Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

A Hec of a microtubule attachment

The central function of kinetochores is to grasp a dynamic microtubule. Structural, biochemical and cell biological approaches have converged to uncover a microtubule-binding activity within the Ndc80/HEC1 complex, providing a satisfying answer to a question that has puzzled biologists for the last century.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Model for microtubule attachment by the kinetochore.

References

  1. Wei, R.W., Al-Bassam, J. & Harrison, S.C. Nat.Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 54–59 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheeseman, I.M., Chappie, J.S., Wilson-Kubalek, E.M. & Desai, A. Cell 127, 983–997 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Deluca, J.G. et al. Cell 127, 969–982 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Maiato, H., DeLuca, J., Salmon, E.D. & Earnshaw, W.C. J. Cell Sci. 117, 5461–5477 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wigge, P.A. & Kilmartin, J.V. J. Cell Biol. 152, 349–360 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McCleland, M.L. et al. Curr. Biol. 14, 131–137 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wei, R.R., Sorger, P.K. & Harrison, S.C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 5363–5367 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Deluca, J.G. et al. 16, 519–531 Mol. Biol. Cell (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McCleland, M.L. et al. Genes Dev. 17, 101–114 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stradal, T., Kranewitter, W., Winder, S.J. & Gimona, M. FEBS Lett. 431, 134–137 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hayashi, I. & Ikura, M. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 36430–36434 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kline-Smith, S.L., Sandall, S. & Desai, A. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 17, 35–46 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hill, T.L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82, 4404–4408 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tanaka, T.U. et al. Cell 108, 317–329 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shang, C. et al. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 3342–3355 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cimini, D., Wan, X., Hirel, C.B. & Salmon, E.D. Curr. Biol. 16, 1711–1718 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Joglekar, A.P., Bouck, D.C., Molk, J.N., Bloom, K.S. & Salmon, E.D. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 581–585 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Emanuele, M.J., McCleland, M.L., Satinover, D.L. & Stukenberg, P.T. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 4882–4892 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Emanuele, M., Burke, D. & Stukenberg, P. A Hec of a microtubule attachment. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14, 11–13 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb0107-11

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb0107-11

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing