Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Unstable neurons underlie a stable learned behavior

Nature Neuroscience volume 19, pages 1665–1671 (2016)Cite this article

Subjects

This article has been updated

Abstract

Motor skills can be maintained for decades, but the biological basis of this memory persistence remains largely unknown. The zebra finch, for example, sings a highly stereotyped song that is stable for years, but it is not known whether the precise neural patterns underlying song are stable or shift from day to day. Here we demonstrate that the population of projection neurons coding for song in the premotor nucleus, HVC, change from day to day. The most dramatic shifts occur over intervals of sleep. In contrast to the transient participation of excitatory neurons, ensemble measurements dominated by inhibition persist unchanged even after damage to downstream motor nerves. These observations offer a principle of motor stability: spatiotemporal patterns of inhibition can maintain a stable scaffold for motor dynamics while the population of principal neurons that directly drive behavior shift from one day to the next.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Approach to measuring the stability of neural firing patterns underlying a highly stable behavior.
Figure 2: Activity patterns from multiunit ensembles and single interneurons are highly stable.
Figure 3: Drift in multiunit firing patterns is not accelerated by unilateral TS nerve transection.
Figure 4: A custom head-mounted fluorescence microscope adapted for use in singing birds.
Figure 5: Projection neurons drift over a 5-d imaging session.
Figure 6: Projection neuron activity preferentially changed over periods of sleep.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 13 October 2016

    In the version of this article initially published online, all three colors in Figure 5c were labeled "Day 1." Green represents Day 2 and blue Day 3. The error has been corrected for the print, PDF and HTML versions of this article.

References

  1. Thompson, L.T. & Best, P.J. Long-term stability of the place-field activity of single units recorded from the dorsal hippocampus of freely behaving rats. Brain Res. 509, 299–308 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kentros, C.G., Agnihotri, N.T., Streater, S., Hawkins, R.D. & Kandel, E.R. Increased attention to spatial context increases both place field stability and spatial memory. Neuron 42, 283–295 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ghosh, K.K. et al. Miniaturized integration of a fluorescence microscope. Nat. Methods 8, 871–878 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, T.-W. et al. Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity. Nature 499, 295–300 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ziv, Y. et al. Long-term dynamics of CA1 hippocampal place codes. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 264–266 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Huber, D. et al. Multiple dynamic representations in the motor cortex during sensorimotor learning. Nature 484, 473–478 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Leonardo, A. Degenerate coding in neural systems. J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 191, 995–1010 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rokni, U., Richardson, A.G., Bizzi, E. & Seung, H.S. Motor learning with unstable neural representations. Neuron 54, 653–666 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ganguly, K. & Carmena, J.M. Emergence of a stable cortical map for neuroprosthetic control. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000153 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Immelmann, K. Song development in the zebra finch and other estrildid finches. in Bird Vocalizations (ed. Hinde, R.A.) 61–74 (Cambridge University Press, 1969).

  11. Lombardino, A.J. & Nottebohm, F. Age at deafening affects the stability of learned song in adult male zebra finches. J. Neurosci. 20, 5054–5064 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Akutagawa, E. & Konishi, M. New brain pathways found in the vocal control system of a songbird. J. Comp. Neurol. 518, 3086–3100 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hahnloser, R.H.R., Kozhevnikov, A.A. & Fee, M.S. An ultra-sparse code underlies the generation of neural sequences in a songbird. Nature 419, 65–70 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kozhevnikov, A.A. & Fee, M.S. Singing-related activity of identified HVC neurons in the zebra finch. J. Neurophysiol. 97, 4271–4283 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Guitchounts, G., Markowitz, J.E., Liberti, W.A. & Gardner, T.J. A carbon-fiber electrode array for long-term neural recording. J. Neural Eng. 10, 046016 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Markowitz, J.E. et al. Mesoscopic patterns of neural activity support songbird cortical sequences. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002158 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kosche, G., Vallentin, D. & Long, M.A. Interplay of inhibition and excitation shapes a premotor neural sequence. J. Neurosci. 35, 1217–1227 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lynch, G.F., Okubo, T.S., Hanuschkin, A., Hahnloser, R.H.R. & Fee, M.S. Rhythmic continuous-time coding in the songbird analog of vocal motor cortex. Neuron 90, 877–892 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Crandall, S.R., Aoki, N. & Nick, T.A. Developmental modulation of the temporal relationship between brain and behavior. J. Neurophysiol. 97, 806–816 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Otchy, T.M. et al. Acute off-target effects of neural circuit manipulations. Nature 528, 358–363 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Katzner, S. et al. Local origin of field potentials in visual cortex. Neuron 61, 35–41 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Buzsáki, G., Anastassiou, C.A. & Koch, C. The origin of extracellular fields and currents--EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 407–420 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schmidt, M.F. Pattern of interhemispheric synchronization in HVc during singing correlates with key transitions in the song pattern. J. Neurophysiol. 90, 3931–3949 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vallentin, D. & Long, M.A. Motor origin of precise synaptic inputs onto forebrain neurons driving a skilled behavior. J. Neurosci. 35, 299–307 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Nordeen, K.W. & Nordeen, E.J. Auditory feedback is necessary for the maintenance of stereotyped song in adult zebra finches. Behav. Neural Biol. 57, 58–66 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tschida, K.A. & Mooney, R. Deafening drives cell-type-specific changes to dendritic spines in a sensorimotor nucleus important to learned vocalizations. Neuron 73, 1028–1039 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Williams, H., Crane, L.A., Hale, T.K., Esposito, M.A. & Nottebohm, F. Right-side dominance for song control in the zebra finch. J. Neurobiol. 23, 1006–1020 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Picardo, M.A. et al. Population-level representation of a temporal sequence underlying song production in the zebra finch. Neuron 90, 866–876 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Long, M.A., Jin, D.Z. & Fee, M.S. Support for a synaptic chain model of neuronal sequence generation. Nature 468, 394–399 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Weinstein, G.D. & Van Scott, E.J. Autoradiographic analysis of turnover times of normal and psoriatic epidermis. J. Invest. Dermatol. 45, 257–262 (1965).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Creamer, B., Shorter, R.G. & Bamforth, J. The turnover and shedding of epithelial cells. I. The turnover in the gastro-intestinal tract. Gut 2, 110–118 (1961).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Diesmann, M., Gewaltig, M.O. & Aertsen, A. Stable propagation of synchronous spiking in cortical neural networks. Nature 402, 529–533 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mooney, R. & Prather, J.F. The HVC microcircuit: the synaptic basis for interactions between song motor and vocal plasticity pathways. J. Neurosci. 25, 1952–1964 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Amador, A., Perl, Y.S., Mindlin, G.B. & Margoliash, D. Elemental gesture dynamics are encoded by song premotor cortical neurons. Nature 495, 59–64 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Cannon, J., Kopell, N., Gardner, T. & Markowitz, J. Neural sequence generation using spatiotemporal patterns of inhibition. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004581 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Rubino, D., Robbins, K.A. & Hatsopoulos, N.G. Propagating waves mediate information transfer in the motor cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 1549–1557 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Murthy, V.N. & Fetz, E.E. Coherent 25- to 35-Hz oscillations in the sensorimotor cortex of awake behaving monkeys. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 5670–5674 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Dombeck, D.A., Graziano, M.S. & Tank, D.W. Functional clustering of neurons in motor cortex determined by cellular resolution imaging in awake behaving mice. J. Neurosci. 29, 13751–13760 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Peters, A.J., Chen, S.X. & Komiyama, T. Emergence of reproducible spatiotemporal activity during motor learning. Nature 510, 263–267 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hira, R. et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of functional clusters of neurons in the mouse motor cortex during a voluntary movement. J. Neurosci. 33, 1377–1390 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Ohgushi, E., Mori, C. & Wada, K. Diurnal oscillation of vocal development associated with clustered singing by juvenile songbirds. J. Exp. Biol. 218, 2260–2268 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Derégnaucourt, S., Mitra, P.P., Fehér, O., Pytte, C. & Tchernichovski, O. How sleep affects the developmental learning of bird song. Nature 433, 710–716 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Crick, F. & Mitchison, G. The function of dream sleep. Nature 304, 111–114 (1983).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Dave, A.S. & Margoliash, D. Song replay during sleep and computational rules for sensorimotor vocal learning. Science 290, 812–816 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wilson, A.A. et al. Sustained expression of alpha1-antitrypsin after transplantation of manipulated hematopoietic stem cells. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 39, 133–141 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Fee, M.S. & Leonardo, A. Miniature motorized microdrive and commutator system for chronic neural recording in small animals. J. Neurosci. Methods 112, 83–94 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Poole, B., Markowitz, J.E. & Gardner, T.J. The song must go on: resilience of the songbird vocal motor pathway. PLoS One 7, e38173 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Markowitz, J.E., Ivie, E., Kligler, L. & Gardner, T.J. Long-range order in canary song. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1003052 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Lim, Y., Shinn-Cunningham, B. & Gardner, T.J. Stable Time-Frequency Contours for Sparse Signal Representation 1–5 (EUSIPCO, 2013).

  50. Aoi, M., Lepage, K., Lim, Y., Eden, U.T. & Gardner, T.J. An approach to time-frequency analysis with ridges of the continuous chirplet transform. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 63, 699–710 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Tchernichovski, O., Nottebohm, F., Ho, C.E., Pesaran, B. & Mitra, P.P. A procedure for an automated measurement of song similarity. Anim. Behav. 59, 1167–1176 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Sahani, M. Latent Variable Models for Neural Data Analysis. PhD Thesis, (California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA, 1999).

  53. Tolias, A.S. et al. Recording chronically from the same neurons in awake, behaving primates. J. Neurophysiol. 98, 3780–3790 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Quiroga, R.Q., Nadasdy, Z. & Ben-Shaul, Y. Unsupervised spike detection and sorting with wavelets and superparamagnetic clustering. Neural Comput. 16, 1661–1687 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Guizar-Sicairos, M., Thurman, S.T. & Fienup, J.R. Efficient subpixel image registration algorithms. Opt. Lett. 33, 156–158 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank H. Eichenbaum and the Center for Neuroscience at BU for the loan of the Inscopix microscope. Special thanks to D.S. Kim and L. Looger for providing the GCaMP6 DNA and to the GENIE project at Janelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute. This work was supported by a grant from CELEST, an NSF Science of Learning Center (SBE-0354378) and by grants from NINDS (R01-NS089679-01 and 1U01NS090454-01).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jeffrey E Markowitz

    Present address: Present address: Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,

  2. William A Liberti and Jeffrey E Markowitz: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    William A Liberti III, Jeffrey E Markowitz, L Nathan Perkins, Daniel P Leman & Timothy J Gardner

  2. Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    William A Liberti III & L Nathan Perkins

  3. Center for Regenerative Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    Derek C Liberti & Darrell N Kotton

  4. The Pulmonary Center and Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    Derek C Liberti & Darrell N Kotton

  5. Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

    Grigori Guitchounts

  6. Program in Neuroscience, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

    Grigori Guitchounts

  7. Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

    Tarciso Velho & Carlos Lois

  8. Brain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande de Norte, Natal, Brazil

    Tarciso Velho

Authors
  1. William A Liberti III
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeffrey E Markowitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L Nathan Perkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Derek C Liberti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Daniel P Leman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Grigori Guitchounts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Tarciso Velho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Darrell N Kotton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Carlos Lois
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Timothy J Gardner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

W.A.L., J.E.M., G.G. and D.P.L. performed the experiment; J.E.M. and W.A.L. analyzed the data; L.N.P. provided software for the custom microscope; D.C.L., D.N.K., T.V. and C.L. provided the lentivirus; T.V. and C.L. discovered the cell-type-specificity of the viral vector. W.A.L., J.E.M. and T.J.G. designed the experiment and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy J Gardner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 Ensemble measurements are stable over a month-long timescale.

(a) Phase difference of the 30 Hz LFP from 0-30 days (blue) and 31-511 days (red) (n=182 channels from n=21 implants). The mode for each distribution is shown as a dotted line. (b,c) Median RMS and firing rate (FR) during singing are shown for each bird (shown in separate colors) across the time-course of the experiment. Error bars indicate interquartile ranges.

Supplementary Figure 2 Unilateral tracheosyringeal (TS) nerve cut disrupts the acoustic details of song.

Example sonograms are shown for the 5 birds used in this experiment before (a) and after (b) TS nerve cut. The thin colored borders surrounding each sonogram match the colors used in Figure 3c-d.

Supplementary Figure 3 Histological verification of virus used for calcium imaging.

(a) Diagram of experimental strategy for calcium imaging. Virus expressing GCaMP6f was injected into HVC, and a retrograde dye (DiI) was injected into the downstream nucleus Area X. (b) Lentivirus with an RSV promoter produces dense infections of HVC projection neurons. Scale bar indicates 400 µm. Inset, closeup of HVC, bounded by the white dotted line. Scale bar indicates 39 µm. (c) Co-localization of GCaMP6f-expressing neurons in HVC and DiI backfill. Scale bar, 250 µm. (d) View of HVC through a chronically implanted GRIN lens. Scale bar, 250 µm. Experiment was repeated in n=2 of the 4 imaged birds.

Supplementary Figure 4 Schematic of custom camera and acquisition system.

(a) Signals from the camera can be wirelessly relayed with an off-the-shelf wireless transmitter (BOSCAM TX24019 or other). (b) Schematic of the data acquisition device used in this study. (c) To reduce cable weight and torque, our experiments made use of custom active commutators. These devices use the deflection of the magnetic field of a disk magnet located on a flex PCB cable to detect torque via a hall sensor (ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS A1301EUA-T). A feedback circuit mediated by a micro-controller (Arduino UNO) corrects the deflection by rotating a slip ring via a servo-driven gearbox with a 1:1 ratio.

Supplementary Figure 5 Summary of a 5-d longitudinal study from Figure 5a.

Overlay of 3 images, with each image representing the presence or absence of neural activity for a day’s worth of imaging, from an entire 5 day longitudinal study for one bird (GCaMP6s, commercial microscope).

Supplementary Figure 6 Cells change their participation in the motor sequence over periods of sleep

(a) Image overlays from morning and evening on a single day show minimal drift in cell participation. (b) Image overlays from evening to morning on a second day show that significant drift in cell participation occurred over the sleep interval.

Supplementary Figure 7 Examples of stable and unstable cells in the same imaging region.

(a) ROI masks for cells in region. (b) Maximum projection of a 191 x 203 µm subsection of the averaged, song-aligned calcium imaging movies, across 5 d. Arrows highlight two cells in this plane that either drop out (green, yellow) or in (blue) of the neural sequence across days. This region is a smaller section of the total imaging plane, shown in (c) and (d). (c) Three day maximum projection overlay from the data in Figure 5c. The maximum projection image is divided by a smoothed version of the same image (100 pixel disk filter) to normalize across bright and dim ROIs. (d) The last three days of the five day longitudinal study, using the same normalization as in (c).

Supplementary Figure 8 Examples of amplitude traces from multipeaked traces.

(a) Single frame stills from the trial-averaged, song-aligned calcium imaging movies the same animal shown in Supplementary Figure 7, across all 5 days of the longitudinal study. Columns are days, and rows are frame times relative to the start of song. (b) Example of three cells with stable timing and amplitude. Five traces represent five days (ordered top to bottom from day 1 to day 5.). (c) Traces of three cells that are unstable across days, with triangles indicating calcium peak times. Dashed lines indicate times corresponding to each frame from (a).

Supplementary Figure 9 Song shifts over periods of sleep in the adult zebra finch.

(a) Time-frequency probability densities, or spectral density images (SDIs, see Online Methods) were created for the first half and second half of song trials from two consecutive days (“day” is the first half, “night” the second) and overlaid. Top, day and night from the first day (Day 1 and Night 1, respectively), with Day 1 assigned to the blue channel and Night 1 to the red. Middle, Day 2 is assigned to the blue channel, with Night 1 again assigned to red. Bottom, the pixel correlation (SDI corr) between the red and blue channels is shown for each image, blue for Night 1-Day 1 and red for Night 1-Day 2. Increased scatter is found over intervals of sleep. (b) Scatter plots of the pixel values for each spectral density image. (c) Blow-ups of the regions highlighted in (a). Experiment repeated in n=10 birds.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liberti, W., Markowitz, J., Perkins, L. et al. Unstable neurons underlie a stable learned behavior. Nat Neurosci 19, 1665–1671 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4405

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4405

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing