Abstract
Pyrazinamide is a sterilizing first-line tuberculosis drug. Genetic, metabolomic and biophysical analyses previously demonstrated that pyrazinoic acid, the bioactive form of the prodrug pyrazinamide (PZA), interrupts biosynthesis of coenzyme A in Mycobacterium tuberculosis by binding to aspartate decarboxylase PanD. While most drugs act by inhibiting protein function upon target binding, we find here that pyrazinoic acid is only a weak enzyme inhibitor. We show that binding of pyrazinoic acid to PanD triggers degradation of the protein by the caseinolytic protease ClpC1-ClpP. Thus, the old tuberculosis drug pyrazinamide exerts antibacterial activity by acting as a target degrader, a mechanism of action that has recently emerged as a successful strategy in drug discovery across disease indications. Our findings provide the basis for the rational discovery of next generation PZA.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The introduction of pyrazinamide (PZA) in the tuberculosis drug regimen shortened treatment from 12 to 6 months1. PZA is a prodrug that is activated by a Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) amidase to release its bioactive component pyrazinoic acid (POA)2. Aspartate decarboxylase PanD, required for Coenzyme A (CoA) biosynthesis, emerged as a target of POA3,4,5,6. In vitro and in vivo screening to isolate spontaneous POA-resistant Mtb mutants identified missense mutations in either panD or the unfoldase clpC1, encoding a component of the caseinolytic protease ClpC1–ClpP3,5,6,7,8. Overexpression and binding studies with PanD or ClpC1 pointed to PanD as the direct target of POA, whereas clpC1 mutations appeared to indirectly cause resistance3,4,6,8,9. Indeed, supplementing growth media with CoA precursors downstream of the PanD-catalyzed step conferred POA resistance3,6,10. Metabolomic analyses confirmed inhibition of PanD by POA4 and biophysical studies using recombinant proteins showed that PanD missense mutations found in POA-resistant strains prevented POA binding4. Together, these results established PanD and the CoA biosynthetic pathway as a target of POA3,4,6,10.
Classically, antibacterials act by inhibiting the function of their target. To characterize POA’s on-target activity, we measured the inhibitory effect of the drug on the enzymatic conversion of aspartate to β-alanine by PanD. Surprisingly, we only observed a weak effect at extremely high concentrations (see “Results”). If POA does not effectively inhibit the catalytic activity of PanD, how does it block the PanD-catalyzed step in CoA synthesis? Interestingly, mutations in PanD and ClpC1 cause the same level of PZA/POA resistance in Mtb7. This suggests a mechanistic link between these two proteins and POA. The unfoldase ClpC1 is part of the caseinolytic protease complex ClpC1–ClpP, involved in the degradation of substrate proteins11,12. In ClpC1, POA resistance mutations are found primarily in the N-terminal and middle domains, proposed to affect substrate selectivity of the complex7,9. Thus, we speculated that PanD may be recognized and degraded by this machinery. ClpC1–ClpP recognizes substrates via short C-terminal tags11,12,13. Curiously, the mycobacterial PanD protein contains a 13 amino acid C-terminal extension of unknown function14. Mutations in this tail cause POA resistance and prevent drug binding3,4,5,6. Therefore, we hypothesized that (1) the C-terminal tail of Mtb PanD constitutes a degradation tag that is recognized by ClpC1–ClpP and (2) binding of POA to PanD triggers increased degradation of the target. Here, we tested these two hypotheses and show that PanD’s C-terminal tail indeed constitutes a degradation tag and that POA binding to PanD stimulates degradation of the protein by ClpC1–ClpP. Thus, the tuberculosis drug PZA promotes degradation of its target. While not yet reported for an antibacterial, drug-induced target degradation has recently emerged as a strategy in drug discovery for other disease indications.
Results
POA is only a weak PanD enzyme inhibitor
The aspartate decarboxylase PanD is a proenzyme activated by autocatalytic cleavage (Fig. 1a, ref. 15). To characterize POA’s on-target activity we purified recombinant PanD in its cleaved active form (Fig. 1b) and measured the inhibitory effect of POA on the enzymatic conversion of aspartate to β-alanine. Surprisingly, we only observed a weak effect at high concentrations. Although POA binds PanD with a dissociation constant KD of 64, 200 µM POA reduced β-alanine production by only 15% (Fig. 1e). Even “bathing” the enzyme in 2 mM POA reduced product formation by only 47% (Fig. 1e). These weak effects were not significantly attenuated when a POA-resistant PanD mutant that does not bind POA was used (Fig. 1e). This suggests that POA is not an effective inhibitor of PanD enzymatic activity.
PanD is substrate of caseinolytic protease
To test the hypothesis that the C-terminal tail of Mtb PanD constitutes a degradation tag that is recognized by ClpC1–ClpP, we constructed red fluorescent protein (RFP) C-terminal reporter fusions13 and measured the effect of various PanD modifications on protein levels in Mtb (Fig. 2a). As expected, the expression of native RFP alone showed a high fluorescence baseline (Fig. 2b). Attachment of PanD’s 13 amino acid C-terminal tail to RFP caused a reduction in fluorescence, indicating that the tail acts as a degradation signal. The same effect was observed when full-length PanD was fused to RFP. Consistent with the C-terminal tail acting as a degradation tag, fusion of PanD lacking its native C-terminal tail to RFP restored baseline fluorescence levels. Similar fluorescence was also observed for a fusion carrying a missense mutation in the C-terminal tail6, consistent with amino acid-sequence recognition by the degradation machinery (Fig. 2b). These experiments were repeated independently in M. bovis BCG, yielding the same results (Supplementary Fig. 2). To determine whether ClpC1 is involved in degradation of PanD’s C-terminal tail, we measured the effect of introducing each RFP fusion into a POA-resistant clpC1 mutant strain (Fig. 2b). The level of native RFP was not affected by the clpC1 mutation compared with wild-type clpC1, and baseline fluorescence levels were observed in both genetic backgrounds. As hypothesized, RFP fusions containing the C-terminal tail alone or full-length PanD showed increased fluorescence levels in clpC1 mutant background, indicating impaired degradation activity by the POA-resistant clpC1 mutant. These results suggested that PanD’s C-terminal degradation tag is recognized by ClpC1, which led us to postulate that PanD degradation is mediated by the caseinolytic protease ClpP. As clpP is genetically essential and cannot be deleted, we employed a pharmacological approach. Treatment of Mtb RFP fusion strains with bortezomib, a mycobacterial ClpP inhibitor16, increased fluorescence of cultures containing RFP-C-terminal tail as well as RFP-full-length PanD fusions to the baseline levels of native RFP (Fig. 2c). We further confirmed ClpC1–ClpP mediated recognition and degradation of PanD by in vitro reconstitution of the process using recombinant ClpC1 and ClpP proteins17, and cell-free synthesized N-terminally eGFP-tagged PanD as substrate (Supplementary Fig. 3). Taken together, these data demonstrate that PanD is a substrate of the caseinolytic protease complex ClpC1–ClpP and that the mycobacterium-specific tail of PanD is a tag recognized by the protease complex. Our finding is consistent with a previous screen for substrates of ClpP, in which Raju et al. identified PanD as one of the 132 Mtb proteins overrepresented upon conditional depletion of Mtb ClpP12.
POA stimulates PanD degradation via caseinolytic protease
Having established that PanD’s C-terminal tail is a degradation tag and PanD levels are regulated posttranslationally, we asked whether POA treatment enhances PanD degradation. POA treatment of cultures harboring the native RFP did not affect fluorescence (Fig. 3a), neither did it affect fluorescence of cultures expressing the RFP-C-terminal fusion, consistent with the requirement of a dual epitope (including His21, Fig. 2a) for POA binding to PanD4. In contrast, the full-length PanD fusion showed a dose-dependent reduction of fluorescence by POA. This reduction was dependent on PanD’s C-terminal tail and was not observed in cultures harboring fusion with POA-resistant PanD proteins containing missense mutations in either the N-terminal His21 or the C-terminal tail, both of which abolishing binding of POA (Fig. 3a, ref. 4). To confirm that POA indeed causes reduction of endogenous PanD levels, we performed western blotting with an anti-PanD antibody, and showed rapid reduction of native PanD in response to POA treatment in wild-type M. bovis BCG but not in a POA-resistant C-terminal PanD missense mutant (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Fig. 4). Further, RFP reporter-based work showed that increased degradation of PanD in Mtb was also observed upon treatment with PZA, the prodrug of POA (Fig. 3a), but not with the control drug isoniazid (Fig. 3b), that targets mycolic acid synthesis. This showed that increased PanD degradation is POA/PZA-specific and not a general drug treatment effect. PanD mRNA levels were not affected by POA treatment, ruling out transcriptional effects (Supplementary Fig. 5). To determine whether ClpC1 is involved in POA’s mechanism of action, we tested the impact of clpC1 mutation on POA-induced PanD degradation by measuring the effect of POA on the various RFP–PanD fusions in the clpC1 mutant background. POA-resistant clpC1 mutations prevented POA/PZA-induced reduction of PanD levels (Fig. 3c). To determine whether the ClpP protease is required for POA-induced PanD degradation, we co-treated cultures with POA and the ClpP inhibitor bortezomib. Inhibition of ClpP prevented POA-induced reduction of PanD levels (Fig. 3d). It is to note that bortezomib also increased fluorescence of the RFP control strain, although to a lesser extent than the PanD-RFP reporter strains. The reasons for this effect remain to be investigated and may include yet unidentified off-target effects. To determine whether the other major protein degradation machinery of Mtb, the proteasome18, contributes to PanD degradation, we measured the effect of prcAB gene deletion on POA susceptibility. POA MIC was not affected by the deletion, arguing against proteasome involvement in PanD degradation (Supplementary Fig. 6). Together, these results suggest that the mechanism of action of PZA/POA involves suicidal derailing of a bacterial posttranslational regulatory mechanism in which POA promotes the breakdown of its essential target by Mtb.
POA changes quaternary and secondary structures of PanD
Next, we resorted to biophysical methodologies to characterize the structural consequences of POA binding to PanD. In previous work, we have used small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) analyses to show that PanD forms a monodispersed octamer in solution4. It is therefore possible that under drug-free conditions, PanD’s C-terminal tail is poorly accessible or even sequestered, resulting in a low degradation efficiency. Binding of POA may induce changes in the conformation and oligomeric state of PanD, rendering the protein’s degradation tag more accessible to the protease complex, thus allowing increased degradation. To determine whether POA indeed affects the oligomeric state of PanD, dynamic light scattering experiments were carried out. Under drug-free conditions, PanD showed one major peak corresponding to a hydrodynamic diameter of 8.9 ± 4.92 nm (Fig. 5). This molecule size corresponds to an octameric molecular weight of 105.6 ± 39.9 kDa and is thus consistent with the previous SAXS data. Addition of 200 μM POA resulted in the disappearance of the 8.9 nm peak and the emergence of four peaks with calculated hydrodynamic diameters of 21.04 ± 7.22, 55.04 ± 6.35, 955.4 ± 106.9, and 4801 ± 1134 nm (Fig. 5). The POA-induced formation of a series of larger complexes was visualized and confirmed by electron microscopy (Fig. 6). Together, these results show that POA binding causes the formation of a mixture of larger PanD ensembles and thus has a dramatic effect on the quaternary structure of the protein. To determine whether POA interaction with PanD also affects the protein’s secondary structural content, circular dichroism (CD) analyses were carried out (Fig. 7). The CD spectrum of drug-free PanD suggests a secondary structural content of 4% α-helices and 37.8% β-sheets, consistent with the secondary structural content determined by the crystallographic structure of PanD (PDB ID: 2C45). Addition of 200 μM POA caused a significant shift in the CD spectrum (Fig. 7), showing that POA binding alters the conformation of PanD. Taken together, these biophysical analyses show that POA binding causes major alterations at the secondary and quaternary structural levels. How these multilevel structural changes enhance protein degradation by ClpC1–ClpP remains to be determined.
Discussion
We show here that POA, the bioactive component of PZA, blocks mycobacterial CoA biosynthesis by promoting degradation of its target PanD by the caseinolytic protease ClpC1–ClpP. Drug-induced degradation of a target protein is a novel antibacterial mechanism. However, this strategy does have precedents: selective estrogen receptor degraders, such as fulvestrant, used clinically for the treatment of certain breast cancers, are known to decrease intracellular estrogen receptor α levels19. In addition to fulvestrant, small-molecule phthalimides (e.g., thalidomide and lenalidomide)20,21 and the plant hormone Auxin22 were shown to induce the degradation of specific substrates. Interestingly, targeted protein degradation as a novel drug discovery approach has gained momentum in recent years23. PROTACs, heterobifunctional molecules which contain discrete binding moieties for the protein of interest and for E3 ligase, make use of the human ubiquitin—proteasome system to specifically degrade tagged proteins24. A first PROTAC drug is heading for clinical trials25. In conclusion, we report that an old tuberculosis drug acts by an event-based rather than occupation-based mechanism, accelerating degradation of its cellular target by Mtb’s own protease machinery.
Methods
Bacterial strains, culture medium, and chemicals
Mtb H37Rv (ATCC 27294) and M. bovis BCG (ATCC 35734) strains were maintained in complete Middlebrook 7H9 medium (BD Difco) supplemented with 0.05% (vol/vol) Tween 80, 0.5% (vol/vol) glycerol, 0.5% albumin, 0.2% glucose, 0.085% sodium chloride, and 0.0003% catalase at 310 K with agitation at 80 rpm. POA-resistant strain Mtb H37Rv POAR18 (clpC1: A625G/Lys209Glu) was isolated and described previously7. The Mtb H37Rv ΔprcAB strain (hygromycin-resistant) and its complemented mutant (hygromycin-resistant and Kanamycin-resistant) were previously generated and described18. Hygromycin B (Roche) and Kanamycin (Sigma-Aldrich) were used for selection when required at 50 and 25 µg/mL, respectively. PZA, POA, and Isoniazid were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Bortezomib was purchased from Chembridge. Antibiotics were dissolved in 90% DMSO and sterilized using 0.2 μm PTFE membrane filters (Acrodisc PALL).
Susceptibility testing
MICs were performed by the broth dilution method as described7. The strains were grown to mid-log phase, spun down, resuspended in fresh 7H9 broth, and adjusted to an OD600 = 0.1. One hundred microliters of cell suspension was added into wells containing one hundred microliters twofold serially diluted compound in transparent flat-bottomed 96-well plates (Corning Costar), sealed with Breathe-Easy membranes (Sigma-Aldrich). The plates were incubated for 7 days at 310 K with shaking at 80 rpm. After incubation, the cultures were manually resuspended and OD600 was measured using a spectrophotometer (Tecan Infinite M200 Pro). Experiments were repeated at least once independently with two technical replicates. MIC50 values represent the concentration of drug which inhibits bacterial growth by 50% as compared with the respective drug-free control.
Protein preparation
Wild-type Mtb Aspartate decarboxylase PanD (PanDWT) and the POA-resistant mutant PanD (PanD127TRASC131) proteins were overexpressed with N-terminal 6× His tags in E. coli and purified by Ni2+-NTA affinity, followed by gel filtration chromatography with buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 200 mM NaCl as described previously4. Protein concentrations were determined using a BioSpec-nano spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, USA). Purity and homogeneity of samples were verified by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 1b).
SDS-PAGE analyses of recombinant PanD
Protein samples were analyzed by 12% SDS-PAGE (NuPAGE Bis-Tris precast gel) run at a constant voltage of 200 V for 45 min in NuPAGE MES-SDS running buffer. The recombinant protein samples were denatured with a sample buffer containing LDS (NuPAGE), 0.1 M dithiothreitol (DTT) and heating at 368 K for 10 min prior to loading. The gels were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 (BioRad) as described by the suppliers.
1H-1D NMR studies of L-Asp to β-Ala conversion
NMR samples containing 2 mM L-Asp, 10 µM of PanDWT or PanD127TRASC131 were prepared in deuterated water (D2O) buffer. NMR experiments were carried out using a Bruker Avance 400 MHz NMR spectrometer, equipped on a 5 mm BBI probe head at 298 K as described by Sharma et al.26. Basic 1H-1D NMR spectra were collected with presaturation of solvent water (relaxation delay 2 s; solvent presaturation applied during the relaxation delay). Time-dependent 1H-1D NMR experiments were performed to examine the kinetics of enzymatic conversion of L-Asp to β-Ala at six different incubation time points (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 60, and 90 min) using PanDWT (Fig. 1c, d). In order to study the inhibitory effect of POA, the compound was added (0.2 and 2 mM) to reaction mixtures, containing 2 mM of L-Asp. Overall, 10 µM of enzyme (PanDWT or PanD127TRASC131) was added to initiate the reaction (spectra are shown in Supplementary Fig. 1).
Fluorescence reporter strains and reporter assay
Genomic DNA was isolated from Mtb H37Rv (ATCC 27294), M. bovis BCG (ATCC 35734), POA-resistant strains M. bovis BCG POA1.3 (panD: A62G/His21Arg), and M. bovis BCG POA1.1 (panD: T407G/Leu136Arg)6. The sequences of panD in M. bovis BCG (ATCC 35734) and Mtb H37Rv (ATCC 27294) are 100% identical as determined by sequencing. Primers and templates used for plasmid construction of each RFP protein fusion are summarized in Supplementary Table 1. PCR amplification was performed with Phusion DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific) as per the manufacturer’s instructions.
The obtained RFP fusion constructs were electroporated into Mtb H37Rv wild type, Mtb H37Rv POAR18 or wild-type M. bovis BCG as specified and selected on complete Middlebrook 7H11/7H10 agar containing Kanamycin (25 μg/mL) at 310 K. Kanamycin-resistant single colonies were picked and colony-purified. Strains were grown to log phase in respective growth media and stored in 7H9 broth containing 10% glycerol in 1 mL aliquots at 193 K. Strains derived from the above experiments are summarized in Supplementary Table 2.
For the reporter assay, the different fluorescent reporter strains were grown to mid-log phase (OD600 = 0.4–0.6) in their respective selective 7H9 media. All cultures were then adjusted to OD600 = 0.4 in fresh 7H9 broth after centrifugation at 3200 × rpm for 10 min and 100 µL of this suspension was inoculated into wells of a flat-bottomed 96-well plate (Costar Corning), each containing 100 µL of media (with or without drugs). Reporter assays were carried out with dual readout, absorbance (OD600), and relative fluorescence units (RFU; λex/λem, 587/630 for RFP) by using an Infinite M200 Pro plate reader (Tecan). Baseline measurements at day 0 were carried out with RFU, after which plates were sealed with Breathe-Easy sealing membranes (Sigma-Aldrich) and incubated at 310 K with shaking at 80 rpm for measurements at subsequent time points.
Cloning and synthesis of fluorescently tagged proteins
Constructs encoding eGFP alone, or eGFP fused to the N-terminus of proteins of interest were cloned into pET26b or pET21a to allow T7 polymerase initiated in vitro expression. Briefly, expression vectors were linearized by restriction digestion (NdeI and HindIII) and column purified. To make pET26b_eGFP, mycobacterial codon-optimized eGFP was amplified with JH-306 and JH-311, column purified, and cloned into linearized pET26b by Gibson assembly27. To generate eGFP fusion constructs, an 18 bp linker (5′-ggatctagcggatccagt-3′, encoding a flexible GSSGSS linker when being translated) was used as both the DNA homology for Gibson assembly and a flexible linker peptide. PCR amplified eGFP-linker (JH-306/JH-307) and linker protein of interest (Supplementary Table 1) were column purified and cloned into designated vectors using Gibson assembly.
In vitro protein expression was carried out following the manufacturer’s instructions (NEB, E6800s). Briefly, 300 ng of each column purified plasmid (Supplementary Table 1) was mixed with PURExpress solution A and B (10 and 7.5 µL, respectively), 0.5 µL of RNaseOUTTM RNase inhibitors (Thermo), and nuclease-free water (Promega) to make final volume 25 µL. Protein synthesis was allowed by incubating the reaction mix at 310 K for 5 h, and then stopped by adding excessive amount of chloramphenicol (final concentration as 500 µg/mL). Successful protein production was validated by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis and Coomassie staining. The remaining products were kept at 277 K for no more than a week before further steps.
In vitro reconstitution of PanD degradation
PanD degradation assays with purified recombinant ClpC1 and ClpP (ClpP1 and ClpP2) were carried out as described17. Full-length (eGFP_full_PanD) and N-terminally truncated (eGFP_PanDΔN-term1-24, eGFP_PanDΔN-term1-24, ΔC-term127-139) PanD proteins were produced with N-terminally fused eGFP in a cell-free transcription/translation system as described above. Aliquots from protein expression mixes were diluted fivefold into the proteolysis assay mixture containing 300 nM ClpP1P2 tetradecamer and 300 nM ClpC1 hexamer in reaction buffer (20 mM K-phosphate buffer pH 7.6 containing 100 mM KCl, 5% glycerol, 8 mM Mg-ATP, and 2.5 mM of dipeptide activator Bz-Leu-Leu). Degradation was followed by the loss of eGFP fluorescence17.
Quantitative PCR
RNA from Mtb H37Rv wild type was isolated from an equivalent of 20 mL of culture at an OD600 = 0.4. Cultures were spun down at 3200 rpm for 10 min, resuspended in 1 mL TRIzol (Invitrogen), and subjected to bead beating by using a FastPrep-24 5G instrument (MP Biomedicals; twice for 45 s each, 5 min on ice between pulses). RNA was purified using the PureLink RNA mini kit with the Turbo DNA-free kit (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s instructions with on-column DNAse treatment (Invitrogen). cDNA was synthesized from 500 ng of total RNA with the SuperScript III first-strand synthesis system (Invitrogen) by using random primers (Promega). Quantitative PCR was performed using the FastStart Essential DNA Green Master (Roche) on a LightCycler 96 real-time PCR system (Roche) (for primers, see Supplementary Table 3). Relative expression of transcripts was determined by the ΔΔCQ method as compared with 16S rRNA, which was uniformly expressed in our Mtb strains. cDNA was synthesized from at least two independent RNA samples and qRT-PCR was performed at least twice, in triplicate wells, for each cDNA sample.
Preparation of mycobacterial cell lysates
M. bovis BCG wild type or mutant cultures were grown to mid-log phase in independent biological replicates and 100 mL of culture (adjusted to OD600 = 0.4) was harvested by centrifugation at 3400 × g for 20 min at 277 K, washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and pelleted again. For the western blotting experiments, mid-log cultures were adjusted to OD600 = 0.2 in fresh media and subjected to POA treatment (1 or 4 mM), the equivalent of 100 mL OD600 = 0.4 was harvested at specified time points. The cell pellets were resuspended in 600 µL lysis buffer (50 mM Tris/Hcl pH 7.5, 5% (vol/vol) glycerol, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 1% n-dodecyl β-D-maltoside (w/vol), 1× complete EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche)), transferred to a lysis matrix B tube (MP Biomedicals) and homogenized using a FastPrep-24 5 G instrument (MP Biomedicals). The cell debris was pelleted by centrifugation at 13,000 × rpm for 10 min at 277 K and the supernatant (about 400 µL) was collected and stored at 193 K until further use. The protein concentration was determined by a BCA protein assay kit (Pierce).
In-gel digestion
The protein lysates were concentrated by SpeedVac to 30 µL each. Samples were then polymerized with 4% SDS, 10% acrylamide (29:1 C), 0.25% ammonium persulfate, and 0.25% TEMED for 30 min. The gels were fixed with 50% methanol, 12% acetic acid for 30 min. The bands of interest were individually cut out from the gel (for protein identification from SDS-PAGE) or the entire polymerized cell lysates (prepared as described above) were cut into ~1 mm3 pieces and washed three times with 0.5 mL 50 mM triethylammonium bicarbonate buffer (TEAB), 50% (vol/vol) acetonitrile, and then treated with 500 µL acetonitrile. The gel pieces were reduced with 5 mM tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP) in 100 mM TEAB and incubated at 329 K for 1 h. TCEP solution was removed and samples were dehydrated with acetonitrile. Solvent was removed, and samples were alkylated with 10 mM methyl methanethiosulfonate (MMTS) in 100 mM TEAB, followed by incubation at room temperature for 60 min. The gel pieces were washed with 50 mM TEAB and dehydrated with acetonitrile two times. The gel pieces were dried in a Speedvac. Overall, 12.5 ng/µL of Trypsin Gold (Promega) in 500 mM TEAB was added and kept at 277 K for 30 min. The mixture was incubated at 310 K for 16 h. Overall, 200 µL 50 mM TEAB was added to the digest, spun down at 6000 rpm for 10 min and the supernatant was collected. A total of 200 µL 5% formic acid (vol/vol), 50% acetonitrile was added to the gel pieces, spun down at 6000 rpm for 10 min and the supernatant was collected. The gel pieces were finally treated with 200 µL acetonitrile, followed by centrifugation at 6000 × rpm for 10 min. The three supernatants were combined and dried in a SpeedVac.
LC–MS/MS analysis
The peptide separation was carried out on an Eksigent nanolC Ultra and ChiPLC-nanoflex (Eksigent, Dublin, CA, USA) in Trap Elute configuration. The samples were desalted with Sep-Pak tC 18 μ Elution Plate (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) and reconstituted with 20 μL of diluent (98% water, 2% acetonitrile, and 0.05% formic acid). Five microliters of the sample was loaded on a 200 μm × 0.5 mm trap column and eluted on an analytical 75 μm × 150 mm column. Both trap and analytical columns were made of ChromXP C18-CL, 3 μm (Eksigent, Germany). Peptides were separated by a gradient formed by 2% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid (mobile phase A) and 98% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid (mobile phase B): 5–7% of mobile phase B in 0.1 min, 7–30% of mobile phase B in 10 min, 30–60% of mobile phase B in 4 min, 60–90% of mobile phase B in 1 min, 90–90% of mobile phase B in 5 min, 90–5% of mobile phase B in 1 min, and 5–5% of mobile phase B in 10 min, at a flow rate of 300 nL/min.
The MS analysis was performed on a TripleTOF 5600 system (AB SCIEX, Foster City, CA, USA) in Information Dependent Mode. MS spectra were acquired across the mass range of 400–1250 m/z in high resolution mode (>30,000) using 250 ms accumulation time per spectrum. A maximum of 20 precursors per cycle were chosen for fragmentation from each MS spectrum with 100 ms minimum accumulation time for each precursor and dynamic exclusion for 8 s. Tandem mass spectra were recorded in high sensitivity mode (resolution >15,000) with rolling collision energy. Survey-IDA Experiment, with charge state 2–4, which exceeds 125 cps was selected.
Peptide identification was carried out on the ProteinPilot 5.0 software Revision 4769 (AB SCIEX) using the Paragon database search algorithm (5.0.0.4767) for peptide identification and the integrated false discovery rate analysis function. The data were searched against a database consisting of M. bovis BCG proteome UP000001472 (total 7782 entries). The search parameters are as follows: Sample type—identification; Cys alkylation—MMTS; digestion—trypsin; special factors—none; species—none. The processing was specified as follows: ID focus—biological modifications; search effort—thorough; detected protein threshold—0.05 (10.0%) and competitor Error Margin (ProtScore)—2.00.
Western blot analyses of native PanD protein
Total protein extracts were prepared from M. bovis BCG cultures as described above and protein contents were quantified using the BCA protein assay kit (Pierce). Ten micrograms of total protein lysates was subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE (NuPAGE Bis-Tris precast gel and NuPAGE MES-SDS running buffer). Dual color markers (Biorad Precision Plus) and recombinant PanDWT protein were included as molecular weight markers. Proteins were transferred onto 0.2 µm nitrocellulose membranes (Biorad) in a mini Trans-Blot cell (Biorad). Blots were blocked with 5% skimmed milk containing Phosphate-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween-20 (PBST) for 3 h at 298 K, and then probed with PanD-specific rabbit sera 1:500 in 5% skimmed milk-PBST overnight at 277 K. PanD-specific rabbit sera were obtained from i-DNA Technologies (Singapore) by immunizing rabbits with a synthetic peptide from the PanD aspartate decarboxylase domain (C-IAYATMDDARARTY-amide). Secondary HRP Goat-anti-rabbit antibodies (#65-6120 Invitrogen) were used at a 1:5000 dilution in 5% skimmed milk-PBST for 1 h at 298 K. Detection was performed with the Clarity Max Western ECL kit (Biorad) and visualized with a ChemiDoc imaging system (Biorad). To ensure equivalent loading of total protein lysates, blots were stripped and re-probed with Anti-RpoB monoclonal antibody (#12087 Abcam) at a 1:10,000 dilution in 5% skimmed milk-PBST and 1:20,000 secondary HRP Rabbit-anti-mouse antibody (#61–6520 Invitrogen) in 5% skimmed milk-PBST16. Unprocessed scans are available in the Source Data file.
Dynamic light scattering studies
Dynamic light scattering experiments of PanDWT and the mutant PanD127TRASC131 in the absence or presence of 200 µM POA were carried out using the Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS spectrophotometer. The protein was incubated for 40 min with drug before measurement. The samples were measured in a low-volume quartz batch cuvette (ZEN2112, Malvern Instruments) using 12 µL of 1 mg/mL of PanD in 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5) buffer containing 200 mM NaCl. After 60 s equilibration time at 298 K, the backscattering at 173° was detected for all proteins. Scattering intensities were analyzed using the instrument software to calculate the hydrodynamic diameter (DH), size, and volume distribution.
Electron microscopy
PanDWT and the mutant PanD127TRASC131 was incubated with 200 μM POA for 40 min as described under dynamic light scattering before applying a volume of 4 μL of the drug-bound protein (50 μg/mL) to a glow discharged carbon-coated copper TEM grid and stained with 2% (v/v) uranyl acetate. Electron micrographs were recorded on a 120 kV Tecnai spirit T12 transmission electron microscope (FEI) equipped with a 4 K CCD camera (FEI) at a calibrated magnification of ×66,350 under low-dose conditions.
Circular dichroism spectroscopy
CD spectra of PanDWT and the mutant PanD127TRASC131 with or without 200 µM POA were recorded with a CHIRASCAN spectrometer (Applied Photo-physics) using a 60 µL quartz cell (Hellma, Germany) with 0.1 mm path length. The respective protein was incubated for 40 min with drug before measurement. Light of 190–260 nm was used to record the far UV–spectra at 298 K with 1 nm resolution. Two independent measurements were carried out and each measurement was performed three times for each sample. The CD spectra were acquired in a buffer of 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, and 200 mM NaCl with protein concentration of 2.0 mg/mL. Secondary structural content was determined from CD spectrum using K2D3 software28.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
References
Fox, W., Ellard, G. A. & Mitchison, D. A. Studies on the treatment of tuberculosis undertaken by the British Medical Research Council Tuberculosis Units, 1946-1986, with relevant subsequent publications. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 3, S231–S279 (1999).
Scorpio, A. & Zhang, Y. Mutations in pncA, a gene encoding pyrazinamidase/nicotinamidase, cause resistance to the antituberculous drug pyrazinamide in tubercle bacillus. Nat. Med. 2, 662–667 (1996).
Shi, W. et al. Aspartate decarboxylase (PanD) as a new target of pyrazinamide in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 3, e58 (2014).
Gopal, P. et al. Pyrazinoic acid inhibits mycobacterial coenzyme A biosynthesis by binding to aspartate decarboxylase PanD. ACS Infect. Dis. 3, 807–819 (2017).
Gopal, P. et al. In vivo-selected pyrazinoic acid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains harbor missense mutations in the aspartate decarboxylase PanD and the unfoldase ClpC1. ACS Infect. Dis. 3, 492–501 (2017).
Gopal, P. et al. Pyrazinamide resistance is caused by two distinct mechanisms: prevention of coenzyme A depletion and loss of virulence factor synthesis. ACS Infect. Dis. 2, 616–626 (2016).
Yee, M., Gopal, P. & Dick, T. Missense mutations in the unfoldase ClpC1 of the caseinolytic protease complex are associated with pyrazinamide resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrobial Agents Chemother. 61, e02342–02316 (2017).
Zhang, S. et al. Mutation in clpC1 encoding an ATP-dependent ATPase involved in protein degradation is associated with pyrazinamide resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 6, e8 (2017).
Weinhäupl, K. et al. The antibiotic cyclomarin blocks arginine-phosphate–induced millisecond dynamics in the N-terminal domain of ClpC1 from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 8379–8393 (2018).
Dillon, N. A., Peterson, N. D., Rosen, B. C. & Baughn, A. D. Pantothenate and pantetheine antagonize the antitubercular activity of pyrazinamide. Antimicrobial Agents Chemother. 58, 7258–7263 (2014).
Akopian, T. et al. The active ClpP protease from M. tuberculosis is a complex composed of a heptameric ClpP1 and a ClpP2 ring. EMBO J. 31, 1529–1541 (2012).
Raju, R. M. et al. Post-translational regulation via Clp protease is critical for survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS Pathog. 10, e1003994 (2014).
Yamada, Y. & Dick, T. Mycobacterial caseinolytic protease gene regulator ClgR is a substrate of caseinolytic protease. mSphere 2, e00338-16 (2017).
Gopalan, G., Chopra, S., Ranganathan, A. & Swaminathan, K. Crystal structure of uncleaved L-aspartate-α-decarboxylase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proteins 65, 796–802 (2006).
Chopra, S., Pai, H. & Ranganathan, A. Expression, purification, and biochemical characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis aspartate decarboxylase, PanD. Protein Expr. Purif. 25, 533–540 (2002).
Moreira, W. et al. Target mechanism-based whole-cell screening identifies bortezomib as an inhibitor of caseinolytic protease in mycobacteria. mBio 6, e00253-15 (2015).
Akopian, T. et al. Cleavage specificity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis ClpP1P2 protease and identification of novel peptide substrates and boronate inhibitors with anti-bacterial activity. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 11008–11020 (2015).
Gandotra, S., Lebron, M. B. & Ehrt, S. The Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteasome active site threonine is essential for persistence yet dispensable for replication and resistance to nitric oxide. PLoS Pathog. 6, e1001040 (2010).
Dauvois, S., Danielian, P. S., White, R. & Parker, M. G. Antiestrogen ICI 164,384 reduces cellular estrogen receptor content by increasing its turnover. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 4037–4041 (1992).
Fischer, E. S. et al. Structure of the DDB1–CRBN E3 ubiquitin ligase in complex with thalidomide. Nature 512, 49 (2014).
Krönke, J. et al. Lenalidomide causes selective degradation of IKZF1 and IKZF3 in multiple myeloma cells. Science 343, 301 (2014).
Gray, W. M., Kepinski, S., Rouse, D., Leyser, O. & Estelle, M. Auxin regulates SCFTIR1-dependent degradation of AUX/IAA proteins. Nature 414, 271 (2001).
Salami, J. & Crews, C. M. Waste disposal—an attractive strategy for cancer therapy. Science 355, 1163 (2017).
Lai, A. C. & Crews, C. M. Induced protein degradation: an emerging drug discovery paradigm. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 16, 101 (2016).
Scudellari, M. Protein-slaying drugs could be the next blockbuster therapies. Nature 567, 298–300 (2019).
Sharma, R., Florea, M., Nau, W. M. & Swaminathan, K. Validation of drug-like inhibitors against Mycobacterium Tuberculosis L-aspartate α-decarboxylase using nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR). PLoS ONE 7, e45947 (2012).
Murphy, K. C. et al. ORBIT: a new paradigm for genetic engineering of mycobacterial chromosomes. mBio 9, e01467–01418 (2018).
Louis-Jeune, C., Andrade-Navarro, M. A. & Perez-Iratxeta, C. Prediction of protein secondary structure from circular dichroism using theoretically derived spectra. Proteins 80, 374–381 (2011).
Schubert Olga, T. et al. The Mtb proteome library: a resource of assays to quantify the complete proteome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Cell Host Microbe 13, 602–612 (2013).
Acknowledgements
We thank Sabai Phyu, National University of Singapore BSL3 Core Facility, for support and Uday Ganapathy and Veronique Dartois, Center for Discovery and Innovation, Hackensack Meridian Health, for discussion and comments on the manuscript. We are grateful to Sabine Ehrt, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, for providing the prcAB knockout strain. We thank N. Kamariah and S. Rishikesan, School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, for their support in imaging the PanD proteins, Bill Jacobs, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, for sharing his pMV262 plasmid and Yoshiyuki Yamada, National University of Singapore, for the modified pMV262-mRFP construct. This research was supported by the Singapore Ministry of Health’s National Medical Research Council under NMRC/TCR/011-NUHS/2014 and NMRC/CG/013/2013 (T.D.) and is part of the SPRINT-TB program led by Nick Paton. J.P.S. received a Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine graduate scholarship. T.D. holds a Toh Chin Chye Visiting Professorship at the National University of Singapore. Research reported in this publication is also supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers 2R01AI106398-05 (T.D.), P01AI095208 (E.J.R), by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1181211 (E.J.R.), and by the National Research Foundation (NRF) Singapore, NRF Competitive Research Programme (CRP), Grant Award Number NRF–CRP18–2017–01; G.G.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization—P.G., J.P.S., M.Y., M.G., E.J.R., G.G., and T.D.; Methodology—P.G., J.P.S., M.Y., M.G., Q.L., E.J.R., G.G., and T.D.; Investigation—P.G., J.P.S., M.Y., P.R., J.S., S.B., J.Z., T.A., O.K., T.K.L., and M.G.; Writing original draft—P.G., G.G., and T.D.; Writing review and editing—all authors; Funding acquisition—E.J.R., G.G., T.D.; Supervision—P.G., Q.L., E.J.R., G.G., and T.D.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Alessio Ciulli, Charles Scott and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gopal, P., Sarathy, J.P., Yee, M. et al. Pyrazinamide triggers degradation of its target aspartate decarboxylase. Nat Commun 11, 1661 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15516-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15516-1
This article is cited by
-
Drug-resistant tuberculosis: a persistent global health concern
Nature Reviews Microbiology (2024)
-
ClpC2 protects mycobacteria against a natural antibiotic targeting ClpC1-dependent protein degradation
Communications Biology (2023)
-
A convolutional neural network highlights mutations relevant to antimicrobial resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Nature Communications (2022)
-
Fungal-derived compounds and mycogenic nanoparticles with antimycobacterial activity: a review
SN Applied Sciences (2022)
-
The Struggle to End a Millennia-Long Pandemic: Novel Candidate and Repurposed Drugs for the Treatment of Tuberculosis
Drugs (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.