Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Imaging

Safety of spinal angiography

Spinal angiography has historically been associated with a high risk of complications, but up-to-date safety reports are lacking. A recent retrospective review found a low complication rate of catheter angiography of the spine, and suggests that MRI performs poorly as an alternative approach to the diagnosis of spinal vascular disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Chen, J. & Gailloud, P. Safety of spinal angiography: complication rate analysis in 302 diagnostic angiograms. Neurology 77, 1235–1240 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharma, A. & Westesson, P. Preoperative evaluation of spinal vascular malformations by MR angiography: how reliable is the technique: case report and review of literature. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 110, 521–524 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mull, M. et al. Value and limitations of contrast enhanced MR angiography in spinal arteriovenous malformations and dural arteriovenous fistulas. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 28, 1249–1258 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Eddleman, C. S. et al. Advanced non-invasive imaging of spinal vascular malformations. Neurosurg. Focus 26, E9 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eddleman, C. S. et al. 4D radial acquisition contrast-enhanced MR angiography and intracranial arteriovenous malformations: quickly approaching digital subtraction angiography. Stroke 40, 2749–2753 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Di Chiro, G. & Wener, L. Angiography of the spinal cord. A review of contemporary techniques and applications. J. Neurosurg. 39, 1–29 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kieffer, E. et al. Spinal cord arteriography: a safe adjunct before descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysmectomy. J. Vasc. Surg. 35, 262–268 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sadick, V. et al. Impact of biplane versus single-plane imaging on radiation dose, contrast load and procedural time in coronary angioplasty. Br. J. Radiol. 83, 379–394 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy J. Carroll.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hurley, M., Carroll, T. Safety of spinal angiography. Nat Rev Neurol 8, 10–11 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2011.202

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2011.202

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing