Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Paper
  • Published:

Evidence that Sp1 positively and Sp3 negatively regulate and androgen does not directly regulate functional tumor suppressor 15-lipoxygenase 2 (15-LOX2) gene expression in normal human prostate epithelial cells

Abstract

In this project, we studied the gene regulation of 15-lipoxygenase 2 (15-LOX2), the most abundant arachidonate-metabolizing LOX in adult human prostate and a negative cell-cycle regulator in normal human prostate (NHP) epithelial cells. Through detailed in silico promoter examination and promoter deletion and activity analysis, we found that several Sp1 sites (i.e., three GC boxes and one CACCC box) in the proximal promoter region play a critical role in regulating 15-LOX2 expression in NHP cells. Several pieces of evidence further suggest that the Sp1 and Sp3 proteins play a physiologically important role in positively and negatively regulating the 15-LOX2 gene expression, respectively. First, mutations in the GC boxes affected the 15-LOX2 promoter activity. Second, both Sp1 and Sp3 proteins were detected in the protein complexes that bound the GC boxes revealed by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Third, importantly, inhibition of Sp1 activity or overexpression of Sp3 both inhibited the endogenous 15-LOX2 mRNA expression. Since 15-LOX2 is normally expressed in the prostate luminal epithelial cells, we subsequently explored whether androgen/androgen receptor may directly regulate its gene expression. The results indicate that androgen does not directly regulate 15-LOX2 gene expression. Together, these observations provide insight on how 15-LOX2 gene expression may be regulated in NHP cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 8
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AA:

arachidonic acid

AR:

androgen receptor

DN:

dominant negative

EMSA:

electrophoretic mobility shift assay

LOX:

lipoxygenase

15-LOX2:

15-lipoxygenase 2

15-LOX2sv-a/b/c:

15-LOX2 splice variant a, b or c

MMA:

mithramycin A

NE:

nuclear extract

NHP:

normal human prostate epithelial cells

PCa:

prostate cancer

RLU:

relative luciferase unit

TSS:

transcription start site

References

  • Bhatia B, Maldonado CJ, Tang S, Chandra D, Klein RD, Chopra D, Shappell SB, Yang P, Newman RA and Tang DG . (2003). J. Biol. Chem., 278, 25091–25100.

  • Black AR, Black JD and Azizkhan-Clifford J . (2001). J. Cell. Physiol., 188, 143–160.

  • Blais A, Monte D, Pouiot F and Labrie C . (2002). J. Biol. Chem., 277, 31679–31693.

  • Brash AR, Boeglin WE and Chang MS . (1997). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 6148–6152.

  • Chen BK and Chang WC . (2000). Proc. Natl. Acad. USA, 97, 10406–10411.

  • Chopra DP, Grignon DJ, Joiakim A, Mathieu PA, Mohamed A, Sakr WA, Powell IJ and Sarkar FH . (1996). J. Cell. Physiol., 169, 269–280.

  • Frith MC, Hansen U and Weng Z . (2001). Bioinformatics, 17, 878–889.

  • Garcia-Ruiz I, de la Torre P, Diaz T, Esteban E, Fernandez I, Munoz-Yague T and Solis-Herruzo JA . (2002). J. Biol. Chem., 277, 30551–30558.

  • Grinstein E, Jundt F, Weinert I, Wernet P and Yoyer H-D . (2002). Oncogene, 21, 1485–1492.

  • Hagen G, Muller S, Beato M and Suske G . (1994). EMBO J., 13, 3843–3851.

  • Heinemeyer T, Wingender E, Reuter I, Hermjakob H, Kel A, Kel O, Ignatieva E, Ananko E, Podkolodnaya O, Kolpakov F, Podkolodny N and Kolchanov N . (1998). Nucleic Acid Res., 26, 364–370.

  • Hong C, Kim H-A, Firestone GL and Bjeldanes LF . (2002). Carcinogenesis, 23, 1297–1305.

  • Huang L, Sowa Y, Sakai T and Pardee AB . (2000). Oncogene, 19, 5712–5719.

  • Jackson SP, MacDonald JJ, Lees-Miller S and Tijan R . (1990). Cell, 63, 155–165.

  • Kaluz S, Kaluzova M and Stanbridge EJ . (2003). Cancer Res., 63, 917–922.

  • Kelavkar U, Wang S, Montero A, Murtagh J, Shah K and Badr K . (1998). Mol. Biol. Reports, 25, 173–182.

  • Kilty I, Alison L and Vickers PJ . (1999). Eur. J. Biochem., 266, 83–93.

  • Kingsley C and Winoto A . (1992). Mol. Cell. Biol., 12, 4251–4261.

  • Kritzik MR, Ziober AF, Dicharry S, Conrad DJ and Sigal E . (1997). Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1352, 267–281.

  • Kumar AP and Butler AP . (1997). Nucleic Acid Res., 25, 2012–2019.

  • Levine M and Tijan R . (2003). Nature, 424, 147–151.

  • Liang F, Schaufele F and Gardner DG . (2001). J. Biol. Chem., 276, 1516–1522.

  • Locker J . (1993). Gene Transcription: A Practical Approach Hames BD and Higgins SJ (eds). Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, pp. 321–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matys V, Fricke E, Gefferes R, Goβling E, Haubrock M, Hehl R, Hornischer K, Karas D, Kel AE, Kel-Margoulis OV, Kloos D-U, Land S, Lewicki-Potapov B, Michael H, Munch R, Reuter I, Rotert S, Saxel H, Scheer M, Thiele S and Wingender E . (2000). Nucleic Acid Res., 28, 316–319.

  • Ptersohn D and Thiel G . (1996). Eur. J. Biochem., 239, 827–834.

  • Sambrook J and Russell DW . (2001). Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual 3rd edn., Vol. 1. CSHL Press, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory: New York, pp. 7.75–7.81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer G, Cramer T, Suske G, Kemner W, Wiedenmann B and Hocker M . (2003). J. Biol. Chem., 278, 8190–8198.

  • Shappell SB, Boeglin WE, Olson SJ, Kasper S and Brash AR . (1999). Am. J. Pathol., 155, 235–245.

  • Strachan T and Read AP . (2000). Human Molecular Genetics 2nd edn. Wiley-Liss: New York, pp. 169–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang DG, Li L, Chopra D and Porter AT . (1998). Cancer Res., 58, 3466–3479.

  • Tang S, Bhatia B, Maldonado C, Yang P, Newman RA, Liu J, Chandra D, Traag J, Klein RD, Fischer SM, Chopra D, Shen J, Zhau H, Chung LWK and Tang DG . (2002). J. Biol. Chem., 277, 16189–16201.

  • Won J, Yim J and Kim TK . (2002). J. Biol. Chem., 277, 38230–38238.

  • Yamada K, Tanaka T, Miyamoto K and Noguchi T . (2000). J. Biol. Chem., 275, 18129–18137.

  • Zhang J, Thomas TZ, Kasper S and Matusik RJ . (2000). Endocrinology, 141, 4698–4710.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D Chopra for NHP2 cells, G Thiel for DN-Sp1, L W-K Chung for AR, R Matusik for the ARR2PB promoter, J-J Shen and Molecular Biology Core for assistance in sequencing, and members of the Tang lab for helpful discussions. This work is supported, in part, by R01 CA90297, ACS Grant RSG-03-163-01-MGO, DOD grant DAMD17-03-1-0137, and NIEHS Center Grant ES07784. SL Friedman is supported by R01 DK 37340. CJ Maldonado is supported by NIH post-doctoral training grant T32 CA09480-16. D Chandra is supported by DOD Postdoctoral Traineeship Award DAMD17-02-1-0083. B Bhatia is a graduate student in GSBS program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dean G Tang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tang, S., Bhatia, B., Zhou, J. et al. Evidence that Sp1 positively and Sp3 negatively regulate and androgen does not directly regulate functional tumor suppressor 15-lipoxygenase 2 (15-LOX2) gene expression in normal human prostate epithelial cells. Oncogene 23, 6942–6953 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207913

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207913

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links