Sir,
In Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), graft preparation is done with a mechanical microkeratome.1 Interface corneal metallic deposits due to the microkeratome dissection have been described after LASIK2 but have not been described with DSAEK. We report a case of post DSAEK patient with long-term presence of presumed metallic particles in the interface.
Case report
A 75-year-old female presented with bilateral Fuchs dystrophy and nuclear sclerosis, worse in her right eye. She underwent planned phaco-emulsification, foldable three-piece IOL implantation with DSAEK in right eye. DSAEK donor tissue was prepared by eye bank with automated microkeratome. The procedure was performed by a technique described elsewhere.3 There were no intraoperative complications. After 1 week, slit-lamp examination revealed donor disc in place, and clear and compact cornea. Presence of multiple brightly reflective particles was observed in interface. There was no associated anterior chamber reaction or subjective symptoms. In the last follow-up visit, 18 months postoperatively, corrected visual acuity was 20/25 with compact and clear cornea. Interface particles were unchanged and character of brightly reflective deposits was unaltered (Figure 1).
Comment
To our knowledge this is the first report of presumed metallic particles in host-graft interface after DSAEK. Absence of anterior chamber reaction, reflective nature, wide area of deposition, and no change with topical steroids excluded possibility of intralamellar keratitis, epithelial downgrowth, or infectious etiology. Especially the reflective nature, sharp borders of particles and inert nature were similar to the metallic deposits described in interface after LASIK. In previous studies, microkeratome-related blade shattering leading to deposits of metallic debris have been described in LASIK.2 Wave-like deposition of debris in DSAEK interface with presumed origin from microkeratome4 and small particles observed only in confocal microscopy5 have been reported in previous studies after DSAEK. In our case, the reflective nature of the slit-lamp observed debris was suggestive of metallic origin, which did not seem to affect the visual outcome in 18 months follow up. Confocal microscopy was not available. In the future, femtosecond laser technology may provide thinner, better quality grafts and in addition will avoid microkeratome-related interface debris.
References
Suh LH, Yoo SH, Deobhakta A, Donaldson KE, Alfonso EC, Culbertson WW et al. Complications of Descemet's stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty: survey of 118 eyes at One Institute. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 1517–1524.
El Danasoury MA, El Maghraby A, Klyce SD, Mehrez K . Comparison of photorefractive keratectomy with excimer laser in situ keratomileusis in correcting low myopia (from 2.00 to 5.50 diopters). A randomised study. Ophthalmology 1999; 106: 411–420.
Kymionis GD, Kontadakis GA, Agorogiannis GI, Bennett M, Angelidou F . Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty combined with phacoemulsification in Chandler syndrome. Eur J Ophthalmol 2011; 21: 495–497.
Kymionis GD, Ide T, Yoo SH . Interface wavelike deposits after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 2009; 127: 1389–1390.
Kobayashi A, Mawatari Y, Yokogawa H, Sugiyama K . In vivo laser confocal microscopy after descemet stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2008; 145: 977–985.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kymionis, G., Kankariya, V. & Kontadakis, G. Long-term presence of metallic particles in the DSAEK interface. Eye 25, 1382–1383 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2011.165
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2011.165