Abstract
Therapeutic efficacy against cancer relies heavily on the ability of the therapeutic agents to reach their final targets. The optimal targets of most cancer therapeutic agents are usually biological macromolecules at the subcellular level, which play a key role in carcinogenesis. Therefore, to improve the therapeutic efficiency of drugs, researchers need to focus on delivering not only the therapeutic agents to the target tissues and cells but also the drugs to the relevant subcellular structures. In this review, we discuss the most recent construction strategies and release patterns of various cancer cell subcellular-targeting nanoformulations, aiming at providing guidance in the overall design of precise nanomedicine. Additionally, future challenges and potential perspectives are illustrated in the hope of enhancing anticancer efficacy and accelerating the translational progress of precise nanomedicine.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems (NDDSs) are extensively employed in the therapy, diagnosis, and imaging of cancer due to their characteristics of high cancer-targeting efficacy, low toxicity, and controlled release properties.1 An efficient drug delivery system must avoid the clearance of the reticuloendothelial system, penetrate across blood vessel walls and be enriched at cancer sites to exert their pharmacological effects.2 For this purpose, an ever-increasing number of preclinical studies have reported a large number of engineered nanoformulations with unique physical and chemical properties, with the goal of delivering chemotherapeutic agents, photosensitizers, genes, and other biomolecules to cancer cells in specific and efficient manners.3 However, due to the problems of multidrug resistance (MDR), high variability, and poor patient prognosis, NDDSs have still faced tremendous challenges. It is therefore necessary when designing new treatment strategies to study in-depth the pathogenesis of cancer.
With the development of precision medicine, researchers have realized that variations in key intracellular biomolecules (genes and proteins), which are usually at the subcellular level, play a critical role in carcinogenesis and cancer development.4,5,6 Designing drug candidates based on molecular-level pathogenesis has become a new pattern and trend of drug discovery. For example, Ying et al. found that the expression level of sterol o-acyltransferase 1, which is responsible for transforming cholesterol into cholesterol ester-storage granules, is closely related to the poor prognosis of patients with liver cancer. Based on this, the research team proved that avasimibe, a small molecular inhibitor of sterol o-acyltransferase 1, had a good antitumor effect on patient-derived tumor tissue xenograft model of hepatocellular carcinoma, and provided new treatment strategies for tumor patients.7 Moreover, high-profile gene therapies also have to deliver the therapeutic genes into the cytoplasm or nucleus, where they can function. As a result, effective NDDSs should not only carry the therapeutic agents to the target tissues and cells but also deliver the drugs to distinct subcellular sites which mean organelles as targets accurately. They are considered to be one of the most promising approaches for cancer treatment. Through their proper design and specific modifications, subcellular-targeting nanoformulations are enriched in tumor cells, are internalized by endocytosis across the subcellular barriers (such as inner body embedding and lysosomal degradation)8 and target-specific subcellular structures (as shown in Fig. 1). This is then followed by the controlled release of therapeutic agents at the target sites, thus improving their antitumor efficacy, reducing their toxic and side effects, and overcoming the most critical limitation of intracellular drug delivery—MDR.9
In this review, based on the latest research progress over the past 5 years, we will focus on the important aspects of subcellular-targeting nanoformulations for cancer therapy. First, relevant knowledge including the specific endocytosis pathway of different nanoformulations taken up into cells and the pathological characteristics of tumor cell organelles are the key elements for guiding the construction of NDDSs, especially for the selection of targeting ligands. Next, according to the different subcellular targets of commonly used anticancer therapeutic strategies (chemical therapy, gene therapy, photodynamic therapy (PDT), etc.) applied after surgery, this article will elaborate on how to achieve precise subcellular targeting by functionalizing the surface of nanoparticles (NPs) with ligands and other means in the order of lysosome, nucleus, mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and Golgi apparatus. Furthermore, we will point out that multiple targeting and controlled release are crucial to the design and overall construction of the subcellular-targeting NDDSs. Finally, two challenges and potential directions to pursue in order to boost precise subcellular targeting are illustrated, which will benefit the transformation of NDDSs from laboratory research to clinical practice.
Main
NDDSs can achieve the enrichment of tumor microenvironment, cell internalization, and intracellular delivery through passive or active targeting. In passive targeting, the size, shape, and surface charge of NPs can affect penetration and retention, thus significantly affecting their cell internalization and subcellular localization. For example, positively charged ultrasmall NPs have a higher affinity to the organelles such as mitochondria and nuclei, thereby promoting their intracellular permeability.10 Active targeting usually relies on the modification of localization group such as antibodies, ligands, etc., which have specific interaction with the receptor, thus leading to more significant effect than conventional treatment strategies. In intracellular transport and targeting, we still focus on these two aspects to explore design strategies of subcellular-targeting nanoformulations.
Endocytosis and intracellular trafficking of nanoformulations
There are many targets (such as folate receptors, transferrin (Tf) receptors, antigens) which are usually overexpressed on the surface of cancer cells, and targeting them to maximize the drug accumulation around cancer cells have become a focus research to cancer therapy in recent decades. When NPs reach the cell surface through passive or active targeting, endocytosis is the main mechanism by which they are taken up by cancer cells. Different types of NDDSs rely on different cell endocytosis mechanisms to enter the cell, which ensures they internalize in specific intracellular regions.11 We will briefly review the classic endocytosis pathways for better prediction of the intracellular fate of nanoformulations.
Endocytosis can be divided into clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME), caveolae-mediated endocytosis (CVME), macropinocytosis, and phagocytosis12 (as shown in Fig. 2). Among these, CME and CVME are the major uptake pathways of various nanoformulations. Generally, large NPs (<120 nm) are internalized mainly through CME, and specific ligand-modified nanoformulations (e.g., epidermal growth factor, folic acid, chemokines, and Tf) can significantly improve the efficiency of this endocytosis pathway. Following CME, the nanoformulations are trafficked through the early endosomes—late endosomes—lysosomes pathway and arrive in the lysosomal lumen, where they may be degraded by lysosomal hydrolases.13 For those nanoformulations whose action sites are other subcellular localizations in the cytoplasm, they are supposed to be designed to avoid endosome/lysosome degradation and retain their biological activity. Using carrier materials that are stable in acidic environments and solution with pH buffering properties can alleviate degradation problem to a certain extent.14 Endosome/lysosome escape capability is a more effective prerequisite.15 The commonly recognized mechanisms of lysosomal escape include proton-sponge effect, membrane fusion, the generation of gas, and the application of CPPs and PCI. Some examples and applications used in nanomedicine are listed in Table 1. On the other hand, nanoformulations with a small particle size (<60 nm) usually rely on CVME to enter cells. These NPs coated by caveolae usually do not enter lysosomes and are directly transferred to the Golgi or ER.16,17 Other endocytosis processes are shown in Fig. 2. As is apparent, the endocytosis process of antitumor NPs is the key step to achieve subcellular enrichment. Deep understanding and exploration of these endocytic pathways are rather significant for developing new delivery strategies for subcellular targeting.
Lysosomal accumulation
Many nanoformulations mediated by CME can actively accumulate in lysosomes at the end of the endocytosis pathway. Taking full advantage of this accumulation to delivery antitumor drugs that act on lysosomes can greatly simplify the complexity of the carriers’ design. Second, recent reports have demonstrated chloroquine and its derivatives,18 rapamycin,19 HSP70 antagonist,20 and cathepsin B21 can act on the lysosomes and their components to trigger lysosomal membrane permeabilization (LMP), which can bypass the classical caspase apoptosis pathway and thus produce antitumor effects on drug-resistant cells.22 Third, the lysosomal pathological features lay a foundation for precise drug release.23 Given the evidence discussed above, lysosomal targeting and destruction could represent potential pharmacological delivery strategies.
Lysosomal characteristics
Lysosomes are single-membrane acidic vesicles (pH 4.5–5.0) that contain more than 60 hydrolytic enzymes that can break down biomolecules (such as proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, and nucleic acids).24 They play important roles in maintaining cellular homeostasis, inducing cell apoptosis, nutrient sensing, and immune responses.22 However, malignant transformation usually leads to changes in lysosomal volume, composition, and subcellular localization. In cancer cells, increased lysosomal fragility caused by increases in sphingomyelin makes lysosomes more vulnerable to LMP in response to stimuli, such as surfactants, heat, and reactive oxygen species (ROS), thus causing cell death.25
Delivery strategies of lysosomal precise therapy
Receptor-mediated endocytosis can usually increase the possibility of the NPs’ final arrival in lysosomes,13 so ligand modifications play important roles in lysosomal targeting. When NDDSs are modified by the specific aptamer of receptors on the surface of tumor cells, such as Tf26 and the anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 monoclonal antibody,27 the receptor–ligand complex is mediated by receptor–ligand interactions, collected into transport vesicles and delivered into the early endosome-late endosome-lysosome pathway, resulting in its accumulation in lysosomes. Owen et al. reported NPs modified by different anti-HER2 mAbs (trastuzumab and 73JIgG) that bind to different epitopes on HER2 have variable amounts reaching the lysosome.28 Lysosome-targeting fragments can also be used to promote lysosomal accumulation. For example, alkylated piperidine fragments could target lysosomes and then self-assemble to construct anticancer prodrug molecules.29 In addition to surface modification, other physicochemical properties of NPs affect the efficiency of lysosomal accumulation. Lysosomal accumulation of internalized NPs is related to NP rigidity, size,30 and surface charge,31 and smaller and softer NPs with certain positive and negative charges have much greater uptake rates into lysosomes in cancer cells. Therefore, the main means of delivering drugs to lysosomes is to design and develop the appropriate targeting sequences, assisted by optimizing the physical and chemical properties of nanoformulations.
After reaching lysosomes, NDDSs need to respond to the lysosomal microenvironment effectively to release their cancer therapeutic agents, which need to act rapidly on the lysosome and trigger LMP. This response mainly relies on some pH-sensitive liposomes and stimulus-responsive polymers containing specific pH-triggered switches (such as disulfide bonds,32 hydrazone bonds, acrylic acid, and diethylaminophenyl units33) and enzyme response switches (such as cathepsin B-sensitive dipeptide linker,34 glycosidic bond hydrolyzed by glycosidase,35 vSIRPα-probe activated by lysosomal endopeptidases36). Additional important triggering methods are the delivery of photosensitizers37 and magnetic agents24 to lysosomes by NDDSs. When the tumor is exposed to external near-infrared light or a magnetic field, the sensitive agents will produce a considerable amount of ROS and heat, stimulating the destruction of the fragile lysosomal membrane, and induce tumor cell death. As shown by Zhang et al., their novel photosensitizer supramolecular nanogel is sensitive to lysosomal pH and aggregates in the lysosomes for enhanced PDT of multidrug-resistant cancer.37
Nucleus targeting
Chemotherapy is still the cornerstone of cancer treatment and the vast majority of conventional chemotherapeutic drugs need to work in the nucleus of cancer cells to induce apoptosis.38 Alternatively, cancer gene therapy, which transfers genes (such as the CRISPR/Cas9 nuclease system, nucleic acid aptamers, DNA, and siRNA) to the chromosomes of tumor cells to regulate or replace abnormal genes, is gradually emerging.39 Their efficacy depends on the efficient transfer of the drugs or complete therapeutic exogenous gene into the nucleus.40 In recent studies, the nucleus has been commonly used as the site of action for free radicals and heat to cooperate with chemotherapy or gene therapy to improve the antitumor effect,41 which means transporting photosensitizers or theranostics to the nucleus to produce ROS with potentially damaging effects.42,43 However, the NDDSs targeting the cancer cell membrane generally only release foreign genes or anticancer agents into the cytoplasm, and then they can only enter the nucleus through free diffusion. The efficiency of diffusion is limited, and <1% of the therapeutic agents in the cytoplasm enter the nucleus and reach the final target.38 Therefore, enhanced therapeutic agent efficiency by nuclear targeted delivery is anticipated to be necessary for efficient cancer treatments and overcoming MDR.
Nuclear characteristics
The nucleus is the site of storage, replication, and transcription of genetic material and it plays important roles in cell proliferation, metabolism, growth, and differentiation. Due to the strong shielding effect of the bilayer nuclear membrane, nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) with lengths of ~90 nm and transverse diameters of 70 nm are the only channels for bidirectional exchange between the cytoplasm and nucleoplasm. The inner walls of NPCs are tethered with phenylalanine-glycine nucleoporins (FG Nups), thus limiting the inner diameter to only ~40 nm.44 As a result, the low efficiency of nuclear membrane penetration has greatly hindered applications of nuclear targeting NDDSs.
Construction strategies of cancer cell nucleus-targeting NDDSs
In general, the NDDSs’ ability to efficiently access the cancer cell nucleus from the cytoplasm arises from three aspects: passive diffusion, active targeting, and pore formation in the nuclear envelope membrane (as shown in Fig. 3).
Passive diffusion
The structure of the NPCs limits the translocation of nanoformulations into the nucleus by passive diffusion. Based on principles of Brownian motion, the key influencing factors of passive cancer cell nucleus-targeting NPs such as size, shape, and charge have been extensively studied as follows.
Size is the critical factor affecting the passive diffusion of NPs into the nucleus. Lim’s group has demonstrated that ions and small molecules with molecular weights <40 kDa can diffuse freely through the NPCs.44 For NDDSs, NPs capable of passive nuclear diffusion are generally smaller than 9 nm.45 Therefore, it is necessary for nucleus-targeting NPs to regulate their size by rational preparation or to achieve size reduction of large NPs activated by special pH conditions or enzymes.46 In particular, how to compress and fold gene macromolecules to minimize the size of the gene nanocarrier system should be considered. The existing research has mainly focused on how to condense DNA/RNA into stable complexes through the electrostatic interactions between cation nanocarriers and anion nucleic acids.39
Although small NPs are able to diffuse into the nucleus, the charge and shape of the NPs also play important roles in nuclear uptake. Positively charged NPs are more favorable for passage into the nucleus, but intravenous injection of positively charged NPs may induce hemolysis. To address this problem, a charge reversal strategy from negative to positive in endosomes and lysosomes has been applied.47 NDDSs that recover a positive charge in lysosomes can not only promote lysosomal escape but also enhance nuclear targeting, thus enhancing the cytotoxicity of the anticancer drug compared with free drugs.48 Other studies have shown that NPs with a higher aspect ratio (shaped like rods or worms) achieve higher nuclear concentrations compared with the lower aspect ratio NPs,49which can be ascribed to the structure of the NPCs.
Active targeting
Although the ultrasmall NPs can carry therapeutic agents into the cancer cells’ nucleus, most of the marketed NDDSs, whose sizes are usually between 100 and 200 nm, are excluded from the nucleus.38 Fortunately, NPs larger than NPC can realize nuclear active targeting by surface ligand modification after lysosomal escape.
Nuclear localization signal sequences (NLSs),50 including from the SV40 T antigen, adenovirus, transactivator of transcription (TAT) peptide, NF-κB, KRRRR et al.51,52 are the most classical ligands used for nuclear targeting. NLSs can be recognized by karyopherins (Kaps) and rapid binding between Kaps and FG Nups cause FG Nups to shrink back into more malleable forms.53,54 Therefore, NLSs modified NPs with a large particle size could enter the nucleus via active translocation. Thus far, most reported sizes of active nuclear targeting NDDSs were extended to 50 nm, which means gold NPs55 and mesoporous silica NPs (MSNs)56 have been extensively used in nucleus active targeting because of their advantages of easy control of particle size and surface modification. For example, Tang et al.57 synthesized copper sulfide NPs encapsulated by a silica shell layer, which were modified by RGD and TAT peptides at the same time. Mediated by RGD to enter cancer cells, these NPs can effectively target the nucleus with the help of TAT. When illuminated by a 980 nm laser, copper sulfide NPs release heat to rapidly increase the temperature and damage the DNA. Li et al.58 developed a kind of gold NPs with simultaneous surface modification of siRNA and NLSs. The NLS-mediated NPs translocated to the nucleus and the siRNA acted on gene promoter DNA methylation, thus inducing long-term gene silencing in the nucleus of cancer cells. Meanwhile, a promising strategy to transfer larger NPs to the nucleus involves optimizing the NLS density.59 For instance, compared to the high density of 2 NLS2/nm, NPs modified with the intermediate density of 0.9 NLS2/nm can achieve a 3.7-fold increased nuclear accumulation.60 In addition to NLSs ligands, boronic acid groups can also translocate anticancer NPs with a large size from the cell surface to the nucleus through the importin α/β-mediated pathway. In the future, the development and discovery of new NLSs will provide a wider range of options for targeted ligands of nuclear targeting NDDSs.
Opening the nuclear membrane
In addition to improving the physicochemical properties of the nanoformulations to pass through NPCs as readily as possible, another effective method is to open the nuclear membrane with the help of cell membrane penetrating peptides (CPPs)61 to enhance the nuclear translocation of antitumor NDDSs. Researchers have gradually mastered some common properties of CPPs and have synthesized a series of CPPs with stronger penetration and higher efficiency, such as CB5005,62 which consists of a membrane permeation sequence cascaded with the NF-κB NLS. Further study found this kind of CPP had a unique affinity to brain glioma and its application in adriamycin delivery could effectively penetrate the membranes of cancer cells and the nucleus, allowing the chemotherapy drugs to directly damage the DNA.
In short, nuclear delivery efficiency may depend on the physicochemical properties of the NPs including size, shape, charge, and surface modifications. Intensive study of these factors may allow for the development of efficient cell nucleus-targeting NDDSs. Meanwhile, besides light responses,41 further research is required to explore the means of controlling drug release from carriers in the nucleus.
Mitochondria targeting
As indispensable energy reservoirs, mitochondria are also important as targets of anticancer drugs. Lonidamine, amlodipine, ceramide, and some natural substances (resveratrol, berberine, betulinic acid) are the main antitumor therapeutic agents acting on mitochondria. They usually activate the apoptotic effector proteins Bax and Bak, release cytochrome c, and form apoptotic bodies, inducing cancer cells’ death.63,64 Paclitaxel (PTX), doxorubicin (DOX), and camptothecin, in addition to acting on recognized targets, also act on mitochondria to varying degrees to induce apoptosis.65
Mitochondria in cancer cells show greater susceptibility than those in normal tissues. Thus, there is the potential to deliver radiosensitizers,66 photosensitizers,67 and theranostics68 to the mitochondria of cancer cells, aiming at ROS production and oxidative stress, which induce mitochondrial permeability transitions and fundamentally affect the energy supply of cancer cells. All of the above have demonstrated that mitochondria targeting is of great significance for improving antitumor therapy.
Mitochondrial characteristics
Mitochondria are double-membrane-bound organelles with independent DNA69 and they participate in multiple cellular functions, including energy production, calcium buffering, lipid synthesis, signaling, cell proliferation, and apoptosis.70 In the process of Adenosine triphosphate synthesis, protons are pumped from the mitochondrial matrix to the intermembrane space, which generates a proton gradient and establishes the mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP, about −160 mv).Cancer cells tend to experience mitochondrial dysfunction, such as an increased MMP (−220 mv), accumulation of hydrogen peroxide, reduced oxidative phosphorylation, increased ROS production, Ca2+ overload, and the Warburg effect,71,72 which mean that mitochondria in cancer cells are more susceptible to external disturbances than normal cells.
Construction strategies of cancer cell mitochondria-targeting NDDSs
In view of the large negative MMP and the precise membrane structure of mitochondria in cancer cells, cancer cell mitochondria-targeting NDDSs usually achieve active subcellular targeting with the aid of two different targeting ligands: delocalized lipophilic cations (DLCs) and specific mitochondrial-targeting sequences (MTSs). Similarly, disturbing the mitochondrial membrane integrity by CPPs also helps NPs penetrate into mitochondria (as shown in Fig. 4).
Active targeting
DLCs, including 4-carboxybutyl triphenylphosphonium bromide (TPP), quaternary ammonium salts, nitrogen-containing heterocycles, et al.,73 can easily pass through lipid bilayers and accumulate in the mitochondrial matrix due to their high lipophilicity and stable cationic charge, so they have become the most popular constituent molecules in mitochondrial-targeting NDDSs.74 Among them, TPP has been the most extensively studied and it can both induce lysosomal escape and localize from the cytoplasm to the mitochondria. TPP-anchored poly(amidoamine) dendrimer,75 TPP-Lonidamine-DOX self-assembled NPs,76 PLGA-b-PEG NPs with surface modification of TPP,77 and silica NPs with surface modification of TPP78 can carry different therapeutic molecules to mitochondria in cancer cells. However, cationic materials represented by TPP induce inevitable systemic toxicity. Chemical modification of TPP or application of a core-shell structure, which shields the positive charges during circulation but is then removed in the lysosomal environment to expose the TPP, can maximize the safety of the drug. For instance, compared with liposomes where STPP is embedded in the lipid bilayer, liposomal loading with PTX and modification with a novel triphenyphosphonium-PEG-PE conjugate can more easily interact with the mitochondria and avoid the nonspecific cytotoxicity of STPP, to enhance their antitumor effects.79
In consideration of the safety concerns of DLCs, researchers have preferred to develop new MTSs to achieve precise intracellular localization. The precise membrane structure and internal structure of mitochondria provide a basis for determining the specific loci of MTSs. MTSs such as the KLA peptide80 and the amphipathic tail-anchoring peptide81 commonly contain 20–30 amino acids and α-helix structures that are rich in base, hydroxyl, and hydrophobic residues. Anticancer drugs, DNA, and nanocarriers conjugated to MTSs or DNA sequences encoding MTSs integrated into therapeutic DNA, are supposed to target mitochondria.82 For example, Kazuaki et al. designed a dual-function lipid-based drug delivery system that is capable of intracellular trafficking, such as endosomal escape mediated by octaarginine (a kind of CPP), and then delivery to mitochondria mediated by MTSs.83 However, it should be realized that extensive applications of MTSs are limited by their poor stability and their inability to target tumor locations. It is essential to improve the physicochemical and biopharmaceutical properties of these peptides and conjugate them with cancer cell-targeting fragments before clinical applications.
It is worth mentioning that the special mitochondrial microenvironment of cancer cells may be a trigger for drug release from vehicles. For example, Yue et al.84 reported the use of TL-CPT-PEG1K-TPP copolymers. After uptake by the cancer cells, the NPs were guided to the mitochondria by TPP, with hundreds of fold increased accumulation. The thioketal linker (TL) in the copolymers was sensitive to a high concentration of ROS in the cancer cells’ mitochondria to release CPT. Hu et al.85 constructed a kind of MSNs loaded with Fe2+. After mediated by the MTSs to enter the cancer cells’ mitochondria, the Fe2+ reacted with the increased amount of H2O2 and generated cell-damaging hydroxyl radicals. NIR exposure could promote chemical reactions and this delivery system has overcome the limitations that conventional PDT needs to rely on O2 and controllably exert their anticancer effects.
Opening the mitochondria envelope
Similar to the nuclear targeting delivery strategies, CPPs can also be used to enhance NDDSs penetration in accurate delivery of mitochondria targeting. Compared with the cell membrane, the mitochondrial membrane is more hydrophobic and has more negative potential, thus increasing the positive polarity and hydrophobicity of CPPs is conducive to helping nanoformulations cross the mitochondrial membrane. Commonly used mitochondrial CPPs generally have highly hydrophobic residues, such as cyclohexyl and SS peptides. In addition, some cationic small molecules, including rhodamine, pyridinium, and cyanine, which have inherent capabilities of mitochondrial penetration, can be modified on the surface of liposomes86 or self-assembled into NPs with imaging functions87 to selectively target the mitochondria.
In conclusion, an in-depth study of the cancer cells’ special mitochondrial microenvironment and development of novel targeting sequences may benefit the further design of efficient and safe mitochondrial-targeting NDDSs.
ER and Golgi targeting nanoformulations
With the development of modern oncology, the discovery of new and valuable anticancer targets and cellular pathways has fostered the study of cancer therapeutic agents acting on organelles other than the nucleus and mitochondria. The ER and Golgi have gradually attracted attention due to their large intracellular surface area and important roles in endocytosis.
Characteristics of the ER and Golgi
As the largest subcellular structure in the cell, the ER is a series of lamellar and tubular cavities composed of membranes that are weakly alkaline and it stores large amounts of calcium. ER controls the biosynthesis, folding, and assembly of proteins and other biological macromolecules, as well as playing an important role in cell survival and homeostasis.88 When stimulated, the ER will release calcium ions and active caspase-8 to initiate the apoptotic program.89 Eeyarestatin, bortezomib, natural polyphenols, terpenes, and other ER stress inducers90 have been identified.91 Delivering anticancer drugs to cause sustained and excessive ER stress, thus inducing cell death, has become a new anticancer strategy.
The Golgi apparatus is closely linked to the ER. It is usually comprised of three different compartments, including the cis-Golgi network, medial-Golgi, and trans-Golgi network, which have a pH gradient from cis-Golgi network (pH 6.7) to trans-Golgi network (pH 6.0).92 It is an important organelle of cell secretory pathways that can modify, label, store and transport proteins, lipids, and polysaccharides. Recent studies have shown that the Golgi’s function is significantly improved in cancer cells, and its structural integrity affects certain signaling pathways, particularly those related to migration, invasion, and angiogenesis.93,94 Therefore, delivering intra-Golgi protein inhibitors to cancer cells’ Golgi has the potential to block multiple molecular pathways associated with the development of cancer.
Design of ER or Golgi targeting nanoformulations
In the delivery process of therapeutic agents acting on the ER or Golgi apparatus, it is necessary to consider the different endocytosis pathways of NPs entering cancer cells. That is, mainly because the CVME pathway can actively transport NPs into the ER and Golgi. Obviously, it is very beneficial to deliver antitumor agents to achieve CVME by specific design of their nanoformulations. The other key to designing NDDSs is to enhance their retention time in the target substructure and to avoid their being discharged by exocytosis. For example, Xue et al. reported a pH-responsive photothermal ablation agent that was assembled with bovine serum albumin to form NPs. Due to their hypertrophic morphology, they could accumulate in the Golgi apparatus of cancer cells during endocytosis. Meanwhile, NPs can be activated for effective photothermal therapy in response to the acidic environment of the Golgi.95
In addition, we must take into consideration that a significant proportion of NDDSs enter the lysosomes of cancer cells through the CME. For these NPs, only by modifying the appropriate ER and Golgi target sequences can they selectively target to these subcellular organelles after endolysosomal escape to the cytoplasm. Studies have shown that several biocompatible metal complexes could be used to target the ER. Kwon et al. reported an effective strategy for IR(III) delivery targeting the ER. The IR(III) complex can not only target the ER actively but also produce ROS in response to the PDT reagent, which results in oxidative damage to proteins.96 E3/19K of adenovirus,97 phosphotetrapeptide (4P),98 KKXX peptide,99 propylene oxide,100 the sulfonyl group,101 and ER-targeting photosensitizer TCPP-TER102 have also been applied to construct NPs targeting the ER.
In terms of Golgi targeting, Huang et al. demonstrated that L-cysteine is a kind of effective ligand for the Golgi. Carbon quantum dots and silica NPs could target the Golgi to monitor its changes when they are modified with l-cysteine.103 Gong’s team repeatedly proved that chondroitin sulfate (CS) nanomicelles targeted the Golgi since the glycosyltransferases in the Golgi could specifically bind to CS.104,105
However, it should be pointed out that compared with the targeting of the mitochondria and nuclei, the subcellular targeting of the ER and Golgi is still in its infancy, with not enough information available to apply comprehensive design strategies.
Other subcellular-targeting nanoformulations
Apart from the above, there are several other important subcellular structures that are also susceptible to therapeutic agents.
The mutation of and abnormal expression of cytoskeleton-associated proteins play important roles in cancer cell migration, so targeting the cytoskeleton may be a potential anticancer therapy.106 For drugs (such as PTX and vincristine) acting on the cytoskeleton, the current delivery strategy is mainly to design NDDSs that are degraded in the lysosome, releasing the therapeutic agents into the cytoplasm through lysosome escape, and then achieve the drug targeting by the interaction between the drug molecules and the protein targets.107
As a complex of RNA and protein, many key molecules and proteins in ribosomes are secondary regulators of epigenetic regulation and cancer progression.108,109 In recent years, ribosomes have been gradually regarded as a potential target in the development of anticancer drugs.110,111 Discovery and delivery of drug molecules acting on ribosomes remains in a preliminary stage. Delivery of antitumor drugs to ribosomes will also be an important branch of subcellular targeting in the near future.
Key factors in the rational design of subcellular-targeting anticancer nanomedicine
The above has described different strategies of precise delivery of antitumor agents to subcellular organelles in cancer cells. To guide the rational design and clinical transformation of subcellular-targeting anticancer nanomedicine comprehensively, we will emphasize below two key factors and principles that need to be considered when constructing efficient nanomedicine.
Dual targeting and multiple targeting
The initial premise of the subcellular-targeting NDDSs discussed above is that they have overcome the first step of initial delivery and tend to accumulate in the region of the tumor. Therefore, in the rational design of subcellular targeting anticancer nanomedicine, we need to use dual-targeting strategies, taking into account both cancer cell targeting and subcellular targeting. For example, Qu’s team112 designed folate and TAT-modified Fe3O4 core/mesoporous silica shell NPs to deliver camptothecin, López et al.113 developed mesoporous silica particles with asymmetric modification of folate and TPP, and Xie et al.114 constructed hollow carbonitride nanospheres modified by hyaluronic acid (HA) and mitochondrial localization peptide D. These NDDSs achieved the organic combination of cancer enrichment and subcellular level targeting, which greatly improving the efficiency of the antitumor agents. Furthermore, it should be noted that the overlapping interactions between two target ligands and their relative densities may have influences on their targeting ability. Meanwhile, scientists are also making efforts to synthesize multifunctional targeting sequences, such as one sequence having both cancer-targeting and subcellular targeting functions or having both navigation and imaging functions.
In many cases, targeting only one organelle may not be able to reach the expected therapeutic effect. One solution chosen by scientists is to simultaneously target multiple subcellular organelles or structures. For example, Yao et al.115 have developed HA-modified hydroxyapatite (HAP) NPs (HAP-HA). HA acts as a tumor-targeting active ligand and can bind to the CD44 receptor overexpressed on the surface of cancer cells. HAP can load and deliver DOX to the nucleus and mitochondria of tumor cells to maximize the expected therapeutic effect. Multiple targeting is based on the principle of organelle interaction network and functional synergy. Achieve simultaneous targeting of mitochondria and nucleus, ER and nucleus, as well as ER and mitochondria is of great significance for enhancing therapeutic efficacy.
Accurate response and controlled release
The differences between nanoformulations and free drugs lie not only in the protection and transport by the carriers but also in the controllable release of the cargoes in specific locations.116 Thus, subcellular-targeting nanoformulations are supposed to release their payload in a controlled manner to ensure that the goods cannot be released before reaching the specific target, but only be released on demand when they reach the target successfully. This response relies on the characteristics of the microenvironment in different organelles, such as the acidity of lysosomes,32 the weak basicity of the ER, the weak acidity of the Golgi,95 and the high expression of ROS84 and H2O285 in the mitochondria. In-depth explorations of intracellular environments, components, and functionality will drive innovation in the development of promising subcellular-targeting NDDSs in the field of anticancer nanomedicine. It needs to be emphasized that in some programmed stimulus-response drug delivery systems, the use of two or more stimuli in sequential or coordinated action also requires comprehensive tests in vivo to achieve accurate spatiotemporal control of each trigger factor.
Conclusions and perspectives
With the development of medical biology and nanotechnology, research into and applications of subcellular-targeting NDDSs have become hot topics and trends over the past 5 years. Great advances in nanotechnology have stimulated the quick development of various subcellular-targeting nanoformulations as listed in Table 2. They are generally modified with subcellular-targeting function groups to efficiently cross through the intracellular obstacles and reach the molecular target, where they control their payloads release in response to the specific subcellular microenvironment (e.g., the acidic environment of the lysosome and Golgi). This direct delivery of therapeutic agents to their final destination maximizes the therapeutic efficacy of various cancer therapies. Although progress in preclinical studies has been made, we have to point out that some limitations still remain. Here, we list the current challenges and potential future directions of this topic.
In terms of cell biology research, the current progress related to the fate of subcellular-targeting nanomedicine may involve some uncertainties. (1) There is controversy since different researchers have come to different conclusions about the endocytosis pathway and mechanism of the same type of nanoformulation. (2) There is a lack of support from raw data and targeted research related to the stability of most currently existing nanoformulations in lysosomes, especially regarding how to ensure subcellular-targeting groups are able to function after escaping from the lysosome. (3) The intertumor heterogeneity is currently less considered in the design of subcellular-targeting NDDSs, which are mainly based on the common pathological features of organelles. Therefore, there is an urgent need for more comprehensive studies on different types of cancer cells (such as MDR cells) at the organelle/molecular level. In addition, precision medicine is based on gene mutation information, and individualized treatment, especially in subcellular delivery of gene therapeutic agents, should pay more attention to understanding the internal regulation of living systems by combining them with gene sequencing technology.
In terms of clinical transformation, the translation efficiency of complex nanoformulations is quite low. A high targeting ability of multiple modified structures is closely related to their instability, and a high sensitivity to intracellular environmental changes is often accompanied by systemic toxicity. This imbalance between efficacy and side effects makes demands on the exploration of multifunctional targeting groups (e.g., have both cancer-targeting and subcellular-targeting functions, have both navigation and imaging functions) on the one hand, and drives the development of diversification triggering and release strategies at the subcellular level (especially the nucleus) on the other hand. Furthermore, exploiting controllable preparation of nanoformulations in combination with other novel techniques such as microfluidic technology will control or optimize their properties more accurately.
In terms of monitoring methods, observing dynamic nanoformulations’ behavior in vivo and in tumor cells is indispensable to the biological and medical research of nanomedicine. However, the various visualization imaging techniques in the field of nanomedicine have their own advantages and disadvantages. For instance, the analysis conducted by transmission electron microscopy is static while having high resolution. Two-photon microscopy can observe tumor tissues directly in real time and in vivo, but it is limited by the imaging depth and the resolution at the subcellular level. Most of the organelle fluorescent dyes need to be used after cell membrane rupture and inactivation. To solve these problems will require complementation with numerous technologies on the basis of the existing tools, especially imaging methods for visualizing the actual process of nanoformulations entering single cancer cells. In addition, subcellular pharmacokinetics also affect the final efficacy of nanomedicine and should be paid more attention to, since it can be used for screening and transformation.
In general, subcellular-targeting NDDS are expected to play a greater role in cancer treatment and, where appropriate, of other diseases. It is also an inevitable trend in the field of personalized cancer medicine and precision nanomedicine. This review emphasizes the importance of subcellular targeting in the precise treatment of tumors, and encourages the development of novel subcellular-targeting strategies. The application of multidisciplinary and more concentrated efforts in the research into subcellular-targeting NDDSs and clinical transformation can further enhance our understanding of personalized cancer medicine for precise treatment and effectively guide the future design of nanoformulations.
References
van der Meel, R. et al. Smart cancer nanomedicine. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 1007–1017 (2019).
Shi, J., Kantoff, P. W., Wooster, R. & Farokhzad, O. C. Cancer nanomedicine: progress, challenges and opportunities. Nat. Rev. Cancer 17, 20–37 (2017).
Dai, Y., Xu, C., Sun, X. & Chen, X. Nanoparticle design strategies for enhanced anticancer therapy by exploiting the tumour microenvironment. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 3830–3852 (2017).
Stratton, M. R. Exploring the genomes of cancer cells: progress and promise. Science 331, 1553–1558 (2011).
Rozenblatt-Rosen, O. et al. The Human Tumor Atlas Network: charting tumor transitions across space and time at single-cell resolution. Cell 181, 236–249 (2020).
Murciano-Goroff, Y. R., Taylor, B. S., Hyman, D. M. & Schram, A. M. Toward a more precise future for oncology. Cancer Cell 37, 431–442 (2020).
Jiang, Y. et al. Proteomics identifies new therapeutic targets of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Nature 567, 257–261 (2019).
Liu, J. et al. Design of nanocarriers based on complex biological barriers in vivo for tumor therapy. Nano Today 15, 56–90 (2017).
Rajendran, L., Knölker, H. J. & Simons, K. Subcellular targeting strategies for drug design and delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 9, 29–42 (2010).
Kang, J. W., So, P. T. C., Dasari, R. R. & Lim, D. K. High resolution live cell Raman imaging using subcellular organelle-targeting SERS-sensitive gold nanoparticles with highly narrow intra-nanogap. Nano Lett. 15, 1766–1772 (2015).
Liu, C. G., Han, Y. H., Kankala, R. K., Wang, S. B. & Chen, A. Z. Subcellular performance of nanoparticles in cancer therapy. Int. J. Nanomedicine 15, 675–704 (2020).
Lundquist, P. & Artursson, P. Oral absorption of peptides and nanoparticles across the human intestine: opportunities, limitations and studies in human tissues. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 106, 256–276 (2016).
Xu, S., Olenyuk, B. Z., Okamoto, C. T. & Hamm-Alvarez, S. F. Targeting receptor-mediated endocytotic pathways with nanoparticles: rationale and advances. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 65, 121–138 (2013).
Khaled, S. Z. et al. One-pot synthesis of pH-responsive hybrid nanogel particles for the intracellular delivery of small interfering RNA. Biomaterials 87, 57–68 (2016).
Zhao, Z., Ukidve, A., Kim, J. & Mitragotri, S. Targeting strategies for tissue-specific drug delivery. Cell 181, 151–167 (2020).
Zhou, Q. et al. Enzyme-activatable polymer–drug conjugate augments tumour penetration and treatment efficacy. Nanotechnol 14, 799–809 (2019).
Liu, C., Yu, W., Chen, Z., Zhang, J. & Zhang, N. Enhanced gene transfection efficiency in CD13-positive vascular endothelial cells with targeted poly(lactic acid)-poly(ethylene glycol) nanoparticles through caveolae-mediated endocytosis. J. Control. Release 151, 162–175 (2011).
Sun, X. et al. Targeting autophagy enhances the anticancer effect of artemisinin and its derivatives. Med. Res. Rev. 39, 2172–2193 (2019).
Lawrence, R. E. et al. Structural mechanism of a Rag GTPase activation checkpoint by the lysosomal folliculin complex. Science 366, 971–977 (2019).
Wen, W., Liu, W., Shao, Y. & Chen, L. VER-155008, a small molecule inhibitor of HSP70 with potent anti-cancer activity on lung cancer cell lines. Exp. Biol. Med. 239, 638–645 (2014).
Matarrese, P. et al. Cathepsin B inhibition interferes with metastatic potential of human melanoma: an in vitro and in vivo study. Mol. Cancer. 9, 207 (2010).
Galluzzi, L. et al. Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018. Cell Death Differ. 25, 486–541 (2018).
Domagala, A. et al. Typical and atypical inducers of lysosomal cell death: a promising anticancer strategy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 2256 (2018).
Domenech, M., Marrero-Berrios, I., Torres-Lugo, M. & Rinaldi, C. Lysosomal membrane permeabilization by targeted magnetic nanoparticles in alternating magnetic fields. ACS Nano 7, 5091–5101 (2013).
Erdal, H. et al. Induction of lysosomal membrane permeabilization by compounds that activate p53-independent apoptosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 192–197 (2005).
Liu, L., Wei, Y., Zhai, S., Chen, Q. & Xing, D. Dihydroartemisinin and transferrin dual-dressed nano-graphene oxide for a pH-triggered chemotherapy. Biomaterials 62, 35–46 (2015).
Lee, H., Dam, D. H. M., Ha, J. W., Yue, J. & Odom, T. W. Enhanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 degradation in breast cancer cells by lysosome-targeting gold nanoconstructs. ACS Nano 9, 9859–9867 (2015).
Owen, S. C. et al. Targeting HER2 + breast cancer cells: lysosomal accumulation of anti-HER2 antibodies is influenced by antibody binding site and conjugation to polymeric nanoparticles. J. Control. Release 172, 395–404 (2013).
Daum, S. et al. Lysosome-targeting amplifiers of reactive oxygen species as anticancer prodrugs. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 56, 15545–15549 (2017).
Huang, W. C. et al. Engineering chimeric receptors to investigate the size- and rigidity-dependent interaction of pegylated nanoparticles with cells. ACS Nano 10, 648–662 (2016).
Borkowska, M. et al. Targeted crystallization of mixed-charge nanoparticles in lysosomes induces selective death of cancer cells. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 331–341 (2020).
Sun, B. et al. Disulfide bond-driven oxidation- and reduction-responsive prodrug nanoassemblies for cancer therapy. Nano Lett. 18, 3643–3650 (2018).
Liang, P. et al. Tumor-microenvironment-responsive nanoconjugate for synergistic antivascular activity and phototherapy. ACS Nano 12, 11446–11457 (2018).
Yu, N. et al. Dually enzyme- and acid-triggered self-immolative ketal glycoside nanoparticles for effective cancer prodrug monotherapy. Nano Lett. 20, 5465–5472 (2020).
Liu, X. et al. Controlled loading of albumin-drug conjugates ex vivo for enhanced drug delivery and antitumor efficacy. J. Control. Release 13, S0168–S3659 (2020).
Ko, Y. J. et al. Versatile activatable vSIRPα-probe for cancer-targeted imaging and macrophage-mediated phagocytosis of cancer cells. J. Control. Release 323, 376–386 (2020).
Zhang, X. et al. Endosome/lysosome-detained supramolecular nanogels as an efflux retarder and autophagy inhibitor for repeated photodynamic therapy of multidrug-resistant cancer. Nanoscale Horiz. 5, 481–487 (2020).
Pan, L., Liu, J. & Shi, J. Cancer cell nucleus-targeting nanocomposites for advanced tumor therapeutics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 6930–6946 (2018).
Hu, Q., Li, H., Wang, L., Gu, H. & Fan, C. DNA nanotechnology-enabled drug delivery systems. Chem. Rev. 119, 6459–6506 (2019).
Van Der Aa, M. A. E. M. et al. The nuclear pore complex: the gateway to successful nonviral gene delivery. Pharm. Res. 23, 447–459 (2006).
Cheng, H. et al. Chimeric peptide engineered exosomes for dual-stage light guided plasma membrane and nucleus targeted photodynamic therapy. Biomaterials 211, 14–24 (2019).
Yang, Y. et al. G-quadruplex-based nanoscale coordination polymers to modulate tumor hypoxia and achieve nuclear-targeted drug delivery for enhanced photodynamic therapy. Nano Lett. 18, 6867–6875 (2018).
Han, K. et al. Acidity-triggered tumor-targeted chimeric peptide for enhanced intra-nuclear photodynamic therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 4351–4361 (2016).
Sakiyama, Y., Mazur, A., Kapinos, L. E. & Lim, R. Y. H. Spatiotemporal dynamics of the nuclear pore complex transport barrier resolved by high-speed atomic force microscopy. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 719–723 (2016).
Huo, S. et al. Ultrasmall gold nanoparticles as carriers for nucleus-based gene therapy due to size-dependent nuclear entry. ACS Nano 8, 5852–5862 (2014).
Fan, Y., Li, C., Li, F. & Chen, D. PH-activated size reduction of large compound nanoparticles for in vivo nucleus-targeted drug delivery. Biomaterials 85, 30–39 (2016).
Xu, P. et al. Targeted charge-reversal nanoparticles for nuclear drug delivery. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 46, 4999–5002 (2007).
Zhou, Z. et al. Charge-reversal drug conjugate for targeted cancer cell nuclear drug delivery. Adv. Funct. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200900825 (2009).
Hinde, E. et al. Pair correlation microscopy reveals the role of nanoparticle shape in intracellular transport and site of drug release. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 81–89 (2017).
Cheng, Y. et al. Dual-targeted peptide-conjugated multifunctional fluorescent probe with AIEgen for efficient nucleus-specific imaging and long-term tracing of cancer cells. Chem. Sci 8, 4571–4578 (2017).
Sun, Y. et al. Novel polymeric micelles as enzyme-sensitive nuclear-targeted dual-functional drug delivery vehicles for enhanced 9-nitro-20(: S)-camptothecin delivery and antitumor efficacy. Nanoscale 12, 5380–5396 (2020).
Cheng, Y. et al. A multifunctional peptide-conjugated AIEgen for efficient and sequential targeted gene delivery into the nucleus. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 58, 5049–5053 (2019).
Kapinos, L. E., Huang, B., Rencurel, C. & Lim, R. Y. H. Karyopherins regulate nuclear pore complex barrier and transport function. J. Cell Biol. 216, 3609–3624 (2017).
Liu, J. N. et al. Simultaneous nuclear imaging and intranuclear drug delivery by nuclear-targeted multifunctional upconversion nanoprobes. Biomaterials 33, 7282–7290 (2012).
Kang, B., Mackey, M. A. & El-Sayed, M. A. Nuclear targeting of gold nanoparticles in cancer cells induces DNA damage, causing cytokinesis arrest and apoptosis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 1517–1519 (2010).
Pan, L. et al. Nuclear-targeted drug delivery of tat peptide-conjugated monodisperse mesoporous silica nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 5722–5725 (2012).
Li, N. et al. Nuclear-targeted photothermal therapy prevents cancer recurrence with near-infrared triggered copper sulfide nanoparticles. ACS Nano 12, 5197–5206 (2018).
Li, N. et al. Nuclear-targeted siRNA delivery for long-term gene silencing. Chem. Sci. 8, 2816–2822 (2017).
Tammam, S. N., Azzazy, H. M. E., Breitinger, H. G. & Lamprecht, A. Chitosan nanoparticles for nuclear targeting: the effect of nanoparticle size and nuclear localization sequence density. Mol. Pharm. 253, 30–36 (2015).
Tammam, S. N., Azzazy, H. M. E. & Lamprecht, A. The effect of nanoparticle size and NLS density on nuclear targeting in cancer and normal cells; impaired nuclear import and aberrant nanoparticle intracellular trafficking in glioma. J. Control. Release 253, 30–36 (2017).
Xu, J. et al. Cell-penetrating peptide: a means of breaking through the physiological barriers of different tissues and organs. J. Control. Release 309, 106–124 (2019).
Zhang, L. et al. Functionalized cell nucleus-penetrating peptide combined with doxorubicin for synergistic treatment of glioma. Acta Biomater. 42, 90–101 (2016).
Jeena, M. T., Kim, S., Jin, S. & Ryu, J. H. Recent progress in mitochondria-targeted drug and drug-free agents for cancer therapy. Cancers (Basel) 12, 4 (2020).
Zhou, J. et al. The anticancer efficacy of paclitaxel liposomes modified with mitochondrial targeting conjugate in resistant lung cancer. Biomaterials 34, 3626–3638 (2013).
Malhi, S. S. et al. Intracellular delivery of redox cycler-doxorubicin to the mitochondria of cancer cell by folate receptor targeted mitocancerotropic liposomes. Int. J. Pharm. 432, 63–74 (2012).
Chen, Y. et al. Enhancement of mitochondrial ROS accumulation and radiotherapeutic efficacy using a Gd-doped titania nanosensitizer. Theranostics 9, 167–178 (2019).
Zhang, J. et al. Intrinsically cancer-mitochondria-targeted thermally activated delayed fluorescence nanoparticles for two-photon-activated fluorescence imaging and photodynamic therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 41051–41061 (2019).
Yue, C. et al. Mitochondria-targeting near-infrared light-triggered thermosensitive liposomes for localized photothermal and photodynamic ablation of tumors combined with chemotherapy. Nanoscale 9, 11103–11118 (2017).
Douiev, L., Soiferman, D., Alban, C. & Saada, A. The effects of ascorbate, N-acetylcysteine, and resveratrol on fibroblasts from patients with mitochondrial disorders. J. Clin. Med. 6, 1 (2016).
Chen, Z. et al. Hierarchical targeted hepatocyte mitochondrial multifunctional chitosan nanoparticles for anticancer drug delivery. Biomaterials 52, 240–250 (2015).
Milane, L., Trivedi, M., Singh, A., Talekar, M. & Amiji, M. Mitochondrial biology, targets, and drug delivery. J. Control. Release 207, 40–58 (2015).
Carroll, B., Korolchuk, V. I. & Sarkar, S. Amino acids and autophagy: Cross-talk and co-operation to control cellular homeostasis. Amino Acids 47, 2065–2088 (2015).
Ma, X., Gong, N., Zhong, L., Sun, J. & Liang, X. J. Future of nanotherapeutics: Targeting the cellular sub-organelles. Biomaterials 97, 10–21 (2016).
Song, J. et al. Mitochondrial targeting nanodrugs self-assembled from 9-O-octadecyl substituted berberine derivative for cancer treatment by inducing mitochondrial apoptosis pathways. J. Control. Release 294, 27–42 (2019).
Biswas, S., Dodwadkar, N. S., Piroyan, A. & Torchilin, V. P. Surface conjugation of triphenylphosphonium to target poly(amidoamine) dendrimers to mitochondria. Biomaterials 33, 4773–4782 (2012).
Liu, Y. et al. Mitochondrial-targeting lonidamine-doxorubicin nanoparticles for synergistic chemotherapy to conquer drug resistance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 43498–43507 (2017).
Marrache, S. & Dhar, S. Engineering of blended nanoparticle platform for delivery of mitochondria-acting therapeutics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16288–16293 (2012).
Yuan, P. et al. Mitochondria-targeting, intracellular delivery of native proteins using biodegradable silica nanoparticles. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 58, 7657–7661 (2019).
Biswas, S., Dodwadkar, N. S., Deshpande, P. P. & Torchilin, V. P. Liposomes loaded with paclitaxel and modified with novel triphenylphosphonium-PEG-PE conjugate possess low toxicity, target mitochondria and demonstrate enhanced antitumor effects in vitro and in vivo. J. Control. Release 159, 393–402 (2012).
Yan, J. et al. Mitochondria-targeted tetrahedral DNA nanostructures for doxorubicin delivery and enhancement of apoptosis. J. Mater. Chem. B 8, 492–503 (2020).
Shah, B. P. et al. Core-shell nanoparticle-based peptide therapeutics and combined hyperthermia for enhanced cancer cell apoptosis. ACS Nano 8, 9379–9387 (2014).
Yamada, Y. & Harashima, H. Mitochondrial drug delivery systems for macromolecule and their therapeutic application to mitochondrial diseases. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 60, 1439–1462 (2008).
Kajimoto, K., Sato, Y., Nakamura, T., Yamada, Y. & Harashima, H. Multifunctional envelope-type nano device for controlled intracellular trafficking and selective targeting in vivo. J. Control. Release 190, 593–606 (2014).
Yue, C. et al. ROS-responsive mitochondria-targeting blended nanoparticles: chemo- and photodynamic synergistic therapy for lung cancer with on-demand drug release upon irradiation with a single light source. Theranostics 6, 2352–2366 (2016).
Hu, P. et al. Near infrared-assisted Fenton reaction for tumor-specific and mitochondrial DNA-targeted photochemotherapy. Biomaterials 141, 86–95 (2017).
Biswas, S., Dodwadkar, N. S., Sawant, R. R., Koshkaryev, A. & Torchilin, V. P. Surface modification of liposomes with rhodamine-123-conjugated polymer results in enhanced mitochondrial targeting. J. Drug Target. 19, 552–561 (2011).
Huang, Y. et al. Pyridinium-substituted tetraphenylethylenes functionalized with alkyl chains as autophagy modulators for cancer therapy. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 59, 10042–10051 (2020).
Xiao, H. et al. A new endoplasmic reticulum-targeted two-photon fluorescent probe for imaging of superoxide anion in diabetic mice. Biosens. Bioelectron. 91, 449–455 (2017).
Wang, C. et al. Investigation of endosome and lysosome biology by ultra pH-sensitive nanoprobes. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 113, 87–96 (2017).
Wang, Y. et al. An NIR-fluorophore-based therapeutic endoplasmic reticulum stress inducer. Adv. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201800475 (2018).
Zhang, H. et al. Targeting VCP enhances anticancer activity of oncolytic virus M1 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci. Transl. Med. 9, 7996 (2017).
Zhang, H. et al. An off-on COX-2-specific fluorescent probe: targeting the golgi apparatus of cancer cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 11663–11669 (2013).
Nishita, M. et al. Ror2 signaling regulates Golgi structure and transport through IFT20 for tumor invasiveness. Sci. Rep. 26, 7 (2017).
Lee, J. S. et al. TMEM165, a Golgi transmembrane protein, is a novel marker for hepatocellular carcinoma and its depletion impairs invasion activity. Oncol. Rep. 135, 11663–11669 (2018).
Xue, F. et al. A smart drug: a pH-responsive photothermal ablation agent for Golgi apparatus activated cancer therapy. Chem. Commun. 53, 6424–6427 (2017).
Nam, J. S. et al. Endoplasmic reticulum-localized Iridium(III) complexes as efficient photodynamic therapy agents via protein modifications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 10968–10977 (2016).
Sher, Y.-P., Lin, S.-I., Chai, K. M., Chen, I.-H. & Liu, S.-J. Endoplasmic reticulum-targeting sequence enhanced the cellular immunity of a tumor-associated antigen L6-based DNA vaccine. Am. J. Cancer Res. 9, 2028–2036 (2019).
Feng, Z. et al. Enzymatic assemblies disrupt the membrane and target endoplasmic reticulum for selective cancer cell death. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 9566–9573 (2018).
Sneh-Edri, H., Likhtenshtein, D. & Stepensky, D. Intracellular targeting of PLGA nanoparticles encapsulating antigenic peptide to the endoplasmic reticulum of dendritic cells and its effect on antigen cross-presentation in vitro. Mol. Pharm. 8, 1266–1275, https://doi.org/10.1021/mp200198c (2011).
Sahay, G., Gautam, V., Luxenhofer, R. & Kabanov, A. V. The utilization of pathogen-like cellular trafficking by single chain block copolymer. Biomaterials 31, 1757–1764 (2010).
Ghosh, C., Nandi, A. & Basu, S. Supramolecular self-assembly of triazine-based small molecules: targeting the endoplasmic reticulum in cancer cells. Nanoscale 11, 3326–3335 (2019).
Deng, H. et al. Endoplasmic reticulum targeting to amplify immunogenic cell death for cancer immunotherapy. Nano Lett. 20, 1928–1933 (2020).
Li, R. S. et al. Chiral nanoprobes for targeting and long-term imaging of the Golgi apparatus. Chem. Sci. 8, 6829–6835 (2017).
Luo, J. et al. Golgi apparatus-targeted chondroitin-modified nanomicelles suppress hepatic stellate cell activation for the management of liver fibrosis. ACS Nano 13, 3910–3923 (2019).
Li, H. et al. Chondroitin sulfate-linked prodrug nanoparticles target the Golgi apparatus for cancer metastasis treatment. ACS Nano 13, 9386–9396 (2019).
Bao, Y. W., Hua, X. W., Chen, X. & Wu, F. G. Platinum-doped carbon nanoparticles inhibit cancer cell migration under mild laser irradiation: multi-organelle-targeted photothermal therapy. Biomaterials 183, 30–42 (2018).
Huang, Y. et al. Enzyme responsiveness enhances the specificity and effectiveness of nanoparticles for the treatment of B16F10 melanoma. J. Control. Release 316, 208–222 (2019).
Sulima, S. O., Hofman, I. J. F., De Keersmaecker, K. & Dinman, J. D. How ribosomes translate cancer. Cancer Discov. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-0550 (2017).
Ebright, R. Y. et al. Deregulation of ribosomal protein expression and translation promotes breast cancer metastasis. Science 367, 1468–1473 (2020).
Mullard, A. Small molecules against RNA targets attract big backers. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 16, 813–815 (2017).
Frankowski, K. J. et al. Metarrestin, a perinucleolar compartment inhibitor, effectively suppresses metastasis. Sci. Transl. Med. 10, eaap8307 (2018).
Li, Z. et al. A smart nanoassembly for multistage targeted drug delivery and magnetic resonance imaging. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 3612–3620 (2014).
López, V. et al. Janus mesoporous silica nanoparticles for dual targeting of tumor cells and mitochondria. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 26697–26706 (2017).
Xie, R. et al. Mitochondria and nuclei dual-targeted hollow carbon nanospheres for cancer chemophotodynamic synergistic therapy. Mol. Pharm. 16, 2235–2248 (2019).
Xiong, H., Du, S., Ni, J., Zhou, J. & Yao, J. Mitochondria and nuclei dual-targeted heterogeneous hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for enhancing therapeutic efficacy of doxorubicin. Biomaterials 94, 70–83 (2016).
Sun, Q., Zhou, Z., Qiu, N. & Shen, Y. Rational design of cancer nanomedicine: nanoproperty integration and synchronization. Adv. Mater. 29, 14–32 (2017).
Kim, H. et al. Polymer-coated pH-responsive high-density lipoproteins. J. Control. Release 228, 132–140 (2016).
Chen, J. et al. Metal-Phenolic coatings as a platform to trigger endosomal escape of nanoparticles. ACS Nano 13, 11653–11664 (2019).
Li, J. L. et al. Dual drug delivery system based on biodegradable organosilica core-shell architectures. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 5287–5295 (2018).
Herranz-Blanco, B. et al. pH-Switch nanoprecipitation of polymeric nanoparticles for multimodal cancer targeting and intracellular triggered delivery of doxorubicin. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 5, 1904–1916 (2016).
Song, N. et al. Inspired by nonenveloped viruses escaping from endo-lysosomes: a pH-sensitive polyurethane micelle for effective intracellular trafficking. Nanoscale 8, 7711–7722 (2016).
Gao, Y. et al. PH/Redox dual-responsive polyplex with effective endosomal escape for codelivery of siRNA and doxorubicin against drug-resistant cancer cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 16296–16310 (2019).
Cao, Y. et al. Enhanced lysosomal escape of pH-responsive polyethylenimine-betaine functionalized carbon nanotube for the codelivery of survivin small interfering RNA and doxorubicin. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 16296–16310 (2019).
Ding, Y. et al. Dual-functional bio-derived nanoparticulates for apoptotic antitumor therapy. Biomaterials 11, 9763–9776 (2015).
Wang, F. et al. Charge-reversible multifunctional HPMA copolymers for mitochondrial targeting. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 27563–27574 (2017).
Wang, H. et al. Tumor- and mitochondria-targeted nanoparticles eradicate drug resistant lung cancer through mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis. J. Nanobiotechnology 18, 8 (2020).
Assanhou, A. G. et al. Reversal of multidrug resistance by co-delivery of paclitaxel and lonidamine using a TPGS and hyaluronic acid dual-functionalized liposome for cancer treatment. Biomaterials 73, 284–295 (2015).
Dong, Q. et al. Tumor environment differentiated “nanodepot” programmed for site-specific drug shuttling and combinative therapy on metastatic cancer. J. Control. Release 283, 59–75 (2018).
Pharmacy, P. et al. Cationic amphiphilic drugs boost the lysosomal escape of small nucleic acid therapeutics in a nanocarrier-dependent manner. ACS Nano 14, 4774–4791 (2020).
Shi, M. et al. Stimuli-responsive release and efficient siRNA delivery in non-small cell lung cancer by a poly(l-histidine)-based multifunctional nanoplatform. J. Mater. Chem. B 8, 1616–1628 (2020).
Maugeri, M. et al. Linkage between endosomal escape of LNP-mRNA and loading into EVs for transport to other cells. Nat. Commun. 10, 4333 (2019).
Chen, G. et al. NIR-induced spatiotemporally controlled gene silencing by upconversion nanoparticle-based siRNA nanocarrier. J. Control. Release 282, 148–155 (2018).
Joris, F. et al. Repurposing cationic amphiphilic drugs as adjuvants to induce lysosomal siRNA escape in nanogel transfected cells. J. Control. Release 269, 266–276 (2018).
Chen, G., Wang, Y., Xie, R. & Gong, S. Tumor-targeted pH/redox dual-sensitive unimolecular nanoparticles for efficient siRNA delivery. J. Control. Release 259, 105–114 (2017).
Liu, Y. et al. Charge conversional biomimetic nanocomplexes as a multifunctional platform for boosting orthotopic glioblastoma RNAi therapy. Nano Lett. 20, 1637–1646 (2020).
Dong, Y. et al. PH-sensitive shell-core platform block DNA repair pathway to amplify irreversible DNA damage of triple negative breast cancer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 38417–38428 (2019).
Han, L., Tang, C. & Yin, C. Enhanced antitumor efficacies of multifunctional nanocomplexes through knocking down the barriers for siRNA delivery. Biomaterials 44, 111–121 (2015).
Qiao, C. et al. Traceable nanoparticles with dual targeting and ROS response for RNAi-based immunochemotherapy of intracranial glioblastoma treatment. Adv. Mater. 30, e1705054 (2018).
Liu, J. et al. NIR light-activated dual-modality cancer therapy mediated by photochemical internalization of porous nanocarriers with tethered lipid bilayers. J. Mater. Chem. B 5, 8289–8298 (2017).
Zhang, Q. et al. Photoactivatable prodrug-backboned polymeric nanoparticles for efficient light-controlled gene delivery and synergistic treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Nano Lett. 20, 3039–3049 (2020).
Li, Y. et al. Photothermally triggered cytosolic drug delivery of glucose functionalized polydopamine nanoparticles in response to tumor microenvironment for the GLUT1-targeting chemo-phototherapy. J. Control. Release 317, 232–245 (2020).
Wang, J. et al. Visible light-switched cytosol release of siRNA by amphiphilic fullerene derivative to enhance RNAi efficacy in vitro and in vivo. Acta Biomater. 59, 158–169 (2017).
Kim, K., Lee, C. S. & Na, K. Light-controlled reactive oxygen species (ROS)-producible polymeric micelles with simultaneous drug-release triggering and endo/lysosomal escape. Chem. Commun. 52, 2839–2842 (2016).
Brendel, J. C. et al. Secondary self-assembly of supramolecular nanotubes into tubisomes and their activity on cells. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 57, 16678–16682 (2018).
Zhou, Z., Liu, Y., Wu, L., Li, L. & Huang, Y. Enhanced nuclear delivery of anti-cancer drugs using micelles containing releasable membrane fusion peptide and nuclear-targeting retinoic acid. J. Mater. Chem. B 5, 7175–7185 (2017).
Hauser, A. K. et al. Targeted iron oxide nanoparticles for the enhancement of radiation therapy. Biomaterials 105, 127–135 (2016).
Tian, Y. et al. Integration of cell-penetrating peptides with rod-like bionanoparticles: virus-inspired gene-silencing technology. Nano Lett. 18, 5453–5460 (2018).
Yi, A., Sim, D., Lee, Y. J., Sarangthem, V. & Park, R. W. Development of elastin-like polypeptide for targeted specific gene delivery in vivo. J. Nanobiotechnology 18, 15 (2020).
He, H. et al. Suppression of hepatic inflammation via systemic siRNA delivery by membrane-disruptive and endosomolytic helical polypeptide hybrid nanoparticles. ACS Nano 10, 1859–1870 (2016).
Xu, J. et al. Precise targeting of POLR2A as a therapeutic strategy for human triple negative breast cancer. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 388–397 (2019).
He, Y. et al. Sequential intra-intercellular delivery of nanomedicine for deep drug-resistant solid tumor penetration. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 8978–8988 (2020).
Gopisetty, M. K. et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress: major player in size-dependent inhibition of P-glycoprotein by silver nanoparticles in multidrug-resistant breast cancer cells. J. Nanobiotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-019-0448-4 (2019).
Mallick, A., More, P., Syed, M. M. K. & Basu, S. Nanoparticle-mediated mitochondrial damage induces apoptosis in cancer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 13218–13231 (2016).
Jana, A. et al. Photocontrolled nuclear-targeted drug delivery by single component photoresponsive fluorescent organic nanoparticles of acridin-9-methanol. Bioconjug. Chem. 24, 1828–1839 (2013).
Li, X., Pan, L. & Shi, J. Nuclear-targeting MSNs-based drug delivery system: global gene expression analysis on the MDR-overcoming mechanisms. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 4, 2641–2648 (2015).
Chen, Y. P. et al. Catcher in the rel: nanoparticles-antibody conjugate as NF-κB nuclear translocation blocker. Biomaterials 246, 119997 (2020).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21873057), Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. ZR2019MB041), the Major Basic Research Project of Shandong Natural Science Foundation, P.R. China (Grant No. ZR2018ZC0232) and the Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University (Grant No. 2018JC006).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Fu, X., Shi, Y., Qi, T. et al. Precise design strategies of nanomedicine for improving cancer therapeutic efficacy using subcellular targeting. Sig Transduct Target Ther 5, 262 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-020-00342-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-020-00342-0
This article is cited by
-
Microneedle-mediated nanomedicine to enhance therapeutic and diagnostic efficacy
Nano Convergence (2024)
-
Oxygen tank for synergistic hypoxia relief to enhance mitochondria-targeted photodynamic therapy
Biomaterials Research (2022)
-
Organelle-targeted therapies: a comprehensive review on system design for enabling precision oncology
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy (2022)
-
Interaction behavior between glycated human serum albumin and metformin in the presence of silver nanoparticles: a combination study of spectroscopic, calorimetric and molecular dynamic
Journal of the Iranian Chemical Society (2022)
-
Mitochondria-targeted accumulation of oxygen-irrelevant free radicals for enhanced synergistic low-temperature photothermal and thermodynamic therapy
Journal of Nanobiotechnology (2021)