Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

High bacterivory by the smallest phytoplankton in the North Atlantic Ocean

Abstract

Planktonic algae <5 μm in size are major fixers of inorganic carbon in the ocean1. They dominate phytoplankton biomass in post-bloom, stratified oceanic temperate waters2. Traditionally, large and small algae are viewed as having a critical growth dependence on inorganic nutrients, which the latter can better acquire at lower ambient concentrations owing to their higher surface area to volume ratios3,4. Nonetheless, recent phosphate tracer experiments in the oligotrophic ocean5 have suggested that small algae obtain inorganic phosphate indirectly, possibly through feeding on bacterioplankton. There have been numerous microscopy-based studies of algae feeding mixotrophically6,7 in the laboratory8,9,10 and field11,12,13,14, as well as mathematical modelling of the ecological importance of mixotrophy15. However, because of methodological limitations16 there has not been a direct comparison of obligate heterotrophic and mixotrophic bacterivory. Here we present direct evidence that small algae carry out 40–95% of the bacterivory in the euphotic layer of the temperate North Atlantic Ocean in summer. A similar range of 37–70% was determined in the surface waters of the tropical North-East Atlantic Ocean, suggesting the global significance of mixotrophy. This finding reveals that even the smallest algae have less dependence on dissolved inorganic nutrients than previously thought, obtaining a quarter of their biomass from bacterivory. This has important implications for how we perceive nutrient acquisition and limitation of carbon-fixing protists as well as control of bacterioplankton in the ocean.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Bacterivory rates and abundance of protist groups.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li, W. K. W. Primary production of prochlorophytes, cyanobacteria, and eukaryotic ultraphytoplankton — measurements from flow cytometric sorting. Limnol. Oceanogr. 39, 169–175 (1994)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tarran, G. A., Zubkov, M. V., Sleigh, M. A., Burkill, P. H. & Yallop, M. Microbial community structure and standing stocks in the NE Atlantic in June and July of 1996. Deep-Sea Res. II 48, 963–985 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Malone, T. C. in The Physiological Ecology of Phytoplankton (ed. Morris, I.) 433–463 (Blackwell Scientific, 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chisholm, S. W. in Primary Productivity and Biogeochemical Cycles in the Sea (eds Falkowski, P. G. & Woodhead, A. D.) 213–237 (Plenum, 1992)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Zubkov, M. V. et al. Microbial control of phosphate in the nutrient-depleted North Atlantic subtropical gyre. Environ. Microbiol. 9, 2079–2089 (2007)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Caron, D. A. in Microbial Ecology of the Oceans (ed. Kirchman, D.) 495–523 (Wiley & Sons, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jones, R. I. Mixotrophy in planktonic protists: an overview. Freshwater Biol. 45, 219–226 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rothhaupt, K. O. Laboratory experiments with a mixotrophic chrysophyte and obligately phagotrophic and phototrophic competitors. Ecology 77, 716–724 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stibor, H. & Sommer, U. Mixotrophy of a photosynthetic flagellate viewed from an optimal foraging perspective. Protist 154, 91–98 (2003)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hansen, P. J. & Hjorth, M. Growth and grazing responses of Chrysochromulina ericina (Prymnesiophyceae): the role of irradiance, prey concentration and pH. Mar. Biol. 141, 975–983 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bird, D. F. & Kalff, J. Bacterial grazing by planktonic lake algae. Science 231, 493–495 (1986)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Arenovski, A. L., Lim, E. L. & Caron, D. A. Mixotrophic nanoplankton in oligotrophic surface waters of the Sargasso Sea may employ phagotrophy to obtain major nutrients. J. Plankton Res. 17, 801–820 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tittel, J. et al. Mixotrophs combine resource use to outcompete specialists: implications for aquatic food webs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 12776–12781 (2003)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Unrein, F., Massana, R., Alonso-Saez, L. & Gasol, J. M. Significant year-round effect of small mixotrophic flagellates on bacterioplankton in an oligotrophic coastal system. Limnol. Oceanogr. 52, 456–469 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Thingstad, T. F., Havskum, H., Garde, K. & Riemann, B. On the strategy of “eating your competitor”: A mathematical analysis of algal mixotrophy. Ecology 77, 2108–2118 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vaque, D., Gasol, J. M. & Marrase, C. Grazing rates on bacteria — the significance of methodology and ecological factors. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 109, 263–274 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zubkov, M. V. & Sleigh, M. A. Ingestion and assimilation by marine protists fed on bacteria labeled with radioactive thymidine and leucine estimated without separating predator and prey. Microb. Ecol. 30, 157–170 (1995)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zubkov, M. V. & Sleigh, M. A. Assimilation efficiency of Vibrio bacterial protein biomass by the flagellate Pteridomonas: Assessment using flow cytometric sorting. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 54, 281–286 (2005)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zubkov, M. V., Tarran, G. A. & Fuchs, B. M. Depth related amino acid uptake by Prochlorococcus cyanobacteria in the Southern Atlantic tropical gyre. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 50, 153–161 (2004)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fagerbakke, K. M., Heldal, M. & Norland, S. Content of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur and phosphorus in native aquatic and cultured bacteria. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 10, 15–27 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sherr, B. F., Sherr, E. B. & Fallon, R. D. Use of monodispersed, fluorescently labeled bacteria to estimate in situ protozoan bacterivory. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53, 958–965 (1987)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Zubkov, M. V., Sleigh, M. A. & Burkill, P. H. Measurement of bacterivory by protists in open ocean waters. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 27, 85–102 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sherr, E. B. & Sherr, B. F. Significance of predation by protists in aquatic microbial food webs. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 81, 293–308 (2002)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Marie, D., Partensky, F., Jacquet, S. & Vaulot, D. Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green I. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63, 186–193 (1997)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Mary, I. et al. Light enhanced amino acid uptake by dominant bacterioplankton groups in surface waters of the Atlantic Ocean. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 63, 36–45 (2008)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zubkov, M. V., Burkill, P. H. & Topping, J. N. Flow cytometric enumeration of DNA-stained oceanic planktonic protists. J. Plankton Res. 29, 79–86 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Olson, R. J., Zettler, E. R. & DuRand, M. D. in Handbook of Methods in Aquatic Microbial Ecology (eds Kemp, P. F., Sherr, B. F., Sherr, E. B. & Cole, J. J.) 175–186 (Lewis, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zubkov, M. V. & Burkill, P. H. Syringe pumped high speed flow cytometry of oceanic phytoplankton. Cytometry A 69A, 1010–1019 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the captain, officers and crew aboard the RRS Discovery for their help during the cruises, M. Moore for sharing chlorophyll concentration measurements, P. Hill for helping with setting up experiments on the second cruise, and P. Warwick for his help with radiotracer measurements ashore. We thank M. Sleigh, A. Martin and R. Leakey for their critical comments on the earlier drafts of the paper. We thank H. Ducklow for constructive criticism of the earlier version of this paper. This study was supported by the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) through the Oceans 2025 core programmes of the National Oceanography Centre, Southampton and Plymouth Marine Laboratory. The second cruise was supported by the NERC thematic programme Surface Ocean Low Atmosphere Study (SOLAS).

Author Contributions The experimental approach was designed by M.Z., who carried out the tracer work. Flow cytometric analyses were done by G.T. and M.Z., respectively, on the first and second cruise.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikhail V. Zubkov.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

The file contains Supplementary Figures 1-9 with Legends. (PDF 576 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zubkov, M., Tarran, G. High bacterivory by the smallest phytoplankton in the North Atlantic Ocean. Nature 455, 224–226 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07236

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07236

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing