The results of several clinical trials in metastatic colorectal cancer presented in 2014 will influence clinical practice. These findings include definitive data from phase III trials comparing bevacizumab and cetuximab-based therapy in the first-line, studies elucidating the value of maintenance therapy after induction treatment, and data on new agents in this disease.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
β-carboline derivative Z86 attenuates colorectal cancer cell proliferation and migration by directly targeting PI3K
Natural Products and Bioprospecting Open Access 03 January 2024
-
The role of PDGFRA as a therapeutic target in young colorectal cancer patients
Journal of Translational Medicine Open Access 26 October 2021
-
Identification of histone methyltransferase NSD2 as an important oncogenic gene in colorectal cancer
Cell Death & Disease Open Access 20 October 2021
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Heinemann, V. et al. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 15, 1065–1075 (2014).
Stintzing, S. et al. Independent radiological evaluation of objective response, early tumor shrinkage, and depth of response in FIRE-3 (AIO KRK-0306) in the final RAS evaluable population [abstract LBA11]. Ann. Oncol. 25 (Suppl. 5), v1–v41 (2014).
Venook, A. P. et al. CALGB/SWOG 80405: Phase III trial of irinotecan/5-FU/leucovorin (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5-FU/leucovorin (mFOLFOX6) with bevacizumab (BV) or cetuximab (CET) for patients (pts) with KRAS wild-type (wt) untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum (mCRC) [abstract]. J. Clin. Oncol. 32 (5s Suppl.), LBA3 (2014).
Lenz, H. et al. CALGB/SWOG 80405: Phase III trial of irinotecan/5-FU/leucovorin (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5-FU/leucovorin (mFOLFOX6) with bevacizumab (BV) or cetuximab (CET) for patients (pts) with expanded RAS analyses untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum (mCRC) [abstract]. Ann. Oncol. 25 (Suppl. 4), A5010 (2014).
Arnold, D. et al. Maintenance strategy with fluoropyrimidines (FP) plus Bevacizumab (Bev), Bev alone, or no treatment, following a standard combination of FP, oxaliplatin (Ox), and Bev as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): a phase III non-inferiority trial (AIO KRK 0207) [abstract]. J. Clin. Oncol. 32 (5s Suppl.), 3503 (2014).
Chibaudel, B. et al. Bevacizumab-erlotinib as maintenance therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Final results of the GERCOR DREAM study [abstract 4970]. Ann. Oncol. 25 (Suppl. 4), iv167–iv209 (2014).
Koopman, M. et al. Final results and subgroup analyses of the phase 3 CAIRO3 study: maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab versus observation after induction treatment with chemotherapy and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) [abstract]. J. Clin. Oncol. 32 (Suppl. 3), LBA388 (2014).
Grothey, A. et al. Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 381, 303–312 (2013).
Kim, T. W. et al. CONCUR: a randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 study of regorafenib (REG) monotherapy in Asian patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) [abstract 500O]. Ann. Oncol. 25 (Suppl. 4), iv168–iv169 (2014).
Van Cutsem, E. et al. Phase III RECOURSE trial of TAS-102 vs. placebo, with best supportive care (BSC), in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to standard therapies [abstract LBA13]. Ann. Oncol. 25 (Suppl. 5), v1–v41 (2014).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
Research funding for A.G. was provided by Bayer, Eisai/Morphotek, Eli–Lilly, Genentech, Pfizer, and Sanofi. A.G. received honoraria for consulting from Amgen, Bayer, Boston Biomedicals, Bristol–Myers Squibb, Eli-Lilly, Genentech/Roche, and Sanofi. Research funding for J.M.H. was provided by Boston Biomedicals, Genentech and, PRISM. The Mayo Clinic Foundation received honoraria for consulting by J.M.H from Bayer.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Table 1
Comparison of outcomes of FIRE 3 and CALGB/SWOG 80405 trials (DOC 52 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hubbard, J., Grothey, A. Progress in defining first-line and maintenance therapies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 12, 73–74 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.233
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.233