Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Deficits in perceptual noise exclusion in developmental dyslexia

Abstract

We evaluated signal-noise discrimination in children with and without dyslexia, using magnocellular and parvocellular visual stimuli presented either with or without high noise. Dyslexic children had elevated contrast thresholds when stimuli of either type were presented in high noise, but performed as well as non-dyslexic children when either type was displayed without noise. Our findings suggest that deficits in noise exclusion, not magnocellular processing, contribute to the etiology of dyslexia.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2: Contrast thresholds.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Olson, R. et al. J. Learn. Disabil. 22, 339–348 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Harm, M.W. & Seidenberg, M.S. Psychol. Rev. 106, 491–528 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gottardo, A., Stanovich, K.E. & Siegel, L.S. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 63, 563–582 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cornelissen, P.L. et al. Vision Res. 38, 471–482 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Demb, J.B., Boynton, G.M. & Heeger, D.J. J. Neurosci. 18, 6939–6951 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Willcutt, E.G. & Pennington, B.F. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 41, 1039–1048 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lovegrove, W.J. et al. Science 210, 439–440 (1980).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ramus, F. et al. Brain 126, 841–865 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lu, Z.L. & Dosher, B.A. Vision Res. 38, 1183–1198 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Manis, F.R. & Keating, P. in The Connections Between Language and Reading Disabilities (Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sperling, A.J., Lu, Z.L. & Manis, F.R. Ann. Dyslexia 54, 281–303 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Molfese, D.L. Brain Lang. 72, 238–245 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Read, C. et al. Cognition 24, 31–44 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by National Institute of Child Health and Human Development grant HD29891 (F.R.M.), and by National Institute of Mental Health grants KO2-MH01188 and P50-MH64445 (M.S.S.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne J Sperling.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Table 1

Reading and cognitive scores (means and s.d.). (PDF 69 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

Correlations between contrast thresholds and reading and cognitive measures. (PDF 62 kb)

Supplementary Methods (PDF 121 kb)

Supplementary Video 1

Magnocellular stimulus, no noise. The signal appears on the left side of the fixation mark, alternating in counter-phase as it fades on and off. (MOV 97 kb)

Supplementary Video 2

Magnocellular stimulus, high noise. The signal, embedded in a noise patch, appears on the left side of the fixation mark, while a plain noise patch appears on the right. (MOV 234 kb)

Supplementary Video 3

Parvocellular stimulus, no noise. The signal appears on the left side of the fixation mark and does not alternate as it fades on and off. (MOV 115 kb)

Supplementary Video 4

Parvocellular stimulus, high noise. The signal, embedded in a noise patch, appears on the left side of the fixation mark, while a plain noise patch appears on the right. (MOV 261 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sperling, A., Lu, ZL., Manis, F. et al. Deficits in perceptual noise exclusion in developmental dyslexia. Nat Neurosci 8, 862–863 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1474

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1474

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing