I strive to find the best hummus — and the best experimental approach.
The hummus in Israel is made from freshly cooked chickpeas yielding a creamy, delectably rich spread that complements fresh pitta and Syrian olives. I find conversations flow easily with hummus — whether debating who has the best hummus in town or the best interpretation for a set of experiments. It's a wonder how simple things can be interpreted so differently. Yet, just as the quest for the ultimate hummus can lead to new destinations; so too a simple band on a gel can direct me to one experiment and my colleague to another.
Differences in interpretation that may initially seem trivial could have a crucial impact on the direction and take-home message of a project. I think part of becoming a seasoned scientist is learning how to build confidence in one's ability to interpret data independently and to defend those interpretations.
I experienced this recently while preparing a manuscript. I debated with my colleagues on how to interpret a key phenotype in a pepper mutant. In the end I went with my gut — which, I am learning, is a wise move for a good scientist, and for a hummus aficionado. Now, when I discuss data with friends, it is at my chosen restaurant. Who would have thought my ability to choose between hummus with a touch of cumin or a 'shpritz' of lemon would help me defend my experimental interpretations?
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lippman, Z. Going with your gut. Nature 453, 254 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7192-254c
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7192-254c