Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Drug Insight: biological effects of botulinum toxin A in the lower urinary tract

Abstract

Botulinum toxins can effectively and selectively disrupt and modulate neurotransmission in striated muscle. Recently, urologists have become interested in the use of these toxins in patients with detrusor overactivity and other urological disorders. In both striated and smooth muscle, botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) is internalized by presynaptic neurons after binding to an extracellular receptor (ganglioside and presumably synaptic vesicle protein 2C). In the neuronal cytosol, BTX-A disrupts fusion of the acetylcholine-containing vesicle with the neuronal wall by cleaving the SNAP-25 protein in the synaptic fusion complex. The net effect is selective paralysis of the low-grade contractions of the unstable detrusor, while still allowing high-grade contraction that initiates micturition. Additionally, BTX-A seems to have effects on afferent nerve activity by modulating the release of ATP in the urothelium, blocking the release of substance P, calcitonin gene-related peptide and glutamate from afferent nerves, and reducing levels of nerve growth factor. These effects on sensory feedback loops might not only help to explain the mechanism of BTX-A in relieving symptoms of overactive bladder, but also suggest a potential role for BTX-A in the relief of hyperalgesia associated with lower urinary tract disorders.

Key Points

  • There has been recent interest in the potential use of botulinum toxins, particularly botulinum toxin A (BTX-A), in patients with detrusor overactivity and other urological disorders

  • After internalization of BTX-A into the cytosol of presynaptic neurons, it disrupts fusion of the acetylcholine-containing vesicle with the neuronal wall by cleaving the SNAP-25 protein in the synaptic fusion complex

  • In detrusor overactivity, the effect of BTX-A results in selective paralysis of the low-grade contractions of the unstable detrusor, while still allowing the high-grade contractions that initiate micturition

  • BTX-A also seems to affect afferent nerve activity by modulating the release of ATP in the urothelium, blocking the release of substance P, calcitonin gene-related peptide and glutamate from afferent nerves, and reducing the levels of nerve growth factor

  • In view of its effects on sensory feedback loops, BTX-A could have a potential role in relieving hyperalgesia associated with lower urinary tract disorders, in addition to its reported beneficial effects on symptoms of overactive bladder

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Structure of BTX-A.
Figure 2: Internalization and translocation of BTX-A.
Figure 3: Inhibition of acetylcholine exocytosis by BTX-A.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Billante CR et al. (2002) Comparison of neuromuscular blockade and recovery with botulinum toxins A and F. Muscle Nerve 26: 395–403

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jurasinski CV et al. (2001) Correlation of cleavage of SNAP-25 with muscle function in a rat model of Botulinum neurotoxin type A induced paralysis. Toxicon 39: 1309–1315

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shen J et al. (2006) How muscles recover from paresis and atrophy after intramuscular injection of botulinum toxin A: study in juvenile rats. J Orthop Res 24: 1128–1135

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schurch B et al. (2005) Botulinum toxin type A is a safe and effective treatment for neurogenic urinary incontinence: results of a single treatment, randomized, placebo controlled 6-month study. J Urol 174: 196–200

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Simpson LL (1979) The action of botulinal toxin. Rev Infect Dis 1: 656–662

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lacy DB et al. (1998) Crystal structure of botulinum neurotoxin type A and implications for toxicity. Nat Struct Biol 5: 898–902

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Aoki KR and Guyer B (2001) Botulinum toxin type A and other botulinum toxin serotypes: a comparative review of biochemical and pharmacological actions. Eur J Neurol 8 (Suppl 5): 21–29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Simpson LL (2004) Identification of the major steps in botulinum toxin action. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 44: 167–193

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kozaki S et al. (1989) Immunological characterization of papain-induced fragments of Clostridium botulinum type A neurotoxin and interaction of the fragments with brain synaptosomes. Infect Immun 57: 2634–2639

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Aoki KR (2004) Botulinum toxin: a successful therapeutic protein. Curr Med Chem 11: 3085–3092

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Segelke B et al. (2004) Crystal structure of Clostridium botulinum neurotoxin protease in a product-bound state: evidence for noncanonical zinc protease activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 6888–6893

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bandyopadhyay S et al. (1987) Role of the heavy and light chains of botulinum neurotoxin in neuromuscular paralysis. J Biol Chem 262: 2660–2663

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Black JD and Dolly JO (1986) Interaction of 125I-labeled botulinum neurotoxins with nerve terminals. II. Autoradiographic evidence for its uptake into motor nerves by acceptor-mediated endocytosis. J Cell Biol 103: 535–544

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dolly JO et al. (1984) Acceptors for botulinum neurotoxin reside on motor nerve terminals and mediate its internalization. Nature 307: 457–460

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Black JD and Dolly JO (1987) Selective location of acceptors for botulinum neurotoxin A in the central and peripheral nervous systems. Neuroscience 23: 767–779

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Williams RS et al. (1983) Radioiodination of botulinum neurotoxin type A with retention of biological activity and its binding to brain synaptosomes. Eur J Biochem 131: 437–445

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dong M et al. (2006) SV2 is the protein receptor for botulinum neurotoxin A. Science 312: 592–596

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mahrhold S et al. (2006) The synaptic vesicle protein 2C mediates the uptake of botulinum neurotoxin A into phrenic nerves. FEBS Lett 580: 2011–2014

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Keller JE and Neale EA (2001) The role of the synaptic protein SNAP-25 in the potency of botulinum neurotoxin type A. J Biol Chem 276: 13476–13482

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Blaustein RO et al. (1987) The N-terminal half of the heavy chain of botulinum type A neurotoxin forms channels in planar phospholipid bilayers. FEBS Lett 226: 115–120

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Li L and Singh BR (2000) Spectroscopic analysis of pH-induced changes in the molecular features of type A botulinum neurotoxin light chain. Biochemistry 39: 6466–6474

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Montecucco C et al. (1994) Bacterial protein toxins penetrate cells via a four-step mechanism. FEBS Lett 346: 92–98

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kalandakanond S and Coffield JA (2001) Cleavage of SNAP-25 by botulinum toxin type A requires receptor-mediated endocytosis, pH-dependent translocation, and zinc. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 296: 980–986

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schiavo G et al. (1990) Membrane interactions of tetanus and botulinum neurotoxins: a photolabelling study with photoactivatable phospholipids. J Physiol (Paris) 84: 180–187

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schmid MF et al. (1993) Direct visualization of botulinum neurotoxin-induced channels in phospholipid vesicles. Nature 364: 827–830

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Koriazova LK and Montal M (2003) Translocation of botulinum neurotoxin light chain protease through the heavy chain channel. Nat Struct Biol 10: 13–18

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hoch DH et al. (1985) Channels formed by botulinum, tetanus, and diphtheria toxins in planar lipid bilayers: relevance to translocation of proteins across membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 82: 1692–1696

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Sheridan RE (1998) Gating and permeability of ion channels produced by botulinum toxin types A and E in PC12 cell membranes. Toxicon 36: 703–717

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fu FN et al. (2002) Spectroscopic analysis of low pH and lipid-induced structural changes in type A botulinum neurotoxin relevant to membrane channel formation and translocation. Biophys Chem 99: 17–29

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Simpson LL et al. (1993) Chelation of zinc antagonizes the neuromuscular blocking properties of the seven serotypes of botulinum neurotoxin as well as tetanus toxin. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 267: 720–727

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Simpson LL et al. (2001) The role of zinc binding in the biological activity of botulinum toxin. J Biol Chem 276: 27034–27041

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Smith CP and Chancellor MB (2004) Emerging role of botulinum toxin in the management of voiding dysfunction. J Urol 171: 2128–2137

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Martin TF (1994) The molecular machinery for fast and slow neurosecretion. Curr Opin Neurobiol 4: 626–632

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schiavo G et al. (1994) Tetanus and botulinum neurotoxins are zinc proteases specific for components of the neuroexocytosis apparatus. Ann N Y Acad Sci 710: 65–75

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bittner MA et al. (1989) Isolated light chains of botulinum neurotoxins inhibit exocytosis. Studies in digitonin-permeabilized chromaffin cells. J Biol Chem 264: 10354–10360

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Dolly JO et al. (2002) Insights into the extended duration of neuroparalysis by botulinum neurotoxin A relative to the other shorter-acting serotypes: differences between motor nerve terminals and cultured neurons. In Scientific and Therapeutic Aspects of Botulinum Toxin, 91–102 (Eds Brin MF et al.) Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

    Google Scholar 

  37. O'Sullivan GA et al. (1999) Rescue of exocytosis in botulinum toxin A-poisoned chromaffin cells by expression of cleavage-resistant SNAP-25. Identification of the minimal essential C-terminal residues. J Biol Chem 274: 36897–36904

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Turton K et al. (2002) Botulinum and tetanus neurotoxins: structure, function and therapeutic utility. Trends Biochem Sci 27: 552–558

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Fernandez-Salas E et al. (2004) Plasma membrane localization signals in the light chain of botulinum neurotoxin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 3208–3213

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Washbourne P et al. (1997) Botulinum neurotoxin types A and E require the SNARE motif in SNAP-25 for proteolysis. FEBS Lett 418: 1–5

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Breidenbach MA and Brunger AT (2005) New insights into clostridial neurotoxin-SNARE interactions. Trends Mol Med 11: 377–381

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Foran PG et al. (2003) Evaluation of the therapeutic usefulness of botulinum neurotoxin B, C1, E, and F compared with the long lasting type A. Basis for distinct durations of inhibition of exocytosis in central neurons. J Biol Chem 278: 1363–1371

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Meunier FA et al. (2003) Dynamics of motor nerve terminal remodeling unveiled using SNARE-cleaving botulinum toxins: the extent and duration are dictated by the sites of SNAP-25 truncation. Mol Cell Neurosci 22: 454–466

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Eleopra R et al. (1998) Different time courses of recovery after poisoning with botulinum neurotoxin serotypes A and E in humans. Neurosci Lett 256: 135–138

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sloop RR et al. (1997) Human response to botulinum toxin injection: type B compared with type A. Neurology 49: 189–194

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Keller JE et al. (1999) Persistence of botulinum neurotoxin action in cultured spinal cord cells. FEBS Lett 456: 137–142

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Filippi GM et al. (1993) Botulinum A toxin effects on rat jaw muscle spindles. Acta Otolaryngol 113: 400–404

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Rosales RL et al. (1996) Extrafusal and intrafusal muscle effects in experimental botulinum toxin-A injection. Muscle Nerve 19: 488–496

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Modugno N et al. (1998) Botulinum toxin restores presynaptic inhibition of group Ia afferents in patients with essential tremor. Muscle Nerve 21: 1701–1705

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Borodic GE and Ferrante R (1992) Effects of repeated botulinum toxin injections on orbicularis oculi muscle. J Clin Neuroophthalmol 12: 121–127

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Spencer RF and McNeer KW (1987) Botulinum toxin paralysis of adult monkey extraocular muscle. Structural alterations in orbital, singly innervated muscle fibers. Arch Ophthalmol 105: 1703–1711

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Harris CP et al. (1991) Histologic features of human orbicularis oculi treated with botulinum A toxin. Arch Ophthalmol 109: 393–395

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Borodic GE et al. (1991) Botulinum A toxin for the treatment of adult-onset spasmodic torticollis. Plast Reconstr Surg 87: 285–289

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Thesleff S et al. (1990) Trophic interrelations at the neuromuscular junction as revealed by the use of botulinal neurotoxins. J Physiol (Paris) 84: 167–173

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. de Paiva A et al. (1999) Functional repair of motor endplates after botulinum neurotoxin type A poisoning: biphasic switch of synaptic activity between nerve sprouts and their parent terminals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 3200–3205

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Alderson K et al. (1991) Botulinum-induced alteration of nerve-muscle interactions in the human orbicularis oculi following treatment for blepharospasm. Neurology 41: 1800–1805

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Juzans P et al. (1996) Nerve terminal sprouting in botulinum type-A treated mouse levator auris longus muscle. Neuromuscul Disord 6: 177–185

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Angaut-Petit D et al. (1990) Terminal sprouting in mouse neuromuscular junctions poisoned with botulinum type A toxin: morphological and electrophysiological features. Neuroscience 37: 799–808

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Van Putten MJ et al. (2002) In vivo analysis of end-plate noise of human extensor digitorum brevis muscle after intramuscularly injected botulinum toxin type A. Muscle Nerve 26: 784–790

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Chancellor MB et al. (2003) Successful use of bladder botulinum toxin injection to treat refractory overactive bladder [abstract DP50]. 98th Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association, Chicago, IL, USA

  61. Popat R et al. (2005) A comparison between the response of patients with idiopathic detrusor overactivity and neurogenic detrusor overactivity to the first intradetrusor injection of botulinum-A toxin. J Urol 174: 984–989

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Smith CP et al. (2005) Single-institution experience in 110 patients with botulinum toxin A injection into bladder or urethra. Urology 65: 37–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Smith CP et al. (2003) Effect of botulinum toxin A on the autonomic nervous system of the rat lower urinary tract. J Urol 169: 1896–1900

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Somogyi GT et al. (1996) M1 muscarinic receptor-induced facilitation of ACh and noradrenaline release in the rat bladder is mediated by protein kinase C. J Physiol 496 (Pt 1): 245–254

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Chu FM and Dmochowski R (2006) Pathophysiology of overactive bladder. Am J Med 119: 3–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Somogyi GT et al. (1998) Frequency dependence of muscarinic facilitation of transmitter release in urinary bladder strips from neurally intact or chronic spinal cord transected rats. Br J Pharmacol 125: 241–246

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Bayliss M et al. (1999) A quantitative study of atropine-resistant contractile responses in human detrusor smooth muscle, from stable, unstable and obstructed bladders. J Urol 162: 1833–1839

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. O'Reilly BA et al. (2002) P2X receptors and their role in female idiopathic detrusor instability. J Urol 167: 157–164

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Nishiguchi J et al. (2005) Detrusor overactivity induced by intravesical application of adenosine 5′-triphosphate under different delivery conditions in rats. Urology 66: 1332–1337

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. MacKenzie I et al. (1982) The effects of purified botulinum neurotoxin type A on cholinergic, adrenergic and non-adrenergic, atropine-resistant autonomic neuromuscular transmission. Neuroscience 7: 997–1006

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Smith CP et al. (2003) Effect of stimulation intensity and botulinum toxin isoform on rat bladder strip contractions. Brain Res Bull 61: 165–171

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Apostolidis A et al. (2006) Proposed mechanism for the efficacy of injected botulinum toxin in the treatment of human detrusor overactivity. Eur Urol 49: 644–650

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Andersson KE and Arner A (2004) Urinary bladder contraction and relaxation: physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol Rev 84: 935–986

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Khera M et al. (2004) Botulinum toxin A inhibits ATP release from bladder urothelium after chronic spinal cord injury. Neurochem Int 45: 987–993

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Ford AP et al. (2006) Purinoceptors as therapeutic targets for lower urinary tract dysfunction. Br J Pharmacol 147 (Suppl 2): S132–S143

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Paukert M et al. (2001) Inflammatory mediators potentiate ATP-gated channels through the P2X(3) subunit. J Biol Chem 276: 21077–21082

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Cortright DN and Szallasi A (2004) Biochemical pharmacology of the vanilloid receptor TRPV1. An update. Eur J Biochem 271: 1814–1819

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Morenilla-Palao C et al. (2004) Regulated exocytosis contributes to protein kinase C potentiation of vanilloid receptor activity. J Biol Chem 279: 25665–25672

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Davis JB et al. (2000) Vanilloid receptor-1 is essential for inflammatory thermal hyperalgesia. Nature 405: 183–187

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Charrua A et al. (2007) Transient receptor potential vanilloid subfamily 1 is essential for the generation of noxious bladder input and bladder overactivity in cystitis. J Urol 177: 1537–1541

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Apostolidis A et al. (2005) Decreased sensory receptors P2X3 and TRPV1 in suburothelial nerve fibers following intradetrusor injections of botulinum toxin for human detrusor overactivity. J Urol 174: 977–982

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Schulte-Baukloh H et al. (2007) Persistence of the synaptosomal-associated protein-25 cleavage product after intradetrusor botulinum toxin A injections in patients with myelomeningocele showing an inadequate response to treatment. BJU Int 100: 1075–1080

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Basbaum AI and Jessell TM (2000) The perception of pain. In Principles of Neural Science, edn 4, 472–491 (Eds Kandel ER et al.) New York: McGraw Hill

    Google Scholar 

  84. Aoki KR (2005) Review of a proposed mechanism for the antinociceptive action of botulinum toxin type A. Neurotoxicology 26: 785–793

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Zubrzycka M and Janecka A (2000) Substance P: transmitter of nociception (Minireview). Endocr Regul 34: 195–201

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Smet PJ et al. (1997) Distribution and colocalization of calcitonin gene-related peptide, tachykinins, and vasoactive intestinal peptide in normal and idiopathic unstable human urinary bladder. Lab Invest 77: 37–49

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Chuang YC et al. (2004) Intravesical botulinum toxin A administration produces analgesia against acetic acid induced bladder pain responses in rats. J Urol 172: 1529–1532

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Rapp DE et al. (2006) Botulinum toxin type A inhibits calcitonin gene-related peptide release from isolated rat bladder. J Urol 175: 1138–1142

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Steers WD and Tuttle JB (2006) Mechanisms of Disease: the role of nerve growth factor in the pathophysiology of bladder disorders. Nat Clin Pract Urol 3: 101–110

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Giannantoni A et al. (2006) Botulinum-A toxin injections into the detrusor muscle decrease nerve growth factor bladder tissue levels in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity. J Urol 175: 2341–2344

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Relja M and Telarovic S (2005) Botulinum toxin type-A and pain responsiveness in cervical dystonia: a dose response study. Mov Disord 20: P77

    Google Scholar 

  92. Foster KA (2004) The analgesic potential of clostridial neurotoxin derivatives. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 13: 1437–1443

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Tarsy D and First ER (1999) Painful cervical dystonia: clinical features and response to treatment with botulinum toxin. Mov Disord 14: 1043–1045

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Haferkamp A et al. (2004) Lack of ultrastructural detrusor changes following endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin type A in overactive neurogenic bladder. Eur Urol 46: 784–791

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Comperat E et al. (2006) Histologic features in the urinary bladder wall affected from neurogenic overactivity—a comparison of inflammation, oedema and fibrosis with and without injection of botulinum toxin type A. Eur Urol 50: 1058–1064

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Mejia NI et al. (2005) Long-term botulinum toxin efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity. Mov Disord 20: 592–597

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Natalie Avenell-Mills provided research and editorial assistance for the development of the manuscript, with support from Allergan, Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael B Chancellor.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

MB Chancellor is a consultant for Allergan, Inc. and has received grant/research support from Allergan, Inc. CJ Fowler is a consultant and speaker for Allergan Inc., and has also received grant/research support from the company. A Apostolidis is a consultant for Allergan Inc., and has also received grant/research support from the company. WC de Groat is a consultant for Allergan Inc. CP Smith is a consultant for Allergan Inc. and has received grant/research support from the company. GT Somogyi has received grant/research support from Allergan Inc., and KR Aoki is a stockholder/director of Allergan Inc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chancellor, M., Fowler, C., Apostolidis, A. et al. Drug Insight: biological effects of botulinum toxin A in the lower urinary tract. Nat Rev Urol 5, 319–328 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro1124

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro1124

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing