Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research Note
  • Published:

A comparison of sexing methods in fetal mice

Abstract

Accurate mouse sexing is vital when conducting research examining sexual dimorphisms. Late fetal and newborn mouse pups are more immature than many previously described sexing methods allow. This study compares the sexing accuracy of a newly described internal gonad sexing method to a recently described peritoneal pigmentation sexing method in embryonic day 20 C57BL/6J mouse pups, using Sry genotyping to confirm the sex. The internal gonad sexing method was found to be highly accurate, while the peritoneal pigmentation method was slightly less accurate. Therefore, while Sry genotyping remains the gold standard, immediate and less expensive sexing methods can be performed accurately as early as the late fetal period in C57BL/6J mice.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: A representative UV-visualized gel result from Sry genotyping of homogenized tissue from an adult male and an adult female mouse as representative knowns, as well as four E20 mouse pups.
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4: E20 female mouse internal anatomy.
Figure 5: E20 male mouse internal anatomy.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Greenham, L.W. & Greenham, V. Sexing mouse pups. Lab. Anim. 11, 181–184 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wolterink-Donselaar, I.G., Meerding, J.M. & Fernandes, C. A method for gender determination in newborn dark pigmented mice. Lab Anim. (NY) 38, 35–38 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Whyte, J.J., Roberts, R.M. & Rosenfeld, C.S. Fluorescent in situ hybridization for sex chromosome determination before and after fertilization in mice. Theriogenology 67, 1022–1031 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cook, M. The Anatomy of the Laboratory Mouse (Academic Press Inc., New York, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, H. et al. Identification of novel markers of mouse fetal ovary development. PLoS ONE 7, e41683 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy M. Crombleholme.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deeney, S., Powers, K. & Crombleholme, T. A comparison of sexing methods in fetal mice. Lab Anim 45, 380–384 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.1105

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.1105

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing