Abstract
SHP2 participates in multiple signaling events by mediating T-cell development and function, and regulates cytokine-dependent granulopoiesis. To explore whether and how SHP2 can regulate bone-marrow eosinophil differentiation, we investigate the contribution of SHP2 in the bone-marrow eosinophil development in allergic mice. Blockade of SHP2 function by SHP2 inhibitor PHPS-1 or conditional shp2 knockdown by adenovirus-inhibited bone-marrow-derived eosinophil differentiation in vitro, with no detectable effects on the apoptosis of eosinophils. Furthermore, SHP2 induced eosinophil differentiation via regulation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway. Myeloid shp2 conditional knockout mice (LysMcreshp2flox/flox) failed to induce eosinophilia as well as airway hyper-responsiveness. The SHP2 inhibitor PHPS-1 also alleviated eosinophilic airway inflammation and airway hyper-responsiveness, accompanied by significantly reduced levels of systemic eosinophils and eosinophil lineage-committed progenitors in allergic mice. We demonstrate that inhibition of eosinophil development is SHP2-dependent and SHP2 is sufficient to promote eosinophil formation in vivo. Our data reveal SHP2 as a critical regulator of eosinophil differentiation, and inhibition of SHP2 specifically in myeloid cells alleviates allergic airway inflammation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
Asthma is a chronic airway disease characterized by reversible hyper-reactivity and progressive airway inflammation, especially infiltration of eosinophils into the airway. Eosinophils appear to be the key effector cells in asthma, and there is a positive correlation between increased numbers and activation of eosinophils and the severity of asthma.1, 2, 3 Increased numbers of eosinophils have also been found in the bone marrow of patients with atopic asthma.4 Eosinophils develop in the bone marrow, exit to the bloodstream and enter lung tissue in response to pro-inflammatory mediators such as eotaxin.5, 6, 7
Eosinophils develop from granulocyte/monocyte progenitors (GMPs) through intermediate eosinophil lineage-committed progenitors (EoPs) in mice,8 whereas human EoPs are derived from common myeloid progenitors or their upstream multipotent progenitors.9 Expression of the IL-5 receptor on EoPs is a result of commitment of GMPs to the eosinophil lineage, which means that IL-5 supports eosinophil development from EoPs rather than instructing GMPs to commit to the eosinophil lineage.8
The protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 is a ubiquitously expressed intracellular enzyme that contains two Src homology 2 domains and one catalytic protein tyrosine phosphatase domain.10, 11, 12 SHP2 integrates multiple signaling events and mediates a variety of physiological functions.13, 14, 15 Studies have shown that SHP2 participates in multiple signaling events by mediating T-cell development and function, and stimulating CEBPA gene expression to regulate cytokine-dependent granulopoiesis.16, 17 Normal SHP2 function is critical for the initial step of embryonic stem (ES) cell differentiation to mesoderm and to hemangioblasts. It acts within the LIF-gp130-Stat3 pathway to keep a proper balance of ES cell differentiation, pluripotency and apoptosis, thereby maintaining a functional hematopoietic stem cell/progenitor pool.13, 18, 19, 20 Pazdrak et al.21, 22, 23 demonstrated that the physical association of SHP2 with the phosphorylated α common chain of the IL-5 receptor (IL-5αcR) and Grb2, and its early activation, are required for coupling of the receptor to the Ras-Raf-MAP/Erk2 pathway and for the prevention of eosinophil death by IL-5, and shp2 may also act as both a positive effector to downstream GM-CSF- and ICAM-1-dependent ERK1/2 activation in human eosinophils.
In a previous study, we have shown that specific deletion of shp2 expression in mouse airway epithelia reduces TGF-β1 production and attenuates allergic airway remodeling.24 However, as SHP2 is expressed ubiquitously, it is of interest to know its possible roles in other cells or tissues during the development of asthma. As eosinophils are crucial for the pathogenesis of asthma, it is important to understand how eosinophil differentiation is regulated. Therefore, we investigated whether and how SHP2 affects eosinophil development. By using the SHP2 inhibitor PHPS-1 and specifically deleting shp2 in myeloid cells, we found that inactivation or loss of SHP2 in these cells decreased the level of eosinophil recruitment to the airway, resulting in alleviation of lung inflammation and reduction of airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR), which were most likely through a direct inhibition of eosinophil differentiation. These results suggest that SHP2 may be a key regulator of eosinophil differentiation and thus can serve as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of asthma.
Results
SHP2 is required for eosinophil differentiation in vitro without influence on the apoptosis of eosinophils
To begin to test the function of SHP2 in eosinophil differentiation, we first analyzed the effect of phenylhydrazonopyrazolone sulfonate, PHPS-1,25 as a cell-permeable compound, which is highly specific for SHP2 over the closely related tyrosine phosphatases Shp1 and PTP1B, on the outgrowth of eosinophils from purified bone-marrow cells. Non-adherent mononuclear cells (NAMNCs) were first cultured for 4 days with recombinant mouse FLT3 ligand (rmFlt3-L; 100 ng/ml) and recombinant mouse stem cell factor (rmSCF; 100 ng/ml), and then cultured for 6 days with rmIL-5 (10 ng/ml) for eosinophil differentiation (Figure 1a; detailed in Materials and Methods). This induced the development of eosinophils that contained eosinophilic granules and a characteristic donut-shaped nucleus, as observed by Wright–Giemsa staining (Figure 1b). Flow cytometric analysis confirmed the development of eosinophils, as these cells were SSChi SiglecF+ (Figure 1c). PHPS-1 (20 μM) administration together with IL-5 dramatically reduced the production of eosinophils (Figures 1d–h). However, there was no change in the production of eosinophils when PHPS-1 was given in the first 4 days before IL-5 was given (Supplementary Figures 1a–c), suggesting that the decreased eosinophil generation was not due to alterations in the numbers of very early progenitors (likely GMPs, before IL-5 stimulation to EoPs). We further detected the effect of PHPS-1 on the cell apoptosis during bone-marrow eosinophil (bmEo) differentiation in vitro. Analysis of the percentage and total SiglecF+ Annexin V− cells demonstrated that there was markedly increased percentage and total viable eosinophils in the control group in comparison with PHPS-1-treated group (Figures 1i and j and Supplementary Figures 1d and e). PHPS-1 failed to have any considerable effect on the apoptosis of SiglecF+ cells, while increasing the apoptosis of SiglecF− cells (Figures 1k and l and Supplementary Figures 1f and g), in which most cells were likely EoPs after IL-5 sitmulation. Moreover, the total Annexin V+ cells between the control group and the PHPS-1-treated group were similar (Figure 1m and Supplementary Figure 1h). Thus, the decreased number of bmEos by PHPS-1 may partly due to the increased apoptosis of EoPs. These data together suggest that PHPS-1 inhibits the differentiation of eosinophils without affecting their survival, while increasing the apoptosis of EoPs.
We next harvested the bone-marrow NAMNCs of Shp2flox/flox mice, and infected them with Ad-Cre-GFP to induce shp2 knockdown in vitro (Figure 1n). Western blot analysis confirmed that the level of the SHP2 protein was indeed significantly reduced in these cells (Figures 1o and p). Consistent with the effect of PHPS-1, bone-marrow NAMNCs in which shp2 was deleted showed remarkably reduced eosinophil percentages compared with controls (Figures 1q and r).
SHP2 is required for IL-5-induced colony formation
To assess the effect of SHP2 to IL-5-induced differentiation of eosinophils, we subjected cells from wild-type (WT) and allergic mice to colony-forming unit (CFU) assay using IL-5 with the treatment of PHPS-1 or not in vitro. The PHPS-1 group displayed a specific decrease in CFUs induced by IL-5 (Figure 2a). Furthermore, the number of eosinophil CFU (Eos-CFU) was remarkably reduced when NAMNCs were treated with PHPS-1 in vitro, especially those from allergic mice (Figure 2a), in which IL-5Rα was highly expressed. Consistent with the effect of PHPS-1, bone-marrow NAMNCs in which shp2 was deleted showed remarkably reduced numbers of Eos-CFU compared with controls (Figure 2b). Furthermore, in response to IL-5, the Eos-CFUs were smaller in NAMNCs treated with Ad-Cre-GFP in comparison with the Ad-GFP group (Figure 2c). These data further suggest that SHP2 indeed has a key role in the development of eosinophils.
Genetic knockdown of shp2 decreases eosinophil percentage in the bone marrow
To further investigate the in vivo and in vitro function of SHP2 in the bone marrow, we generated LysMcreShp2flox/flox mice in which Cre expression was induced, and then inactivated the shp2 gene in myeloid cells (Figure 3a). Analysis of the genomic DNA from tails indicated expression of the floxed shp2 and the Cre genes (Figure 3b). We first detected the base level of eosinophils in the bone marrow using flow cytometry and found that they were remarkably decreased in the LysMcreShp2flox/flox mice (Figures 3c and d), whereas they yielded normal numbers of macrophages (gated as SiglecF− F4/80+; Figures 3e and f) and neutrophils (gated as Gr-1int CD11bint, Gr-1+ CD11blo and Gr-1+ CD11b+, likely representing pro/mye and immature and mature neutrophils, respectively; Figures 3g and h). Furthermore, eosinophils were dramatically decreased in the bone marrow of LysMcreShp2flox/flox mice during the eosinophil differentiation in vitro (Figures 3i–k), whereas the decreased level of eosinophils was not due to alterations in the number of eosinophil progenitors (defined as Lin− Sca-1− CD34+ c-Kitlo IL-5Rα+; Supplementary Figure 1i). In addition, lin− cells were sorted and cultured with G-CSF and PHPS-1 in vitro to find whether SHP2 is required in neutrophil development. Although the percentage of mature neutrophils (defined as Gr-1+ CD11b+) was decreased and that of immature neutrophils (defined as Gr-1int CD11b+) was increased in the PHPS-1 group, the total numbers of mature and immature neutrophils were decreased significantly (Supplementary Figures 1j–l), which suggested that PHPS-1 inhibited the production of neutrophils. Collectively, these data indicate that SHP2 is required for eosinophil differentiation and can also affect on the development of neutrophils.
SHP2 regulates IL-5-induced eosinophil differentiation via p-Erk activation
To explore the possible mechanisms of eosinophilopoiesis, we first measured the dynamic change of SHP2 and found that it was induced in a time-dependent manner during eosinophil differentiation (Figure 4a). Real-time PCR analysis also revealed that the IL-5-induced mRNA levels of Gata-1 and Mbp were markedly reduced by PHPS-1 (Figures 4b and c). We also measured the level of Gata-1 and Mbp mRNA on day 10 of eosinophil differentiation of Shp2flox/flox mice, and found that both were significantly reduced when NAMNCs were transfected with Ad-Cre-GFP (Figures 4d and e). We next examined the downstream signaling events of SHP2 in the regulation of eosinophil differentiation and found that SHP2 protein levels were markedly decreased in the bmEos of LysMcreShp2flox/flox mice compared with Shp2flox/flox mice (Figure 4f). Furthermore, knockdown of shp2 suppressed activation of the Erk signal (Figure 4f), a common downstream kinase of IL-5 during eosinophil differentiation.26 Furthermore, the percentage and number of eosinophils also decreased when the bone-marrow cells were treated with 1,4-diamino-2,3-dicyano-1,4-bis[2-aminophenylthio] butadiene (U0126), a specific MAPK/ERK kinase inhibitor (Figures 4g–j). Furthermore, we detected the effect of U0126 on the apoptosis level of bmEos during differentiation. U0126 had no apparent effect on the apoptosis level of SiglecF+ eosinophils (Supplementary Figures 2a–d). Analysis of the percentage and total SiglecF+ Annexin V− (AnnV−) cells demonstrated markedly increased percentage and total viable eosinophils in the control group in comparison with the U0126-treated group (Supplementary Figures 2e and f). Whereas U0126 increased the apoptosis of SiglecF− cells (Supplementary Figures 2g and h), in which most were eosinophil progenitor cells, the decreased number of bmEos was partly due to the apoptosis of SiglecF− cells. Total AnnV+ cells were also increased in the U0126-treated group (Supplementary Figures 2i and j). These data together suggest that U0126 inhibits the differentiation of eosinophils without affecting their survival while increasing the apoptosis of eosinophil progenitors. Moreover, the deficiency of SHP2 results in reduced activation of the Erk pathway, which then inhibits eosinophil differentiation in the bone marrow.
Myeloid shp2 knockdown alleviates airway inflammation and decreases AHR in a model of allergic asthma
Regulation of eosinophil differentiation by SHP2 suggested a role for SHP2 in allergic eosinophilic airway inflammation. Therefore, we sensitized and challenged LysMcreShp2flox/flox and Shp2flox/flox mice with chicken egg ovalbumin or house dust mite to establish two allergic models (Figures 5a and l) and explore whether conditional myeloid cell-specific shp2 knockout inhibits lung eosinophilic inflammation. Myeloid cell-specific shp2 knockout LysMcreShp2flox/flox mice showed a marked decrease in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) inflammatory cells relative to Shp2flox/flox control mice (Figures 5b and m). Moreover, AHR in LysMcreShp2flox/flox allergic mice was significantly reduced compared with OVA-treated Shp2flox/flox controls (Figure 5c). Furthermore, myeloid cell-specific shp2 knockdown resulted in a remarkable reduction in the mRNA levels of IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13, whereas there was no appreciable difference in the IFN-γ mRNA level (Figures 5d–g). There was no obvious change in the level of serum eotaxin between OVA-treated LysMcreShp2flox/flox and Shp2flox/flox mice (Supplementary Figure 2k). The decreased pro-inflammatory cell infiltrates in mice were further demonstrated by a corresponding alleviation in the histopathology observed in these mice as reflected quantitatively by the inflammatory and PAS scores (Figures 5h–k). These results reveal that myeloid cell-specific shp2 knockdown in an acute allergic model inhibits airway inflammation and reduces airway responsiveness, and the mechanism is probably through inhibition of the production of eosinophils.
PHPS-1 alleviates airway inflammation and decreases AHR in allergic mice
As myeloid shp2 knockdown alleviates airway inflammation, we suggest that SHP2 may be a previously underappreciated therapeutic target for intervention. As such, PHPS-1 was used to explore whether it can alter allergen-induced pulmonary inflammation and become the potential therapeutic drug. We sensitized and challenged WT mice with chicken egg ovalbumin with PHPS-1 or not (Figure 6a). We quantified total and differential cell counts from BALF. As expected, PHPS-1 led to a significant reduction in total cell number, and, specifically, there was a remarkable decrease in eosinophil number in OVA/PHPS-1 mice compared with the OVA/PBS group (Figure 6b). PHPS-1 also decreased AHR in allergic mice, reducing the levels to those in the PBS-treated control group (Figure 6c). AHR to methacholine (Mch) was similar in the Control/PHPS-1 and Control/PBS groups. In addition, we assessed the effects of PHPS-1 on the mRNA levels of IL-4, IL-5, IL-13 and IFN-γ in the lung. Pharmacological inhibition of SHP2 resulted in a marked reduction of the mRNA levels of IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13; however, no detectable change was found in the IFN-γ mRNA level (Figures 6d–g). The protein levels of IL-4 and IL-13 in lung tissue were consistent with the mRNA levels (Figures 6h and i). The protein level of eotaxin was also reduced in the serum of OVA/PHPS-1 mice (Supplementary Figure 2l). Lung histopathology showed considerably fewer inflammatory cells in the lungs of OVA/PHPS-1 mice than OVA/PBS mice (Figures 6j and k). Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining demonstrated less mucus production and fewer mucus-producing cells in the bronchioles and lungs of OVA/PHPS-1 mice than in OVA/PBS mice (Figures 6l and m). These findings reveal a potential role of PHPS-1 in protection against allergic airway inflammation.
PHPS-1 inhibits the production of eosinophils and EoPs in allergic mice
To determine whether PHPS-1 inhibits the production of eosinophils and then eases lung inflammation, we measured the numbers of eosinophils in both blood and bone marrow. The numbers of eosinophils in blood and bone marrow decreased when allergic mice were treated with PHPS-1 (Figures 7a and b). We also analyzed the protein level of IL-5 in blood, and interestingly found no significant difference between OVA/PHPS-1 and OVA/PBS mice (Figure 7c). The apoptosis of eosinophils in the bone marrow was also similar in these two groups (Figures 7d and e). These data indicate that PHPS-1 inhibits the formation of eosinophils independent of IL-5, without influencing the apoptosis of eosinophils. Next, we evaluated the EoPs in the bone marrow and found a dramatic decrease in their number in allergic mice treated with PHPS-1 (Figures 7f and g), although there was no alteration in IL-5Rα surface expression in eosinophil progenitors (Supplementary Figure 2m). It indicates that the decreased eosinophil numbers was possibly because of the decreased numbers of eosinophil progenitors. An ex vivo Eos-CFU assay further confirmed this observation, as the number of Eos-CFU from bone-marrow NAMNCs was considerably reduced in OVA/PHPS-1 mice relative to the OVA/PBS group (Figure 7h). This was supported with quantitative real-time PCR analysis of the key transcription factors in NAMNCs, as the mRNA level of Gata-1 was inhibited in OVA/PHPS-1 mice compared with OVA/PBS mice (Figure 7i). However, the absolute number of GMPs (Lineage− c-Kit+ CD16/32hi CD34+) was not significantly different in OVA/PHPS-1 and OVA/PBS mice (Figures 7j and k). These results suggest that PHPS-1 inhibits the differentiation of EoPs from GMPs. These data together indicated that PHPS-1 reduces the number of EoPs and represses the expression of transcription factor Gata-1 for eosinophil development.
Discussion
Allergic asthma is characterized by the infiltration of eosinophils into the airway and lung tissues with progressive tissue damage.6 Eosinophils developed from the bone marrow and migrate into lung tissue after exposure to pulmonary allergens,27, 28, 29 and thus the blockade of eosinophil production should be an efficacious approach to the treatment or prevention of asthma at the source. However, to the best of our knowledge, fewer efforts have targeted the inhibition of eosinophil differentiation for the prevention of allergic airway diseases. Recently, studies have already shown that Shp2 has an important role in lung diseases,30, 31 especially in chronic asthma.24 In this study, we clearly demonstrated that SHP2 is critically involved in eosinophil differentiation. Genetic deletion of shp2 in myeloid cells effectively reduced the number of eosinophils in the bone marrow and eventually protected mice from OVA-induced allergic airway inflammation. Pharmacological inhibition of SHP2 with PHPS-1 also markedly attenuated eosinophil differentiation in vitro, and decreased the numbers of eosinophils and EoPs in allergic mice. More interestingly, we also clearly demonstrated that the inhibition of SHP2 had little effect on eosinophil apoptosis. Altogether, these data strongly suggest that blockade of eosinophil differentiation, such as through SHP2 inhibition, could be a potential therapy for asthma and other consequences of eosinophilic inflammation.
The phenylhydrazonopyrazolone sulfonate PHPS-1 is a potent and cell-permeable inhibitor, which is specific for SHP2 and inhibits SHP2-dependent cellular events and downstream signaling.25 Recent studies30 further suggest that PHPS-1 inhibited the activation of Erk1/2 by CS and PHPS-1 was given 10 μM in vitro and 3 mg/kg in vivo 30 min before CS exposure. We established OVA-induced allergic model with PHPS-1 according to their method with minor modification. In our work, although PHPS-1 effectively attenuated eosinophil differentiation in vitro, its overall protective role in vivo cannot rule out other possible mechanisms such as the inhibition of functions in the epithelium, neutrophils and T cells. We have recently shown that SHP2 expression is induced locally in the airway during asthma development, and genetic knockdown of shp2 in airway epithelia significantly attenuates OVA-induced airway remodeling and lung dysfunction,24 suggesting an important role of SHP2 in the regulation of local airway damage. Thus, the protection by PHPS-1 against allergic airway inflammation may also be due in part to its possible function in the prevention of airway damage.
Previous studies have shown that SHP2 is a positive regulator of growth-factor signaling.17, 20 Similarly, we also found that the SHP2 protein level was increased significantly, and this in turn positively regulated eosinophil development, depending on Erk activity. Adachi et al.32 have shown that ERK1/2 MAP kinases have an important role in eosinophil differentiation. IL-5 signaling is critical in eosinophil development and survival.33, 34, 35 Specific domains within the αc receptor of IL-5 may contain information necessary to initiate EoP proliferation and bmEo differentiation through propagation via distinct signaling pathways, resulting in a dramatic increase in the activity of SHP2 phosphatase and other downstream molecules. Feng et al.18 also demonstrated that normal SHP2 function is critical in mediating the appropriate levels of activated Erk and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3) necessary to maintain the proper balance of stem cell differentiation, self-renewal and apoptosis. Kano et al.36 showed that Erk activation is critical in delivering pro-apoptotic signals via Siglec-8 in IL-5-activated eosinophils. In our data, the phosphatase activity of Erk1/2 was remarkably reduced when shp2 was conditionally deleted in LysMcreShp2flox/flox mice during bmEo differentiation. Therefore, we assumed that SHP2 regulates eosinophil differentiation at least partially through the Erk1/2 MAPK pathway. To prove this hypothesis, a pharmacological inhibitor of Erk1/2, U0126, was used in the experiment. We found U0126 also significantly reduced the eosinophil differentiation. Thus, SHP2 has a positive role in IL-5-induced activation of the Ras-Erk kinase pathway and leads to bmEo differentiation in the bone marrow.
It might be noteworthy that PHPS-1 markedly decreased the OVA-induced EoPs while having no appreciable effects on GMPs. These data suggested that SHP2 is probably not involved in OVA-induced GMP production. Moreover, the in vitro study also showed that there was no change in eosinophils when PHPS-1 was treated before IL-5 was given, suggesting that the decreased eosinophil was not due to alterations in the numbers of GMPs. However, whether SHP2 directly regulates the development of EoPs from GMPs is not clear. If SHP2 is involved in EoP production from GMPs, PHPS-1 could have a direct regulatory effect on this process. Our in vitro study proved that the apoptosis of SiglecF− cells were increased, in which most cells were likely EoPs. These data indicated that PHPS-1 increases the apoptosis of EoPs. However, SHP2 knockdown mediated by the M-lysozyme gene (LysM) should not change the SHP2 levels during the development of EoPs from GMPs. The LysM gene is strongly expressed in mature macrophages and myeloid cells, and is a marker of myeloid differentiation. It is progressively turned on during differentiation from myeloid precursor cells to mature eosinophils, in which it is fully active.37, 38 In such a case, the decreased eosinophils in the OVA-challenged LysMcreShp2flox/flox mice might be due to the decreased differentiation of eosinophils from EoPs in the bone marrow. Furthermore, PHPS-1 has no effect on serum IL-5 production in allergic mice, which may indicate that PHPS-1 can directly inhibit eosinophil development both in vitro and in vivo.
As the LysM gene is expressed in mature macrophages and myeloid cells, the next question is whether myeloid SHP2 knockdown alters the development of neutrophils or macrophages. We found that neutrophils were significantly decreased in the BALF of LysMcreShp2flox/flox allergic mice and OVA-challenged mice treated with PHPS-1, although there was no considerable difference in the base level of bone-marrow neutrophils. The in vitro neutrophil number also decreased when lineage-negative (Lin−) mouse marrow cells were cultured with G-CSF and PHPS-1. Jack et al.39 found that G-CSF activate STAT3 and SHP2, and potentially shifts the balance to granulopoiesis via the effects of SHP2 on regulators. These data suggest that SHP2 also has a critical role in neutrophil development. However, we found that monocytes were similar in the BALF of allergic mice either with myeloid SHP2 knockdown or with PHPS-1 treatment. Jack et al.39 have also shown that M-CSF activates ERK independently of SHP2 in monopoiesis. Thus, SHP2 may have no effects on the development of monocytes or macrophages.
The detailed mechanisms by which SHP2 regulates eosinophil differentiation remain unclear. Several lines of evidence have demonstrated unequivocally that GATA-1 has an integral role in the differentiation of myeloid progenitors to the eosinophil lineage and the regulation of eosinophil-specific genes.40, 41, 42 Disruption of a high-affinity double-palindromic GATA site in the mouse GATA-1 promoter results in the selective loss of the eosinophil lineage in vivo.37, 38 We showed that inhibition of SHP2 activity in the WT NAMNCs by PHPS-1, or reduction in SHP2 levels in NAMNCs from Shp2flox/flox mice by Ade-Cre effectively decreased the expression of Gata-1. These data suggested the possibility that SHP2 regulates eosinophil differentiation through downregulation of Gata-1 expression. However, these data do not rule out the possibility that SHP2 regulates eosinophil differentiation through other pathways that eventually results in decreased numbers of eosinophils, and the decreased Gata-1 expression is just a marker of eosinophil downregulation in this case. Nonetheless, the detailed molecular pathways that mediate SHP2 function in eosinophil differentiation warrant further study.
In summary, we have demonstrated that SHP2 is a potential positive regulator of eosinophil differentiation, and inhibition of SHP2 specifically in myeloid cells eventually alleviates eosinophilic airway inflammation. Our study also represents an initial effort to demonstrate that targeting eosinophil differentiation could be an effective therapeutic approach to asthma.
Materials and Methods
Mice
All animal procedures conformed to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Zhejiang University Medical Laboratory Animal Care and Use Committee. WT C57BL/6 mice were purchased from the Laboratory Animal Center of the Zhejiang University (Hangzhou, China). Shp2flox/flox and LysMcre mice on the C57BL/6 background were a generous gift from Dr. Gen-Sheng Fen (University of California at San Diego, CA, USA). LysMcreShp2flox/flox mice and littermate controls (Shp2flox/flox) were used for the experiments. All protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Studies at the Zhejiang University. The primers used for gene typing were as follows: shp2: forward, 5′-ACGTCATGATCCGCTGTCAG-3′; reverse, 5′-ATGGGAGGGACAGTGCAGTG-3′; Cre: common primer, 5′-CCCAGAAATGCCAGATTACG-3′; mutant primer, 5′-CTTGGGCTGCCAGAATTTCTC-3′.
Isolation and ex vivo culture of mouse bmEos
The method of ex vivo culture of bmEos was as described previously with slight modification.41 Briefly, bone-marrow NAMNC cells were cultured at 106/ml in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM; Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) with 20% FBS (Invitrogen), 100 IU/ml penicillin and 10 mg/ml streptomycin, 2 mM glutamine, 25 mM HEPES, 1 × nonessential amino acids, 1 mM sodium pyruvate and 0.006‰ β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 100 ng/ml rmSCF (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA) and 100 ng/ml rmFLT3-L (PeproTech) from days 0 to 4. On day 4, the medium was replaced with medium containing 10 ng/ml rmIL-5 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). On day 8, the cells were provided with fresh medium supplemented with rmIL-5. In most experiments, 20 μM PHPS-1 (Sigma-Aldrich) was treated on days 4 and 8 when the medium was replaced. While in some experiments 20 μM PHPS-1 (Sigma-Aldrich) was treated on day 0 and washed off on day 4 when the medium was replaced. U0126 (20 μM; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) was treated on days 4 and 8 when the medium was replaced. Cells were enumerated and harvested for analysis of the mRNA levels of Gata-1 and Mbp. Apoptosis was detected and cells were stained with SiglecF for anylysis of eosinophils. Cells were lysed and analyzed by western blotting with polyclonal ERK1/2, p-ERK1/2, SHP2 and β-actin. Antibodies against ERK and p-ERK were from Cell Signaling Technology, and antibodies against SHP2 and β-actin were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX, USA). Proteins were visualized with fluorescent antibodies. Fluorescence signals were captured with Odyssey Imaging (Li-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA) system, and quantified with Li-COR Image Studio. All blot images shown in the figures were representatives from at least three independent experiments.
Isolation and ex vivo culture of mouse bone-marrow-derived neutrophils
The Lin− cells were collected by BD Influx and cultured with 100 ng/ml rmG-CSF for 10 days with PHPS-1 treatment (20 μM). Neutrophils were analyzed on culture day 10. For analysis of neutrophils, cells were stained with APC-eFluor780-conjugated Gr-1 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) and PE-conjugated CD11b (eBioscience) in the presence of anti-CD16/32 block (2.4 G2; BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA, USA). Gr-1lo/CD11b+ and Gr-1hi/CD11b+ subsets defined immature and mature neutrophil populations, respectively.43
Shp2 conditional deletion in the bone marrow by adenovirus transfection in vitro
Mouse bone-marrow NAMNCs were collected as described previously;44 NAMNCs from Shp2flox/flox mice were transduced with Ad-Cre-GFP and Ad-GFP at a multiplicity of infection of 20 for 6 h and further cultured with rmIL-5 (10 ng/ml) for the assay of bmEo CFUs. For bmEo differentiation, NAMNCs from Shp2flox/flox mice were first cultured with 100 ng/ml SCF and 100 ng/ml FLT3-L for 4 days and then transduced with Ad-Cre-GFP and Ad-GFP at a multiplicity of infection of 20 for 6 h and further cultured with rmIL-5 (10 ng/ml) for the assay of bmEos. On day 8, the efficiency of shp2 deletion was determined.
Assay for bone-marrow colony-forming units
A total of 2 × 104 bone-marrow NAMNCs was supplemented with IL-5 (10 ng/ml) and cultured in IMDM supplemented with 0.9% methylcellulose (Stem Cell), 20% fetal bovine serum (GIBCO BRL, Grand Island, NY, USA),1% penicillin–streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine and 0.006% β-mercaptoethanol in 3.5-cm dishes (Corning, Corning, NY, USA) at 37 °C under 5% CO2. After 14 days, colonies (>50 cells) were counted using an inverted microscope and classified using morphological and histological criteria. Eos-CFU was also determined by expression of SiglecF (>90%).45
Flow cytometry
For analysis of eosinophils in the bone marrow using flow cytometry, cells were stained with PE-conjugated SiglecF (BD Pharmingen) in the presence of anti-CD16/32 block (2.4 G2; BD Pharmingen). For the identification of EoPs (Lineage− CD34+ CD16/32hi c-kitlow IL-5 Rα+) and GMPs (Lineage− c-Kit+ CD16/32hi CD34+), the antibodies used were FITC-conjugated anti-IL-5Rα chain (H7; BD Pharmingen), Alexa Fluor700-conjugated anti-CD34 (RAM34; eBioscience), APC-conjugated anti-c-Kit (2B8; eBioscience), PE-Cy5-conjugated anti-Sca-1 (D7; Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) and Perp-Cy5.5-conjugated anti-CD16/32 monoclonal antibodies (eBioscience), as well as a lineage cocktail (CD4 (RM4-5; Biolegend), CD8a (53-6.7; Biolegend), CD11b (M1/70; Biolegend), CD45R/B220 (RA3-6B2; Biolegend), Gr-1 (RB6-8C5; Biolegend) and TER-119/Erythroid cells, followed by streptavidin-APC-Cy7 (BD Pharmingen). Dead cells were excluded by using DAPI. Cell staining was determined with a BD LSRFortessa cell analyzer. Flow data were analyzed and plotted with the FlowJo software (Treestar Inc.). Apoptosis was detected using an Annexin V apoptosis detecion kit (eBioscience) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
For ex vivo lin− cell cultures, bone-marrow cells from WT mice were stained with a lineage cocktail (CD4 (RM4-5; Biolegend), CD8a (53-6.7; Biolegend), CD11b (M1/70; Biolegend), CD45R/B220 (RA3-6B2; Biolegend), Gr-1 (RB6-8C5; Biolegend) and TER-119/Erythroid cells), followed by streptavidin-APC-Cy7 (BD Pharmingen). The Lin− cells were collected by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (BD Influx, San Jose, CA, USA) and cultured in IMDM/FBS containing 100 ng/ml recombinant mouse G-CSF (Peprotech) for 10 days with PHPS-1 treatment (20 μM). Neutrophil populations were then analyzed using flow cytometry on culture day 10.
Ovalbumin-induced allergic airway inflammation model
Mice were intraperitoneally (i.p.) sensitized on days 0 and 14 with OVA or saline. On days 24, 25 and 26, mice were challenged with 1.5% OVA or saline for 40 min. The mice of SHAM/PBS and OVA/PBS groups were injected i.p with saline 1 h before each saline or OVA challenge, while the mice of SHAM/PHPS-1 and OVA/PHPS-1 groups were injected i.p with 5 mg/kg PHPS-1 1 h before each saline or OVA challenge. Twenty-four hours after the final OVA or saline challenge, airway responsiveness was measured using Buxco FinePointe as previously described.46 Mice were killed 24 h after the last exposure for BALF, blood, tissues and bone marrows. Eosinophils, EoPs and GMPs were detected in the bone marrow using flow cytometry. Lungs were fixed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or PAS to demonstrate the general morphology and the presence of mucin within goblet cells. Slides were digitalized with an Olympus BX51 microscope (4/0.3 NA objective) equipped with an Olympus DP70 digital camera and ACDSee5.0 software for image acquisition. The concentrations of IL-4, IL-5, IL-13 and eotaxin were determined using ELISA as per the manufacturer’s instructions (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA).
Isolation of RNA and quantitative real-time PCR
Cells from various tissues were suspended in TRIzol reagent (Takara) and extraction proceeded as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The PCR primers were from Shanghai Bioengineering (Shanghai, China). RNA was reverse-transcribed using a PrimeScript TM RT-PCR kit (Takara, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan) and cDNA was subjected to real-time PCR with SYBR Premix Ex TaqTM (Perfect Real Time; Takara). Real-time PCR cycling was carried out on a 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The primers used were as follows: Il-4: forward, 5′-GGTCTCAACCCCCAGCTAGT-3′; reverse, 5′-GCCGATGATCTCTCTCAAGTGAT-3′; Il-5: forward, 5′-CTCTGTTGACAAGCAATGAGACG-3′; reverse, 5′-TCTTCAGTATGTCTAGCCCCTG-3′; Il-13: forward, 5′- CAGCCTCCCCGATACCAAAAT-3′; reverse, 5′-GCGAAACAGTTGCTTTGTGTAG-3′; Ifn-γ: forward, 5′- CCTGCAGAGCCAGATTATCTC-3′; reverse, 5′-CCTTTTTCGCCTTGCTGTTGC-3′; Gata-1: forward, 5′-TATGGCAAGACGGCACTCTAC-3′; reverse, 5′-GGTGTCCAAGAACGTGTTGTT-3′; Mbp: forward, 5′-GCAAACGCTTTCGATGGGTTG-3′; reverse, 5′-ACACAGTGAGATAGACGCCAG-3′; β-actin: forward, 5′-AGAGGGAAATCGTGCGTGAC-3′; reverse, 5′-CAATAGTGATGACCTGGCCGT-3′. The mRNA levels were calculated using the comparative parameter threshold cycle (Ct) and normalized to β-actin.
HDM-induced allergic airway inflammation model
Mice were intratracheally (i.t.) sensitized on days 1, 2 and 3 with 50 μg house hust mite (HDM) or saline. On days 14, 15 and 16, mice were challenged with 50 μg HDM or saline. Mice were killed 24 h after the last exposure to HDM or saline for the measurement of BALF cellularity.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, Inc, La Jolla, CA, USA). Alternatively, several experiments were analyzed with Student’s t-test. Data are expressed as mean±S.E.M. Differences between the mean values were considered significant when P<0.05.
Abbreviations
- GMP:
-
granulocyte/monocyte progenitor
- EoP:
-
eosinophil lineage-committed progenitor
- ES:
-
embryonic stem
- IL-5αcR:
-
IL-5 receptor
- PHPS-1:
-
phenylhydrazonopyrazolone sulfonate
- CFU:
-
colony-forming unit
- Eos-CFU:
-
eosinophil colony-forming unit
- U0126:
-
1,4-diamino-2,3-dicyano-1,4-bis[2-aminophenylthio] butadiene
- AHR:
-
airway hyper-responsiveness
- BALF:
-
bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
- Mch:
-
methacholine
- PAS:
-
Periodic acid-Schiff
- NAMNC:
-
non-adherent mononuclear cell
- LysM :
-
M-lysozyme gene
- STAT3:
-
signal transducer and activator of transcription 3
- WT:
-
wild type
- rmSCF:
-
recombinant mouse stem cell factor
- rmFLT3-L:
-
recombinant mouse FLT3 ligand
- Lin-:
-
lineage-negative
- i.p.:
-
intraperitoneally
- H&E:
-
hematoxylin and eosin
- Ct:
-
threshold cycle
- i.t.:
-
intratracheally
- HDM:
-
house hust mite
- bmEo:
-
bone-marrow eosinophil
- IMDM:
-
Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium
- AnnV:
-
Annexin V
- Eo:
-
eosinophil
- LM:
-
lymphomononuclear cell
- Mac:
-
macrophage
- Neut:
-
neutrophil
References
Gleich GJ . The eosinophil and bronchial asthma: current understanding. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1990; 85: 422–436.
Inman MD, Ellis R, Wattie J, Denburg JA, O'Byrne PM . Allergen-induced increase in airway responsiveness, airway eosinophilia, and bone-marrow eosinophil progenitors in mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1999; 21: 473–479.
Hamelmann E, Gelfand EW . IL-5-induced airway eosinophilia—the key to asthma? Immunol Rev 2001; 179: 182–191.
Southam DS, Widmer N, Ellis R, Hirota JA, Inman MD, Sehmi R . Increased eosinophil-lineage committed progenitors in the lung of allergen-challenged mice. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005; 115: 95–102.
Rosenberg HF, Phipps S, Foster PS . Eosinophil trafficking in allergy and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007; 119: 1303–1310 quiz 1311-1302.
Uhm TG, Kim BS, Chung IY . Eosinophil development, regulation of eosinophil-specific genes, and role of eosinophils in the pathogenesis of asthma. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res 2012; 4: 68–79.
Dorman SC, Sehmi R, Gauvreau GM, Watson RM, Foley R, Jones GL et al. Kinetics of bone marrow eosinophilopoiesis and associated cytokines after allergen inhalation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004; 169: 565–572.
Iwasaki H, Mizuno S, Mayfield R, Shigematsu H, Arinobu Y, Seed B et al. Identification of eosinophil lineage-committed progenitors in the murine bone marrow. J Exp Med 2005; 201: 1891–1897.
Mori Y, Iwasaki H, Kohno K, Yoshimoto G, Kikushige Y, Okeda A et al. Identification of the human eosinophil lineage-committed progenitor: revision of phenotypic definition of the human common myeloid progenitor. J Exp Med 2009; 206: 183–193.
Feng GS, Hui CC, Pawson T . SH2-containing phosphotyrosine phosphatase as a target of protein-tyrosine kinases. Science 1993; 259: 1607–1611.
Feng GS . Shp-2 tyrosine phosphatase: signaling one cell or many. Exp Cell Res 1999; 253: 47–54.
Neel BG, Gu H, Pao L . The 'Shp'ing news: SH2 domain-containing tyrosine phosphatases in cell signaling. Trends Biochem Sci 2003; 28: 284–293.
Ke Y, Zhang EE, Hagihara K, Wu D, Pang Y, Klein R et al. Deletion of Shp2 in the brain leads to defective proliferation and differentiation in neural stem cells and early postnatal lethality. Mol Cell Biol 2007; 27: 6706–6717.
Bard-Chapeau EA, Li S, Ding J, Zhang SS, Zhu HH, Princen F et al. Ptpn11/Shp2 acts as a tumor suppressor in hepatocellular carcinogenesis. Cancer Cell 2011; 19: 629–639.
Zhu HH, Ji K, Alderson N, He Z, Li S, Liu W et al. Kit-Shp2-Kit signaling acts to maintain a functional hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell pool. Blood 2011; 117: 5350–5361.
Salmond RJ, Huyer G, Kotsoni A, Clements L, Alexander DR . The src homology 2 domain-containing tyrosine phosphatase 2 regulates primary T-dependent immune responses and Th cell differentiation. J Immunol 2005; 175: 6498–6508.
Zhang L, Friedman AD . SHP2 tyrosine phosphatase stimulates CEBPA gene expression to mediate cytokine-dependent granulopoiesis. Blood 2011; 118: 2266–2274.
Chan RJ, Johnson SA, Li Y, Yoder MC, Feng GS . A definitive role of Shp-2 tyrosine phosphatase in mediating embryonic stem cell differentiation and hematopoiesis. Blood 2003; 102: 2074–2080.
Chan G, Cheung LS, Yang W, Milyavsky M, Sanders AD, Gu S et al. Essential role for Ptpn11 in survival of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Blood 2011; 117: 4253–4261.
Li L, Modi H, McDonald T, Rossi J, Yee JK, Bhatia R . A critical role for SHP2 in STAT5 activation and growth factor-mediated proliferation, survival, and differentiation of human CD34+ cells. Blood 2011; 118: 1504–1515.
Pazdrak K, Schreiber D, Forsythe P, Justement L, Alam R . The intracellular signal transduction mechanism of interleukin 5 in eosinophils: the involvement of lyn tyrosine kinase and the Ras-Raf-1-MEK-microtubule-associated protein kinase pathway. J Exp Med 1995; 181: 1827–1834.
Pazdrak K, Adachi T, Alam R . Src homology 2 protein tyrosine phosphatase (SHPTP2)/Src homology 2 phosphatase 2 (SHP2) tyrosine phosphatase is a positive regulator of the interleukin 5 receptor signal transduction pathways leading to the prolongation of eosinophil survival. J Exp Med 1997; 186: 561–568.
Pazdrak K, Young TW, Stafford S, Olszewska-Pazdrak B, Straub C, Starosta V et al. Cross-talk between ICAM-1 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor signaling modulates eosinophil survival and activation. J Immunol 2008; 180: 4182–4190.
Qin XJ, Zhang GS, Zhang X, Qiu ZW, Wang PL, Li YW et al. Protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 regulates TGF-beta1 production in airway epithelia and asthmatic airway remodeling in mice. Allergy 2012; 67: 1547–1556.
Hellmuth K, Grosskopf S, Lum CT, Wurtele M, Roder N, von Kries JP et al. Specific inhibitors of the protein tyrosine phosphatase Shp2 identified by high-throughput docking. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 7275–7280.
Takatsu K, Kouro T, Nagai Y . Interleukin 5 in the link between the innate and acquired immune response. Adv Immunol 2009; 101: 191–236.
Hogan MB, Weissman DN, Hubbs AF, Gibson LF, Piktel D, Landreth KS . Regulation of eosinophilopoiesis in a murine model of asthma. J Immunol 2003; 171: 2644–2651.
Lee JJ, Dimina D, Macias MP, Ochkur SI, McGarry MP, O'Neill KR et al. Defining a link with asthma in mice congenitally deficient in eosinophils. Science 2004; 305: 1773–1776.
Palframan RT, Collins PD, Williams TJ, Rankin SM . Eotaxin induces a rapid release of eosinophils and their progenitors from the bone marrow. Blood 1998; 91: 2240–2248.
Li FF, Shen J, Shen HJ, Zhang X, Cao R, Zhang Y et al. Shp2 plays an important role in acute cigarette smoke-mediated lung inflammation. J Immunol 2012; 189: 3159–3167.
Zhang X, Zhang Y, Tao B, Teng L, Li Y, Cao R et al. Loss of Shp2 in alveoli epithelia induces deregulated surfactant homeostasis, resulting in spontaneous pulmonary fibrosis. FASEB J 2012; 26: 2338–2350.
Adachi T, Choudhury BK, Stafford S, Sur S, Alam R . The differential role of extracellular signal-regulated kinases and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in eosinophil functions. J Immunol 2000; 165: 2198–2204.
Sanderson CJ . Interleukin-5, eosinophils, and disease. Blood 1992; 79: 3101–3109.
Mould AW, Matthaei KI, Young IG, Foster PS . Relationship between interleukin-5 and eotaxin in regulating blood and tissue eosinophilia in mice. J Clin Invest 1997; 99: 1064–1071.
Clutterbuck EJ, Hirst EM, Sanderson CJ . Human interleukin-5 (IL-5) regulates the production of eosinophils in human bone marrow cultures: comparison and interaction with IL-1, IL-3, IL-6, and GMCSF. Blood 1989; 73: 1504–1512.
Kano G, Almanan M, Bochner BS, Zimmermann N . Mechanism of Siglec-8-mediated cell death in IL-5-activated eosinophils: role for reactive oxygen species-enhanced MEK/ERK activation. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2013; 132: 437–445.
Cross M, Mangelsdorf I, Wedel A, Renkawitz R . Mouse lysozyme M gene: isolation, characterization, and expression studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988; 85: 6232–6236.
Mollers B, Klages S, Wedel A, Cross M, Spooncer E, Dexter TM et al. The mouse M-lysozyme gene domain: identification of myeloid and differentiation specific DNasel hypersensitive sites and of a 3'-cis acting regulatory element. Nucleic Acids Res 1992; 20: 1917–1924.
Jack GD, Zhang L, Friedman AD . M-CSF elevates c-Fos and phospho-C/EBPalpha(S21) via ERK whereas G-CSF stimulates SHP2 phosphorylation in marrow progenitors to contribute to myeloid lineage specification. Blood 2009; 114: 2172–2180.
Yu C, Cantor AB, Yang H, Browne C, Wells RA, Fujiwara Y et al. Targeted deletion of a high-affinity GATA-binding site in the GATA-1 promoter leads to selective loss of the eosinophil lineage in vivo. J Exp Med 2002; 195: 1387–1395.
Kulessa H, Frampton J, Graf T . GATA-1 reprograms avian myelomonocytic cell lines into eosinophils, thromboblasts, and erythroblasts. Genes Dev 1995; 9: 1250–1262.
Hirasawa R, Shimizu R, Takahashi S, Osawa M, Takayanagi S, Kato Y et al. Essential and instructive roles of GATA factors in eosinophil development. J Exp Med 2002; 195: 1379–1386.
Hestdal K, Ruscetti FW, Ihle JN, Jacobsen SE, Dubois CM, Kopp WC et al. Characterization and regulation of RB6-8C5 antigen expression on murine bone marrow cells. J Immunol 1991; 147: 22–28.
Sehmi R, Dorman S, Baatjes A, Watson R, Foley R, Ying S et al. Allergen-induced fluctuation in CC chemokine receptor 3 expression on bone marrow CD34+ cells from asthmatic subjects: significance for mobilization of haemopoietic progenitor cells in allergic inflammation. Immunology 2003; 109: 536–546.
Hua W, Liu H, Xia LX, Tian BP, Huang HQ, Chen ZY et al. Rapamycin inhibition of eosinophil differentiation attenuates allergic airway inflammation in mice. Respirology 2015; 20: 1055–1065.
Ano S, Morishima Y, Ishii Y, Yoh K, Yageta Y, Ohtsuka S et al. Transcription factors GATA-3 and RORgammat are important for determining the phenotype of allergic airway inflammation in a murine model of asthma. J Immunol 2013; 190: 1056–1065.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. GS Feng (University of California at San Diego, USA) for the Shp2flox/flox mice and LysMcre mice. This work was supported by grants from the Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (973 Program 2009CB522103), the National Key Program of China (no. 81130001), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81100019 and no. 91542000).
Author contributions
L-xX, WH, Z-hC and H-hS designed the study and the experiments. L-xX, WH, YJ and B-pT performed the experiments and contributed to data collection. Z-wQ, CZ, L-qC, H-bZ, Y-fW, H-qH, FL, Y-hK, JJL and WL contributed to the collection of data and analysis and interpretation of data. L-xX, Z-hC, S-mY and H-hS drafted the manuscript. All authors read, critically revised and approved the final manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Edited by G Raschella'
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on Cell Death and Disease website
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Cell Death and Disease is an open-access journal published by Nature Publishing Group. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Xia, Lx., Hua, W., Jin, Y. et al. Eosinophil differentiation in the bone marrow is promoted by protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP2. Cell Death Dis 7, e2175 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2016.74
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2016.74