKFB3 targeting. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.463, 1115–1121 (2015).
Savarimuthu Francis, S. M. et al. MicroRNA-34c is associated with emphysema severity and modulates SERPINE1 expression. BMC Genomics.15, 88 (2014).
Calin, G. A. et al. MiR-15a and miR-16-1 cluster functions in human leukemia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA105, 5166–5171 (2008).
Boesch-Saadatmandi, C., Wagner, A. E., Wolffram, S. & Rimbach, G. Effect of quercetin on inflammatory gene expression in mice liver in vivo—role of redox factor 1, miRNA-122 and miRNA-125b. Pharm. Res.65, 523–530 (2012).
Nana-Sinkam, S. P. & Croce, C. M. MicroRNA regulation of tumorigenesis, cancer progression and interpatient heterogeneity: towards clinical use. Genome Biol.15, 445 (2014).
Sikand, K., Singh, J., Ebron, J. S. & Shukla, G. C. Housekeeping gene selection advisory: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and beta-actin are targets of miR-644a. PLoS ONE7, e47510 (2012).
White, N. M. et al. Identification and validation of dysregulated metabolic pathways in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Tumour Biol.35, 1833–1846 (2014).
Li, Y. et al. Epigenetic deregulation of miR-29a and miR-1256 by isoflavone contributes to the inhibition of prostate cancer cell growth and invasion. Epigenetics7, 940–949 (2012).
Muniyappa, M. K. et al. MiRNA-29a regulates the expression of numerous proteins and reduces the invasiveness and proliferation of human carcinoma cell lines. Eur. J. Cancer45, 3104–3118 (2009).
Leder, A. et al. Micron-sized iron oxide-containing particles for microRNA-targeted manipulation and MRI-based tracking of transplanted cells. Biomaterials51, 129–137 (2015).
Ramirez, C. M. et al. MicroRNA 33 regulates glucose metabolism. Mol. Cell Biol.33, 2891–2902 (2013).
Wong, T. S. et al. Identification of pyruvate kinase type M2 as potential oncoprotein in squamous cell carcinoma of tongue through microRNA profiling. Int J. Cancer123, 251–257 (2008).
Li, W. et al. Insulin promotes glucose consumption via regulation of miR-99a/mTOR/PKM2 pathway. PLoS ONE8, e64924 (2013).
Tao, T. et al. Loss of SNAIL inhibits cellular growth and metabolism through the miR-128-mediated RPS6KB1/HIF-1alpha/PKM2 signaling pathway in prostate cancer cells. Tumour Biol.35, 8543–8550 (2014).
Saumet, A. et al. Estrogen and retinoic acid antagonistically regulate several microRNA genes to control aerobic glycolysis in breast cancer cells. Mol. Biosyst.8, 3242–3253 (2012).
Kaller, M. et al. Genome-wide characterization of miR-34a induced changes in protein and mRNA expression by a combined pulsed SILAC and microarray analysis. Mol. Cell Proteom.10, M111 010462 (2011).
Zhang, Y., Liu, G. & Gao, X. Attenuation of miR-34a protects cardiomyocytes against hypoxic stress through maintenance of glycolysis. Biosci Rep. 37, BSR20170925 (2017).
Li, L. et al. miR-30a-5p suppresses breast tumor growth and metastasis through inhibition of LDHA-mediated Warburg effect. Cancer Lett.400, 89–98 (2017).
Han, R. L. et al. miR-383 inhibits ovarian cancer cell proliferation, invasion and aerobic glycolysis by targeting LDHA. Neoplasma64, 244–252 (2017).
Zhang, R. et al. HPV E6/p53 mediated down-regulation of miR-34a inhibits Warburg effect through targeting LDHA in cervical cancer. Am. J. Cancer Res.6, 312–320 (2016).
Chen, H. et al. Long non-coding RNA CRYBG3 regulates glycolysis of lung cancer cells by interacting with lactate dehydrogenase A. J. Cancer9, 2580–2588 (2018).
Kulshreshtha, R. et al. A microRNA signature of hypoxia. Mol. Cell Biol.27, 1859–1867 (2007).
Meng, S. et al. MicroRNA 107 partly inhibits endothelial progenitor cells differentiation via HIF-1beta. PLoS ONE7, e40323 (2012).
Song, T. et al. MiR-138 suppresses expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha (HIF-1alpha) in clear cell renal cell carcinoma 786-O cells. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev.12, 1307–1311 (2011).
Yeh, Y. M., Chuang, C. M., Chao, K. C. & Wang, L. H. MicroRNA-138 suppresses ovarian cancer cell invasion and metastasis by targeting SOX4 and HIF-1alpha. Int J. Cancer133, 867–878 (2013).
Bertozzi, D. et al. The natural inhibitor of DNA topoisomerase I, camptothecin, modulates HIF-1alpha activity by changing miR expression patterns in human cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Ther.13, 239–248 (2014).
Hua, Z. et al. MiRNA-directed regulation of VEGF and other angiogenic factors under hypoxia. PLoS ONE1, e116 (2006).
Hebert, C. et al. High mobility group A2 is a target for miRNA-98 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Mol. Cancer6, 5 (2007).
Bai, R. et al. MicroRNA-195 induced apoptosis in hypoxic chondrocytes by targeting hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha. Eur. Rev. Med Pharm. Sci.19, 545–551 (2015).
Liu, L. Z. et al. MiR-21 induced angiogenesis through AKT and ERK activation and HIF-1alpha expression. PLoS ONE6, e19139 (2011).
Wen, X. et al. Long non-coding RNA DANCR stabilizes HIF-1alpha and promotes metastasis by interacting with NF90/NF45 complex in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Theranostics8, 5676–5689 (2018).
Asadzadeh, Z. et al. microRNAs in cancer stem cells: Biology, pathways, and therapeutic opportunities. J. Cell Physiol.234, 10002–10017 (2019).
Taipaleenmaki, H. et al. Antagonizing miR-218-5p attenuates Wnt signaling and reduces metastatic bone disease of triple negative breast cancer cells. Oncotarget7, 79032–79046 (2016).
Song, X. L. et al. miR-1301-3p promotes prostate cancer stem cell expansion by targeting SFRP1 and GSK3beta. Biomed. Pharmacother.99, 369–374 (2018).
Jiang, C. et al. miR-217 targeting DKK1 promotes cancer stem cell properties via activation of the Wnt signaling pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol. Rep.38, 2351–2359 (2017).
Yao, Y., Hua, Q. & Zhou, Y. CircRNA has_circ_0006427 suppresses the progression of lung adenocarcinoma by regulating miR-6783-3p/DKK1 axis and inactivating Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.508, 37–45 (2019).
Jin, Y. et al. Circular RNA hsa_circ_0000523 regulates the proliferation and apoptosis of colorectal cancer cells as miRNA sponge. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res.51, e7811 (2018).
Xia, L. et al. Circular RNA circ-CBFB promotes proliferation and inhibits apoptosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia through regulating miR-607/FZD3/Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.503, 385–390 (2018).
Chen, F. et al. Emerging roles of circRNA_NEK6 targeting miR-370-3p in the proliferation and invasion of thyroid cancer via Wnt signaling pathway. Cancer Biol. Ther.19, 1139–1152 (2018).
Ke, X. et al. MiR-410 induces stemness by inhibiting Gsk3beta but upregulating beta-catenin in non-small cells lung cancer. Oncotarget8, 11356–11371 (2017).
Zhang, G. J. et al. MiR-92a promotes stem cell-like properties by activating Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in colorectal cancer. Oncotarget8, 101760–101770 (2017).
Zhu, J. et al. miR-19 targeting of GSK3beta mediates sulforaphane suppression of lung cancer stem cells. J. Nutr. Biochem.44, 80–91 (2017).
Wu, Z., Shi, W. & Jiang, C. Overexpressing circular RNA hsa_circ_0002052 impairs osteosarcoma progression via inhibiting Wnt/beta-catenin pathway by regulating miR-1205/APC2 axis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.502, 465–471 (2018).
Geng, Y. et al. Hsa_circ_0009361 acts as the sponge of miR-582 to suppress colorectal cancer progression by regulating APC2 expression. Clin. Sci. (Lond.)133, 1197–1213 (2019).
Hsieh, I. S. et al. MicroRNA-320 suppresses the stem cell-like characteristics of prostate cancer cells by downregulating the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Carcinogenesis34, 530–538 (2013).
Su, J. et al. MicroRNA-200a suppresses the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway by interacting with beta-catenin. Int J. Oncol.40, 1162–1170 (2012).
Zhu, P. et al. lnc-beta-Catm elicits EZH2-dependent beta-catenin stabilization and sustains liver CSC self-renewal. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.23, 631–639 (2016).
Li, T. et al. Long non-coding RNA lncTCF7 activates the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway to promote metastasis and invasion in colorectal cancer. Oncol. Lett.14, 7384–7390 (2017).
Babashah, S. et al. Targeting of the signal transducer Smo links microRNA-326 to the oncogenic Hedgehog pathway in CD34+ CML stem/progenitor cells. Int J. Cancer133, 579–589 (2013).
Lu, J. et al. MiR-26a inhibits stem cell-like phenotype and tumor growth of osteosarcoma by targeting Jagged1. Oncogene36, 231–241 (2017).
Gao, X., Zhu, X., Sun, Y. & Liu, J. MicroRNA141 inhibits the selfrenewal of glioblastoma stem cells via Jagged1. Mol. Med. Rep.16, 167–173 (2017).
Shao, T. et al. The long noncoding RNA HOTAIR serves as a microRNA-34a-5p sponge to reduce nucleus pulposus cell apoptosis via a NOTCH1-mediated mechanism. Gene715, 144029 (2019).
Wang, Y. et al. LncRNA NALT interaction with NOTCH1 promoted cell proliferation in pediatric T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Sci. Rep.5, 13749 (2015).
Xu, H. et al. NFIX circular RNA promotes glioma progression by regulating miR-34a-5p via notch signaling pathway. Front Mol. Neurosci.11, 225 (2018).
Chen, Y. et al. Circ-ASH2L promotes tumor progression by sponging miR-34a to regulate Notch1 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res.38, 466 (2019).
Lan, L. et al. Rhamnetin induces apoptosis in human breast cancer cells via the miR-34a/Notch-1 signaling pathway. Oncol. Lett.17, 676–682 (2019).
Zhang, K. et al. The liver-enriched lnc-LFAR1 promotes liver fibrosis by activating TGFbeta and Notch pathways. Nat. Commun.8, 144 (2017).
Sun, X. et al. MiR-208a stimulates the cocktail of SOX2 and beta-catenin to inhibit the let-7 induction of self-renewal repression of breast cancer stem cells and formed miR208a/let-7 feedback loop via LIN28 and DICER1. Oncotarget6, 32944–32954 (2015).
Zhong, X. et al. Identification of microRNAs regulating reprogramming factor LIN28 in embryonic stem cells and cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem.285, 41961–41971 (2010).
Jiang, J. et al. Overexpression of microRNA-21 strengthens stem cell-like characteristics in a hepatocellular carcinoma cell line. World J. Surg. Oncol.14, 278 (2016).
Gao, Y. et al. Linc-DYNC2H1-4 promotes EMT and CSC phenotypes by acting as a sponge of miR-145 in pancreatic cancer cells. Cell Death Dis.8, e2924 (2017).
Wu, J. et al. Long non-coding RNA SNHG20 promotes the tumorigenesis of oral squamous cell carcinoma via targeting miR-197/LIN28 axis. J. Cell Mol. Med.23, 680–688 (2019).
Fu, Z. et al. LncRNA HOTTIP modulates cancer stem cell properties in human pancreatic cancer by regulating HOXA9. Cancer Lett.410, 68–81 (2017).
Zhang, Z. et al. Long non-coding RNA FEZF1-AS1 promotes breast cancer stemness and tumorigenesis via targeting miR-30a/Nanog axis. J. Cell Physiol.233, 8630–8638 (2018).
Guo, L. et al. Knockdown of long non-coding RNA linc-ITGB1 inhibits cancer stemness and epithelial-mesenchymal transition by reducing the expression of Snail in non-small cell lung cancer. Thorac. Cancer10, 128–136 (2019).
Yu, J. et al. miR-300 inhibits epithelial to mesenchymal transition and metastasis by targeting Twist in human epithelial cancer. Mol. Cancer13, 121 (2014).
Bing, L., Hong, C., Li-Xin, S. & Wei, G. MicroRNA-543 suppresses endometrial cancer oncogenicity via targeting FAK and TWIST1 expression. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet.290, 533–541 (2014).
Liu, S. et al. MiR-137 regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition in gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Tumour Biol.35, 9131–9138 (2014).
Zhu, X. et al. miR-186 regulation of Twist1 and ovarian cancer sensitivity to cisplatin. Oncogene35, 323–332 (2016).
Haga, C. L. & Phinney, D. G. MicroRNAs in the imprinted DLK1-DIO3 region repress the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition by targeting the TWIST1 protein signaling network. J. Biol. Chem.287, 42695–42707 (2012).
Nairismagi, M. L. et al. Translational control of TWIST1 expression in MCF-10A cell lines recapitulating breast cancer progression. Oncogene31, 4960–4966 (2012).
Li, L. Z. et al. miR-720 inhibits tumor invasion and migration in breast cancer by targeting TWIST1. Carcinogenesis35, 469–478 (2014).
Zhou, Y. et al. miR-33a is up-regulated in chemoresistant osteosarcoma and promotes osteosarcoma cell resistance to cisplatin by down-regulating TWIST. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res.33, 12 (2014).
Zhang, P. et al. Cordycepin (3'-deoxyadenosine) suppressed HMGA2, Twist1 and ZEB1-dependent melanoma invasion and metastasis by targeting miR-33b. Oncotarget6, 9834–9853 (2015).
Tsukerman, P. et al. MiR-520d-5p directly targets TWIST1 and downregulates the metastamiR miR-10b. Oncotarget5, 12141–12150 (2014).
Hernandez, J. M. et al. miR-675 mediates downregulation of Twist1 and Rb in AFP-secreting hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann. Surg. Oncol.20(Suppl 3), S625–S635 (2013).
Nairismagi, M. L. et al. The proto-oncogene TWIST1 is regulated by microRNAs. PLoS ONE8, e66070 (2013).
Niu, H. et al. Long non-coding RNA AK027294 involves in the process of proliferation, migration, and apoptosis of colorectal cancer cells. Tumour Biol.37, 10097–10105 (2016).
Ma, F. et al. Overexpression of LncRNA AFAP1-AS1 predicts poor prognosis and promotes cells proliferation and invasion in gallbladder cancer. Biomed. Pharmacother.84, 1249–1255 (2016).
Wang, S. H. et al. Overexpression of LncRNA-ROR predicts a poor outcome in gallbladder cancer patients and promotes the tumor cells proliferation, migration, and invasion. Tumour Biol.37, 12867–12875 (2016).
Yu, T. et al. Downregulation of miR-491-5p promotes gastric cancer metastasis by regulating SNAIL and FGFR4. Cancer Sci.109, 1393–1403 (2018).
Xu, M. et al. MiR-22 suppresses epithelial-mesenchymal transition in bladder cancer by inhibiting Snail and MAPK1/Slug/vimentin feedback loop. Cell Death Dis.9, 209 (2018).
Cao, L., Wan, Q., Li, F. & Tang, C. E. MiR-363 inhibits cisplatin chemoresistance of epithelial ovarian cancer by regulating snail-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition. BMB Rep.51, 456–461 (2018).
Fan, M. J. et al. MiR-30 suppresses lung cancer cell 95D epithelial mesenchymal transition and invasion through targeted regulating Snail. Eur. Rev. Med Pharm. Sci.21, 2642–2649 (2017).
Zhang, Z., Zhang, M., Chen, Q. & Zhang, Q. Downregulation of microRNA-145 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition via regulating Snail in osteosarcoma. Cancer Gene Ther.24, 83–88 (2017).
Xia, W. et al. miR-153 inhibits epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting Snail. Oncol. Rep.34, 655–662 (2015).
Zhang, Y. F. et al. miR-410-3p suppresses breast cancer progression by targeting Snail. Oncol. Rep.36, 480–486 (2016).
Chen, X. et al. PRMT5 circular RNA promotes metastasis of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder through sponging miR-30c to induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Clin. Cancer Res.24, 6319–6330 (2018).
Xiao, C., Wu, C. H. & Hu, H. Z. LncRNA UCA1 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of breast cancer cells via enhancing Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharm. Sci.20, 2819–2824 (2016).
Jiang, Y. et al. MiR-203 acts as a radiosensitizer of gastric cancer cells by directly targeting ZEB1. Onco Targets Ther.12, 6093–6104 (2019).
Wang, G. et al. Loss of miR-873 contributes to gemcitabine resistance in triple-negative breast cancer via targeting ZEB1. Oncol. Lett.18, 3837–3844 (2019).
Li, L. & Li, S. miR-205-5p inhibits cell migration and invasion in prostatic carcinoma by targeting ZEB1. Oncol. Lett.16, 1715–1721 (2018).
Zhang, C., Xue, Q., Xu, Z. & Lu, C. MiR-5702 suppresses proliferation and invasion in non-small-cell lung cancer cells via posttranscriptional suppression of ZEB1. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. e22163 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbt.22163 (2018).
Xu, J. et al. The inhibition of miR-126 in cell migration and invasion of cervical cancer through regulating ZEB1. Hereditas156, 11 (2019).
Li, J. et al. MiR-186-5p upregulation inhibits proliferation, metastasis and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of colorectal cancer cell by targeting ZEB1. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.640, 53–60 (2018).
Chen, L., Yao, H., Wang, K., Liu, X. & Long Non-Coding, R. N. A. MALAT1 Regulates ZEB1 Expression by Sponging miR-143-3p and Promotes Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression. J. Cell Biochem.118, 4836–4843 (2017).
Qu, R., Chen, X. & Zhang, C. LncRNA ZEB1-AS1/miR-409-3p/ZEB1 feedback loop is involved in the progression of non-small cell lung cancer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.507, 450–456 (2018).
Zhu, C. et al. Long noncoding RNA SNHG16 promotes cell proliferation by sponging MicroRNA-205 and upregulating ZEB1 expression in osteosarcoma. Cell Physiol. Biochem.51, 429–440 (2018).
Li, Y. et al. Long non-coding RNA NNT-AS1 affects progression of breast cancer through miR-142-3p/ZEB1 axis. Biomed. Pharmacother.103, 939–946 (2018).
Zhang, S. et al. Long non-coding RNA HOTTIP promotes hypoxia-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition of malignant glioma by regulating the miR-101/ZEB1 axis. Biomed. Pharmacother.95, 711–720 (2017).
Lu, Y. et al. The long non-coding RNA NEAT1 regulates epithelial to mesenchymal transition and radioresistance in through miR-204/ZEB1 axis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Tumour Biol.37, 11733–11741 (2016).
Wang, P. S. et al. A novel long non-coding RNA linc-ZNF469-3 promotes lung metastasis through miR-574-5p-ZEB1 axis in triple negative breast cancer. Oncogene37, 4662–4678 (2018).
Zou, Q. et al. A TP73-AS1/miR-200a/ZEB1 regulating loop promotes breast cancer cell invasion and migration. J. Cell Biochem119, 2189–2199 (2018).
Ying, X., Zhu, J. & Zhang, Y. Circular RNA circ-TSPAN4 promotes lung adenocarcinoma metastasis by upregulating ZEB1 via sponging miR-665. Mol. Genet. Genom. Med.7, e991 (2019).
Liu, Y. Y., Zhang, L. Y. & Du, W. Z. Circular RNA circ-PVT1 contributes to paclitaxel resistance of gastric cancer cells through regulates ZEB1 expression by sponging miR-124-3p. Biosci Rep. 39, BSR20193045 (2019).
Tao, Z. et al. MiR-195/-16 family enhances radiotherapy via T cell activation in the tumor microenvironment by blocking the PD-L1 immune checkpoint. Cell Physiol. Biochem.48, 801–814 (2018).
Kao, S. C. et al. Tumor suppressor microRNAs contribute to the regulation of PD-L1 expression in malignant pleural mesothelioma. J. Thorac. Oncol.12, 1421–1433 (2017).
Gao, L. et al. MiR-873/PD-L1 axis regulates the stemness of breast cancer cells. EBioMedicine41, 395–407 (2019).
Qu, F. et al. MicroRNA-497-5p down-regulation increases PD-L1 expression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J. Drug Target27, 67–74 (2019).
Wang, W. et al. A miR-570 binding site polymorphism in the B7-H1 gene is associated with the risk of gastric adenocarcinoma. Hum. Genet.132, 641–648 (2013).
Ghousein, A. et al. miR-4510 blocks hepatocellular carcinoma development through RAF1 targeting and RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK signalling inactivation. Liver Int. 40, 240–251 (2020).
Wu, R. S. et al. MiR-101 promotes nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell apoptosis through inhibiting Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling pathway. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharm. Sci.22, 150–157 (2018).
Moles, R., Bellon, M. & Nicot, C. STAT1: a novel target of miR-150 and miR-223 Is involved in the proliferation of HTLV-I-transformed and ATL cells. Neoplasia17, 449–462 (2015).
Lian, J. et al. Downregulation of microRNA-383 is associated with male infertility and promotes testicular embryonal carcinoma cell proliferation by targeting IRF1. Cell Death Dis.1, e94 (2010).
Wang, Z. et al. MicroRNA-101 has a suppressive role in osteosarcoma cells through the targeting of c-FOS. Exp. Ther. Med.11, 1293–1299 (2016).
Tao, T. et al. Involvement of FOS-mediated miR-181b/miR-21 signalling in the progression of malignant gliomas. Eur. J. Cancer49, 3055–3063 (2013).
Li, S. et al. MicroRNA-490-5p inhibits proliferation of bladder cancer by targeting c-Fos. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.441, 976–981 (2013).
Wang, F. et al. MicroRNA-19a/b regulates multidrug resistance in human gastric cancer cells by targeting PTEN. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.434, 688–694 (2013).
Yang, T. S. et al. MicroRNA-106b in cancer-associated fibroblasts from gastric cancer promotes cell migration and invasion by targeting PTEN. FEBS Lett.588, 2162–2169 (2014).
Zhu, J. et al. MiR-20b, -21, and -130b inhibit PTEN expression resulting in B7-H1 over-expression in advanced colorectal cancer. Hum. Immunol.75, 348–353 (2014).
Zhang, G. et al. MicroRNA-92a functions as an oncogene in colorectal cancer by targeting PTEN. Dig. Dis. Sci.59, 98–107 (2014).
Liu, B. et al. MiR-26a enhances metastasis potential of lung cancer cells via AKT pathway by targeting PTEN. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1822, 1692–1704 (2012).
Qu, C. et al. MiR-205 determines the radioresistance of human nasopharyngeal carcinoma by directly targeting PTEN. Cell Cycle11, 785–796 (2012).
Yang, H. et al. MicroRNA expression profiling in human ovarian cancer: miR-214 induces cell survival and cisplatin resistance by targeting PTEN. Cancer Res.68, 425–433 (2008).
Ma, F. et al. Upregulated microRNA-301a in breast cancer promotes tumor metastasis by targeting PTEN and activating Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Gene535, 191–197 (2014).
Wan, J., Ling, X., Peng, B. & Ding, G. miR-142-5p regulates CD4+ T cells in human non-small cell lung cancer through PD-L1 expression via the PTEN pathway. Oncol. Rep.40, 272–282 (2018).
Lin, S. et al. Effect of microRNA-101 on proliferation and apoptosis of human osteosarcoma cells by targeting mTOR. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. Med. Sci.34, 889–895 (2014).
Wu, D., Huang, H. J., He, C. N. & Wang, K. Y. MicroRNA-199a-3p regulates endometrial cancer cell proliferation by targeting mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Int J. Gynecol. Cancer23, 1191–1197 (2013).
Xu, S. et al. MiR-497 decreases cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer cells by targeting mTOR/P70S6K1. Oncotarget6, 26457–26471 (2015).
Zhang, G. et al. microRNA-4717 differentially interacts with its polymorphic target in the PD1 3' untranslated region: a mechanism for regulating PD-1 expression and function in HBV-associated liver diseases. Oncotarget6, 18933–18944 (2015).
Wang, H. et al. miR-106b aberrantly expressed in a double transgenic mouse model for Alzheimer's disease targets TGF-beta type II receptor. Brain Res.1357, 166–174 (2010).
Zhang, Y., Li, M. & Hu, C. Exosomal transfer of miR-214 mediates gefitinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.507, 457–464 (2018).
Frassanito, M. A. et al. Bone marrow fibroblasts overexpress miR-27b and miR-214 in step with multiple myeloma progression, dependent on tumour cell-derived exosomes. J. Pathol.247, 241–253 (2019).
Ding, G. et al. Pancreatic cancer-derived exosomes transfer miRNAs to dendritic cells and inhibit RFXAP expression via miR-212-3p. Oncotarget6, 29877–29888 (2015).
Fabbri, M. et al. MicroRNAs bind to Toll-like receptors to induce prometastatic inflammatory response. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA109, E2110–E2116 (2012).
Szebeni, G. J., Vizler, C., Kitajka, K. & Puskas, L. G. Inflammation and cancer: extra- and intracellular determinants of tumor-associated macrophages as tumor promoters. Mediators Inflamm.2017, 9294018 (2017).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by funding from the Project Nn10 of Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital (Grant Number Nn102017-02), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number 81602323, 81872149), Outstanding Youth Project of Heilongjiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant Number YQ2019H027), Distinguished Young Scholars of Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital (Grant Number JCQN2018-03), Yong Elite Training Foundation Grant of Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital (Grant Number JY2016-02) and Haiyan Fund Project of Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital (Grant Number JJQN 2018-10).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, L., Wang, Q., Qiu, Z. et al. Noncoding RNAs: the shot callers in tumor immune escape. Sig Transduct Target Ther 5, 102 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-020-0194-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-020-0194-y
This article is cited by
-
The interplay between noncoding RNAs and drug resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma: the big impact of little things
Journal of Translational Medicine (2023)
-
High-density lipoprotein regulates angiogenesis by long non-coding RNA HDRACA
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy (2023)
-
RNA-mediated immunotherapy regulating tumor immune microenvironment: next wave of cancer therapeutics
Molecular Cancer (2022)
-
The interplay of cytokine signaling and non-coding RNAs in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma pathobiology
Molecular Biology Reports (2022)
-
Emerging Concepts on the Role of Extracellular Vesicles and Its Cargo Contents in Glioblastoma-Microglial Crosstalk
Molecular Neurobiology (2022)
