Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Standardized MRD flow and ASO IGH RQ-PCR for MRD quantification in CLL patients after rituximab-containing immunochemotherapy: a comparative analysis

Abstract

Rituximab-containing regimens are becoming a therapeutic standard in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), so that a validation of flow cytometric minimal residual disease (MRD) quantification (MRD flow) in the presence of this antibody is necessary. We therefore compared results obtained by real-time quantitative (RQ)-PCR to MRD flow in 530 samples from 69 patients randomized to receive chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus rituximab. Quantitative MRD levels assessed by both techniques were closely correlated irrespective of therapy (r=0.95). The sensitivity and specificity of MRD flow was not influenced by the presence of rituximab. With 58.9% positive and 26.4% negative samples by both techniques, 85.3% of assessments (452/530) were qualitatively concordant between MRD flow and RQ-PCR. Discordant samples were typically negative by MRD flow and simultaneously positive close to the detection limit of the PCR assays, indicating a higher sensitivity of PCR for very low MRD levels. However, 93.8% of all samples were concordantly classified by both methods using a threshold of 10−4 to determine MRD positivity. MRD flow and PCR are equally effective for MRD quantification in rituximab-treated CLL patients within a sensitivity range of up to 10−4, whereas PCR is more sensitive for detecting MRD below that level.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Keating MJ, O'Brien S, Albitar M, Lerner S, Plunkett W, Giles F et al. Early results of a chemoimmunotherapy regimen of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab as initial therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 4079–4088.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Byrd JC, Peterson BL, Morrison VA, Park K, Jacobson R, Hoke E et al. Randomized phase 2 study of fludarabine with concurrent versus sequential treatment with rituximab in symptomatic, untreated patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9712 (CALGB 9712). Blood 2003; 101: 6–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eichhorst BF, Busch R, Hopfinger G, Pasold R, Hensel M, Steinbrecher C et al. Fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide versus fludarabine alone in first-line therapy of younger patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 2006; 107: 885–891.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bosch F, Ferrer A, Villamor N, Gonzalez M, Briones J, Gonzalez-Barca E et al. Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and mitoxantrone as initial therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: high response rate and disease eradication. Clin Cancer Res 2008; 14: 155–161.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kay NE, Geyer SM, Call TG, Shanafelt TD, Zent CS, Jelinek DF et al. Combination chemoimmunotherapy with pentostatin, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab shows significant clinical activity with low accompanying toxicity in previously untreated B chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 2007; 109: 405–411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Moreton P, Kennedy B, Lucas G, Leach M, Rassam SM, Haynes A et al. Eradication of minimal residual disease in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia after alemtuzumab therapy is associated with prolonged survival. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 2971–2979.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Grever M, Kay N, Keating MJ, O'Brien S et al. National cancer institute-sponsored working group guidelines for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: revised guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. Blood 1996; 87: 4990–4997.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hallek M, Cheson BD, Catovsky D, Caligaris-Cappio F, Dighiero G, Dohner H et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a report from the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia updating the National Cancer Institute-Working Group 1996 guidelines. Blood 2008; 111: 5446–5456.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ritgen M, Bottcher S, Stilgenbauer S, Bunjes D, Schubert J, Cohen S et al. Quantitative MRD monitoring identifies distinct GVL response patterns after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results from the GCLLSG CLL3X trial. Leukemia 2008; 22: 1377–1386.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moreno C, Villamor N, Colomer D, Esteve J, Gine E, Muntanola A et al. Clinical significance of minimal residual disease, as assessed by different techniques, after stem cell transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 2006; 107: 4563–4569.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dreger P, Ritgen M, Bottcher S, Schmitz N, Kneba M . The prognostic impact of minimal residual disease assessment after stem cell transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Is achievement of molecular remission worthwhile? Leukemia 2005; 19: 1135–1138.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Milligan DW, Fernandes S, Dasgupta R, Davies FE, Matutes E, Fegan CD et al. Results of the MRC pilot study show autografting for younger patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia is safe and achieves a high percentage of molecular responses. Blood 2005; 105: 397–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wendtner CM, Ritgen M, Schweighofer CD, Fingerle-Rowson G, Campe H, Jager G et al. Consolidation with alemtuzumab in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in first remission--experience on safety and efficacy within a randomized multicenter phase III trial of the German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG). Leukemia 2004; 18: 1093–1101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Montillo M, Tedeschi A, Miqueleiz S, Veronese S, Cairoli R, Intropido L et al. Alemtuzumab as consolidation after a response to fludarabine is effective in purging residual disease in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 2337–2342.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. del Poeta G, Del Principe MI, Buccisano F, Maurillo L, Capelli G, Luciano F et al. Consolidation and maintenance immunotherapy with rituximab improve clinical outcome in patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer 2008; 112: 119–128.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rawstron AC, Kennedy B, Moreton P, Dickinson AJ, Cullen MJ, Richards SJ et al. Early prediction of outcome and response to alemtuzumab therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 2004; 103: 2027–2031.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ritgen M, Lange A, Stilgenbauer S, Dohner H, Bretscher C, Bosse H et al. Unmutated immunoglobulin variable heavy-chain gene status remains an adverse prognostic factor after autologous stem cell transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 2003; 101: 2049–2053.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hillmen P, Skotnicki AB, Robak T, Jaksic B, Dmoszynska A, Wu J et al. Alemtuzumab compared with chlorambucil as first-line therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 5616–5623.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bottcher S, Ritgen M, Pott C, Bruggemann M, Raff T, Stilgenbauer S et al. Comparative analysis of minimal residual disease detection using four-color flow cytometry, consensus IgH-PCR, and quantitative IgH PCR in CLL after allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation. Leukemia 2004; 18: 1637–1645.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tam CS, O'Brien S, Wierda W, Kantarjian H, Wen S, Do KA et al. Long-term results of the fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab regimen as initial therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 2008; 112: 975–980.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Robak T, Blonski JZ, Gora-Tybor J, Jamroziak K, Dwilewicz-Trojaczek J, Tomaszewska A et al. Cladribine alone and in combination with cyclophosphamide or cyclophosphamide plus mitoxantrone in the treatment of progressive chronic lymphocytic leukemia: report of a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of the Polish Adult Leukemia Group (PALG CLL2). Blood 2006; 108: 473–479.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bruggemann M, Droese J, Bolz I, Luth P, Pott C, von Neuhoff N et al. Improved assessment of minimal residual disease in B cell malignancies using fluorogenic consensus probes for real-time quantitative PCR. Leukemia 2000; 14: 1419–1425.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rawstron AC, Kennedy B, Evans PA, Davies FE, Richards SJ, Haynes AP et al. Quantitation of minimal residual disease levels in chronic lymphocytic leukemia using a sensitive flow cytometric assay improves the prediction of outcome and can be used to optimize therapy. Blood 2001; 98: 29–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rawstron AC, Villamor N, Ritgen M, Bottcher S, Ghia P, Zehnder JL et al. International standardized approach for flow cytometric residual disease monitoring in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Leukemia 2007; 21: 956–964.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. van der Velden V, Cazzaniga G, Schrauder A, Hancock J, Bader P, Panzer-Grumayer ER et al. Analysis of minimal residual disease by Ig/TCR gene rearrangements: guidelines for interpretation of real-time quantitative PCR data. Leukemia 2007; 21: 604–611.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hallek M, Fingerle-Rowson G, Fink A, Busch R, Mayer J, Hensel M et al. Immunochemotherapy with fludarabine (F), cyclophosphamide (C), and rituximab (R) (FCR) versus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (FC) improves response rates and progression-free survival (PFS) of previously untreated patients (pts) with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Blood 2008; 112. abstract 325.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Byrd JC, Rai K, Peterson BL, Appelbaum FR, Morrison VA, Kolitz JE et al. Addition of rituximab to fludarabine may prolong progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia: an updated retrospective comparative analysis of CALGB 9712 and CALGB 9011. Blood 2005; 105: 49–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rawstron AC, de Tute R, Jack AS, Hillmen P . Flow cytometric protein expression profiling as a systematic approach for developing disease-specific assays: identification of a chronic lymphocytic leukaemia-specific assay for use in rituximab-containing regimens. Leukemia 2006; 20: 2102–2110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bottcher S, Ritgen M, Buske S, Gesk S, Klapper W, Hoster E et al. Minimal residual disease detection in mantle cell lymphoma: Methods and significance of four-color flow cytometry compared to consensus IGH-polymerase chain reaction at initial staging and for follow-up examinations. Haematologica 2008; 93: 551–559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Krober A, Seiler T, Benner A, Bullinger L, Bruckle E, Lichter P et al. V(H) mutation status, CD38 expression level, genomic aberrations, and survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 2002; 100: 1410–1416.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dohner H, Stilgenbauer S, Benner A, Leupolt E, Krober A, Bullinger L et al. Genomic aberrations and survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1910–1916.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wierda W, O'Brien S, Wen S, Faderl S, Garcia-Manero G, Thomas D et al. Chemoimmunotherapy with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab for relapsed and refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 4070–4078.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG) and the contributing centers taking care of patients being enrolled in this study. The contribution of the GCLLSG study center (Anne Westermann, Anna-Maria Fink) is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Elke Harbst, Vanessa Krull, Jamileh Hanani, Maike Starken, Lada Henseleit, Sebastian Buske, Martina Klingenberg and Karin Olsen for excellent technical assistance. We also thank F Hoffmann—La Roche Ltd, Basel, for research funding provided.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S Böttcher.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Leukemia website (http://www.nature.com/leu)

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Böttcher, S., Stilgenbauer, S., Busch, R. et al. Standardized MRD flow and ASO IGH RQ-PCR for MRD quantification in CLL patients after rituximab-containing immunochemotherapy: a comparative analysis. Leukemia 23, 2007–2017 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2009.140

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2009.140

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links