Abstract
While studying the physiological response of primary rat astrocytes to fluid shear stress in a model of traumatic brain injury (TBI), we found that shear stress induced Ca2+ entry. The influx was inhibited by MK-801, a specific pore blocker of N-Methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor (NMDAR) channels, and this occurred in the absence of agonists. Other NMDA open channel blockers ketamine and memantine showed a similar effect. The competitive glutamate antagonists AP5 and GluN2B-selective inhibitor ifenprodil reduced NMDA-activated currents, but had no effect on the mechanically induced Ca2+ influx. Extracellular Mg2+ at 2 mM did not significantly affect the shear induced Ca2+ influx, but at 10 mM it produced significant inhibition. Patch clamp experiments showed mechanical activation of NMDAR and inhibition by MK-801. The mechanical sensitivity of NMDARs may play a role in the normal physiology of fluid flow in the glymphatic system and it has obvious relevance to TBI.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
N-Methyl-D-aspartic acid receptors (NMDARs) are mediators of synaptic activity in the brain. Inappropriate activation of NMDARs produces neuronal dysfunctions including cell death1. During traumatic brain injury (TBI), there is an elevation of Ca2+ in glia and neurons and the source of the Ca2+ influx has been postulated to include NMDARs, cationic mechanosensitive ion channels (MSCs) or voltage-gated Ca2+ channels2,3. Several studies showed mechanical modulation of NMDARs, but most papers assumed that this occurred by modulation of agonist affinity4,5. Martinac’s group, however, showed that reconstituted NMDARs can be activated by bilayer tension in the absence of agonists6. We tested the mechanical properties of NMDARs in vitro in the adult rat astrocyte preparation and could reproduce the results. This mechanical sensitivity of the channels suggests that patch clamp data may need to be reexamined since patched membranes are under high tension due to the binding of membrane to the glass7,8.
Our primary assay applied fluid shear stress to cultured primary rat astrocytes in a microfluidic chamber where we monitored Ca2+ using fluorescence microscopy. We applied precise shear pulses using a high speed pressure-servo9. A shear pulse of 23 dyn/cm2 for only 10 ms caused a transient rise in Ca2+ that slowly grew, peaking in ~4 s (Fig. 1a/control panel, 1b). The late Ca2+ peak is evidence of a “memory” of the transient stimulus10. However, there was no significant latency between the beginning of the stimulus and the beginning of the response. We presumed that the Ca2+ influx was the result of activation of cationic mechanosensitive channels (MSCs) such as Piezo11,12, but inhibition of those channels with the specific inhibitor GsMTx413 was not effective (Fig. 1f).
Based upon earlier reports of the mechanosensitivity of NMDA channels6, we tested the effect of MK-801, a specific pore blocker14. Pre-treatment of cells with MK-801 (50 μM, 8 min) almost completely inhibited the Ca2+ transients in ~75% of the cells (Fig. 1a/MK-801 panel) and reduced the peak response by ~45% in other cells (Fig. 1a/MK-801 panel, yellow arrows). Some cells did not respond to shear stress. The Ca2+ rise in all cells could be completely suppressed by adding 30 μM ruthenium red to 10 μM MK-801 (Fig. 1a/MK-801+ RR panel, 1b). Other NMDAR pore blockers, memantine15 (50 μM, Fig. 1c, light blue traces) and ketamine16 (50 μM, Fig. 1c, green traces), also inhibited the Ca2+ response. Low dose extracellular Mg2+ (2 mM) did not significantly affect the Ca2+ influx, but it is effective at high concentration (10 mM) (Fig. 1d). As a control for normal NMDAR activation, we gently perfused (<0.7 dyn/cm) cells with the agonists glutamate and glycine. This produced oscillatory Ca2+ responses (Fig. 1e, green traces) presumably arising from influx and calcium-induced-calcium-release (CICR)17. The glutamate activated Ca2+ increase was completely suppressed by MK-801 (Fig. 1e, blue traces, *P < 0.05 in Fig. 1f), whereas the shear induced response was only partially inhibited (Fig. 1f). Similarly, the inhibitory effect of memantine and ketamine was reduced under shear stimuli as though the efficacy had been reduced (Fig. 1f). Figure 1g summarizes the fraction of responding astrocytes to various treatments. The results suggest that the residual Ca2+ response observed with MK-801 under shear was due to either a parallel mechanically activated pathway13,18 or possibly a stress-induced change in the affinity for MK-801. A similar reduction in affinity was observed for Mg2+ inhibition (Supplementary Materials, SM1) as reported for reconstituted channels6.
Rat astrocytes have endogenous cationic MSCs inhibited by GsMTx413,19 but we didn’t see evidence of their effect on the response to shear stress. We tested nonspecific inhibitors of MSCs including ruthenium red (RR)20 and Gd3+ 10. RR reduced the peak Ca2+ response by ~30% (Fig. 1a/RR panel, 1f), while Gd3+ blocked the response completely10. Why didn’t shear stress activate GsMTx4 sensitive Ca2+ fluxes when those MSCs are known to exist in the astrocytes? The most likely explanation is that shear stress doesn’t not produce the large tension in the bilayer characteristic of patch recording7,21.
If NMDARs are the primary contributor to the Ca2+ transients induced by shear forces, then NMDA in the presence of glycine should elicit inward currents in the astrocytes. In whole cell patch recordings, NMDA and glycine (100 μM each)22 did generate robust excitatory currents (Fig. 2). These currents were sensitive to a GluN2B-selective inhibitor (ifenprodil, 10 μM) and the glutamate antagonist (AP5, 100 μM). They were also inhibited by MK-801 (50 μM) and the conopeptide (NMB-1, 10 μM)23,24,25 (Fig. 2), so we conclude that functional NMDARs were present in our astrocytes. The presence of the GluN1 subunits in the astrocytes was further confirmed by Western blots (Supplemental Materials, SM2).
To test whether endogenous glutamate release might play a role in the mechanical activation of NMDARs26, we tested the response to shear stimuli in the presence of the binding site antagonists AP5 (50 to 200 μM) and ifenprodil (10 μM). In control experiments, they inhibited the response to glutamate and glycine (Fig. 3b,c), consistent with our patch clamp results, but they had no effect on the shear-induced Ca2+ increase (Fig. 3a,c). Thus, glutamate binding is not involved in the response to shear stress, but the pore blocker MK-801 did inhibit the response (Fig. 3a, blue). To see whether shear might cause glutamate secretion, we measured glutamate levels in the perfusate. Using an enzymatic fluorescence assay with NADH27, shear stimuli (23 dyn/cm2) did not produce a significant (>1 μM) increase of fluorescence (Supplemental Materials, SM3), while controls with glutamate added to the perfusate showed reliable responses at ~1 μM (Supplemental Materials, SM3)27. We conclude that glutamate binding is not involved in the NMDAR response to shear stress.
To try and associate the shear response with subunit specificity, we expressed GluN1,2A and GluN1,2B subunits in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Wild type CHO cells responded to shear stress (23 dyn/cm2 for 10 ms) with a Ca2+ elevation but the response had a pronounced latency of ~6 s (Fig. 4a, gray). This response was completely blocked by 5 μM GsMTx4 (Fig. 4a blue) implying that CHO cells have functional Piezo type channels18.
We tested whether GluN1,2A or GluN1,2B expressing cells produced a shear sensitive Ca2+ flux with the endogenous MSCs inhibited by GsMTx4, and the Ca2+ response persisted in both cell types (Fig. 4a, red and orange). The Ca2+ response in cells expressing GluN1,2A was much higher than that for GluN1,2B, but both were inhibited by MK-801 (Fig. 4b,c). The peak Ca2+ amplitudes with shear stress were similar to those obtained with agonists without shear stress (Fig. 4b,c, green traces). The responses were also inhibited by MK-801 (Fig. 4b, blue). Note that the NMDAR responses differed from the endogenous MSC responses in that there was no significant latency between the stimulus and the initial onset of Ca2+ rise.
As expected from the astrocyte data, AP5 in CHO cells did not inhibit the response to shear stimulation of GluN1,2A (Fig. 4b, yellow), but both ifenprotil and AP5 inhibited the shear stress activated response of GluN1,2B (Fig. 4c, purple and yellow). This suggests that GluN1,2B is not responsible for the observed mechanosensitivity in rat astrocytes. The peak Ca2+ level results are summarized in Fig. 4d–f.
To examine the mechanical responses of NMDARs at higher resolution than in the shear stress experiments, we patch-clamped HEK cells transfected with GluN1,2A. Using outside-out patches we first tested NMDARs by perfusion with NMDA and glycine (Fig. 5b). We then applied positive pressure pulses and observed repeated channel openings that were in phase with the stimulus (Fig. 5). MK-801 mildly reduced the amplitude of these currents (Fig. 5a,c). Some patches showed multi-channel currents (n = 4) while others showed unitary currents (n = 3). The multi-channel currents were reduced to ~57 ± 14% (Mean ± s.e.m., n = 4, P < 0.1, Fig. 5a,c) with 50–100 μM MK-801 and this reduction was statistically significant. In the latter case, we measured the open probability (Po) of channels in the presence of MK-801 (50–100 μM) it was reduced to ~30 ± 11% (Mean ± s.e.m, n = 3, P < 0.05). Compared to the ~70% reduction of the Ca2+ response with the same dose of MK-801 seen with shear stress, the difference may be due to the much higher membrane tension in patches than in the shear stress experiments and distension of the pore with bilayer tension seems to alter the binding of both MK-801 and Mg2+ in the pore. The inhibition remained dependent on the concentration of MK-801. As a control for a generic mechanical response to MK-801, we expressed hPiezo1 (which we suspected to be a background current), and applied NMDA or MK-801 but we did not observe any inhibition.
Discussion
NMDARs are mechanically sensitive in the absence of agonists. We visualized this behavior by using fluid shear stress as a uniform, precise and gentle mechanical stimulus. The results supported earlier data that showed channels activated by mechanical stimuli including anisotonic solutions, or stretching patches and the substrate4,28. Most of those studies presumed that the stretch-sensitive component of the kinetics represented the properties of liganded channels4,5,28. Now we have learned that unliganded channels are mechanically responsive. This fits with observations on reconstituted NMDARs6.
While the gating properties are obviously mechanically sensitive, there is a suggestion that pore dimensions may also be modified as suggested by data from reconstituted channels6 and mechanically injured neurons5. The putative pore effects are visualized as reduction in the ability of Mg2+ to inhibit permeation of Ca2+ and monovalent cations29. In our experiments 2 mM extracellular Mg2+ had a minimal effect on shear induced cell Ca2+ influx, although higher concentrations did significantly inhibit. This dampening of the inhibitory effect of Mg2+ may be the result of membrane tension expanding the pore diameter, as has been suggested for reconstituted channels. As we stated, our stress-induced responses were only partially inhibited by saturating doses (50 μM) of MK-801, but were completely inhibited with a mixture of MK-801 and Ruthenium Red. Since MK-801 is an efficient pore blocker, this reduction in MK-801 sensitivity with shear stress may be due to the postulated deformation of the pore and may explain the rapid dissociation rate we observed.
The magnitude of fluid shear we used did not significantly deform the cells (see Supplemental Materials, SM4) raising the obvious question of how does fluid flow modulate NMDARs? Fluid shear by itself is not likely to directly affect the bilayer since most of the velocity gradient is absorbed by the glycocalyx leaving little fluid velocity at the bilayer30. However, fluid drag applied to the ECM will pull on the cytoskeleton increasing its stress31,32, and bilayer tension is known to be coupled to cytoskeletal tension31,32. While our fluid velocity was precisely controlled, the body stress it produced in the cells depends upon cell geometry and the distribution of stress within the cytoskeleton; that is known to be heterogeneous33,34 and this heterogeneity likely accounts for the variability between cells.
An inherent difficulty in studying biomechanics is that there is no way to apply uniform local stresses35, but we can make a rough estimate of cortical tension. In mammalian cells, Heureaux et al.36 used a precalibrated probe of bilayer tension, the bacterial mechanical channel MscL, and found that the fluid shear stress they used would not activate MscL. Their predicted peak stress was twenty fold greater than what we used. Since MscL gates with a tension of ~5 mN/m37, the flow induced increase in bilayer tension under our conditions is likely much less than 5 mN/m. If we linearly extrapolate Heureaux et al.’s data to our conditions, we predict we had a peak bilayer tension <0.3 mN/m. Haidekker et al.38 did an independent measurement of bilayer tension under fluid shear using fluorescent probes to measure membrane fluidity. Changes in fluidity match changes in tension39. In endothelial cells they found that a shear stress of 26 dyn/cm2 increased the bilayer fluidity (or equivalently increased its tension) by 22%. Using Haidekker’s probes, we found that our fluid shear increased the bilayer tension by only ~10% over that at rest, and since the resting bilayer tension is small8, the fluid stress that we used appears to be too small to activate traditional MSCs like Piezo140.
Our precision shear pulses showed that many astrocytes responded with a Ca2+ rise that began without a measurable latency. The overall Ca2+ responses included both influx and release from ER stores. The initial Ca2+ rise and the subsequent transient was eliminated in Ca2+-free media, but it was present after depleting Ca2+ stores with thapsigargin10. Why should it take seconds for the Ca2+ response to peak following a 10 ms pulse? There seem to be two possibilities: 1) the initial influx of Ca2+ raises local Ca2+ concentration activating a second messenger cascade such as CICR, or 2) the induced body stress caused a break of some cytoskeletal links and that led to plastic deformation of the cytoskeleton that was eventually coupled to bilayer tension. We do not yet know whether NMDARs in vivo are activated by bilayer tension or by direct coupling to the cytoskeleton. Martinac’s experiments on reconstituted NMDARs6 shows that bilayer tension alone was adequate to open the reconstituted channels. However, the literature shows NMDARs linked to α-actinin41, spectrin, and other actin binding proteins42 and that could also couple force to the channel37.
Based upon the CHO expression studies, GluN1,2A seems to be the subunit that accounts for mechanosensitivity (Fig. 4). These subunits are expressed in cortical astrocytes in vivo and in acute brain slices43,44,45,46. Astrocytes themselves are heterogeneous and different subunits are expressed in different parts of the brain47. The Ca2+ responses of our primary adult rat astrocytes to both agonists and shear stress were similar to responses from acutely isolated cortical astrocytes from day old rats.
Mechanical signals play roles in the CNS including in brain development48 and possibly perfusion of brain tissue by the glymphatic system49. Our results may have implications for the treatment of TBI, since therapies may require a focus on improving the distribution of cytoskeletal stress. In adult mice under anesthesia, glymphatic flow increases49 but anesthesia reportedly also decreases astrocyte Ca2+ 50, in apparent contradiction to our hypothesis. However, the anesthesia used by Thrane et al.50 contained ketamine, which is an inhibitor of NMDARs. While we have emphasized the potential role of NMDARs in the CNS, NMDARs are also present outside the CNS as in the postsynaptic folds of skeletal muscle51. In a mechanically active tissue like muscle the mechanical sensitivity may dominate the glutamate sensitivity.
Materials and Methods
Flow chamber and shear stimuli
The microfluidic flow chamber is a parallel plate flow system with a 25 mm diameter cover glass substrate and a 1 mm thick glass slide separated by Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) walls. The chamber dimensions are 1000 μm wide, 15 mm long and 100 μm high. For application of various drugs, we used a chip consisting of three inlet channels that merged into the main flow. The device was fabricated using soft lithography following a fabrication process described previously52. The chamber substrate was coated with human fibronectin (BD Bioscience) and rinsed an hour before seeding the cells. A fast piezo-controlled pressure servo (ALA Scientific Instruments, NY) was used to generate pressure pulses of known waveform with a time resolution of ~1 ms9. To mimic blast waves in the fluids, we used a waveform resembling the classic Friedlander curve53. The fluid shear stress in the chamber was previously calibrated10.
Cell culture and transfection
Primary adult astrocytes were obtained using gelatin-sponge implants from adult Sprague Dawley rat brains provided by Dr. Thomas Langan (SUNY Buffalo). Cells were maintained in DMEM, 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin. To permit phenotypic maturation of astrocytes, they were used in experiments between passages 3 and 10. For the Ca2+ assays, cells were transferred to the microfluidic chambers when the culture flasks reached 95% confluence, and they were cultured in the chamber for 3–5 days before the experiments. Media in the chamber was changed every 24 hrs to sustain the cell growth. For electrophysiology, cells were plated at high densities (80–95%) and maintained in 35 mm dishes for 1–3 days. Prior to electrophysiological recordings, cells were suspended and replated at low density (<5%) onto separate dishes with 2 mL fresh DMEM supplemented with 2 mM MgCl2. Cells were allowed to adhere to plates for 30–60 minutes at 37 °C. Prior to electrophysiological recordings, the growth medium was replaced with PBS.
Chinese Hamster Ovary cells (CHO-K1, ATCC) were maintained in F-12 K medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin. CHO cells were co-transfected with plasmids of GluN1 (0.8 μg) and GluN2A (0.8 μg) or GluN1 (0.8 μg) and GluN2B (0.8 μg) using Effectene Transfection Reagent (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA). CHO was chosen as model cell for expressing NMDA receptors because the properties of transfected receptors were similar to endogenous channels in neurons54. Cells were kept in medium containing transfection reagent and plasmids for ~24 hours, then switched to normal medium for another 24 hr before the experiments. The transfection efficiency was ~40%.
Electrophysiology
Whole-cell currents were recorded using borosilicate glass pipettes (2–5 MΩ) filled with (in mM) 135 CsCl, 33 CsOH, 2 MgCl2, 11 EGTA, 1 CaCl2 and 10 HEPES (pH 7.4). Cells were first perfused with a wash solution containing (in mM): 150 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 0.01 EDTA, 0.5 CaCl2, 0.1 glycine, and 10 HEPBS (pH 8.0) followed by solutions supplemented with NMDA (100 μM, duration 5 s) and with NMDA and drug (5 s), as indicated. Cells were held at −70 mV; currents were filtered at 2 kHz (Axopatch 200B), sampled (Digidata 1440 A) and stored as digital files (pClamp 10.2) for off-line analysis.
Outside-out patches were made from HEK293 cells transfected with GluN1A/2A or hPiezo1 cDNA. Only those patches which responded to NMDA were considered for analysis. NMDARs were mechanically-activated by a pulse train of 500 ms positive pressure steps separated by rest periods of 1500 ms. The bath and pipette solutions were the same as those used for whole-cell recording. The outside-out patches were tested at +50 mV membrane potential because with positive patch pressure depolarized potentials yielded more stable patches. The drugs, NMDA (200 μM) or MK-801 (50–500 μM) in bath solution, were perfused directly onto the outside-out patches. Analysis was performed offline using QuB software (www.qub.buffalo.edu). The mean currents were obtained by time integration of the current (a measure of total charge transferred).
Cytosolic Ca2+ and extracellular glutamate measurements
Prior to the experiments, cells were gently washed with saline followed by loading with the Ca2+ sensitive dye, Fluo-4 AM (5 μM, Invitrogen), and kept in an incubator (37 °C with 95% air and 5% CO2) for 30 min. The chambers were then gently washed and returned to the incubator for ~8 min to allow cleavage of the dye molecules. Normal saline was used as the shearing fluid. Fluorescence images were acquired using an inverted microscope (Axiovert 200 M, Zeiss) equipped with a CCD camera (AxioCam MRm, Zeiss) and a 10x objective lens. A filter set (Ex: 470/40 nm; Em: 525/50 nm) was used for Ca2+ imaging. Time-lapse images were obtained using Zeiss software (AxioVision, Ziess). The concentration of glutamate in solution was measured using the established assay based on the reduction of NAD+ to NADH in the presence of glutamate with a filter set (Ex: 365; Em: 445/50)27.
Protein extraction and Western blot
Cells were washed twice in cold PBS and lysed into 100 mM Tris pH 7.4, 5 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 1% SDS, 1 mm Na3VO4, 10 mm NaF, with protease inhibitors. Protein quantities were determined using microBCA assay (Thermo Scientific). We loaded 100 μg protein lysate from primary astrocytes and 20 μg from HEK293 cells. Blotted membranes were blocked for 1 hr with 5% BSA and probed overnight at 4 °C with Millipore Rbt anti-NR1 1/1000 (MAB1586) in 1% BSA TBST 0.05%. Membranes were rinsed in TBST 0.05% incubated for 1 h with a secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Gt anti-mouse HRP (sc-2062)). Blots were developed using ECL plus (GE Healthcare). Western blots were performed at least twice. For a loading control, membranes were stained with Amido Black (Sigma).
Immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry
For GFAP immunostaining, rat primary cells were fixed with 4% ice-cold paraformaldehyde for 15 min and washed three times with PBS. Cells were then permeabilized with 0.1% Triton in PBS for 10 min at 37 °C and blocked overnight in 5% NGS at 4 °C. Cells were incubated for 1 hr at 37 °C with Santa Cruz GFAP 1/500 (sc-6170) and for 1 h at 37 °C with Donkey anti rabbit TRITC 1/500 (711-025-152). Images were acquired with a fluorescent microscope, Leica DM6000B.
Solutions and reagents
Normal saline containing 1 mM CaCl2 was the control solution. Ruthenium Red, DL-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid, (+)-MK-801 hydrogen maleate, and Memantine hydrochloride (all from Sigma, St. Louis, MO) were diluted, respectively, to 30 μM, 100 μM and 50 μM. Ketamine hydrochloride (Zoetis) was diluted to 50 μM. Glutamate and Glycine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) were diluted to 1 mM in saline. The enantiomeric forms of GsMTx4 were made and purified according to previously published protocols55. L-Glutamic Dehydrogenase from Bovine Liver (G2626) and β-Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide hydrate (N7004) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) were diluted respectively to 56 U/ml and 1 mM in saline and pre-incubated with the cells before the glutamate assay25.
Data Analysis
Relative Ca2+ intensity was calculated using , where F and F0 are the mean fluorescence intensities of selected cells at time t and t = 0, respectively. The background was subtracted before the calculation. The mean calcium changes were an average over N selected cells from each image and from multiple experiments. A new cell culture was used for each experiment. The statistical analysis used the standard error of the mean (s.e.m.). Statistics of peak Ca2+ intensity under different drug treatments were compared with control cells subjected to corresponding stimuli, and analyzed with a paired Student’s t-test where p < 0.05 was considered significant. For electrophysiology, steady-state current amplitudes in the absence (Iss) or presence of drug (IDrug) were determined by fitting a single exponential function to the declining portion of the current trace. The extent of response was determined according to the equation: % current response = (IDrug/Iss) × 100. Differences between IDrug and Iss were considered significant for p < 0.05 according to a paired Student’s t-test.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Maneshi, M. M. et al. Mechanical stress activates NMDA receptors in the absence of agonists. Sci. Rep. 7, 39610; doi: 10.1038/srep39610 (2017).
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
Hardingham, G. E. & Bading, H. Synaptic versus extrasynaptic NMDA receptor signalling: implications for neurodegenerative disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci 11, 682–696, doi: 10.1038/nrn2911 (2010).
MacVicar, B. A. Voltage-dependent calcium channels in glial cells. Science (New York, N.Y) 226, 1345–1347 (1984).
Palygin, O., Lalo, U., Verkhratsky, A. & Pankratov, Y. Ionotropic NMDA and P2X1/5 receptors mediate synaptically induced Ca2 + signalling in cortical astrocytes. Cell calcium 48, 225–231, doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2010.09.004 (2010).
Singh, P. et al. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor mechanosensitivity is governed by C terminus of NR2B subunit. The Journal of biological chemistry 287, 4348–4359, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.253740 (2012).
Zhang, L., Rzigalinski, B. A., Ellis, E. F. & Satin, L. S. Reduction of voltage-dependent Mg2+ blockade of NMDA current in mechanically injured neurons. Science (New York, N.Y) 274, 1921–1923 (1996).
Kloda, A., Lua, L., Hall, R., Adams, D. J. & Martinac, B. Liposome reconstitution and modulation of recombinant N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor channels by membrane stretch. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, 1540–1545, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609649104 (2007).
Suchyna, T. M., Markin, V. S. & Sachs, F. Biophysics and structure of the patch and the gigaseal. Biophysical journal 97, 738–747, doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.05.018 (2009).
Dai, J. W., Sheetz, M. P., Herring, T. & Morris, C. E. Membrane tension in swelling and shrinking molluscan neurons. Mol. Biol. Cell 7, 2614–2614 (1996).
Besch, S. R., Suchyna, T. & Sachs, F. High-speed pressure clamp. Pflugers Arch 445, 161–166, doi: 10.1007/s00424-002-0903-0 (2002).
Maneshi, M. M., Sachs, F. & Hua, S. Z. A Threshold Shear Force for Calcium Influx in an Astrocyte Model of Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma 32, 1020–1029, doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3677 (2015).
Coste, B. et al. Piezo proteins are pore-forming subunits of mechanically activated channels. Nature 483, 176–181, doi: 10.1038/nature10812 (2012).
Gnanasambandam, R., Bae, C., Gottlieb, P. A. & Sachs, F. Ionic Selectivity and Permeation Properties of Human PIEZO1 Channels. PLoS One 10, e0125503, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125503 (2015).
Suchyna, T. M. et al. Bilayer-dependent inhibition of mechanosensitive channels by neuroactive peptide enantiomers. Nature 430, 235–240, doi: 10.1038/nature02743 (2004).
Combes, M., Poindron, P. & Callizot, N. Glutamate protects neuromuscular junctions from deleterious effects of beta-amyloid peptide and conversely: an in vitro study in a nerve-muscle coculture. J Neurosci Res 93, 633–643, doi: 10.1002/jnr.23524 (2015).
Bresink, I. et al. Effects of memantine on recombinant rat NMDA receptors expressed in HEK 293 cells. Br J Pharmacol 119, 195–204 (1996).
Emnett, C. M. et al. Indistinguishable synaptic pharmacodynamics of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor channel blockers memantine and ketamine. Mol Pharmacol 84, 935–947, doi: 10.1124/mol.113.089334 (2013).
Pasti, L., Pozzan, T. & Carmignoto, G. Long-lasting changes of calcium oscillations in astrocytes. A new form of glutamate-mediated plasticity. The Journal of biological chemistry 270, 15203–15210 (1995).
Bae, C., Sachs, F. & Gottlieb, P. A. The Mechanosensitive Ion Channel Piezo1 Is Inhibited by the Peptide GsMTx4. Biochemistry 50, 6295–6300, doi: 10.1021/bi200770q (2011).
Bowman, C. L., Gottlieb, P. A., Suchyna, T. M., Murphy, Y. K. & Sachs, F. Mechanosensitive ion channels and the peptide inhibitor GsMTx-4: history, properties, mechanisms and pharmacology. Toxicon 49, 249–270, doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2006.09.030 (2007).
Coste, B. et al. Piezo1 and Piezo2 are essential components of distinct mechanically activated cation channels. Science 330, 55–60, doi: science.1193270 (2010).
Slavchov, R. I., Nomura, T., Martinac, B., Sokabe, M. & Sachs, F. Gigaseal mechanics: creep of the gigaseal under the action of pressure, adhesion, and voltage. J Phys Chem B 118, 12660–12672, doi: 10.1021/jp506965v (2014).
Kleckner, N. & Dingledine, R. Requirement for glycine in activation of NMDA-receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Science 241, 835–837, doi: 10.1126/science.2841759 (1988).
Drew, L. J. et al. High-Threshold Mechanosensitive Ion Channels Blocked by a Novel Conopeptide Mediate Pressure-Evoked Pain. PLoS ONE 2, e515, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000515 (2007).
Huettner, J. E. & Bean, B. P. Block of N-methyl-D-aspartate-activated current by the anticonvulsant MK-801: selective binding to open channels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 85, 1307–1311 (1988).
Williams, K. Ifenprodil discriminates subtypes of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor: selectivity and mechanisms at recombinant heteromeric receptors. Mol Pharmacol 44, 851–859 (1993).
Hua, X. et al. C(a2+)-dependent glutamate release involves two classes of endoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) stores in astrocytes. Journal of neuroscience research 76, 86–97, doi: 10.1002/jnr.20061 (2004).
Innocenti, B., Parpura, V. & Haydon, P. G. Imaging extracellular waves of glutamate during calcium signaling in cultured astrocytes. J.Neurosci. 20, 1800–1808 (2000).
Paoletti, P. & Ascher, P. Mechanosensitivity of NMDA receptors in cultured mouse central neurons. Neuron 13, 645–655 (1994).
Nowak, L., Bregestovski, P., Ascher, P., Herbet, A. & Prochiantz, A. Magnesium gates glutamate-activated channels in mouse central neurones. Nature 307, 462–465 (1984).
Florian, J. A. et al. Heparan sulfate proteoglycan is a mechanosensor on endothelial cells. Circulation Research 93, E136–E142 (2003).
Akinlaja, J. & Sachs, F. The breakdown of cell membranes by electrical and mechanical stress. Biophys J 75, 247–254, doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77511-3 (1998).
Cox, C. D. et al. Removal of the mechanoprotective influence of the cytoskeleton reveals PIEZO1 is gated by bilayer tension. Nature communications 7 (2016).
Yang, C. et al. Mechanical dynamics in live cells and fluorescence-based force/tension sensors. Biochimica et biophysica acta 1853, 1889–1904, doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.05.001 (2015).
Guo, J., Sachs, F. & Meng, F. Fluorescence-based force/tension sensors: a novel tool to visualize mechanical forces in structural proteins in live cells. Antioxid Redox Signal 20, 986–999, doi: 10.1089/ars.2013.5708 (2014).
Sachs, F. Mechanical transduction by ion channels; a cautionary tale. World Journal of Neurology 5, 74–87, doi: 10.5316/wjn.v5.i3.74 (2015).
Heureaux, J., Chen, D., Murray, V. L., Deng, C. X. & Liu, A. P. Activation of a bacterial mechanosensitive channel in mammalian cells by cytoskeletal stress. Cell Mol Bioeng 7, 307–319, doi: 10.1007/s12195-014-0337-8 (2014).
Martinac, B. et al. Bacterial mechanosensitive channels: models for studying mechanosensory transduction. Antioxid Redox Signal 20, 952–969, doi: 10.1089/ars.2013.5471 (2014).
Haidekker, M. A., L’Heureux, N. & Frangos, J. A. Fluid shear stress increases membrane fluidity in endothelial cells: a study with DCVJ fluorescence. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology 278, H1401–H1406 (2000).
Markin, V. S. & Sachs, F. Free Volume in Membranes: Viscosity or Tension? Open Journal of Biophysics 05, 80–83, doi: 10.4236/ojbiphy.2015.53007 (2015).
Bae, C., Gnanasambandam, R., Nicolai, C., Sachs, F. & Gottlieb, P. A. Xerocytosis is caused by mutations that alter the kinetics of the mechanosensitive channel PIEZO1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, E1162–1168, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219777110 (2013).
Wechsler, A. & Teichberg, V. I. Brain spectrin binding to the NMDA receptor is regulated by phosphorylation, calcium and calmodulin. The EMBO journal 17, 3931–3939, doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.14.3931 (1998).
Husi, H., Ward, M. A., Choudhary, J. S., Blackstock, W. P. & Grant, S. G. Proteomic analysis of NMDA receptor-adhesion protein signaling complexes. Nature neuroscience 3, 661–669, doi: 10.1038/76615 (2000).
Conti, F., DeBiasi, S., Minelli, A. & Melone, M. Expression of NR1 and NR2A/B subunits of the NMDA receptor in cortical astrocytes. Glia 17, 254–258, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199607)17:3<254::AID-GLIA7>3.0.CO;2-0 (1996).
Schipke, C. G. et al. Astrocytes of the mouse neocortex express functional N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. FASEB J 15, 1270–1272 (2001).
Lalo, U., Pankratov, Y., Kirchhoff, F., North, R. A. & Verkhratsky, A. NMDA receptors mediate neuron-to-glia signaling in mouse cortical astrocytes. J Neurosci 26, 2673–2683, doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4689-05.2006 (2006).
Lee, M. C. et al. Characterisation of the expression of NMDA receptors in human astrocytes. PloS one 5, e14123, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014123 (2010).
Dzamba, D., Honsa, P. & Anderova, M. NMDA Receptors in Glial Cells: Pending Questions. Current neuropharmacology 11, 250–262, doi: 10.2174/1570159X11311030002 (2013).
Goriely, A. et al. Mechanics of the brain: perspectives, challenges, and opportunities. Biomech Model Mechanobiol, doi: 10.1007/s10237-015-0662-4 (2015).
Jessen, N. A., Munk, A. S., Lundgaard, I. & Nedergaard, M. The Glymphatic System: A Beginner’s Guide. Neurochem Res, doi: 10.1007/s11064-015-1581-6 (2015).
Thrane, A. S. et al. General anesthesia selectively disrupts astrocyte calcium signaling in the awake mouse cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109, 18974–18979, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1209448109 (2012).
Malomouzh, A. I., Nurullin, L. F., Arkhipova, S. S. & Nikolsky, E. E. NMDA receptors at the endplate of rat skeletal muscles: precise postsynaptic localization. Muscle Nerve 44, 987–989, doi: 10.1002/mus.22250 (2011).
Rahimzadeh, J. et al. Real-time observation of flow-induced cytoskeletal stress in living cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 301, C646–652, doi: ajpcell.00099.2011 (2011).
Brode, H. L. Blast Wave from a Spherical Charge. Physics of Fluids 2, 217–229, doi: 10.1063/1.1705911 (1959).
Uchino, S. et al. Establishment of CHO cell lines expressing four N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subtypes and characterization of a novel antagonist PPDC. FEBS letters 506, 117–122 (2001).
Suchyna, T. M. et al. Identification of a peptide toxin from Grammostola spatulata spider venom that blocks stretch-activated channels. Biophysical Journal 78, 1017Pos (2000).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Institute of Health grant NS085517 (S.Z.H.), grants NS098385 and NS097016 (G.K.P.), and grant HL054887 (F.S.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.M.M. designed and performed the experiments, and wrote the manuscript; B.M., R.G. and S.B. performed the experiments and analyzed data; F.S. interpreted data and wrote the manuscript; S.Z.H. and G.K.P. designed the experiments, analyzed and interpreted data, and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Maneshi, M., Maki, B., Gnanasambandam, R. et al. Mechanical stress activates NMDA receptors in the absence of agonists. Sci Rep 7, 39610 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39610
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39610
This article is cited by
-
NMDA Receptors in Astrocytes
Neurochemical Research (2020)
-
Piezos thrive under pressure: mechanically activated ion channels in health and disease
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology (2017)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.