Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Calculating postnatal growth velocity in very low birth weight (VLBW) premature infants

Journal of Perinatology volume 29, pages 618–622 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

Objective:

Currently, there is no standardized approach to the calculation of growth velocity (GV; g kg –1 day–1) in hospitalized very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. Thus, differing methods are used to estimate GV, resulting in different medical centers and studies reporting growth results that are difficult to compare. The objective of this study was to compare actual GV calculated from infant daily weights during hospitalization in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) with estimated GV using two mathematical models that have been shown earlier to provide good estimated GVs in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants: an exponential model (EM) and a 2-Point model (2-PM).

Study Design:

Daily weights from 81 infants with birth weights (BWs) of 1000 to 1499 g were used to calculate actual GV in daily increments from two starting points: (1) birth and (2) day of life (DOL) of regaining BW. These daily GV values were then averaged over the NICU stay to yield overall NICU GV from the two starting points. We compared these actual GV with estimated GV calculated using the EM and 2-PM methods.

Results:

The mean absolute difference between actual and EM estimates of GV showed <1% error for 100% of infants from both starting points. The mean absolute difference between actual and 2-PM estimates showed <1% error for only 38 and 44% of infants from birth and regaining BW, respectively. The EM was unaffected by decreasing BW and increasing length of NICU stay, whereas the accuracy of the 2-PM was diminished significantly (P<0.001) by both factors.

Conclusion:

In contrast to the 2-PM, the EM provides an extremely accurate estimate of GV in larger VLBW infants, and its accuracy is unaffected by common infant factors. The EM has now been validated for use in all VLBW infants to assess growth and provides a simple-to-use and consistent approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ehrenkranz RA, Younes N, Lemons JA, Fanaroff AA, Donovan EF, Wright LL et al. Longitudinal growth of hospitalized very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 1999; 104 (2): 280–289.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Radmacher P, Rafail S, Adamkin D . Nutrition and growth in VVLBW infants with and without bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Neonatal Intensive Care 2004; 16 (1): 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Steward DK, Pridham KF . Growth patterns of extremely low-birth-weight hospitalized preterm infants. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2002; 31 (1): 57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berry MA, Abrahamowicz M, Usher RH . Factors associated with growth of extremely premature infants during initial hospitalization. Pediatrics 1997; 100 (4): 640–646.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hay Jr WW . Assessing the effect of disease on nutrition of the preterm infant. Clin Biochem 1996; 29 (5): 399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Morris BH, Smith KE, Swank PR, Denson SE, Landry SH . Patterns of physical and neurologic development in preterm children. J Perinatol 2002; 22 (1): 31–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ehrenkranz RA, Dusick AM, Vohr BR, Wright LL, Wrage LA, Poole WK . Growth in the neonatal intensive care unit influences neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2006; 117 (4): 1253–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lucas A, Morley R, Cole TJ . Randomised trial of early diet in preterm babies and later intelligence quotient. BMJ 1998; 317 (7171): 1481–1487.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bertino E, Coscia A, Mombro M, Boni L, Rossetti G, Fabris C et al. Postnatal weight increase and growth velocity of very low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006; 91 (5): F349–F356.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sullivan MC, McGrath MM, Hawes K, Lester BM . Growth trajectories of preterm infants: Birth to 12 years. J Pediatr Health Care 2008; 22 (2): 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Peterson J, Taylor HG, Minich N, Klein N, Hack M . Subnormal head circumference in very low birth weight children: Neonatal correlates and school-age consequences. Early Hum Dev 2006; 82 (5): 325–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pauls J, Bauer K, Versmold H . Postnatal body weight curves for infants below 1000 g birth weight receiving early enteral and parenteral nutrition. Eur J Pediatr 1998; 157 (5): 416–421.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Carlson S, Ziegler E . Nutrient intakes and growth of very low birth weight infants. J Perinatol 1998; 18: 252–258.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fenton TR, McMillan DD, Sauve RS . Nutrition and growth analysis of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 1990; 86 (3): 378–383.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Innis SM, Adamkin DH, Hall RT, Kalhan SC, Lair C, Lim M et al. Docosahexaenoic acid and arachidonic acid enhance growth with no adverse effects in preterm infants fed formula. J Pediatr 2002; 140 (5): 547–554.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Olsen IE, Richardson DK, Schmid CH, Ausman LM, Dwyer JT . Intersite differences in weight growth velocity of extremely premature infants. Pediatrics 2002; 110 (6): 1125–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schanler RJ, Shulman RJ, Lau C . Feeding strategies for premature infants: Beneficial outcomes of feeding fortified human milk versus preterm formula. Pediatrics 1999; 103 (6 Pt 1): 1150–1157.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Patel AL, Engstrom JL, Meier PP, Kimura RE . Accuracy of methods for calculating postnatal growth velocity for extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2005; 116 (6): 1466–1473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Meier PP, Engstrom JL, Mingolelli SS, Miracle DJ, Kiesling S . The rush mothers' milk club: Breastfeeding interventions for mothers with very-low-birth-weight infants. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2004; 33 (2): 164–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Riddle WR, DonLevy SC, Qi XF, Giuse DA, Rosenbloom ST . Equations to support predictive automated postnatal growth curves for premature infants. J Perinatol 2006; 26 (6): 354–358.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The exponential formula described in this publication was copyrighted in 2005 by Rush University Medical Center, all rights are reserved. Methods of using the formula are patent pending. Permission is granted to use the exponential formula for research purposes. No commercial use is permitted without a license from Rush University Medical Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pediatrics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA

    A L Patel & R E Kimura

  2. College of Nursing, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA

    J L Engstrom, P P Meier & B J Jegier

Authors
  1. A L Patel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J L Engstrom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P P Meier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. B J Jegier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R E Kimura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A L Patel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patel, A., Engstrom, J., Meier, P. et al. Calculating postnatal growth velocity in very low birth weight (VLBW) premature infants. J Perinatol 29, 618–622 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2009.55

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2009.55

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links