Abstract
The RNAi machinery is a mighty regulator in a myriad of life events. Despite lines of evidence that small RNAs and components of the RNAi pathway may be associated with structure and behavior of mitotic chromosomes in diverse organisms, a direct role of the RNAi pathway in mammalian mitotic chromosome segregation remains elusive. Here we report that Dicer and AGO2, two central components of the mammalian RNAi pathway, participate in the chromosome segregation. Knockdown of Dicer or AGO2 results in a higher incidence of chromosome lagging, and this effect is independent from microRNAs as examined with DGCR8 knockout cells. Further investigation has revealed that α-satellite RNA, a noncoding RNA derived from centromeric repeat region, is managed by AGO2 under the guidance of endogenous small interference RNAs (ASAT siRNAs) generated by Dicer. Furthermore, the slicer activity of AGO2 is essential for the chromosome segregation. Level and distribution of chromosome-associated α-satellite RNA have crucial regulatory effect on the localization of centromeric proteins such as centromere protein C1 (CENPC1). With these results, we also provide a paradigm in which the RNAi pathway participates in vital cellular events through the maintenance of level and distribution of noncoding RNAs in cells.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The centromere is a special region of chromosome needed for successful assembly of kinetochore and chromosome attachment to spindle [1–4]. Centromeres consist of long stretch of species-specific DNA repeats in most eukaryotes, and it has been known for more than a decade that some transcripts are derived from centromeric repeat regions in multiple eukaryotic organisms investigated [2, 3]. Although the organization of centromere DNA as repeats is largely conserved in eukaryotes, the repeat sequences, transcripts from the repeats and the molecular mechanisms underneath the centromere/kinetochore assembly are not that conserved among different species.
The core centromere of mammalian chromosome is the region for the assembly of kinetochore, and it consists of α-satellite repeats in human and minor satellite repeats in mice. Centromere protein B (CENP-B) is a highly conserved centromeric DNA-binding protein recognizing and binding to a 17-bp sequence (CENP-B box) in the centromeric α-satellite DNA [5, 6]. In vertebrates and mammals, studies have demonstrated that transcripts from the centromeric core associate with centromeric core proteins to serve as integral components of the centromere and kinetochore [2, 3, 7–10]. Several studies have shown that RNA polymerase II-dependent α-satellite RNA is an integral part of centromere and exerts an important function in the kinetochore assembly [7–9]. Centromeric α-satellite RNA associates directly with centromere protein C1 (CENPC1) and facilitates nucleoprotein assembly at the mitotic centromere [7, 11–13]. CENPC1 has both RNA-binding and DNA-binding capacity [7, 8]. This protein is essential for the integrity and localization of kinetochore, and loss of CENPC1 induces chromosome lagging [14, 15]. In mice, centromeric noncoding RNA (ncRNAs) of 120 nucleotides (nt) associate with centromeres and accumulate under stress or differentiation conditions [16]. Components of kinetochore are recruited to minor satellite repeat RNA by CENP-A [17, 18]. In mouse embryonic stem cells, loss of Dicer reduces the level of small double-stranded RNA from centromeric repeats [19]. In a chicken–human hybrid cell line, loss of Dicer results in a higher level of transcripts from α-satellite sequences [20].
The RNA interference (RNAi)/microRNA (miRNA) pathway in mammalian cells is mediated by a cascade of enzymatic reactions [21–23]. First, the large primary miRNA transcripts are processed by a complex of DGCR8 and Drosha into miRNA precursors of ~70 nt with a hairpin structure in the nucleus. miRNA precursors are then transported into the cytoplasm and get cut by Dicer to give rise to mature miRNAs. Endogenous or exogenous double-stranded RNA or short hairpin RNA can also be processed by Dicer to form small interference RNA (siRNA). Both miRNA and siRNA can be loaded into RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) with its core component as AGO2. Inside the siRNA-programmed RISC, the siRNA triggers the degradation of targeted complementary RNA with the slicer activity of AGO2. Whereas in the miRISC (miRNA-programmed RISC), miRNA generally suppresses the translation or promotes the degradation of the target mRNA by incomplete complementation.
Previous results showed that small RNAs and components of the RNAi pathway might be associated with mitotic chromosome segregation [1–3, 24, 25], although the mechanism of how the RNAi machinery participates into this event remains elusive. In this study, we set out to investigate whether the RNAi pathway participates in mitotic chromosome segregation directly. We found that knockdown of Dicer or AGO2 resulted in chromosome lagging. With a DGCR8 knockout cell line, we demonstrated that this effect was largely independent from miRNAs. The RNAi pathway under the guidance of endogenous siRNAs kept the level of α-satellite RNA balanced for precise centromere/kinetochore formation. In addition, the slicer activity of AGO2 was essential, indicating further that a siRNA rather than a miRNA pathway was involved. Our data suggest that AGO2 guided by endogenous siRNAs generated by Dicer controls the level and localization of chromosomal α-satellite RNA to direct the deposition of important centromeric factors such as CENPC1 for mitotic chromosome segregation in mammalian cells.
Results
Dicer or AGO2 knockdown leads to defect in mammalian chromosome segregation
We started to investigate roles of the RNAi pathway in chromosome segregation by knocking down Dicer or AGO2 with siRNAs. Dicer or AGO2 knockdown resulted in chromosome lagging in mitotic human RPE-1 and HeLa cells (Figure 1a and Supplementary Figure S1A–E). As a comparison and also a positive control, knocking down of CENPC1 resulted in higher incidence of chromosome lagging (Figure 1a and Supplementary Figure S1B), and this phenomenon was consistent with early studies about roles of CENPC1 [14, 15, 26]. Furthermore, the mRNA and protein levels of CENPC1 were not significantly changed when knocking down the Dicer or AGO2, respectively (Figure 1b).
Functions of Dicer and AGO2 are largely associated with two classes of small RNA, miRNA and siRNA [23]. To see whether miRNAs are important, we next carried out AGO2 and Dicer knockdown experiments in DGCR8 knockout MEF cells [27–30]. It is well known that these cells lack functional miRNAs, as DGCR8 is a critical component of microprocessor for the production of pre-miRNA from pri-miRNA [27–30] (Supplementary Figure S1F). In DGCR8 knockout cells, AGO2 or Dicer knockdown caused a higher incidence of chromosome lagging (Figure 1c and Supplementary Figure S1G).
Interestingly, knocking down the other Argonaute family members including AGO1, AGO3 and AGO4 did not induce chromosome lagging (Supplementary Figure S2). It seems that Dicer, as well as AGO2 rather than the other Argonautes, possesses unique function in mitotic chromosome segregation.
Taken together, our results demonstrated that AGO2 and Dicer acted in mammalian mitotic chromosome segregation. Their roles in this cellular event may be independent from miRNAs.
AGO2 but not dicer is a chromosomal protein
To investigate further roles of Dicer and AGO2 on mitotic chromosome segregation, we isolated human mitotic metaphase chromosomes with gradient centrifugation (Supplementary Figure S3A) [31]. Results from flow cytometry and immunostaining of chromosome marker (Phos-histone H3) indicated that the isolated chromosomes were of high purity (Supplementary Figure S3B and C). Chromosomes isolated with gradient centrifugation were mostly used for western blot analyses and RNA isolation in this research. Western blot analysis with chromosome samples showed that AGO2 rather than Dicer was a chromosomal protein (Figure 1d). For further confirmation, we applied an immunostaining assay with AGO2 or Dicer antibodies on mitotic chromosomes. Metaphase chromosome spreads were prepared by dropping for immunostaining assay. This method was used for all chromosomal immunofluorescent (IF) staining and RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in this study, unless specified. The immunostaining assay verified that there was AGO2 but almost no Dicer on metaphase mitotic chromosomes (Figure 1e and Supplementary Figure S3B and C). A previous proteomics survey of chicken metaphase chromosomes has shown that AGO2 (ranked 2 356th of 4 030 proteins) rather than Dicer (ranked 3 879th of 4 030 proteins) is a chromosomal protein [32]. In addition, AGO1, AGO3 and AGO4 did not locate on metaphase chromosomes (Supplementary Figure S3D). Our western blots and immunostaining also showed limited signals of AGO2 in the interphase nucleus (Figure 1d and Supplementary Figure S3E), and the data indicate that AGO2 might ‘flood into’ the nucleus presumably because of the increase in permeability or the dissembling of the nuclear envelope in the prometaphase (Supplementary Figure S3E).
α-satellite RNAs are chromosomal ncRNAs and regulate mammalian chromosome segregation
Multiple lines of evidence have shown that ncRNAs are transcribed from centromeric repeats [2, 3]. We performed RNA sequencing with HeLa sample of metaphase chromosomal RNAs (Supplementary Figure S3A). Bioinformatic analysis of sequencing data for reads originated from genomic repeats showed that α-satellite RNAs, ncRNAs derived from centromeric repeats, were present on human mitotic chromosomes along with some other repeat-derived ncRNAs (Figure 2a). We confirmed the relative enrichment of α-satellite RNA in chromosomal RNA as against the total RNA with real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR; Figure 2b). Northern blots showed that α-satellite RNAs with the length ~171 nt (the length of one unit of α-satellite repeat) were enriched on metaphase chromosomes (Figure 2c). Previous work has shown the presence of ~171 nt α-satellite RNAs along with transcripts of various lengths in an array of human cells [33, 34], and our northern blot with chromosomal RNAs demonstrated that the ~171-nt RNA is the major chromosomal α-satellite RNA. To gain insight into the subchromosomal distribution of α-satellite RNAs, we performed RNA-FISH (with or without pre-treatment of RNase A). Positive RNA-FISH signals were observed exclusively on the centromeric region of metaphase chromosomes (Figure 2d). Furthermore, co-staining of α-satellite RNA and CENPC1 protein showed that α-satellite RNA colocalized with CENPC1 (Figure 2e). Next, we found that transfection of in vitro synthesized α-satellite RNA (with Line 1 repeat-derived RNA as a negative control) into nuclei of human HeLa cells resulted in higher incidence of lagging chromosomes during mitosis (Figure 2f and Supplementary Figure S4A and B). This result was consistent with previous report about chromosome missegregation in murine cells with overexpressed centromeric RNA 16. Immunostaining of CENPC1 and CENP-B (a centromere marker [5, 6]) revealed that α-satellite RNA added in trans resulted in CENPC1 dislocation on chromosomal loci without CENP-B colocalization (Figure 2g).
Taken together, these results showed that α-satellite RNAs were component of metaphase chromosomes. Too many of these RNAs would be deteriorative to the formation and function of centromere/kinetochore as shown by CENPC1 dislocation and further chromosome lagging in mammalian cells.
AGO2 and Dicer manage levels of α-satellite RNA and further localization of CENPC1
Considering that both AGO2 or Dicer knocking down and transfection of α-satellite RNA led to a similar phenotype of CENPC1 mislocation and chromosome lagging, we suspected that the RNAi pathway might function to keep the levels of α-satellite RNA in check. AGO2 RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) assays with isolated metaphase chromosomes revealed that AGO2 interacted with α-satellite RNA on chromosomes (Figure 3a and Supplementary Figure S4C). Furthermore, knocking down AGO2 or Dicer resulted in increased levels of α-satellite RNA in both total RNA and chromosomal RNA samples (Figure 3b). FISH for α-satellite RNA revealed increased intensity, larger loci and mislocalization on mitotic metaphase chromosomes followed by applications of AGO2 or Dicer siRNA (Figure 3c). CENPC1 immunostaining of metaphase chromosomes revealed that CENPC1 localization was abnormal and dispersed with dislocation when AGO2 or Dicer was knocked down (Figure 3d). In addition, we noticed that the CENPC1 dislocation observed in Figure 3d was similar to that in Figure 2g with the transfection of exogenous α-satellite RNA, and both phenotypes were associated with an increased level of α-satellite RNA.
Collectively, our data demonstrated that AGO2 and Dicer regulated the amount and distribution of α-satellite RNA and further CENPC1 distribution on mitotic chromosomes. The total amount of CENPC1 was not altered (Figure 1c), but rather the protein mislocated on chromosomes in AGO2 or Dicer-deficient cells.
The existence of ASAT siRNA and its role in chromosome segregation
How does the RNAi pathway manage level and distribution of chromosomal α-satellite RNA? Considering that AGO2 needs the guidance from small RNAs, we sequenced HEK293 cells for small RNAs and analyzed the sequencing data along with small RNA reads from other human cells such as MCF7 and ESC [35, 36]. We found that endo-siRNAs mapped to the 171-base pair (bp) α-satellite repeat element, and most reads mapped roughly 60–80 and 90–120 bp regions of the α-satellite repeat element (Figure 4a and Supplementary Figure S5A). We termed these siRNAs α-satellite siRNA (ASAT siRNA).
Co-transfection of 50 or 100 nM in vitro synthesized ASAT siRNAs could reverse the abnormal increase in α-satellite RNA seen under Dicer knockdown (Figure 4b and Supplementary Figure S5B). Actually, 100-nM exogenous ASAT siRNA under Dicer knockdown resulted in a significantly decreased level of α-satellite RNA compared with the normal level (scramble siRNA control), indicating that the concentration of 100 nM might be too high. Indeed, 50-nM ASAT siRNA under Dicer knockdown resulted in a slightly decreased (but not statistically significant) level of α-satellite RNA (Figure 4b).
As our data showed that AGO2 is a chromosomal protein (Figure 1d and e), we examined the chromosomal AGO2 (chr AGO2) level in the absence of Dicer (Figure 4c). Dicer knockdown decreased chromosomal AGO2 level significantly, and exogenous ASAT siRNAs could restore the level of AGO2 protein on metaphase chromosomes upon Dicer knockdown (Figure 4c). Furthermore, the exogenous ASAT siRNAs could partially rescue the chromosome lagging phenotype and restore CENPC1 localization in Dicer knockdown cells (Figure 4d and e). We also analyzed the chromosomal localization of AGO2 and found that AGO2 IF signals were decreased, whereas FISH signals of α-satellite RNAs were increased at both centromere and chromosome arms upon Dicer knockdown (Figure 4f). A colocalization at the centromere for AGO2 and the overexpressed α-satellite RNAs upon dicer knockdown can still be observed, and AGO2 was presumably guided by limited ASAT siRNA that is still available upon Dicer knockdown.
Taken together, these results support our hypothesis that AGO2 guided by ASAT siRNAs generated by Dicer controls the level and distribution of α-satellite RNAs and further CENPC1 localization at the centromere.
Slicer activity of AGO2 is essential for its role in chromosome segregation
Considering the involvement of ASAT siRNAs in the control of α-satellite RNA and the requirement of AGO2 rather than the other Argonautes in mitotic chromosome segregation, we speculated that the catalytic function of AGO2 might be crucial. Actually, AGO2 is the only member possessing slicer activity to cleave the substrate RNA under the guidance of siRNA among the four mammalian Argonautes [37]. To investigate this issue, we transfected a mutant AGO2, which was devoid of the slicer activity in RPE-1 cells, with a wild-type AGO2 as the control (Supplementary Figure S6) [37]. This mutant AGO2 can function like a dominant-negative protein [30]. We observed higher incidence of chromosome lagging in cells with AGO2 mutant (Figure 5a). Levels of α-satellite RNA were significantly increased in both total and chromosomal RNA samples upon overexpression of the AGO2 mutant (Figure 5b). In consistence with this increase, α-satellite RNA signal on mitotic chromosomes became brighter and dispersed in cells with AGO2 mutant (Figure 5c). Furthermore, CENPC1 immunostaining was aberrant with mislocation on chromosomes in samples with AGO2 mutant (Figure 5d).
Taken together, we concluded that the slicer activity of AGO2 was essential for the RNAi machinery to participate in mammalian chromosome segregation, and thus a siRNA pathway rather than a miRNA pathway was involved.
Discussion
Our data support a model in which the RNAi machinery participates in chromosome segregation by directly keeping the level and distribution of α-satellite RNA on mitotic chromosomes in check (Figure 6). Dicer generates endo-ASAT siRNAs presumably from double-stranded RNAs derived from the centromeric repeats, as transcripts from both directions of the repeats are known to exist in mammalian cells [34]. These endo-ASAT siRNAs then guide AGO2 to target the α-satellite RNAs on mitotic chromosomes. With the slicer activity of AGO2, α-satellite RNAs that mislocalize on chromosome arms and overaccumulate on the centromere are eliminated. The right amount and localization of α-satellite RNAs on the centromere ensure proper deposition of CENPC1 and maybe other components required for the proper formation and function of centromere/kinetochore on mitotic chromosomes. The RNAi pathway is required to keep the fine balancing of α-satellite RNAs, as our data actually show that either too much, too little or dislocation of these RNAs on the chromosome would lead to chromosome lagging. Most previous analyses filtered out small RNAs originated from genomic repeats, and we might be the first to realize the presence of ASAT siRNAs in human cells. The identification of ASAT siRNAs as the guide for AGO2 to target α-satellite RNAs directly links the RNAi pathway to mammalian chromosome segregation.
CENP-C is an essential protein for the assembly of kinetochore. In a recent publication with chicken cells in which the endogenous centromere of a chromosome was removed, the full length or the C terminus of CENP-C protein tethered at a non-centromere site could induce the formation of an ectopic kinetochore with the full complement of kinetochore proteins [38]. Ectopic tethering of the CENP-C N terminus also generated functional kinetochores, although these kinetochores lacked some constitutive centromere-associated proteins [38].
In human cells, the mislocalized α-satellite RNAs on chromosomes upon Dicer or AGO2 knockdown could recruit CENP-C via its RNA-binding motif. Some other centromere/kinetochore proteins might also be recruited by interacting with CENP-C, and eventually these malformed structures would interfere with the precise process of chromosome segregation and lead to chromosome lagging. α-satellite RNAs at the centromere/kinetochore have to be maintained at the right level presumably by the balancing between local transcription at the centromere and the RNAi machinery. However, we have to point out that our data about CENPC1 dislocation upon Dicer knockdown are different from a report with a chicken–human hybrid DT40 cell line, in which loss of Dicer (Dicer null) resulted in accumulation of abnormal mitotic cells, but the localization of CENP-C was normal [20]. The reason might be that DT40 is a chicken–human hybrid cell, which is different from human cell, or the amount at the centromere rather than the localization of CENP-C was misregulated in the hybrid cell. The level of Dicer protein is also different between our research and the DT40 study, as we used siRNA to knockdown Dicer.
Another point of particular interest is the localization of AGO2 on mitotic chromosomes (Figure 1d and e and Supplementary Figure S3E). Locations and activity of Dicer, AGO2 and the RISC complex are subjected to dynamic regulation in eukaryotic cells [22, 23, 39, 40]. The localization of AGO2 on metaphase chromosome is important in managing α-satellite RNAs, but may also be with vital physiological functions in keeping other RNA transcripts in check, as our data show that a myriad of ncRNAs derived from repeats are present on metaphase chromosomes (Figure 2a). It seems that AGO2 but not the other three Argonautes is involved in mammalian chromosome segregation. Interestingly, among the multiple Caenorhabditis elegans Argonaute proteins, only CSR-1 is known to be required for chromosome segregation [41].
In Drosophila, both Dicer-2 and Ago-2 are required for chromosomal localization of the RNA helicase Belle, and Dicer-2 and Ago-2 are related to chromosome segregation by promoting proper localization of proteins such as Belle [24]. This regulatory mechanism may be conserved in human cells. Human Dicer and the Belle homolog DDX3 interact with each other, and Dicer knockdown results in dislocation of DDX3 and defective chromosome segregation in HeLa cells [24]. We suspect that Dicer and AGO2 in human cells are required for the correct amount and distribution of both ncRNAs (for example, α-satellite RNAs) and proteins (for example, CENPC1 and DDX3). Recent study has shown that satellite III (SAT III) RNAs serve as an important component in the kinetochore assembly, in which SAT III RNAs bind to kinetochore component CENP-C, and is necessary for correct localization of centromeric proteins such as CENP-C in Drosophila [26, 42]. It is possible that the Drosophila RNAi machinery may have a role in chromosome segregation by directly managing SAT III RNAs, just similar to what we report here for the mammalian RNAi pathway. It is also known that centromere-encoded RNAs are components of the kinetochore in maize [43]. Whether and how the RNAi machinery manages centromeric ncRNAs involved in chromosome segregation in other sectors of eukaryotic organisms remain to be investigated.
Murine cells with abnormal accumulation of minor satellite RNAs showed chromosome lagging [16], in a way similar to phenotype seen for human cells with higher levels of α-satellite RNAs (Figure 2e). Despite the distinction in the actual centromere repeat sequences, mammalian cells may share similar molecular mechanisms in regulating centromere/kinetochore formation with ncRNAs derived from centromeric repeats. A recent publication demonstrates that minor satellite RNA can even have roles in trans to regulate telomerase via interacting with Aurora Kinase B in mouse embryonic stem cells [10]. It would be interesting to investigate whether the mammalian RNAi machinery also regulates this kind of trans effect of ncRNAs transcribed from centromeric repeats.
The canonical RNAi pathway mediated by miRNAs or siRNAs is viewed mainly as a post-transcriptional regulatory mechanism of gene expression in mammalian cells [22, 23, 39]. Here we have integrated lines of evidence about the involvement of ncRNAs and endo-siRNA pathway in the function of centromere/kinetochore. With our data, it is clear that the mammalian RNAi machinery can not only have roles in gene expression but also participates in cellular behaviors such as mitotic chromosome segregation by directly managing vital ncRNAs involved in.
Materials and Methods
Isolation of metaphase chromosomes
Cells were incubated with colchicine (20 ng ml−1) for 15 h, resulting in a mitotic index of 60–70%. Mitotic chromosomes were isolated following the protocol from Hayashihara et al. [31] (Supplementary Figure S2A and C) . Metaphase chromosomes isolated with this method were used for western blots and isolation of chromosomal RNAs (for real-time PCR, northern blots and RNA sequencing).
Preparation of nuclei, cytoplasm and whole-cell lysis
Nuclei and cytoplasm were prepared with the KeyGen Nuclei Isolation Kit (Cat number: KGA826; Nanjing, China) following the protocol provided. For whole-cell lysis preparation, we collected cells and added with sample buffer (125 mM Tris pH 6.8, 25% (v/v) glycerol, 4% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 10% β-mercaptoethanol). Western blots were performed with samples from the same number of cells containing the corresponding fraction. Only one-sixth of the WCL (whole-cell lyses) and CYTO (cytoplasmic) was loaded to avoid saturation of the corresponding bands (Figure 1d).
Preparation of metaphase chromosome spreading by dropping
Cells were synchronized with colchicine (100 ng ml−1) for 4 h and collected after phosphate-buffered saline washing. Collected cells were treated with hypotonic solution (75 mM KCl) for 30 min at 37 °C. Then, hypotonic cells were collected and fixed with methanol: glacial acetic acid (3:1) solution twice for 1 h. Fixed cells were spun down and resuspended with methanol: glacial acetic acid solution. A small quantity of cell suspension was held vertically ~1 m above the slide (cold). Then a single drop was released from this height on the slide. Slides were washed with phosphate-buffered saline twice and then used for immunostaining and FISH.
RIP assay
RIP was performed following the protocol from Li et al. 2015 [44]. Cells were washed and sonicated in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl at pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA at pH 8, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate and 0.1% SDS, protease inhibitors) containing RNase inhibitors (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and bovine serum albumin carried out as previously described with some modifications. RIP was performed with the relevant antibodies (anti-AGO2, 1:1 000 dilution and IgG as control) and captured with protein G Sepharose 4 Fast Flow suspension (GE Amersham, Little Chalfont, UK). The beads were performed with proteinase K (Sangon, Shanghai, China) digestion for 1 h followed by RNA purification by TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Waltham, MA, USA). Real-time quantitative (qPCR) or semi-quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR) was used to examine the RNA yielded, and primers used for these PCR reactions are listed in Supplementary Table S1.
RNA sequencing and bioinformatic analysis
For HeLa chromosomal RNA high-throughput sequencing, the libraries were prepared following the manufacturer's instructions and applied to Illumina GAIIx system for 80-nt single-end sequencing by ABlife (Wuhan, China). For chromosomal RNA repeats dividing, we filtered the reads to the reference genome downloaded from UCSC (HG18). Small RNA high-throughput sequencing was performed with Illumina GAII 2000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) with total RNA isolated from HEK293 cells. Small RNA reads for MCF7 cell (GEO Accession: GSM402329) and ES cell (GEO Accession: GSM450239) were also analyzed for ASAT siRNAs [35, 36]. In brief, small RNA sequencing reads were mapped to the α-satellite region in tolerance of two mismatches. Upon acceptance, the data will be deposited into the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus database, and the accession code will then be provided.
Northern blot analysis
Digoxin-labeled RNA probes were transcribed with the corresponding insertion in the T vector as a template following the manual of DIG Northern Starter Kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Total RNA and chromosomal RNA (both were 7.5 μg) were loaded on a precast gel (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) containing 15% urea and were ran for 3 h in 1× TBE buffer. RNA was transferred onto Hybond-N+ membrane (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK) by electrophoretic transfer. Hybridization was performed with probes (final concentration 100 ng ml−1) at 62 °C overnight. Membranes were stringently washed twice in wash buffer (2× SSC, 0.1% SDS at 37 °C and 0.1× SSC, 0.1% SDS) at 62 °C for 30 min, respectively, and detection was performed following the protocol provided (Roche, DIG Northern Starter Kit). Images were taken with LAS-4000mini Image Reader (GE Healthcare). Information for oligos used is provided in Supplementary Table S1.
Flow cytometry
The separation profiles of cleared mitotic chromosome fraction and nucleus fraction were confirmed using flow cytometry after staining with propidium iodide (35 μg ml−1). Flow cytometry was performed with FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and FlowJo 7.6 software (FlowJO LLC, Ashland, OR, USA).
Plasmids and plasmid construction
All plasmids were constructed with restriction enzyme digestion and ligation, and were sequenced for confirmation. For AGO2 mutant plasmid construction, 633 and 634 sites of AGO2 were mutated from Q and H to R and A, respectively. The shRNA plasmids for knockdown of AGO1 mRNA (TRCN0000009625), AGO3 mRNA (TRCN0000009636) and AGO4 mRNA (TRCN0000009640) with negative shRNA control (SHC002) were obtained from the MISSION shRNA Library (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA). Information for oligos used is provided in Supplementary Table S1.
FISH
RNA probes were prepared by SP6 (Thermo Scientific) with the corresponding insertion in the T vector as a template, and were labeled with Alexa Fluor546 by using the ULYSIS Nucleic Acid Labeling Kit (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) following the manual provided. The fixed cells and RNA probes (final concentration 2 ng μl−1) were denatured at 80 °C for 10 min, and then incubated at 37 °C for 15–17 h with yeast tRNA blocking. Slides were washed twice with 2× SSC at 45 °C for 10 min. Images were taken with Zeiss Imager A2 microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Information for oligos used is provided in Supplementary Table S1.
IF staining
For immunostaining, slides with cleared mitotic chromosomes or synchronized cells were incubated with antibody against CENPC1 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK; 1:100 dilution, cat no. ab50974), CENP-B (Abcam, 1:100 dilution, cat no. ab25734), Phospho-Histone H3 (Cell Signaling Technology, 1:100 dilution, cat no. 9706), AGO2 (Sigma, 1:100 dilution, cat no. SAB4200085), Dicer (Sigma, 1:100 dilution, cat no. SAB4200087) or ACTB (Abcam, 1:100 dilution, cat no. ab8227) followed with incubation with Alexa Fluor488 or 546 labeled secondary antibody (Abcam, 1:200 dilution cat nos ab150105 and ab150074).
Cell culture and transfection of plasmids, siRNA and α-satellite RNA
HEK293, HeLa and RPE-1 were cultured under standard conditions with DMEM plus 10% fetal bovine serum at 37 °C and 5% CO2. MEF (DGCR8 null) cells were cultured under standard conditions with DMEM plus 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% NEAA at 37 °C and 5% CO2. RPE-1 cells were used in essentially all the FISH and IF experiments because they are diploid. Plasmids and siRNA transfection was performed with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the supplier’s instructions (CENPC1 siRNA-1, 2, 100 nM; AGO2 siRNA-1, 2, 100 nM; Dicer siRNA-1, 2, 100 nM; ASAT siRNA-1, 2, 50 or 100 nM). α-satellite RNA and Line 1 repeat-derived RNA (final concentration 5 ng μl−1) transfections were performed with electroporation using Nucleofection (Lonza, Basel, switzerland) according to the attached instructions. Information for oligos used is provided in Supplementary Table S1.
Antibodies and western blot analysis
For western blots, samples were separated on SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gels and then transferred to Polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Membranes were processed following the ECL western blotting protocol (GE Healthcare). These antibodies were used in western blots: anti-CENPC1 (Abcam, 1:1 000 dilution, cat no. ab50974), anti-Phospho-Histone H3 (Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1 000 dilution, cat no. 9706), anti-ACTB (Abcam, 1:1 000 dilution, cat no. ab8227), anti-Dicer (Sigma, 1:2 000 dilution, cat no. SAB4200087), anti-GAPDH (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA, 1:2 000 dilution, cat no. 3683), anti-AGO2 (Sigma, 1:2 000 dilution, cat no. SAB4200085) and anti-HDAC2 (Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1 000 dilution, cat no. 5113). Images were taken with LAS-4000mini Image Reader (GE Healthcare).
PCR reactions
Total and chromosomal RNAs were purified from cells and chromosomes by using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) with the attached instructions. Complementary DNA for qRT-PCR was synthesized from total and chromosomal RNA using the GoScript Reverse Transcription System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the attached procedures using random hexamer primer or oligo dT. qPCR was performed with Platinum SYBR Green qPCR Supermix UDG (Invitrogen) on PikoReal Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Scientific) according to the standard procedures. For semi-quantitative PCR and semi-quantitative RT-PCR, PCR cycle numbers were set between 20 and 25 to avoid saturation of PCR reactions. Information for oligos used is provided in Supplementary Table S1.
Statistical analysis
Relative mRNA level was calculated by ∆∆Cq method. The values reported in the graphs represent the average of three independent experiments, with error bars showing s.d. After analysis of variance by F-test, the statistical significance and P-value were evaluated by Student’s t-test.
References
Westhorpe FG, Straight AF . Functions of the centromere and kinetochore in chromosome segregation. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2013; 25: 334–340.
Chan L, Wong LH . Transcription in the maintenance of centromere chromatin identity. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40: 11178–11188.
Gent JI, Dawe RK . RNA as a structural and regulatory component of the centromere. Annu Rev Genet 2012; 46: 443–453.
Nasmyth K . Segregating sister genomes, the molecular biology of chromosome separation. Science 2002; 297: 559–565.
Earnshaw WC, Sullivan KF, Machlin PS et al. Molecular cloning of cDNA for CENP-B, the major human centromere autoantigen. J Cell Biol 1987; 104: 817–829.
Masumoto H, Masukata H, Muro Y, Nozaki N, Okazaki T . A human centromere antigen (CENP-B) interacts with a short specific sequence in alphoid DNA, a human centromeric satellite. J Cell Biol 1989; 109: 1963–1973.
Wong LH, Brettingham-Moore KH, Chan L et al. Centromere RNA is a key component for the assembly of nucleoproteins at the nucleolus and centromere. Genome Res 2007; 17: 1146–1160.
Du Y, Topp CN, Dawe RK . DNA binding of centromere protein C (CENPC) is stabilized by single-stranded RNA. PLoS Genet 2010; 6: e1000835.
Chan L, Marshall OJ, Saffery R et al. Active transcription and essential role of RNA polymerase II at the centromere during mitosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109: 1979–1984.
Mallm JP, Rippe K, Aurora Kinase B . Regulates telomerase activity via a centromeric RNA in stem cells. Cell Rep 2015; 11: 1667–1678.
Eymery A, Callanan M, Vourc'h C . The secret message of heterochromatin: new insights into the mechanisms and function of centromeric and pericentric repeat sequence transcription. Int J Dev Biol 2009; 53: 259–268.
Quénet D, Dalal Y . A long non-coding RNA is required for targeting centromeric protein A to the human centromere. Elife 2014; 3: e03254.
Saitoh H, Tomkiel J, Cooke CA et al. CENP-C, an autoantigen in scleroderma, is a component of the human inner kinetochore plate. Cell 1992; 70: 115–125.
Gopalakrishnan S, Sullivan BA, Trazzi S, Della Valle G, Robertson KD . DNMT3B interacts with constitutive centromere protein CENP-C to modulate DNA methylation and the histone code at centromeric regions. Hum Mol Genet 2009; 18: 3178–3193.
Milks KJ, Moree B, Straight AF . Dissection of CENP-C-directed centromere and kinetochore assembly. Mol Biol Cell 2009; 20: 4246–4255.
Bouzinba-Segard H, Guais A, Francastel C . Accumulation of small murine minor satellite transcripts leads to impaired centromeric architecture and function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103: 8709–8714.
Vigneron S, Prieto S, Bernis C, Labbé JC, Castro A, Lorca T . Kinetochore localization of spindle checkpoint proteins: who controls whom? Mol Biol Cell 2004; 15: 4584–4596.
Ferri F, Bouzinba-Segard H, Velasco G, Hubé F, Francastel C . Non-coding murine centromeric transcripts associate with and potentiate Aurora B kinase. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37: 5071–5080.
Kanellopoulou C, Muljo SA, Kung AL et al. Dicer-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells are defective in differentiation and centromeric silencing. Genes Dev 2005; 19: 489–501.
Fukagawa T, Nogami M, Yoshikawa M et al. Dicer is essential for formation of the heterochromatin structure in vertebrate cells. Nat. Cell Biol 2004; 6: 784–791.
Tijsterman M, Plasterk RH . Dicers at RISC; the mechanism of RNAi. Cell 2004; 117: 1–3.
Shan G . RNA interference as gene knockdown technique. The International. J Biochem Cell Biol 2010; 42: 1243–1251.
Ipsaro JJ, Joshua-Tor L . From guide to target: molecular insights into eukaryotic RNA-interference machinery. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2015; 22: 20–28.
Pek JW, Kai T . DEAD-box RNA helicase Belle/DDX3 and the RNA interference pathway promote mitotic chromosome segregation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108: 12007–12012.
Pek JW, Kai T . Non-coding RNAs enter mitosis: functions, conservation and implications. Cell Div 2011; 6: 6.
Rošić S, Köhler F, Erhardt S . Repetitive centromeric satellite RNA is essential for kinetochore formation and cell division. J Cell Biol 2014; 207: 335–349.
Landthaler M, Yalcin A, Tuschl T . The human DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 8 and Its D. melanogaster homolog are required for miRNA biogenesis. Curr Biol 2004; 14: 2162–2167.
Wang Y, Medvid R, Melton C, Jaenisch R, Blelloch R . DGCR8 is essential for microRNA biogenesis and silencing of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nat Genet 2007; 39: 380–385.
Wang Y, Baskerville S, Shenoy A, Babiarz JE, Baehner L, Blelloch R . Embryonic stem cell-specific microRNAs regulate the G1-S transition and promote rapid proliferation. Nat Genet 2008; 40: 1478–1483.
Melton C, Judson RL, Blelloch R . Opposing microRNA families regulate self-renewal in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature 2010; 463: 621–626.
Hayashihara K, Uchiyama S, Kobayashi S et al. Isolation method for human metaphase chromosomes. Protoc Exchange 2008; 10.1038/nprot.2008.166.
Ohta S, Bukowski-Wills JC, Sanchez-Pulido L et al. The protein composition of mitotic chromosomes determined using multiclassifier combinatorial proteomics. Cell 2010; 142: 810–821.
Eymery A, Horard B, El Atifi-Borel M et al. A transcriptomic analysis of human centromeric and pericentric sequences in normal and tumor cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37: 6340–6354.
Ideue T, Cho Y, Nishimura K, Tani T . Involvement of satellite I noncoding RNA in regulation of chromosome segregation. Genes Cells 2014; 19: 528–538.
Persson H, Kvist A, Vallon-Christersson J, Medstrand P, Borg A, Rovira C . The non-coding RNA of the multidrug resistance-linked vault particle encodes multiple regulatory small RNAs. Nat Cell Biol 2009; 11: 1268–1271.
Bernstein BE, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Costello JF et al. The NIH roadmap epigenomics mapping consortium. Nat Biotechnol 2010; 28: 1045–1048.
Liu J, Carmell MA, Rivas FV et al. Argonaute2 is the catalytic engine of mammalian RNAi. Science 2004; 305: 1437–1441.
Hori T, Shang WH, Takeuchi K, Fukagawa T . The CCAN recruits CENP-A to the centromere and forms the structural core for kinetochore assembly. J Cell Biol 2013; 200: 45–60.
Gregory RI, Chendrimada TP, Cooch N, Shiekhattar R . Human RISC couples microRNA biogenesis and posttranscriptional gene silencing. Cell 2005; 123: 631–640.
Shan G, Li Y, Zhang J et al. A small molecule enhances RNA interference and promotes the biogenesis of microRNAs. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26: 933–940.
Yigit E, Batista PJ, Bei Y et al. Analysis of the C. elegans Argonaute family reveals that distinct Argonautes act sequentially during RNAi. Cell 2006; 127: 747–757.
Deshpande G, Calhoun G, Schedl P . Drosophila argonaute-2 is required early in embryogenesis for the assembly of centric/centromeric heterochromatin, nuclear division, nuclear migration, and germ-cell formation. Genes Dev 2005; 19: 1680–1685.
Topp CN, Zhong CX, Dawe RK . Centromere-encoded RNAs are integral components of the maize kinetochore. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101: 15986–15991.
Li Z, Huang C, Bao C et al. Exon-intron circular RNAs regulate transcription in the nucleus. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2015; 22: 256–264.
Acknowledgements
We thank Drs Yangming Wang and Ping Gao for DGCR8 KO MEF. We thank Wanchen Hu and other members of the Ge Shan lab for discussions and technical supports. This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2015CB943000), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31471225, 81171074 and 91232702), CAS (KJZD-EW-L01-2) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WK2070000034).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
GS and CH conceived this project and designed the experiments. GS and CH wrote the manuscript. CH performed most of the experiments and analyzed most of the data. XW performed bioinformatic analysis. SC and LX performed some of the experiments and/or data analysis. All authors have discussed the results and made comments on the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, C., Wang, X., Liu, X. et al. RNAi pathway participates in chromosome segregation in mammalian cells. Cell Discov 1, 15029 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/celldisc.2015.29
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/celldisc.2015.29
This article is cited by
-
RNA processing mechanisms contribute to genome organization and stability in B cells
Oncogene (2024)
-
Dicer promotes genome stability via the bromodomain transcriptional co-activator BRD4
Nature Communications (2022)
-
AGO2 localizes to cytokinetic protrusions in a p38-dependent manner and is needed for accurate cell division
Communications Biology (2021)
-
Antisense oligonucleotide technology can be used to investigate a circular but not linear RNA-mediated function for its encoded gene locus
Science China Life Sciences (2021)
-
Conserved chromosomal functions of RNA interference
Nature Reviews Genetics (2020)