Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Quantification of free cysteines in membrane and soluble proteins using a fluorescent dye and thermal unfolding

Abstract

Cysteine is an extremely useful site for selective attachment of labels to proteins for many applications, including the study of protein structure in solution by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), fluorescence spectroscopy and medical imaging. The demand for quantitative data for these applications means that it is important to determine the extent of the cysteine labeling. The efficiency of labeling is sensitive to the 3D context of cysteine within the protein. Where the label or modification is not directly measurable by optical or magnetic spectroscopy, for example, in cysteine modification to dehydroalanine, assessing labeling efficiency is difficult. We describe a simple assay for determining the efficiency of modification of cysteine residues, which is based on an approach previously used to determine membrane protein stability. The assay involves a reaction between the thermally unfolded protein and a thiol-specific coumarin fluorophore that is only fluorescent upon conjugation with thiols. Monitoring fluorescence during thermal denaturation of the protein in the presence of the dye identifies the temperature at which the maximum fluorescence occurs; this temperature differs among proteins. Comparison of the fluorescence intensity at the identified temperature between modified, unmodified (positive control) and cysteine-less protein (negative control) allows for the quantification of free cysteine. We have quantified both site-directed spin labeling and dehydroalanine formation. The method relies on a commonly available fluorescence 96-well plate reader, which rapidly screens numerous samples within 1.5 h and uses <100 μg of material. The approach is robust for both soluble and detergent-solubilized membrane proteins.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Schematic diagram of the thermofluor assay.
Figure 2: Thermofluor profile.
Figure 3: Comparison of thermal fluorescence with CW-EPR-derived efficiencies of cysteine modification and MS.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoff, A.J. Advanced EPR. Applications in Biology and Biochemistry (Elsevier, 1989).

  2. Powl, A.M., Wright, J.N., East, J.M. & Lee, A.G. Identification of the hydrophobic thickness of a membrane protein using fluorescence spectroscopy: studies with the mechanosensitive channel MscL. Biochemistry 44, 5713–5721 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hubbell, W.L., Cafiso, D.S. & Altenbach, C. Identifying conformational changes with site-directed spin labeling. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 735–739 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chalker, J.M., Bernardes, G.J.L., Lin, Y.A. & Davis, B.G. Chemical modification of proteins at cysteine: opportunities in chemistry and biology. Chem. Asian J. 4, 630–640 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ellman, G.L. Tissue sulfhydryl groups. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 82, 70–77 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lu, J. & Deutsch, C. Pegylation: a method for assessing topological accessibilities in Kv1.3. Biochemistry 40, 13288–13301 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Endeward, B., Butterwick, J.A., MacKinnon, R. & Prisner, T.F. Pulsed electron-electron double-resonance determination of spin-label distances and orientations on the tetrameric potassium ion channel KcsA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 15246–15250 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Riener, C.K., Kada, G. & Gruber, H.J. Quick measurement of protein sulfhydryls with Ellman's reagent and with 4,4′-dithiodipyridine. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 373, 266–276 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mansfeld, J. et al. Extreme stabilization of a thermolysin-like protease by an engineered disulfide bond. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 11152–11156 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rasmussen, T. et al. Tryptophan in the pore of the mechanosensitive channel MscS. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 5377–5384 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ericsson, U.B., Hallberg, B.M., Detitta, G.T., Dekker, N. & Nordlund, P. Thermofluor-based high-throughput stability optimization of proteins for structural studies. Anal. Biochem. 357, 289–298 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Alexandrov, A.I., Mileni, M., Chien, E.Y.T., Hanson, M.A. & Stevens, R.C. Microscale fluorescent thermal stability assay for membrane proteins. Structure 16, 351–359 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mansoor, S.E., Mchaourab, H.S. & Farrens, D.L. Determination of protein secondary structure and solvent accessibility using site-directed fluorescence labeling. studies of T4 lysozyme using the fluorescent probe monobromobimane. Biochemistry 38, 16383–16393 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, W., Hanson, M.A., Stevens, R.C. & Cherezov, V. LCP-Tm: an assay to measure and understand stability of membrane proteins in a membrane environment. Biophys. J. 98, 1539–1548 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sippel, T.O. New fluorochromes for thiols: maleimide and iodoacetamide derivatives of a 3-phenylcoumarin fluorophore. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 29, 314–316 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chalker, J.M., Lercher, L., Rose, N.R., Schofield, C.J. & Davis, B.G. Conversion of cysteine into dehydroalanine enables access to synthetic histones bearing diverse post-translational modifications. Angew. Chem. 51, 1835–1839 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pliotas, C. et al. Conformational state of the MscS mechanosensitive channel in solution revealed by pulsed electron–electron double resonance (PELDOR) spectroscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 2675–2682 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hagelueken, G. et al. PELDOR spectroscopy distance fingerprinting of the octameric outer-membrane protein Wza from Escherichia coli. Angew. Chem. 48, 2904–2906 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bode, B.E. et al. Counting the monomers in nanometer-sized oligomers by pulsed electron-electron double resonance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 6736–6745 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Borbat, P.P. & Freed, J.H. Measuring distances by pulsed dipolar ESR spectroscopy: spin-labeled histidine kinases. Methods Enzymol. 423, 52–116 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bordignon, E. Site-directed spin labeling of membrane proteins. Top. Curr. Chem. 321, 121–157 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schiemann, O. & Prisner, T.F. Long-range distance determinations in biomacromolecules by EPR spectroscopy. Q. Rev. Biophys. 40, 1–53 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Chalker, J.M. et al. Methods for converting cysteine to dehydroalanine on peptides and proteins. Chem. Sci. 2, 1666–1676 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Aebersold, R. & Mann, M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 422, 198–207 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. White, G.F. et al. Subunit organization in the TatA complex of the twin arginine protein translocase: a site-directed EPR spin labeling study. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 2294–2301 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Stoll, S. et al. Double electron-electron resonance shows cytochrome P450cam undergoes a conformational change in solution upon binding substrate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 12888–12893 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Vasquez, V., Cortes, M.D., Furukawa, H. & Perozo, E. An optimized purification and reconstitution method for the MscS channel: strategies for spectroscopical analysis. Biochemistry 46, 6766–6773 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Plechanovová, A. et al. Mechanism of ubiquitylation by dimeric RING ligase RNF4. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 1052–1060 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the Biomedical Sciences Research Complex Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics Facility for mass spectroscopy analysis and assistance with writing the manuscript; B. Bode and R. Ward for discussing the manuscript; A. Plechanovová at the University of Dundee for providing the plasmid for UbcH5a; and J. Chalker at the University of Oxford for providing the dibromide reagent. The UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/H017917/1), the Wellcome Trust (WT081862) and EaStCHEM (E.B. studentship) funded this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

E.B., C.P. and G.H. performed experiments. E.B., C.P., G.H. and J.H.N. analyzed the data. E.B., C.P. and J.H.N. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James H Naismith.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 cwEPR spectra for spin-labeled MscS mutants.

cwEPR spectra for MscS (a) V32R1 (b) S58R1, (c) D67R1, (d) L124R1 and (e) S147R1 and the positive control (f) 4-amino TEMPO with magnetic field (x axis) plotted against intensity (y axis) for each mutant.

Supplementary Figure 2 Thermofluor profile at low concentration.

Thermofluor profile for MscS S147R1 showing the negative control in blue, the positive control in red and the spin-labeled sample in green. Repeat measurements are denoted with (1) a smooth line and (2) a dashed line. The temperature at which the fluorescence intensity was used is highlighted with a black line.

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Methods

Double integration of cwEPR spectra and mass spectroscopy. (PDF 53 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

Efficiency of conversion of cysteine. Table of data presented in Figure 3a showing the percentage of spin-labeling efficiency and the conversion to dehydroalanine calculated using the fluorescence assay and cwEPR (where appropriate), including associated error estimations. (PDF 74 kb)

Supplementary Figure 1

cwEPR Spectra for Spin Labeled MscS Mutants. (PDF 178 kb)

Supplementary Figure 2

Thermofluor Profile at Low Concentration. (PDF 2108 kb)

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Branigan, E., Pliotas, C., Hagelueken, G. et al. Quantification of free cysteines in membrane and soluble proteins using a fluorescent dye and thermal unfolding. Nat Protoc 8, 2090–2097 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.128

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.128

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing