Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communications Arising
  • Published:

Is REST required for ESC pluripotency?

Abstract

Arising from: S. K. Singh, M. N. Kagalwala, J. Parker-Thornburg, H. Adams & S. Majumder Nature 453, 223–227 (2008)10.1038/nature06863; Singh et al. reply

The DNA-binding protein REST (also called NRSF) is a transcriptional repressor that targets many neuronal genes1,2 and is abundant in human and mouse pluripotent embryonic stem cells (ESCs)3,4,5. In a recent Letter to Nature, Singh et al.6 suggested that REST controls the self-renewal and pluripotency of ESCs, because they found that ESCs in which a single REST allele was disrupted (Fig. 1a, β-geo-stop insertion) had reduced alkaline phosphatase activity and expressed lower levels of several pluripotency-associated genes6. Here we show that partial or complete loss of functional REST protein does not abrogate ESC potential as reflected by marker gene expression. These data are consistent with earlier reports7,8, and argue that REST is not required for maintaining ESC pluripotency.

a, Genetic alterations to the Rest locus analysed here (phosphoglycerate kinase 1-neomycin resistance gene (Pgk-Neo) insertion7) and by Singh et al.6 (β-geo-stop insertions in the gene trap ESC lines RRC and YHC). Rectangles represent exons; coding regions are in black. b, REST, Oct4 and lamin B protein levels in wild-type (+/+), homozygous (-/-) and heterozygous (+/-) Rest ESC lysates, and (marked by an asterisk) in wild-type ESCs transfected with siRNA or shRNA constructs targeting Rest (siRest and shRest) or a control sequence (siCtrl and shCtrl). c, Chromatin immunoprecipitation of Rest+/+ (black), Rest+/- (grey) and Rest-/- (white) ESCs using anti-REST (left panel) and anti-Ezh2 (right panel) versus control antibody (immunoglobulin G, IgG). REST binds SG38457 (also known as Fam70b) and Syt4 (which both contain a RE1 motif) but not Math1 (also known as Atoh1; RE1-negative). No significant binding of REST was detected in Rest-/- ESCs. Ezh2-binding at Math1 (ref. 10) confirmed that chromatin fragments were intact. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three experiments. d, Alkaline phosphatase (AP) activity of mutant ESCs (percentage AP-positive colonies ± standard deviation). e, REST, Oct4 and lamin B protein levels in two additional Rest+/- (D05 and F12) and three wild-type ESC lysates. f, Transcript levels in D05 (dark grey), F12 (light grey) and wild-type (black) ESCs are shown (and, for comparison, retinoic-acid-treated embryoid bodies (white)) relative to wild type. Values were normalized to housekeeping genes and error bars show standard deviation of 4–6 experiments.

PowerPoint slide

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chong, J. A. et al. REST: a mammalian silencer protein that restricts sodium channel gene expression to neurons. Cell 80, 949–957 (1995)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schoenherr, C. J. & Anderson, D. J. The neuron-restrictive silencer factor (NRSF): a coordinate repressor of multiple neuron-specific genes. Science 267, 1360–1363 (1995)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyer, L. A. et al. Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells. Cell 122, 947–956 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Westbrook, T. F. et al. SCFβ-TRCP controls oncogenic transformation and neural differentiation through REST degradation. Nature 452, 370–374 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim, J., Chu, J., Shen, X., Wang, J. & Orkin, S. H. An extended transcriptional network for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Cell 132, 1049–1061 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Singh, S. K., Kagalwala, M. N., Parker-Thornburg, J., Adams, H. & Majumder, S. REST maintains self-renewal and pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Nature 453, 223–227 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, Z. F., Paquette, A. J. & Anderson, D. J. NRSF/REST is required in vivo for repression of multiple neuronal target genes during embryogenesis. Nature Genet. 20, 136–142 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Loh, Y. H. et al. The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature Genet. 38, 431–440 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, Z. F. & Behringer, R. R. twist is required in head mesenchyme for cranial neural tube morphogenesis. Genes Dev. 9, 686–699 (1995)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Azuara, V. et al. Chromatin signatures of pluripotent cell lines. Nature Cell Biol. 8, 532–538 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jorgensen, H. F. et al. The impact of chromatin modifiers on the timing of locus replication in mouse embryonic stem cells. Genome Biol. 8, R169 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Conti, L. et al. Niche-independent symmetrical self-renewal of a mammalian tissue stem cell. PLoS Biol. 3, e283 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Billon, N., Jolicoeur, C., Ying, Q. L., Smith, A. & Raff, M. Normal timing of oligodendrocyte development from genetically engineered, lineage-selectable mouse ES cells. J. Cell Sci. 115, 3657–3665 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jørgensen, H., Chen, ZF., Merkenschlager, M. et al. Is REST required for ESC pluripotency?. Nature 457, E4–E5 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07783

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07783

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing