Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Maternal obesity: do patients understand the risks?

Journal of Perinatology volume 30, pages 452–458 (2010)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate patient knowledge of the risks of maternal obesity and compare knowledge between non-obese and obese women.

Study Design:

A face-to-face survey was administered to 105 women at their first prenatal visit. The survey assessed their knowledge of obesity-related risks during pregnancy, weight history and goals and health behaviors. Descriptive statistics described the entire sample. Student's t-test and χ2 tests compared knowledge between non-obese (body mass index (BMI) of <30 kg m–2) and obese (BMI of ⩾30 kg m–2) gravidas.

Result:

There were 56 (54%) non-obese and 47 (46%) obese participants. There were no significant differences between the weight groups with respect to age, race, insurance, education, tobacco use and primigravity. Overall, 49% participants knew that obesity increases risks in pregnancy. The knowledge of specific risks was similar in the non-obese (60% correct) and obese (64% correct) groups (P=0.76). Obese patients were more aware of the risk for diabetes (68 vs 96%, P<0.001). Obese gravidas expressed more interest in weight loss before another pregnancy (61 vs 81%, P=0.03), although the desired BMIs (22.1±2.3 vs 26.2±3.0 kg m–2, P<0.001) were different for non-obese and obese women, respectively. Of all participants, 9% discussed the risks of maternal obesity with a provider before study participation and 75% wanted to participate in a study on weight loss before pregnancy to determine whether it leads to healthier pregnancies.

Conclusion:

Regardless of BMI category, patients required more knowledge about the risks of obesity in pregnancy, requested additional information and were motivated to lose weight before future pregnancies. Because obese women underestimated their optimal weight loss goals, it is necessary to target this group for further education.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kim SY, Morrow B, Callaghan WM, Dietz P, England L . Trends in pre-pregnancy obesity in nine states, 1993-2003. Obesity 2007; 15: 986–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baeten JM, Bukusi EA, Lambe M . Pregnancy complications and outcomes among overweight and obese nulliparous women. Am J Public Health 2001; 91: 436–440.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ogunyemi D, Hullett S, Leeper J, Risk A . Prepregnancy body mass index, weight gain during pregnancy, and perinatal outcome in a rural black population. J Matern Fetal Med 1999; 7: 190–193.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Young TK, Woodmansee B . Factors that are associated with cesarean delivery in a large private practice: the importance of prepregnancy body mass index and weight gain. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 312–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ehrenberg HM, Dierker L, Milluzzi C, Mercer BM . Prevalence of maternal obesity in an urban center. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 1189–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Reece EA . Perspectives on obesity, pregnancy and birth outcomes in the United States: the scope of the problem. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198: 23–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boney C, Vohr BR, Verma A, Tucker R . Metabolic syndrome in childhood: association with birth weight, maternal obesity, and gestational diabetes mellitus. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 290–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Whitaker R . Predicting preschooler obesity at birth. The role of maternal obesity in early pregnancy. Pediatrics 2004; 114: 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pi-Sunyer FX . Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults: The Evidence Report. NIH Publication No. 98-4083. September 1998. National Institute of Health: Bethesda, MD.

  10. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR . Prevalence and trends in obesity among US Adults, 1999-2008. JAMA 2010; 303: 235–241.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Andersson P, Sjoberg RL, Ohrvik J, Leppert J . Knowledge about cardiovascular risk factors among obese individuals. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2006; 5: 275–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Harris MB . Eating habits, restraint, knowledge and attitudes toward obesity. Int J Obesity 1983; 7: 271–286.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Harris MB, Waschull S, Walters L . Feeling fat: motivations, knowledge, and attitudes of overweight women and men. Psychol Rep 1990; 67: 1191–1202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Strecher VJ, Rosenstock IM . The health belief model. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK (eds). Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2nd edn. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, 1997, pp 41–59.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sanchez-Johnsen L, Fitzgibbon ML, Martinovich Z, Stolley MR, Dyer AR, VanHorn L . Ethnic differences in correlates of obesity between Latin-American and black women. Obes Res 2004; 12: 652–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fitzgibbon ML, Blackman LR, Avellone ME . The relationship between body image discrepancy and body mass index across ethnic groups. Obes Res 2000; 8: 582–589.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sorensen TI . Socio-economic aspects of obesity: causes or effects? Int J Obesity Rel Met Dis 1995; 19: S6–S8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Castro LC, Avina RL . Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcomes. Cur Opin Obstet Gynecol 2002; 14: 601–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vermillion ST, Lamoutte C, Soper DE, Verdeja A . Wound infection after cesarean: effect of subcutaneous tissue thickness. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 923–926.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson SR, Railsback LD, Kolberg BH, Varner MW . Maternal obesity and pregnancy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1987; 164: 431–437.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Power ML, Holzman GB, Schulkin J . Obstetrician-gynecologists’ views on the health risks of obesity. J Reprod Med 2001; 46: 941–946.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Galuska D, Will J, Serdula MK, Ford ES . Are health care professionals advising obese patients to lose weight? JAMA 1999; 282: 1576–1578.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Scott JG, Cohen D, DiCicco-Bloom B, Orzano J, Gregory P, Flocke SA et al. Speaking of weight: how patients and primary care clinicians initiate weight loss counseling. Prev Med 2004; 38: 819–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wadden TA, Didie E . What's in a name? Patients’ preferred terms for describing obesity. Obesity Res 2003; 11: 1140–1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kushner RF, Roth JL . Assessment of the obese patient. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2003; 32: 915–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sheiner E, Levy A, Silverberg D, Menes TS, Levy I, Katz M et al. Pregnancy after bariatric surgery is not associated with adverse perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 1335–1340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wittgrove AC, Jester L, Wittgrove P, Clark GW . Pregnancy following gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Obes Surg 1998; 8: 461–464.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Richards DS, Miller DK, Goodman GN . Pregnancy after gastric bypass for morbid obesity. J Reprod Med 1987; 32: 172–176.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

    M A Kominiarek & L K Endres

  2. Department of Maternal Child Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

    S Vonderheid

Authors
  1. M A Kominiarek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S Vonderheid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L K Endres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M A Kominiarek.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kominiarek, M., Vonderheid, S. & Endres, L. Maternal obesity: do patients understand the risks?. J Perinatol 30, 452–458 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2010.52

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2010.52

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links