Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Allografting

Targeted Busulfan therapy with a steady-state concentration of 600–700 ng/mL in patients with sickle cell disease receiving HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplant

Abstract

Busulfan (BU) has a narrow therapeutic window and the average concentration of BU at steady state (Css) is critical for successful engraftment in children receiving BU as part of the preparative regimen for allogeneic transplants. Sixteen patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplant (BMT) from HLA-identical siblings. The preparative regimen consisted of intravenous BU 0.8–1 mg/kg/dose for 16 doses, cytoxan (CY) of 50 mg/kg daily for four doses and equine anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) 30 mg/kg daily for three doses. BU levels were adjusted to provide a total exposure Css of 600–700 ng/mL. The median age at the time of transplant was 6.2 years (range 1.2–19.3). Fourteen (87%) patients required adjustment of the BU dose to achieve a median Css of 652 ng/mL (range 607–700). All patients achieved neutrophil and platelet engraftment without significant toxicity. Median donor engraftment at the last follow-up was 100% (range 80–100). None of the patients experienced sickle cell-related complications post transplant. With a median follow-up of 3 years (range 1.3–9), the event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) are both 100%. We conclude that targeting of BU Css between 600 and 700 ng/mL in this regimen can result in excellent and sustained engraftment in young patients with SCD.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hulbert ML, McKinstry RC, Lacey JL, Moran CJ, Panepinto JA, Thompson AA et al. Silent cerebral infarcts occur despite regular blood transfusion therapy after first strokes in children with sickle cell disease. Blood 2011; 117: 772–779.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Locatelli F, Pagliara D . Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with sickle cell disease. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2012; 59: 372–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vermylen C, Cornu G, Ferster A, Brichard B, Ninane J, Ferrant A et al. Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for sickle cell anaemia: the first 50 patients transplanted in Belgium. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998; 22: 1–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Walters MC, Patience M, Leisenring W, Eckman JR, Scott JP, Mentzer WC et al. Bone marrow transplantation for sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 369–376.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernaudin F, Socie G, Kuentz M, Chevret S, Duval M, Bertrand Y et al. Long-term results of related myeloablative stem-cell transplantation to cure sickle cell disease. Blood 2007; 110: 2749–2756.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Panepinto JA, Walters MC, Carreras J, Marsh J, Bredeson CN, Gale RP et al. Matched-related donor transplantation for sickle cell disease: report from the Center for International Blood and Transplant Research. Br J Haematol 2007; 137: 479–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bolinger AM, Zangwill AB, Slattery JT, Glidden D, DeSantes K, Heyn L et al. An evaluation of engraftment, toxicity and busulfan concentration in children receiving bone marrow transplantation for leukemia or genetic disease. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000; 25: 925–930.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. DeLeve LD, Shulman HM, McDonald GB . Toxic injury to hepatic sinusoids: sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (veno-occlusive disease). Semin Liver Dis 2002; 22: 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McCune JS, Gooley T, Gibbs JP, Sanders JE, Petersdorf EW, Appelbaum FR et al. Busulfan concentration and graft rejection in pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2002; 30: 167–173.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Slattery JT, Risler LJ . Therapeutic monitoring of busulfan in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Ther Drug Monit 1998; 20: 543–549.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann HG, Beatty P, Hows J et al1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995; 15: 825–828.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grochow LB, Krivit W, Whitley CB, Blazar B . Busulfan disposition in children. Blood 1990; 75: 1723–1727.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bolinger AM, Zangwill AB, Slattery JT, Risler LJ, Sultan DH, Glidden DV et al. Target dose adjustment of busulfan in pediatric patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001; 28: 1013–1018.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nguyen L, Fuller D, Lennon S, Leger F, Puozzo C . I.V. busulfan in pediatrics: a novel dosing to improve safety/efficacy for hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant 2004; 33: 979–987.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Michel G, Valteau-Couanet D, Gentet JC, Esperou H, Socie G, Mechinaud F et al. Weight-based strategy of dose administration in children using intravenous busulfan: clinical and pharmacokinetic results. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2012; 58: 90–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nagasawa M, Mitsuiki N, Ono T, Takagi M, Oda H, Yasuhara M et al. Pharmacokinetic monitoring is still required for intravenous busulfan in SCT for small children. Int J Hematol 2010; 91: 728–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Veal GJ, Nguyen L, Paci A, Riggi M, Amiel M, Valteau-Couanet D et al. Busulfan pharmacokinetics following intravenous and oral dosing regimens in children receiving high-dose myeloablative chemotherapy for high-risk neuroblastoma as part of the HR-NBL-1/SIOPEN trial. Eur J Cancer 2012; 48: 3063–3072.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. McPherson ME, Hutcherson D, Olson E, Haight AE, Horan J, Chiang KY . Safety and efficacy of targeted busulfan therapy in children undergoing myeloablative matched sibling donor BMT for sickle cell disease. Bone Marrow Transplant 2011; 46: 27–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Walters MC, Hardy K, Edwards S, Adamkiewicz T, Barkovich J, Bernaudin F et al. Pulmonary, gonadal, and central nervous system status after bone marrow transplantation for sickle cell disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2010; 16: 263–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Alisha McCord and Ryan Frangoul for the administrative support. This project was supported by the Carolyn Perot Rathjen Chair in Pediatrics, Nashville, TN, USA (Haydar Frangoul, MD).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H Frangoul.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maheshwari, S., Kassim, A., Yeh, R. et al. Targeted Busulfan therapy with a steady-state concentration of 600–700 ng/mL in patients with sickle cell disease receiving HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplant. Bone Marrow Transplant 49, 366–369 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2013.188

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2013.188

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links