Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:

Specificity of JAK-kinase inhibition determines impact on human and murine T-cell function

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

References

  1. Harrison C, Kiladjian JJ, Al-Ali HK, Gisslinger H, Waltzman R, Stalbovskaya V et al. JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 787–798.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vannucchi AM, Kiladjian JJ, Griesshammer M, Masszi T, Durrant S, Passamonti F et al. Ruxolitinib versus standard therapy for the treatment of polycythemia vera. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 426–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Verstovsek S, Kantarjian H, Mesa RA, Pardanani AD, Cortes-Franco J, Thomas DA et al. Safety and efficacy of INCB018424, a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, in myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1117–1127.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. O'Shea JJ, Murray PJ . Cytokine signaling modules in inflammatory responses. Immunity 2008; 28: 477–487.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Spoerl S, Mathew NR, Bscheider M, Schmitt-Graeff A, Chen S, Mueller T et al. Activity of therapeutic JAK 1/2 blockade in graft-versus-host disease. Blood 2014; 123: 3832–3842.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Parampalli Yajnanarayana S, Stubig T, Cornez I, Alchalby H, Schonberg K, Rudolph J et al. JAK1/2 inhibition impairs T cell function in vitro and in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. Br J Haematol 2015; 169: 824–833.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Caocci G, Murgia F, Podda L, Solinas A, Atzeni S, La Nasa G . Reactivation of hepatitis B virus infection following ruxolitinib treatment in a patient with myelofibrosis. Leukemia 2014; 28: 225–227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Colomba C, Rubino R, Siracusa L, Lalicata F, Trizzino M, Titone L et al. Disseminated tuberculosis in a patient treated with a JAK2 selective inhibitor: a case report. BMC Res Notes 2012; 5: 552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldberg RA, Reichel E, Oshry LJ . Bilateral toxoplasmosis retinitis associated with ruxolitinib. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 681–683.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wysham NG, Sullivan DR, Allada G . An opportunistic infection associated with ruxolitinib, a novel janus kinase 1,2 inhibitor. Chest 2013; 143: 1478–1479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mascarenhas JO, Talpaz M, Gupta V, Foltz LM, Savona MR, Paquette R et al Primary Analysis Results from an Open-Label Phase II Study of INCB039110, a Selective JAK1 Inhibitor, in Patients with Myelofibrosis Blood. 2014; 56th ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts (714).

  12. Verstovsek S, Tam CS, Wadleigh M, Sokol L, Smith CC, Bui LA et al. Phase I evaluation of XL019, an oral, potent, and selective JAK2 inhibitor. Leuk Res 2014; 38: 316–322.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schnoder TM, Arreba-Tutusaus P, Griehl I, Bullinger L, Buschbeck M, Lane SW et al. Epo-induced erythroid maturation is dependent on Plcgamma1 signaling. Cell Death Differ 2015; 22: 974–985.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wolleschak D, Mack TS, Perner F, Frey S, Schnoder TM, Wagner MC et al. Clinically relevant doses of FLT3-kinase inhibitors quizartinib and midostaurin do not impair T-cell reactivity and function. Haematologica 2014; 99: e90–e93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from Novartis Inc. to DW and FHH and by the DFG-Collaborative Research Center (CRC854) to BI (Project A26), BS (Projects B12 and B19) and TF and FHH (Project A20). All human samples were collected and stored in the Hematology Tissue-Bank Magdeburg (HTM) supported by a grant from the Jose-Carreras Foundation (SP12/04) to FHH.

Author contributions

FP, TMS, SR, DW, CE, MCP, SF, AP, CF and US performed research. FP, MCP, BS, BI, TF analyzed data and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. FHH designed research, analyzed data and wrote the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F H Heidel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

FHH and DW received research funding from Novartis Inc. FHH is an advisory board member for Novartis Inc. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perner, F., Schnöder, T., Ranjan, S. et al. Specificity of JAK-kinase inhibition determines impact on human and murine T-cell function. Leukemia 30, 991–995 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2015.218

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2015.218

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links