Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01911-0, published online 15 May 2017
This Article contains an error in the legend of Figure 6.
“Decoding accuracy in Experiment 2. (A) 8-way classification accuracy of target position (chance = 0.125). The black line reflects significance at p < 10−3 (cluster based permutation test), shaded area is +/− s.e.m. Peak at 264 ms. Note again the similarity in temporal evolution with the N2pc (Fig. 3) and decoding accuracies of Experiment 1 (Fig. 4), although plausibly peaking slightly later because of the increase in the number of items on the screen. (B) Classsification accuracy per quadrant (chance = 0.5). (C) Separate N2pc components were computed for left versus right target objects at each of the four vertical elevations, indicated by color. Colored sections indicate p < 10−3 (cluster based permutation test).”
should read:
“Comparing the N2pc to decoding accuracy in Experiment 2. (A) Average N2pc for left and right targets in Experiment 2, computed using PO7 and PO8 (see Methods). Peak at 260 ms. (B) 8-way classification accuracy of target position in Experiment 2 (chance = 0.125). Peak at 264 ms. Note again the similarity in temporal evolution of decoding accuracy in panel B when compared to the temporal evolution of the N2pc in panel A. (C) Separate N2pc components at each of the four vertical elevations, indicated by color. Thick black or colored lines reflect significance at p < 10−3 (cluster based permutation test), shaded areas are +/− s.e.m.”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Fahrenfort, J.J., Grubert, A., Olivers, C.N.L. et al. Author Correction: Multivariate EEG analyses support high-resolution tracking of feature-based attentional selection. Sci Rep 8, 11236 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29326-5
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29326-5
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
