Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Neonatal lymphatic flow disorders: impact of lymphatic imaging and interventions on outcomes

Abstract

Neonatal chylothorax (NCTx) and central lymphatic flow disorder (CLFD) are historically challenging neonatal disorders with high morbidity and mortality.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of 35 neonates with pulmonary lymphatic abnormalities at our institution who underwent lymphatic evaluation between December 2015 and September 2018. Patients with only pulmonary lymphatic perfusion syndrome were classified as NCTx and those with multiple flow abnormalities were classified as CLFD. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes were compared using t-tests/Wilcoxon rank sum tests and Fisher’s exact tests.

Results

All 35 patients had intranodal MR lymphangiography and 14 (40%) also had conventional fluoroscopic lymphangiography. Fifteen (42.8%) patients were diagnosed with NCTx and 20 (57.1%) were diagnosed with CLFD. Thirty-four (97.1%) patients had pleural effusions. None of the NCTx group had ascites, anasarca, or dermal backflow compared to 17 (85%) (p < 0.001), 8 (42.1%) (p: 0.004), and 20 (100%) (p < 0.001) of the CLFD group, respectively. In the NCTx group, 11 (73.3%) had ethiodized oil embolization and 4 (26.7%) received conservative therapy. Ten (50%) of the CLFD patients had an intervention; of those, two (10%) had ethiodized oil-only embolization. Eight had non-ethiodized oil embolizations (two (25%) had embolization with glue, three (37.5%) underwent surgical lymphovenous anastomosis, two (25%) underwent thoracic duct (TD) externalization, and one (12.5%) had a non-TD lymphatic channel drain placed). Complete resolution of pleural effusions was achieved in all 15 NCTx patients, whereas 9 (45%) of 20 CLFD patients had resolution of chylothorax (p: 0.001).

Conclusions

Establishing a diagnosis of NCTx or CLFD is paramount in selecting treatment options and providing prognostic information. Development of lymphatic interventions represents a paradigm shift in our understanding of neonatal lymphatic flow disorders and may be associated with improved survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Dynamic contrast MR lymphangiography (DCMRL) in neonatal chylothorax and CLFD.
Fig. 2: Survival and mechanical ventilation outcomes.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dori Y. Novel lymphatic imaging techniques. Tech Vasc Inter Radio. 2016;19:255–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Biko DM, Johnstone JA, Dori Y, Victoria T, Oliver ER, Itkin M. Recognition of neonatal lymphatic flow disorder: fetal MR findings and postnatal MR lymphangiogram correlation. Acad Radio. 2018;25:1446–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fogg KL, DellaValle DM, Buckley JR, Graham EM, Zyblewski SC. Feasibility and efficacy of defatted human milk in the treatment for chylothorax after cardiac surgery in infants. Pediatr Cardiol. 2016;37:1072–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen E, Itkin M. Thoracic duct embolization for chylous leaks. Semin Interv Radio. 2011;28:63–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gray M, Kovatis KZ, Stuart T, Enlow E, Itkin M, Keller MS, et al. Treatment of congenital pulmonary lymphangiectasia using ethiodized oil lymphangiography. J Perinatol. 2014;34:720–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Savla JJ, Itkin M, Rossano JW, Dori Y. Post-operative chylothorax in patients with congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:2410–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Weissler JM, Cho EH, Koltz PF, Carney MJ, Itkin M, Laje P, et al. Lymphovenous anastomosis for the treatment of chylothorax in infants: a novel microsurgical approach to a devastating problem. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141:1502–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dori Y, Keller MS, Rome JJ, Gillespie MJ, Glatz AC, Dodds K, et al. Percutaneous lymphatic embolization of abnormal pulmonary lymphatic flow as treatment of plastic bronchitis in patients with congenital heart disease. Circulation. 2016;133:1160–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Itkin M, Chen EH. Thoracic duct embolization. Semin Interv Radio. 2011;28:261–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nadolski G, Itkin M. Thoracic duct embolization for the management of chylothoraces. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2013;19:380–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Attar MA, Donn SM. Congenital chylothorax. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;22:234–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Horvers M, Mooij CF, Antonius TA. Is octreotide treatment useful in patients with congenital chylothorax? Neonatology. 2012;101:225–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Cardiac Center Clinical Research Core at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dalal Taha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pinto, E., Dori, Y., Smith, C. et al. Neonatal lymphatic flow disorders: impact of lymphatic imaging and interventions on outcomes. J Perinatol 41, 494–501 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-020-00771-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-020-00771-3

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links