Abstract
Prostate cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers in men. Replication-competent oncolytic herpes simplex virus (oHSV) vectors are a powerful antitumor therapy that can exert at least two effects: direct cytocidal activity that selectively kills cancer cells and induction of antitumor immunity. In addition, oHSV vectors can also function as a platform to deliver transgenes of interest. In these studies, we have examined the expression of a xenogeneic homologue of the prostate cancer antigen, prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), with the goal of enhancing virotherapy against PAP-expressing tumors. PAP has already been used for cancer vaccination in patients with prostate cancer. Here we show that treatment with oHSV bPΔ6 expressing xenogeneic human PAP (hPAP) significantly reduces tumor growth and increases survival of C57/BL6 mice bearing mouse TRAMP-C2 prostate tumors, whereas expression of syngeneic mouse PAP (mPAP) from the same oHSV vector did not enhance antitumor activity. Treatment of mice bearing metastatic TRAMP-C2 lung tumors with oHSV-expressing hPAP resulted in fewer tumor nodules. To our knowledge, this is the first report of oncolytic viruses being used to express xenoantigens. These data lend support to the concept of combining oncolytic and immunogenic therapies as a way to improve therapy of metastatic prostate cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men in developed countries, and in the United States alone over 180 000 new cases were diagnosed in 2008.1 Treatment options for prostate cancer include surgery with radical prostatectomy, hormone therapy, chemotherapy2 and radiation.3 However, severe secondary effects are common among patients and there is no curative treatment once the primary tumor metastasizes.4 The introduction of genetically engineered oncolytic viruses as a new therapeutic avenue in the battle against cancer began with the use of oncolytic herpes simplex viruses (oHSVs).5 Typically, oHSV carry mutations in the viral genome that enable them to replicate in and kill cancer cells, without harming normal tissue.6 Among the benefits of oHSV vectors are that they are easily manipulated, can carry transgene inserts7 and have already been safely used in human subjects with a variety of cancers.8, 9 Another advantage of oHSV is that it can interact synergistically with other therapeutic modalities, including chemotherapeutic agents10, 11 and radiotherapy,12 thereby promoting better therapeutic outcomes by targeting more then one aspect of cancer biology.
Previous work from our laboratory and others has shown that oHSVs can be used as an in situ vaccine to generate a tumor-specific host immune response.13, 14, 15, 16 Prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) is a prostate-specific antigen that is expressed in both prostate cells and prostate cancer cells17 as well as other adenocarcinomas.18 However, as it is a self-antigen it is not immunogenic due presumably to tolerance. It has previously been shown that immunization of rats with human PAP (hPAP) generates a cytotoxic T lymphocyte response leading to tissue-specific prostatitis.19 Furthermore, immunization of patients with metastatic prostate cancer with recombinant mouse PAP (mPAP) loaded dendritic cells has been shown to result in an antitumor immune response and clinical stabilization of the disease, as indicated by a decreased rise of serum prostate-specific antigen levels.18 This suggests that vaccination with a xenogeneic homolog can break tolerance to a self-antigen, hPAP, inducing a Th1-type cytokine response to both mPAP and hPAP antigens. Other studies have confirmed this concept of using a xenogenic form of an antigen to break antitumor tolerance to other proteins, such as prostate stem cell antigen, where DNA vaccination induced antitumor immune responses against TRAMP-C1 tumors,19 prostate-specific membrane antigen,20 gp100 in melanoma,21 HER2 expressed from a replication-deficient adenovirus vector in breast cancer22 and epidermal growth factor receptor.23 We therefore hypothesized that an oHSV expressing a xenogenic PAP could be used to treat prostate cancer.
In this study, we have combined the ability of oHSV to specifically replicate in and kill cancer cells with the immunogenic effects of in situ vaccination with a xenogeneic PAP protein to create a more powerful therapeutic strategy for prostate cancer. Our results show that this combined approach achieves improved inhibition of established tumor growth and animal survival compared to oHSV alone or when expressing syngeneic mPAP. These results represent an encouraging step toward the development of a viable therapy for prostate cancer and describe a novel approach that should be applicable to other oncolytic viruses.
Results and Discussion
Characterization of oHSVs expressing mPAP and hPAP transgenes
To construct oHSVs expressing hPAP (bPΔ6-hPAP) or the mouse homolog (bPΔ6-mPAP), we used the Flip-Flop HSV-BAC technology.7 A third construct, lacking a transgene (bPΔ6-empty), was also generated to be used as a control (Supplementary Figure 1). The backbone for these vectors was HSV-1 strain Patton, from which PΔ6-BAC was constructed by inserting the BAC cassette into the ICP6 (UL39) gene, as previously described.7 The genomic structure of the vectors was confirmed by restriction endonuclease digestion and gel electrophoresis and the recombinant vectors all express β-galactosidase, which is detectable after X-gal histochemistry (data not shown). Although mouse prostate cancer cells are much less susceptible to oHSV replication than human prostate cancer cells (compare Walker et al24 and Varghese et al25) or Vero cells, they still replicate and spread in mouse TRAMP-C2 and RM-1 prostate cancer cells (Figure 1a). The transgene expressing viruses replicate less well than the parental wild-type strain Patton (WT, Figure 1b), likely due to the ICP6 mutation; however, there is no difference between bPΔ6-hPAP and bPΔ6-empty (Figure 1b). A dose–response curve for killing TRAMP-C2 cells is shown in Figure 1c. Again there is no difference between bPΔ6-hPAP and bPΔ6-empty, showing that expression of hPAP does not alter the in vitro replication or cytotoxicity of bPΔ6.
Next we confirmed that the viruses express the inserted transgenes. The cytomegalovirus immediate early promoter was used to propel transgene expression, as we have described before,26, 27 because it provides high level expression. Vero cells were infected with either bPΔ6-hPAP, bPΔ6-mPAP or bPΔ6-empty and RT–PCR analysis was carried out for mPAP, using mouse transgene-specific primers, and a band corresponding to the expected mPAP RNA was only seen in bPΔ6-mPAP-infected Vero cells (Figure 2a). Expression of the hPAP transgene in mouse tumor cell lines was detected with human-specific anti-PAP antibody. Western blot analysis reveals a band corresponding to hPAP in all lanes where cells were infected with bPΔ6-hPAP (+, Figure 2b). As a control, we show the expression of endogenous hPAP in human LNCaP prostate cells but not in 293 cells (Figure 2b, right). To test the immunogenic effects of the oHSV PAP vectors, it was necessary that the mouse prostate tumor model expressed mPAP. RT–PCR analysis confirmed the presence of mPAP RNA in both TRAMP-C2 and RM-1 prostate cancer cells (Figure 2c). Ultimately, TRAMP-C2 was selected as our experimental tumor cell line because previous data from our lab has shown that these cells are responsive to oHSV treatment in both primary and metastatic tumor models.25, 28 Finally, to verify that bPΔ6-hPAP expresses hPAP protein in vivo, we implanted TRAMP-C2 cells subcutaneously into C57/BL6 immunocompetent mice. Once tumors were established, the mice were injected intra-neoplastically with bPΔ6-hPAP or bPΔ6-empty. At 48 h after injection, hPAP was detected in tumors treated with bPΔ6-hPAP, but not with bPΔ6-empty (Figure 2d).
In vivo treatment with bPΔ6-hPAP leads to tumor reduction and increased animal survival
TRAMP-C2 cells were implanted subcutaneously in syngeneic C57/BL6 mice. Once tumors were established, mice were randomized into four treatment groups: bPΔ6-hPAP, bPΔ6-mPAP, bPΔ6-empty and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) only. Each mouse was treated four times intra-neoplastically with 1 × 107 plaque-forming units (PFU) per injection over a period of 10 days and then monitored for tumor growth and survival. Mice treated with oHSV lacking transgene (bPΔ6-empty) or oHSV expressing a non-xenogenic form of PAP (bPΔ6-mPAP) showed a slower rate of tumor growth, with no difference between mPAP and empty (P=0.7) and not significantly different from the PBS-treated mice (PBS vs mPAP P=0.09, PBS vs empty P=0.08). However, mice treated with the xenogenic hPAP-expressing oHSV (bPΔ6-hPAP) showed a significant inhibition in tumor growth when compared to bPΔ6-mPAP (P=0.03), bPΔ6-empty (P=0.04) or PBS (P=0.002) groups (Figure 3a). This inhibition translated into a significant increase in survival (Figure 3b) when compared to mice treated with bPΔ6-mPAP (P=0.01), bPΔ6-empty (P=0.01) or PBS only (P=0.0008), with the median survival increasing from 29 days for PBS to 39 days for hPAP. In a separate experiment, three intra-tumoral injections of bPΔ6-hPAP resulted in significantly extended survival compared to bPΔ6-empty or PBS (data not shown). This indicates that expression of xenogenic hPAP is enhancing antitumor activity.
Systemically administrated bPΔ6-hPAP reduces tumor nodule burden in a metastatic tumor model
To investigate the therapeutic efficacy of bPΔ6-hPAP in a metastatic tumor model, we injected TRAMP-C2 cells intravenously through the tail vein. TRAMP-C2 cells metastasize primarily to the lungs.28 Tumor-bearing mice were systemically treated through tail vein injection with bPΔ6-hPAP, bPΔ6-mPAP, bPΔ6-empty or PBS four times over a period of 10 days. Mice were killed at day 60 and the lungs were stained with India ink to detect lung tumor nodules, which were measured and counted. Mice treated with bPΔ6-hPAP showed significantly fewer tumors per group than the bPΔ6-empty (P=0.015) or PBS (P=0.017) groups and also a significant reduction in tumor burden when compared with bPΔ6-empty (P=0.034) (Table 1).
In an effort to improve the therapeutic potential of the oHSV vector system, we combined oHSV with a xenoantigen transgene, designed to stimulate an autoimmune response against a prostate antigen, PAP. For these studies, we developed a new oHSV vector using wild-type HSV-1 strain Patton as the backbone and Flip-Flop HSV-BAC technology7 to insert the PAP transgenes into the ICP6 locus of the oHSV genome in a rapid manner. Many oHSV vectors contain ICP6 mutations, which inactivate viral ribonucleotide reductase, impeding virus replication in normal quiescent cells except those lacking p16, such as many tumor cells.29 HrR3, with an insertion of Escherichia coli LacZ inactivating ICP6 in the HSV-1 KOS backbone was the first such vector.30, 31 bPΔ6 has the same LacZ insertion into ICP6 as hrR3, but in a Patton backbone. Expression of PAP did not affect virus replication or tumor cell killing in vitro. To test the xenoantigen strategy, we needed a tumor model with endogenous mPAP expression that progressed slowly enough to allow the treated animals time to generate an immune response, and that was susceptible to oHSV. For these reasons we chose the TRAMP-C2 tumor cell line. Incorporating hPAP transgene into the oHSV vector bPΔ6 led to a reduction in tumor burden in subcutaneous and metastatic prostate tumor models that did not occur with mPAP. Because of limited oHSV replication in mouse prostate cancer cells, syngeneic mouse prostate tumors have been difficult to treat with oHSV, except with the addition of immune-modulatory transgenes, such as IL-12.25, 28
Our data support the concept that better outcomes can be achieved by combining oncolytic viral therapy with immunotherapy than with oncolytic viral therapy alone. The ability of hPAP, but not mPAP, to enhance the antitumor activity of oHSV indicates that a specific immune response is at work, engendered by exposure to the xenogeneic PAP protein and resulting in a loss of tolerance to syngeneic PAP. Previous studies vaccinating rats with vaccinia virus or plasmid-expressing xenogeneic hPAP transgenes showed the induction of a major histocompatibility class I-dependent cytotoxic T lymphocyte-mediated anti-PAP autoimmune response, but not an antibody response.32, 33 In these studies, the response differed to some extent between rat strains and the animals did not bear prostate tumors. To our knowledge, ours is the first report of an oncolytic virus expressing a xenoantigen for cancer vaccination. It is likely that the combination of hPAP with expression of other immunomodulatory molecules will further improve the efficacy of oHSV-mediated immunotherapy. As we have shown that oHSV-expressing hPAP is efficacious in treating mouse prostate cancer, we hypothesize that oHSV-expressing mPAP would be effective in treating human prostate cancer. This could be addressed in a clinical trial for the treatment of prostate cancer.
References
Moul JW, Mouraviev V, Sun L, Schroeck FR, Polascik TJ . Prostate cancer: the new landscape. Curr Opin Urol 2009; 19: 154–160.
Mitchell RE, Chang SS . Current controversies in the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2008; 18: 263–268.
Sia M, Rosewall T, Warde P . Radiotherapy as primary treatment modality. Front Radiat Ther Oncol 2008; 41: 15–25.
Kumar-Sinha C, Tomlins SA, Chinnaiyan AM . Recurrent gene fusions in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2008; 8: 497–511.
Martuza RL, Malick A, Markert JM, Ruffner KL, Coen DM . Experimental therapy of human glioma by means of a genetically engineered virus mutant. Science 1991; 252: 854–856.
Varghese S, Rabkin SD . Oncolytic herpes simplex virus vectors for cancer virotherapy. Cancer Gene Ther 2002; 9: 967–978.
Kuroda T, Martuza RL, Todo T, Rabkin SD . Flip-Flop HSV-BAC: bacterial artificial chromosome based system for rapid generation of recombinant herpes simplex virus vectors using two independent site-specific recombinases. BMC Biotech 2006; 6: 40.
Aghi M, Martuza RL . Oncolytic viral therapies—the clinical experience. Oncogene 2005; 24: 7802–7816.
Liu TC, Galanis E, Kirn D . Clinical trial results with oncolytic virotherapy: a century of promise, a decade of progress. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2007; 4: 101–117.
Post DE, Fulci G, Chiocca EA, Van Meir EG . Replicative oncolytic herpes simplex viruses in combination cancer therapies. Curr Gene Ther 2004; 4: 41–51.
Passer BJ, Castelo-Branco P, Buhrman JB, Varghese S, Rabkin SD, Martuza RL . Oncolytic herpes simplex virus vectors and taxanes synergize to promote killing of prostate cancer cells. Cancer Gene Ther 2009; 16: 551–560.
Harrington KJ, Melcher A, Vassaux G, Pandha HS, Vile RG . Exploiting synergies between radiation and oncolytic viruses. Curr Opin Mol Ther 2008; 10: 362–370.
Toda M, Rabkin SD, Kojima H, Martuza RL . Herpes simplex virus as an in situ cancer vaccine for the induction of specific anti-tumor immunity. Hum Gene Ther 1999; 10: 385–393.
Thomas DL, Fraser NW . HSV-1 therapy of primary tumors reduces the number of metastases in an immune-competent model of metastatic breast cancer. Mol Ther 2003; 8: 543–551.
Benencia F, Courrèges MC, Conejo-García JR, Mohamed-Hadley A, Zhang L, Buckanovich RJ et al. HSV oncolytic therapy upregulates interferon-inducible chemokines and recruits immune effector cells in ovarian cancer. Mol Ther 2005; 12: 780–802.
Li H, Dutuor A, Tao L, Fu X, Zhang X . Virotherapy with a type 2 herpes simplex virus-derived oncolytic virus induces potent antitumor immunity against neuroblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13: 316–322.
Lin MF, DaVolio J, Garcia-Arenas R . Expression of human prostatic acid phosphatase activity and the growth of prostate carcinoma cells. Cancer Res 1992; 52: 4600–4607.
Fong L, Brockstedt D, Benike C, Breen JK, Strang G, Ruegg CL et al. Dendritic cell-based xenoantigen vaccination for prostate cancer immunotherapy. J Immunol 2001; 167: 7150–7156.
Ahmad S, Casey G, Sweeney P, Tangney M, O’Sullivan G . Prostate stem cell antigen DNA vaccination breaks tolerance to self-antigen and inhibits prostate cancer growth. Mol Ther 2009; 17: 1101–1108.
Gregor PD, Wolchok JD, Turaga V, Latouche JB, Sadelain M, Bacich D et al. Induction of autoantibodies to syngeneic prostate-specific membrane antigen by xenogeneic vaccination. Int J Cancer 2005; 116: 415–421.
Gold JS, Ferrone CR, Guevara-Patiño JA, Hawkins WG, Dyall R, Engelhorn ME et al. A single heteroclitic epitope determines cancer immunity after xenogeneic DNA immunization against a tumor differentiation antigen. J Immunol 2003; 170: 5188–5194.
Gallo P, Dharmapuri S, Nuzzo M, Maldini D, Iezzi M, Cavallo F et al. Xenogeneic immunization in mice using HER2 DNA delivered by an adenoviral vector. Int J Cancer 2005; 113: 67–77.
Lu Y, Wei Y, Tian L, Zhao X, Yang L, Hu B et al. Immunogene therapy of tumors with vaccine based on xenogeneic epidermal growth factor receptor. J Immunol 2003; 170: 3162–3170.
Walker JR, McGeagh KG, Sundaresan P, Jorgensen TJ, Rabkin SD, Martuza RL . Local and systemic therapy of human prostate adenocarcinoma with the conditionally replicating herpes simplex virus vector G207. Hum Gene Ther 1999; 10: 2237–2243.
Varghese S, Rabkin SD, Liu R, Nielsen PG, Ipe T, Martuza RL . Enhanced therapeutic efficacy of IL-12, but not GM-CSF, expressing oncolytic herpes simplex virus for transgenic mouse derived prostate cancers. Cancer Gene Ther 2006; 13: 253–265.
Fukuhara H, Ino Y, Kuroda T, Martuza RL, Todo T . Triple gene-deleted oncolytic herpes simplex virus vector double-armed with interleukin 18 and soluble B7-1 constructed by bacterial artificial chromosome-mediated system. Cancer Res 2005; 65: 10663–10668.
Liu TC, Zhang T, Fukuhara H, Kuroda T, Todo T, Martuza RL et al. Oncolytic HSV armed with platelet factor 4, an antiangiogenic agent, shows enhanced efficacy. Mol Ther 2006; 14: 789–797.
Varghese S, Rabkin SD, Nielsen PG, Wang W, Martuza RL . Systemic oncolytic herpes virus therapy of poorly immunogenic prostate cancer metastatic to lung. Clin Cancer Res 2006; 12: 2919–2927.
Aghi M, Visted T, Depinho RA, Chiocca EA . Oncolytic herpes virus with defective ICP6 specifically replicates in quiescent cells with homozygous genetic mutations in p16. Oncogene 2008; 27: 4249–4254.
Goldstein DJ, Weller SK . Herpes simplex virus type 1-induced ribonucleotide reductase activity is dispensable for virus growth and DNA synthesis: isolation and characterization of an ICP6 lacZ insertion mutant. J Virol 1988; 62: 196–205.
Mineta T, Rabkin SD, Martuza RL . Treatment of malignant gliomas using ganciclovir-hypersensitive, ribonucleotide reductase-deficient herpes simplex viral mutant. Cancer Res 1994; 54: 3963–3966.
Fong L, Ruegg CL, Brockstedt D, Engleman EG, Laus R . Induction of tissue-specific autoimmune prostatitis with prostatic acid phosphatase immunization: implications for immunotherapy of prostate cancer. J Immunol 1997; 159: 3113–3117.
Johnson LE, Frye TP, Chinnasamy N, Chinnasamy D, McNeel DG . Plasmid DNA vaccine encoding prostatic acid phosphatase is effective in eliciting autologous antigen-specific CD8+ T cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2007; 56: 885–895.
Foster BA, Gingrich JR, Kwon ED, Madias C, Greenberg NM . Characterization of prostatic epithelial cell lines derived from transgenic adenocarcinoma of the mouse prostate (TRAMP) model. Cancer Res 1997; 57: 3325–3330.
Hall SJ, Mutchnik SE, Chen S-H, Woo SLC, Thompson TC . Adenovirus-mediated herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene and ganciclovir therapy leads to systemic activity against spontaneous and induced metastasis in an orthotopic mouse model of prostate cancer. Int J Cancer 1997; 70: 183–187.
Davis L, Kuehl M, Battey J . Basic Methods in Molecular Biology. Appleton & Lange: Norwalk, CT, 1994.
Grossmann ME, Wood M, Celis E . Expression, specificity and immunotherapy potential of prostate-associated genes in murine cell lines. World J Urol 2001; 19: 365–370.
Vihko P, Virkkunen P, Henttu P, Roiko K, Solin T, Huhtala ML . Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of cDNA encoding human prostatic acid phosphatase. FEBS Lett 1988; 236: 275–281.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr M Crew for providing the mPAP cDNA and Dr Timothy C. Thompson for providing RM-1 cells. This work was supported in part by grants to RLM from the DOD (W81XWH-04-1-0254) and the NIH (R01 CA102139).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on Gene Therapy website
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Castelo-Branco, P., Passer, B., Buhrman, J. et al. Oncolytic herpes simplex virus armed with xenogeneic homologue of prostatic acid phosphatase enhances antitumor efficacy in prostate cancer. Gene Ther 17, 805–810 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/gt.2010.20
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/gt.2010.20
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
NPAS2 promotes aerobic glycolysis and tumor growth in prostate cancer through HIF-1A signaling
BMC Cancer (2023)
-
Potentiating prostate cancer immunotherapy with oncolytic viruses
Nature Reviews Urology (2018)
-
DNA vaccination for prostate cancer: key concepts and considerations
Cancer Nanotechnology (2015)
-
Designing herpes viruses as oncolytics
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics (2015)
-
The Profile of Tumor Antigens Which Can be Targeted by Immunotherapy Depends Upon the Tumor's Anatomical Site
Molecular Therapy (2014)