Abstract
With the size of plasmonic devices entering into the nanoscale region, the impact of quantum physics needs to be considered. In the past, the quantum size effect on linear material properties has been studied extensively. However, the nonlinear aspects have not been explored much so far. On the other hand, much effort has been put into the field of integrated nonlinear optics and a medium with large nonlinearity is desirable. Here we study the optical nonlinear properties of a nanometre scale gold quantum well by using the z-scan method and nonlinear spectrum broadening technique. The quantum size effect results in a giant optical Kerr susceptibility, which is four orders of magnitude higher than the intrinsic value of bulk gold and several orders larger than traditional nonlinear media. Such high nonlinearity enables efficient nonlinear interaction within a microscopic footprint, making quantum metallic films a promising candidate for integrated nonlinear optical applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Plasmonics, a field which has emerged within the last decade, has brought tremendous new opportunities to control light at scales previously thought impossible1. With the development of nanofabrication techniques, the dimension of plasmonic devices has been shrunk into the nanoscale2, where the impact of quantum physics becomes important3,4. Various nanometre-scale plasmonic devices have shown new features that differ from traditional plasmonics3,4,5,6. Over the past few years, the impact of quantum effects on the linear properties of plasmonic devices has been examined from both experimental4,7 and theoretical8,9,10 points of view. The generation of nonlinearity through confinement of electrons has been extensively explored in the context of semiconductor quantum wells since the 1980s11, where both the second-12 and third-order nonlinear response13 have been reported. Size-dependent nonlinear effects have been investigated in some of the previous studies on metallic nanoparticle systems14,15. However, the particle size was not small enough for the quantum size effect to play an important role in those systems and the significant contribution instead came from the hot electrons, which was a non-instantaneous nonlinear response.
Nonlinear optics has been an extensive research focus since the invention of the laser in the 1960s. The nonlinear interaction of light with matter itself leads to many interesting physical phenomena, such as harmonic generation16, optical parametric oscillation17 and optical soliton18. In addition, the nonlinear effects also lead to many useful practical applications. For example, frequency combs generated in optical cavities have been applied in metrology19 and optical communication systems20, and super-continuum generation through photonic crystal fibres is nowadays routinely used as a coherent broadband light source in imaging21. However, despite much effort and many years of advancement in this field, chip-scale-integrated nonlinear optics has yet to be realized owing to the lack of materials with exceptionally high nonlinear responses.
In this study, we investigate the optical Kerr nonlinear properties of a nanometre-scale gold quantum well, and find that the quantum size effect can lead to a giant nonlinear response, which shows a several-order enhancement compared to traditional nonlinear materials, making the thin metallic quantum well promising for on-chip-integrated nonlinear applications.
Results
Sample characterization
Figure 1a shows a transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of the cross-section of one of the 3 nm metal quantum well (MQW) samples (Methods). The confinement of the ‘free’ electrons of gold is realized by the large band gap of the two oxide materials (Al2O3 and SiO2). As shown in the zoomed-in view of the TEM image (Fig. 1b), the gold film is continuous at the thickness of 3 nm. Although TEM figure can accurately tell us the thickness information of the MQW, atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurement is used to obtain the surface roughness right after the Au film deposition. Figure 1c shows the statistics of the film thickness variations through the AFM measurement, where we can see the surface roughness (root mean square) is about ±0.25 nm.
Z-scan measurement
To characterize the nonlinear optical properties of the MQW, z-scan experiment is performed (see schematic setup in Fig. 2a). Z-scan measurement is a sensitive and simple technique for measuring the complex nonlinear refractive index of a material22. Closed (normalized to open) and open aperture z-scan curve of the 3 nm MQW with 900 nm incident wavelength and 111 mW incident power is depicted using red circles in Fig. 2b,d, respectively. By fitting with the standard z-scan theory22, the Kerr coefficient is calculated to be (3.9–0.51i) × 10−9 cm2 W−1 (Methods). To obtain the third-order susceptibility, the refractive index n and extinction coefficient k is needed. For this purpose, reflection and transmission measurements are performed and a two-dimensional Newton’s method together with a multilayer transmission algorithm is used to extract the n, k-values (Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1). With n=0.4 and k=3.7, the third-order nonlinear susceptibility is calculated by23
which gives χ(3)=(0.49+2.0i) × 10−15 m2 V−2. The magnitude of this value shows a four-order enhancement compared with the intrinsic value of bulk gold measured by four wave mixing24. The measured Kerr coefficient of the 3 nm MQW is six to eight orders larger than that of the traditional nonlinear mediums, such as fused silica23. It is worth noting that our sample is a flat metal film and no plasmonic mode (either localized or propagating) can be excited in the experiment. This rules out possible contributions from local field enhancement25,26, but purely an intrinsic response of the MQW. It also indicates that the nonlinear response of the MQW may be further boosted by combining with additional plasmonic resonance structures with large field-enhancement factors. The incident power-dependent nonlinear phase changes is plotted out in Fig. 2c. Clearly, all data fall on a straight line crossing origin, confirming the detected nonlinear effect comes solely from the third-order Kerr response23.
The physical reasons for such a giant nonlinear response are the quantum size effect and the high free electron density of the metal. According to the nonlinear theory23, the third-order nonlinear susceptibility is proportional to , where N is the density of free electrons, is the dipole transition elements associated with the transition between state n and m, the denominator is related to the resonant transition and γmn is a damping term. The magnitude of χ(3) is mainly determined by N and μmn. Owing to the confinement effect, free electrons of the metal are quantized into subbands where their wave functions in the quantum well direction have an extension that is comparable to the well width d (∼several nanometres)11. The dipole transition elements associated to these inter-subband transitions are on the order of e·nanometre, which is much larger than those of the traditional nonlinear crystals (Supplementary Note 2). On the other hand, the N of a typical MQW is on the order of 1028 m−3, much higher than that of a typical semiconductor quantum well. These two facts imply that the nonlinear response of a MQW would be much larger than that of traditional nonlinear crystals and semiconductor quantum wells, making it among the most promising material systems for nonlinear applications.
As a direct comparison and verification, z-scan measurements for a thick gold film (15 nm gold film grown on quartz substrate with 6 nm Al2O3 on top) are also performed with 900 nm incident wavelength and 690 mW incident laser power. For a 15 nm gold film, the impact of quantum size effect is much smaller. As shown in Fig. 2b, no signal is detected at the closed aperture. For the open aperture, a change in normalized transmission ΔT=−0.133% is recorded, which results in an imaginary part for the Kerr coefficient to be 3.4 × 10−12 cm2 W−1. Using the literature data for the n and k for bulk gold27 at 900 nm (n=0.17 and k=5.72), the third-order nonlinear susceptibility for 15 nm gold is calculated to be χ(3)=(−9.1+0.35i) × 10−19 m2 V−2, which agrees reasonably well with previous z-scan measurements of gold Kerr nonlinearity using femtosecond laser sources (≤100 fs)28,29. The measurement results are summarized and compared in Table 1. The |χ(3)| of 15 nm gold film is slightly larger than that of the bulky gold measured by four wave mixing24, which might relate to the weak confinement effect30. The slightly larger |χ(3)| from ref. 28 using z-scan with 100 fs pulse compared with ref. 24 could come from using a wavelength closer to the interband transition. The much larger |χ(3)| reported by using 5.8 ps pulse is due to the thermal nonlinear response.
Wavelength dependence of the third-order nonlinearity
The nonlinear response of the MQW is related to the transition of the quantized ‘free’ electrons between the subbands, which is determined by the MQW geometry. To explore this feature, z-scan experiment is performed on the 3 nm MQW by scanning the wavelength from 690 to 1,020 nm (limited by our femtosecond laser source). The measured nonlinear coefficients, both the real and imaginary parts, are plotted using red and green dots, respectively, in Fig. 3a. The measured nonlinear indices of the 3 nm MQW clearly show two resonance peaks in the measured spectral range, near 740 and 900 nm, respectively.
To fully understand the nonlinear optical properties of the MQW, a quantum electrostatic model31 that is based on the self-consistent solution from Schrödinger and Poisson equations is used to calculate the eigen-state wave functions and eigen energies. As shown in Fig. 3b, there are eight quantized states supported by this MQW. More specifically, we found that the transitions of the fifth to sixth and sixth to seventh eigen-energy states correspond to the experimentally observed resonant peaks around 900 and 740 nm, respectively (Supplementary Note 4 and Supplementary Fig. 2). After that, a standard approach that is based on perturbation theory23 is adopted to calculate the χ(3) of the MQW. Variations in the film thickness would lead to the broadening of the resonance feature of the material response. To take this effect into account, a Gaussian-broadening approach32 is adopted by using the thickness variation data obtained from AFM measurement (detailed calculation and discussion can be found in Supplementary Notes 2 and 5). Finally, the calculated Kerr coefficients (both the real part and imaginary part) are plotted using dotted-line curves in Fig. 3a, which agree well with the experimental results.
Nonlinear spectral broadening measurement
Thermal effect can play a very important role in z-scan experiment33. The Kerr coefficient of gold film has been reported as high as 10−8 cm2 W−1 previously using z-scan method34,35, where pulses with picosecond or even nanosecond duration were used. For such long pulse width, the dominant nonlinearity is the thermal effect36,37. In our experiment, pulses of only 80 fs are used and this effect can be neglected. To further exclude other contributions from thermal nonlinearity, the measurement of spectral broadening of a pulse due to self-phase modulation38 is performed, as shown in Fig. 4. The reason is that optical Kerr response is an instantaneous response, whereas athermal and thermal effects (Supplementary Notes 6 and 7) are much slower than Kerr response and would not lead to spectral broadening. The self-phase modulation-induced spectral broadening effect is proportional to the nonlinear phase Re(n2) × I × k × Leff, where I is the light intensity, k is the wave vector and Leff is the effective length38. Full simulation of optical pulse propagation38 is performed by using the experimentally measure nonlinear coefficients and the corresponding transmitted spectrum are plotted using solid black lines in Fig. 4. As can be seen here, excellent agreement between theory and experiment is found, indicating that the third-order nonlinear effect measured from z-scan is indeed from the instantaneous Kerr response and the contribution from thermal effect can be neglected.
Discussion
To summarize, we demonstrated giant Kerr nonlinear responses in MQW structures by the combination of the quantum size effect and the high free electron density of metal films. The measured nonlinear Kerr susceptibility |χ(3)| reaches as high as 2.06 × 10−15 m2 V−2, showing a four order-of-magnitude enhancement compared with the intrinsic value of bulk gold24,29. Spectral broadening measurements confirm that the third-order nonlinear effect is an instantaneous Kerr response. Comparing with the localized surface plasmon resonance based nonlinear effects, the MQWs have the advantages of broadband operation and free of scattering (Supplementary Note 8). We expect that MQW structures can be easily combined with existing nano-photonic waveguides for integrated nonlinear optics39, opening new opportunities for on-chip nonlinear optical applications with exceptionally high integration density.
Methods
Sample fabrication and characterizations
The commercial magneto-sputtering machine AJA International in Nano3 facility at Calit2 was used for thin gold film growth and the qualities of the thin gold films were characterized by both TEM (FEI Tecnai) cross-section imaging and AFM (nanoScience Instruments) surface morphology mapping. Focused ion beam (FEI Scios DualBeam) milling was used to prepare the samples for later TEM imaging, as shown in Fig. 1 in the manuscript.
Reflection and transmission of the sample were measured by the commercialized spectrophotometer Lambda 1,050 system. Ti-sapphire laser (Mai Tai HP) was used for all the nonlinear measurement with Si Transimpedance Amplified Photodetectors (Thorlabs PDA100A) as the detector.
Obtaining the nonlinear index from z-scan measurement
This section shows how to obtain the nonlinear index of the 3 nm gold quantum well from measured z-scan curves in Fig. 2. From standard z-scan theory22, the closed aperture transmittance (after normalization to the open signal) can be expressed as:
where , k=2π/λ is the wave vector and x=z/z0, I0 is the peak intensity, and Leff=(1−e−αL)/α is the effective length with α as the linear absorption coefficient. is the diffraction length of a Gaussian laser beam with w0 as the beam waist at focus. By best fitting equation (2) with the closed aperture z-scan curve shown in Fig. 2b, the maximum nonlinear phase shift ΔΦ0 is determined to be 0.24 for the z-scan curves shown in Fig. 2 in the manuscript. By substituting all other parameters (laser intensity, effective length and wave vector), the value for the real part of the nonlinear index (Kerr coefficient) is finally calculated to be Re(n2)=3.97 × 10−9 cm2 W−1 at 900 nm for our 3 nm gold quantum well.
It is noteworthy that in the 3 nm quantum well sample, the thickness of the quartz substrate and the top Al2O3 layer are 300 μm and 6 nm, respectively. Considering that the nonlinear Kerr coefficient for quartz and Al2O3 are only 3.2 × 10−20 and 2.9 × 10−20 m2 W−1, respectively, the contribution to the nonlinear phase shift from these two materials can be safely neglected. Indeed, the fact that the 15 nm gold sample has no detectable closed-aperture z-scan signal is also the experimental proof that the contribution from the substrate and top Al2O3 material is negligible compared with the 3 nm gold quantum well.
The normalized open aperture transmittance gives the information regarding the imaginary part of the Kerr coefficient. The normalized open z-scan curve can be expressed as:
where , with m is an integer starting from 0. For the case of 3 nm, the transmission is increased by about 2.5% at the focus, corresponding to the phenomenon of saturable absorption. By fitting equation (2) to the z-scan curve, the imaginary part of Kerr coefficient for the 3 nm gold quantum well is calculated to be −5.1 × 10−10 cm2 W−1. For 15 nm gold film, a very small decrease in the transmission (ΔT=−0.133%) is observed, corresponding to the two-photon absorption, which is typically observed for bulk gold. More specifically, by fitting the experimental data with z-scan theory, a value of 3.4 × 10−12 cm2 W−1 is obtained for the 15 nm gold film.
Data availability
The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Qian, H. et al. Giant Kerr response of ultrathin gold films from quantum size effect. Nat. Commun. 7, 13153 doi: 10.1038/ncomms13153 (2016).
References
Barnes, W. L., Dereux, A. & Ebbesen, T. W. Surface plasmon subwavelength optics. Nature 424, 824–830 (2003).
Stockman, M. I. Nanoplasmonics: past, present, and glimpse into future. Opt. Express 19, 22029–22106 (2011).
Tame, M. S. et al. Quantum plasmonics. Nat. Phys. 9, 329–340 (2013).
Scholl, J. A., Koh, A. L. & Dionne, J. A. Quantum plasmon resonances of individual metallic nanoparticles. Nature 483, 421–427 (2012).
Khajavikhan, M. et al. Thresholdless nanoscale coaxial lasers. Nature 482, 204–207 (2012).
Savage, K. J. et al. Revealing the quantum regime in tunnelling plasmonics. Nature 491, 574–577 (2012).
Dryzek, J. & Czapla, A. Quantum size effect in optical spectra of thin metallic films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 721–724 (1987).
Mortensen, N. A., Raza, S., Wubs, M., Søndergaard, T. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. A generalized non-local optical response theory for plasmonic nanostructures. Nat. Commun. 5, 3809 (2014).
Esteban, R., Borisov, A. G., Nordlander, P. & Aizpurua, J. Bridging quantum and classical plasmonics with a quantum-corrected model. Nat. Commun. 3, 825 (2012).
Wood, D. M. & Ashcroft, N. W. Quantum size effects in the optical-properties of small metallic particles. Phys. Rev. B. 25, 6255–6274 (1982).
Schmittrink, S., Chemla, D. S. & Miller, D. A. B. Linear and nonlinear optical-properties of semiconductor Quantum wells. Adv. Phys. 38, 89–188 (1989).
Lee, J. et al. Giant nonlinear response from plasmonic metasurfaces coupled to intersubband transitions. Nature 511, 65–69 (2014).
Sirtori, C., Capasso, F., Sivco, D. L. & Cho, A. Y. Giant, triply resonant, third-order nonlinear susceptibility χ3 ω (3) in coupled quantum wells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1010–1013 (1992).
Drachev, V. P., Buin, A. K., Nakotte, H. & Shalaev, V. M. Size dependent χ(3) for conduction electrons in Ag nanoparticles. Nano. Lett. 4, 1535–1539 (2004).
Hache, F., Ricard, D. & Flytzanis, C. Optical nonlinearities of small metal particles: surface-mediated resonance and quantum size effects. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 3, 1647–1655 (1986).
Fejer, M. M., Magel, G. A., Jundt, D. H. & Byer, R. L. Quasi-phase-matched second harmonic generation: tuning and tolerances. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 28, 2631–2654 (1992).
Foster, M. A. et al. Broad-band optical parametric gain on a silicon photonic chip. Nature 441, 960–963 (2006).
Mollenauer, L. F., Stolen, R. H. & Gordon, J. P. Experimental observation of picosecond pulse narrowing and solitons in optical fibers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1095–1098 (1980).
Del’Haye, P. et al. Optical frequency comb generation from a monolithic microresonator. Nature 450, 1214–1217 (2007).
Pfeifle, J. et al. Coherent terabit communications with microresonator Kerr frequency combs. Nat. Photonics 8, 375–380 (2014).
Dudley, J. M., Genty, G. & Coen, S. Supercontinuum generation in photonic crystal fiber. Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 1135–1184 (2006).
Sheik-Bahae, M., Said, A. A., Wei, T. H., Hagan, D. J. & Stryland, E. W. V. Sensitive measurement of optical nonlinearities using a single beam. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 26, 760–769 (1990).
Boyd, R. W. Nonlinear Optics. 3rd edn (Academic Press (2008).
Renger, J., Quidant, R., van Hulst, N. & Novotny, L. Surface-enhanced nonlinear four-wave mixing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 046803 (2010).
Marinica, D. C., Kazansky, A. K., Nordlander, P., Aizpurua, J. & Borisov, A. G. Quantum plasmonics: nonlinear effects in the field enhancement of a plasmonic nanoparticle dimer. Nano. Lett. 12, 1333–1339 (2012).
Papadopoulos, M. G., Sadlej, A. J. & Leszczynski, J. Non-Linear Optical Properties of Matter Springer (2006).
Johnson, P. B. & Christy, R. W. Optical constants of the noble metals. Phys. Rev. B. 6, 4370–4379 (1972).
Rotenberg, N., Bristow, A. D., Pfeiffer, M., Betz, M. & van Driel, H. M. Nonlinear absorption in Au films: role of thermal effects. Phys. Rev. B. 75, 155426 (2007).
Boyd, R. W., Shi, Z. M. & De Leon, I. The third-order nonlinear optical susceptibility of gold. Opt. Commun. 326, 74–79 (2014).
Lysenko, O., Bache, M. & Lavrinenko, A. Third-order susceptibility of gold for ultrathin layers. Opt. Lett. 41, 317–320 (2016).
Qian, H., Xiao, Y., Lepage, D., Chen, L. & Liu, Z. Quantum electrostatic model for optical properties of nanoscale gold films. Nanophotonics 4, 413–418 (2015).
Hamedi, H. R. & Juzeliūnas, G. Phase-sensitive Kerr nonlinearity for closed-loop quantum systems. Phys. Rev. A 91, 053823 (2015).
de Nalda, R. et al. Limits to the determination of the nonlinear refractive index by the Z-scan method. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 19, 289–296 (2002).
Smith, D. D. et al. z-scan measurement of the nonlinear absorption of a thin gold film. J. Appl. Phys. 86, 6200–6205 (1999).
Wang, P. et al. Surface-enhanced optical nonlinearity of a gold film. Opt. Commun. 229, 425–429 (2004).
Conforti, M. & Della Valle, G. Derivation of third-order nonlinear susceptibility of thin metal films as a delayed optical response. Phys. Rev. B. 85, 245423 (2012).
Guillet, Y., Rashidi-Huyeh, M. & Palpant, B. Influence of laser pulse characteristics on the hot electron contribution to the third-order nonlinear optical response of gold nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. B. 79, 045410 (2009).
Agrawal, G. P. Nonlinear Fiber Optics Academic Press (2007).
Moss, D. J., Morandotti, R., Gaeta, A. L. & Lipson, M. New CMOS-compatible platforms based on silicon nitride and Hydex for nonlinear optics. Nat. Photonics 7, 597–607 (2013).
Acknowledgements
We thank Yunfeng Jiang for help on TEM sample characterization, and Qian Ma and Kangwei Wang for help on the spectrum broadening setup. We acknowledge financial support from the Office of Naval Research (ONR) Young Investigator Award (Grant Number N00014-13-1-0535) and the ONR MURI programme (N00014-13-1-0678).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.Q. and Y.X. designed and performed the experiments. H.Q. performed the sample growth and characterization. Y.X. performed the theoretical work. All authors analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. Z.L. supervised the research.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figures 1-2, Supplementary Notes 1-8 and Supplementary References (PDF 549 kb)
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Qian, H., Xiao, Y. & Liu, Z. Giant Kerr response of ultrathin gold films from quantum size effect. Nat Commun 7, 13153 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13153
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13153
This article is cited by
-
Electrically induced directional self-focusing in electrochromic NiO thin solid films
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics (2023)
-
A laser beam weakening the protective capacity of optical limiting devices
Applied Physics B (2022)
-
Highly-efficient electrically-driven localized surface plasmon source enabled by resonant inelastic electron tunneling
Nature Communications (2021)
-
Nanoscale nonlinear plasmonics in photonic waveguides and circuits
La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento (2021)
-
Photonic Spin Hall Effect Modified by Ultrathin Au Films and Monolayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides in One-Dimensional Photonic Crystal
Plasmonics (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.