Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Genetics

How to validate a breast cancer prognostic signature

Whether a 70-gene signature could help individualize therapy in breast cancer patients with small tumors is the subject of a recently reported study. The authors of the article raise important issues about how to validate the clinical utility of the new molecular classifiers for risk prediction.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Mook, S. et al. The 70-gene prognosis signature predicts early metastasis in breast cancer patients between 55 and 70 years of age. Ann. Oncol. 21, 717–722 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. van 't Veer, L. J. et al. Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 415, 530–536 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Azzato, E. M. et al. Prevalent cases in observational studies of cancer survival: do they bias hazard ratio estimates? Br. J. Cancer 100, 1806–1811 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Blows, F. M. et al. Subtyping of breast cancer by immunohistochemistry to investigate a relationship between subtype and short and long term survival: a collaborative analysis of data for 10,159 cases from 12 studies. PLoS Med. 7, e1000279 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Blamey, R. W. et al. Survival of invasive breast cancer according to the Nottingham Prognostic Index in cases diagnosed in 1990-1999. Eur. J. Cancer 43, 1548–1555 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ravdin, P. M. et al. Computer program to assist in making decisions about adjuvant therapy for women with early breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 19, 980–991 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wishart, G. C. et al. PREDICT: a new UK prognostic model that predicts survival following surgery for invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 12, R1 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Dawson, S. J. et al. BCL2 in breast cancer: a favourable prognostic marker across molecular subtypes and independent of adjuvant therapy received. Br. J. Cancer 103, 668–675 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Teschendorff, A. E. et al. A consensus prognostic gene expression classifier for ER positive breast cancer. Genome Biol. 7, R101 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Cardoso, F. et al. Clinical application of the 70-gene profile: the MINDACT trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 26, 729–735 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Caldas.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pharoah, P., Caldas, C. How to validate a breast cancer prognostic signature. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 7, 615–616 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.142

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.142

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer