Abstract
Recent studies have suggested that circadian genes have important roles in maintaining the circadian rhythm of the cardiovascular system. However, the associations between diurnal BP changes and circadian genes remain undetermined. We conducted a genetic association study of young-onset hypertension, in which 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring was performed. A total of 23 tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on 11 genes involved in circadian rhythms were genotyped for correlations with diurnal BP variation phenotypes. A permutation test was used to correct for multiple testing. Five tag SNPs within five loci, including rs3888170 in NPAS2, rs6431590 in PER2, rs1410225 in RORββ, rs3816358 in BMAL1 and rs10519096 in RORα, were significantly associated with the non-dipper phenotype in 372 young hypertensive patients. A genetic risk score was generated by counting the risk alleles and effects for each individual. Genotyping was performed in an additional independent set of 619 young-onset hypertensive subjects. Altogether, non-dippers had a higher weighted genetic risk score than dippers (1.67±0.56 vs. 1.54±0.55, P<0.001), and the additive genetic risk score also indicated a graded association with decreased diurnal BP changes (P=0.006), as well as a non-dipper phenotype (P=0.031). After multivariable logistic analysis, only the circadian genetic risk score (odds ratio (OR), 1550; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.225–1.961, P<0.001) and the use of β-blockers (OR, 1.519; 95% CI, 1.164–1.982, P=0.003) were independently associated with the presence of non-dippers among subjects with young-onset hypertension. Genetic variants in circadian genes were associated with the diurnal phenotype of hypertension, suggesting a genetic association with diurnal BP changes in essential hypertension.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Hypertension is a multifactorial genetic trait that can be influenced by differential gene–gene interaction, variable penetrance and various environmental factors. Although >20 genes have been assessed for their general genetic associations with essential hypertension,1 the identification of an ‘intermediate phenotype’, such as a specific subgroup of hypertensive patients with more homogeneous baseline characteristics and genetic backgrounds, could have particular clinical significance. A cluster of candidate genes, which could be assessed and managed more reliably, might contribute to the determining potential pathophysiology and determining the clinical outcomes of these patients.
It is well known that blood pressure (BP) can vary diurnally and exhibit a decrease of >10%, a so-called ‘dip’, at nighttime compared with that in the daytime during our normal daily lives. With the use of an ambulatory BP monitor, we previously identified a subgroup of young hypertensive patients who did not experience normal nighttime decreases in BP, corresponding to so-called ‘non-dipper’ hypertension.2 Compared with dipper hypertensive patients, non-dipper hypertensive patients had significantly more severe autonomic dysfunction, glucose metabolism abnormalities and vascular complications.2 Accumulating clinical evidence has further indicated that blunted normal nocturnal BP variation could be associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality,3 suggesting that non-dipper hypertensives might constitute a particular subgroup of hypertensive patients at high risk for future adverse events. Although early identification and risk stratification are mandatory, the underlying mechanisms linking hypertensive patients with the presence of non-dipper status are not adequately understood. Multiple possible pathophysiologies, such as abnormal neurohormonal regulation, lack of physical activity, increased dietary sodium intake, smoking and genetic predisposition, have been proposed.
Recently, the link between circadian clock function and metabolic diseases has attracted attention. Turek et al.4 demonstrated that clock-mutant mice developed the features of metabolic syndrome, including hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia. Ando et al.5 demonstrated that rhythmic mRNA expression of clock genes was dampened in the peripheral leukocytes of patients with type 2 diabetes. In addition to metabolic syndrome and diabetes, genes governing circadian rhythms, such as BMAL16 and NPAS2,7 have been reported to be associated with hypertension. However, whether circadian genes contribute to diurnal BP change remains to be determined. Heritability studies seeking genetic evidence of familial aggregation have suggested that diurnal variability in BP might be partially under genetic control.8 Furthermore, melatonin, which modulates the central circadian rhythm, significantly affected the variability of BP.9 Taken together, one could speculate about the potential role of genetic regulation of circadian rhythms in diurnal BP changes. To avoid the influence of the aging process and environmental factors, we focused particularly on young-onset hypertension, which is believed to involve a more prevalent genetic component in the pathogenesis of essential hypertension. We investigated whether circadian genes were associated with the presence of the non-dipper phenotype. Given the accumulating evidence linking non-dipper hypertension to elevated CVD risk, our findings in relatively young patients might provide specific genetic insights into early risk identification, stratification and management in clinical practice.10
Methods
Patients
A total of 991 patients with young-onset hypertension were recruited for the Academia Sinica Multi-center Young-Onset Hypertension Genetic Study. The diagnostic criteria for young-onset hypertension have been previously reported.11 Hypertensive patients were included if their systolic BP was >140 mm Hg and/or if their diastolic BP was >90 mm Hg over a period of 2 months or if they were taking any antihypertensive medications. All of the study patients had to have received their initial diagnoses of essential hypertension at between 20 and 51 years of age. Furthermore, upon enrollment, the potential causes of secondary hypertension, including chronic renal disease, renal arterial stenosis, primary aldosteronism, coarctation of the aorta, thyroid disorders, Cushing syndrome and pheochromocytoma, were carefully excluded by extensive review of medical records and by further clinical examinations and investigations, including blood chemistry and endocrinology tests for each patient. Patients diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (fasting glucose >126 mg dl–1) or marked obese status (body mass index >35 kg m–2) were also excluded from this study. The study protocol was approved by the Human Investigation Committee of the Institute of Biochemical Science, Academia Sinca, Taiwan, and all of the subjects provided written informed consent
Ambulatory BP monitoring
After enrollment, all of the patients underwent ambulatory BP monitoring for 24 h on a weekday with one of the three available automatic devices. The device was an Oscar oscillometric ambulatory BP monitor (Sun Tech Medical Instruments, Eynsham, Oxfordshire, UK). All of the patients were fitted with the device at between 0800 and 1000 h. The device was programmed to record BP and heart rate (HR) every 30 min throughout the day and night. BP and HR were measured automatically by detecting the Korotkoff sounds during stepwise deflations (3.0±1.0 mm Hg per step). The accuracy of the BP monitoring devices was validated in our previous study.12
Diurnal BP change and the definition of non-dipper hypertension
For each recording, the study patients were advised to go to bed at 2300 h and to wake up at 0700 h. All medications were administered in the morning. The patients were also asked to record their real sleeping time if it was beyond this range. The BP measurements during sleep were then used as the nighttime BP, whereas the other BP recordings were used as the daytime BP. The difference between daytime BP and nighttime BP was calculated. In this study, the presence of non-dipper hypertension was defined a reduction in the mean BP of <10% at nighttime, compared with that in the daytime. Patients with non-dipper hypertension were identified as non-dippers.
Candidate gene selection and genotyping methods
Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood using the Puregene DNA isolation kit (GentraSystems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). A two-stage genotyping approach was applied in this study. We used power calculation to calculate power of two-stage study.13 When we assumed that an additive-effect disease model with a prevalence of 13.4% for young-onset hypertension,14 a genetic relative risk of 2, and a disease allele frequency of 0.2–0.4, the power of our two-stage analysis was 0.87–0.90. Based on the results of power calculation, we divided all samples into two groups randomly to exam association between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of candidate genes and the diurnal BP pattern. During the first stage, a total of 23 tag SNPs on 11 genes involved in circadian rhythms were selected from the HapMap Project (International HapMap Consortium). These genes were CLOCK15 (rs6811520, rs11932595, rs11931061), BMAL18 (rs11022742, rs7924734, rs3816358), DEC116 (rs1110261, rs908078), DEC216 (rs3809140), CRY117 (rs11113179, rs10861704), PER118 (rs2253820, rs2278637), PER219 (rs6431590, rs10462023), NPAS120 (rs1862499), NPAS27 (rs3888170, rs2305160), RORα21 (rs17237318, rs10519096) and RORβ22 (rs10512037, rs11144064). Genotyping assays were performed by the Academia Sinica National Genotyping Center (Taipei, Taiwan), using the Sequenom MassARRAY System (San Diego, CA, USA). Genotype calling was performed using the automatic call system implemented in the Sequenom Typer software (Sequenom). SNPs were excluded if the minor allele frequency was <1% or if it was not in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. During the second stage, SNPs that were significantly associated with the non-dipper phenotype were genotyped in another independent set of 619 patients with young-onset hypertension, to generate a genetic risk score for analyzing the genetic associations between circadian genes and the non-dipper phenotype.
Statistical analysis
The genotype frequency, allele frequency and Hardy–Weinberg P-value were calculated using Pearson's exact test. Allelic association analysis was performed using the X2 test. The coefficients and odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with logistic regression analysis. For the first stage of genotyping, risk factors, including sex, age, smoking habit and antihypertensive treatment, were controlled to determine the independent SNPs associated with non-dipper hypertension. Permutation tests based on 10 000 replications were also performed to correct the genotypic P-value using PLINK.26 Analysis of a false discovery rate23 using SAS GENETICS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was performed to account for a multiple test correction. The associations between non-dipper hypertension and SNPs were evaluated by adjusting for multiple tests of all genes using a board threshold, false discovery rate P-value <0.1 in the first stage. The SNP for each individual gene that had a significant, independent association with the non-dipper phenotype was selected for second-stage genotyping. Joint analysis of the combined genetic information from both stages of genotyping (stage 1 and stage 2) was then performed to detect genetic associations, as previously prescribed.13 A genetic score was generated by counting the risk alleles for each individual.24 To assess further the impact of SNP markers in determining non-dipper status, weighted generic scores were generated, and non-dipper-associated SNP markers were entered into a multivariate regression model to obtain the regression coefficients for weighted genetic risk scores. The weighted sum of the risk allele account was calculated, and the weight for each SNP was the coefficient derived from the multivariate regression of these SNPs, as a previous study reported.25 Logistic analyses were performed to investigate the factors that were independently associated with non-dipper hypertension after adjusting for risk factors, including age, sex, body mass index and antihypertensive agents. PLINK software26 and SPSS software (v. 15.0, SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) were used for statistical analysis.
Results
The basic characteristics of the 372 first-stage young-onset hypertension subjects are shown in Table 1. Young-onset hypertensive subjects with the non-dipper phenotype had higher baseline nighttime BP and smaller diurnal BP changes than those with dipper hypertension. Five tag SNPs within five loci, rs3888170 in NPAS2 (P=0.04), rs6431590 in PER2 (P=0.02), rs1410225 in RORβ (P=0.039), rs3816358 in BMAL1 (P=0.03) and rs10519096 in RORα (P=0.01), were significantly associated with the non-dipper phenotype in 372 young hypertensive patients (Table 2). These five SNPs were then genotyped in another independent set of 619 young-onset hypertension patients. There was no evidence of population stratification for these 1000 young-onset hypertensive subjects, who were assessed in our previous study.27 Table 3 shows the effects of these five SNP associated with the non-dipper phenotype. Weighted generic scores were generated by counting the risk alleles and effects. A joint analysis of both stages of genotype information was performed to detect the genetic associations between circadian genes and the non-dipper phenotype.
Among the total 991 young-onset hypertensive patients, systolic BP and diastolic BP during the sleeping period were lower in patients with dipper hypertension than in those patients with non-dipper hypertension (109.77±11.27 vs. 119.02±12.77 mm Hg; 71.76±9.08 vs. 78.05±10.05 mm Hg, P<0.001, respectively; Table 4). In contrast, daytime systolic BP and diastolic BP, recorded by the ambulatory BP monitor, were higher in dippers than in non-dippers (128.29±12.57 vs. 123.88±12.82 mm Hg; 86.22±9.73 vs. 83.6±10.14 mm Hg, P<0.001, respectively). The diurnal BP change was greater in patients with dipper hypertension (17.06±5.84% vs. 4.23±4.47%, P<0.001) than in those with non-dipper hypertension. Moreover, there was more frequent use of β-blockade agents in patients with non-dipper hypertension than in those with dipper hypertension (P<0.001). Higher genetic risk scores were observed in patients with non-dipper hypertension than in those with dipper hypertension (1.67±0.56 vs. 1.54±0.55, P<0.001). Genetic risk scores were evenly distributed in the population (Figure 1a), and the cumulative incidence of patients with non-dipper phenotypes increased significantly with the score (P=0.031; Figure 1b). Furthermore, the percentage changes in diurnal BP decreased gradually as the genetic risk score increased (P=0.006; Figure 1c), indicating that the genetic risk score was associated with dampened normal diurnal blood changes, as well as the with non-dipper phenotype. When compared with a genetic score of 1.6–2.0, which was the median score, the risk difference was nine times higher in the highest genetic score group than in the lowest genetic score group, and the adjusted ORs for the presence of non-dipper hypertension increased significantly with the genetic risk score (Figure 2). After multivariate analysis adjusted for risk factors and antihypertensive agents, only the genetic risk score (OR, 1550; 95% CI, 1.225–1.961, P<0.001) and the use of β-blockers (OR, 1.519; 95% CI, 1.164–1.982, P=0.003) were independently associated with the presence of non-dipper status among subjects with young-onset hypertension (Table 5).
Discussion
This study is the first study especially using candidate gene approach focusing on young-onset hypertensive subjects and ambulatory BP monitor to evaluate the association between circadian genes and diurnal BP change. In this study, we generated a genetic score to test the predicted value of genetic score in determining non-dipper hypertension. The additive circadian genetic score was significantly associated with the diurnal change in BP as well as the presence of non-dipper hypertension. Interestingly, both the use of β-blockers and the genetic risk score were independently associated with the presence of the non-dipper phenotype, suggesting complex interactions among genetics, drugs and diurnal BP changes in essential hypertension.
Circadian clock system for cardiovascular physiology
Cardiovascular or hemodynamic parameters, such as HR and BP, exhibit variations that are consistent with circadian rhythms.28 Cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction, stroke and sudden cardiac death, demonstrate marked circadian variations,29 and patients with impaired circadian patterns in BP are at increased risk for cardiovascular complications.3 The circadian system is responsible for regulating physiological rhythms, and it consists of multiple negative and positive regulatory pathways.30 The circadian system includes the transcriptional–translational autoregulatory loop, which is located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus within the hypothalamus in the brain, which generates the molecular oscillations of circadian genes that regulate downstream oscillators in peripheral tissues.30 In brief, CLOCK and BMAL induce the expression of several genes by binding to E-box enhancer elements in the promoters of target genes, including Period genes (PER1/2/3) and Cryptochrome genes (CRY1/2), the protein products of which are PER and CRY, respectively, which negatively regulate the activation of their own expression by inhibiting the activity of the CLOCK/BMAL1 complex, thereby constituting a negative feedback loop.31 Another regulatory loop is induced by CLOCK/BMAL1 heterodimers that activate the transcription of the retinoic acid-related orphan nuclear receptors REV-ERBαα and RORα.32, 33 Members of ROR (α, β and γ) and REV-ERB (α and β) could regulate BMAL1.
Circadian genes and non-dipper hypertension
This study first showed the associations between circadian genes and non-dipper hypertension. Candidate genes, including CLOCK, BMAL1, PER1/2, CRY1/2, DEC1/2, NPAS1/2 and ROR (α and β), which were either directly or indirectly involved in circadian rhythms, were selected for our study. SNPs in BMAL1 were recently identified as susceptible genetic markers for hypertension in a family association study.6 NPAS2 was also reported to be associated with hypertension.7 Animal studies have shown that altered Bmal1 levels could contribute to hypertension in spontaneously hypertensive rats by producing aberrant sleep patterns and changes in the macrostructure of sleep.34 It is believed that sleep disruptions have an important role in hypertensive models.35 Modification of the NPAS2 gene could alter sleep patterns, and the physiologic function of PER2 influences behavior sensitization to psychostimulants.9 Animal studies have demonstrated that ablating core clock genes causes either an attenuated or a flattened BP rhythm in mice,36 suggesting the importance of the circadian clock in BP regulation.
Our study showed that risk alleles in the NPAS2, PER2, RORα, RORβ and BMAL1 genes were associated with an increased risk of non-dipper hypertension. Patients with more risk alleles were at greater risk than those with fewer risk alleles. However, the mechanisms underlying ‘circadian genes’ and their involvement in regulating BP, leading to cardiovascular complications, remain undetermined.37 Barclay et al.38 recently demonstrated that circadian desynchrony caused by shiftwork in a mouse model could cause disruption of diurnal liver transcriptome rhythms, enriching the pathways involved in glucose and lipid metabolism. This study result provided a possible linking between the circadian clock and cardiovascular risk. In addition, Burgueño et al.39 showed increased serum levels of resistin, a cardiovascular biomarker, in rotating shiftworkers. Furthermore, Sookoian et al.40 reported that rotating shiftworkers carried a higher risk of metabolic syndrome and higher systemic inflammation, independent of age or physical activity. Together, the circadian clock contributes to cardiovascular events that could involve pathways of metabolism and systemic inflammation. Recent studies have demonstrated that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) interact with the molecular clock components and have important roles in maintaining cellular energy metabolism.41 PPARα could induce BMAL1 gene expression,42 and the transcription of PPARα was also regulated by the CLOCK-BMAL1 complex.43 In addition, PPARγ, which controls lipid metabolism, has been reported to regulate the transcription of the BMAL1 and Rev-erbα genes.44, 45 In addition, it has also been reported that PER2 participates in cellular energy homeostasis and that it is regulated by PPARα46 and PPARγ.47 Interestingly, a recent animal study indicated that increased PPARγ expression contributed to decreased BP in mice.48 Pioglitazone, a ligand of PPARγ used to control blood sugar, has been reported to decrease BP independent of reductions in blood sugar levels, and it could even restore circadian rhythms.49 Furthermore, it has been reported that the PPAR gene was associated with hypertension.50, 51 Altogether, circadian genes might interact with PPARs and have important roles in maintaining cellular energy homeostasis and circadian rhythms. Further studies are required to investigate the roles of these genes in BP regulation.
β-Blockers and non-dipper hypertension
In this study, in addition to the genetic risk score, the use of β-blockers was found to be independently associated with the presence of non-dipper hypertension, which is consistent with the findings of Stanton’s study. In that study, the author demonstrated a tendency for β-blockers to reduce daytime BP but not affect nighttime BP or early morning BP surges.52 β-Blockers might also decrease the HR to a greater extent during the daytime. Some agents with partial agonist activity, such as pindolol, have even been reported to increase the HR at night.53 Thus, the current evidence indicates that the BP-lowering effects of β-blockers are dominant during the daytime, but they are minor during the nighttime and early morning.54 This evidence is consistent with our findings that the use of β-blockers was independently associated with a decrease in diurnal BP variability and that it could contribute to the development of non-dipper hypertension. Furthermore, a β2-adrenoceptor agonist was reported to induce PER1 expression,55 indicating that β2-adrenoceptor modulation might alter the functions of circadian genes. Further studies are required to investigate these complex interactions.
Study limitations
There were some limitations of our study. First, as this study was conducted in Chinese hypertensive subjects, concerns might remain regarding the application of the results of our study to the general population without further replication studies. Second, the effects of lifestyle behaviors on BP control were considered, but it was difficult to collect the necessary information for our study. Subjects with relatively less healthy lifestyle behaviors might be more susceptible to genetic risk than those with more healthy behaviors.56 Whether the genotype score has value in predicting the risk of non-dipper hypertension in specific subgroups of risk remains to be tested. Third, we used additional 619 patients to verify the association of the five SNPs with the diurnal BP pattern, but P-values were not enough significant after multiple test correction. Then, we used joint analysis instead of replication-based analysis to confirm the first-stage results. It has been mentioned that joint analysis is more efficient and more powerful than replication-based analysis for two-stage genome-wide association studies and similar joint analysis has been used in many genetic studies.13 Furthermore, a small number of patients took thiazide diuretics and/or β-blockers, which might potentially have influenced the subsequent analysis of the interactions between antihypertensive medications and the circadian genetic risk score. In addition, the selected SNPs in this study might have been insufficient to encompass all of the genetic information of the circadian genes. Further fine-mapping and functional studies are required to identify the most critical regions.
Conclusion
Genes involved in circadian rhythms could be related to diurnal BP changes, as well as to the presence of non-dipper hypertension. The circadian genetic risk score and the use of β-blockers were found to be associated independently with non-dipper hypertension after adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors. These findings could be helpful in identifying at-risk subgroups among hypertensive patients and in providing additional information for the use of antihypertensive medications and the application of treatment strategies.
References
Williams GH, Fisher ND . Genetic approach to diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in human hypertension. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 1997; 6: 199–204.
Chen JW, Jen SL, Lee WL, Hsu NW, Lin SJ, Ting CT, Chang MS, Wang PH . Differential glucose tolerance in dipper and nondipper essential hypertension: the implications of circadian blood pressure regulation on glucose tolerance in hypertension. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 1743–1748.
Cuspidi C, Meani S, Salerno M, Valerio C, Fusi V, Severgnini B, Lonati L, Magrini F, Zanchetti A . Cardiovascular target organ damage in essential hypertensives with or without reproducible nocturnal fall in blood pressure. J Hypertens 2004; 22: 273–280.
Turek FW, Joshu C, Kohsaka A, Lin E, Ivanova G, McDearmon E, Laposky A, Losee-Olson S, Easton A, Jensen DR, Eckel RH, Takahashi JS, Bass J . Obesity and metabolic syndrome in circadian Clock mutant mice. Science 2005; 308: 1043–1045.
Ando H, Takamura T, Matsuzawa-Nagata N, Shima KR, Eto T, Misu H, Shiramoto M, Tsuru T, Irie S, Fujimura A, Kaneko S . Clock gene expression in peripheral leucocytes of patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2009; 52: 329–335.
Woon PY, Kaisaki PJ, Bragança J, Bihoreau MT, Levy JC, Farrall M, Gauguier D . Aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-like (BMAL1) is associated with susceptibility to hypertension and type 2 diabetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104: 14412–14417.
Englund A, Kovanen L, Saarikoski ST, Haukka J, Reunanen A, Aromaa A, Lönnqvist J, Partonen T . NPAS2 and PER2 are linked to risk factors of the metabolic syndrome. J Circadian Rhythms 2009; 7: 5.
Fava C, Burri P, Almgren P, Arcaro G, Groop L, Lennart Hulthén U, Melander O . Dipping and variability of blood pressure and heart rate at night are heritable traits. Am J Hypertens 2005; 18: 1402–1407.
Grossman E, Laudon M, Yalcin R, Zengil H, Peleg E, Sharabi Y, Kamari Y, Shen-Orr Z, Zisapel N . Melatonin reduces night blood pressure in patients with nocturnal hypertension. Am J Med 2006; 119: 898–902.
Hunt SC, Williams RR, Barlow GK . A comparison of positive family history definitions for defining risk of future disease. J Chronic Dis 1986; 39: 809–821.
Chen JW, Wu SY, Pan WH . Clinical characteristics of young-onset hypertension implications for different genders. Int J Cardiol 2004; 96: 65–71.
Huang CC, Leu HB, Wu TC, Lin SJ, Chen JW . Clinical predictors of the response to short-term thiazide treatment in nondiabetic essential hypertensives. J Hum Hypertens 2008; 22: 329–337.
Skol AD, Scott LJ, Abecasis GR, Boehnke M . Joint analysis is more efficient than replication-based analysis for two-stage genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 2006; 38: 209–213.
Pan WH, Chang HY, Yeh WT, Hsiao SY, Hung YT . Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in Taiwan: results of Nutrition and Health Survey in Taiwan (NAHSIT) 1993–1996. J Hum Hypertens 2001; 15: 793–798.
Vitaterna MH, King DP, Chang AM, Kornhauser JM, Lowrey PL, McDonald JD, Dove WF, Pinto LH, Turek FW, Takahashi JS . Mutagenesis and mapping of a mouse gene, Clock, essential for circadian behavior. Science 1994; 264: 719–725.
Honma S, Kawamoto T, Takagi Y, Fujimoto K, Sato F, Noshiro M, Kato Y, Honma K . Dec1 and Dec2 are regulators of the mammalian molecular clock. Nature 2002; 419: 841–844.
Wisor JP, O'Hara BF, Terao A, Selby CP, Kilduff TS, Sancar A, Edgar DM, Franken P . A role for cryptochromes in sleep regulation. BMC Neurosci 2002; 3: 20.
Gery S, Komatsu N, Baldjyan L, Yu A, Koo D, Koeffler HP . The circadian gene per1 plays an important role in cell growth and DNA damage control in human cancer cells. Mol Cell 2006; 22: 375–382.
Fu L, Pelicano H, Liu J, Huang P, Lee C . The circadian gene Period2 plays an important role in tumor suppression and DNA damage response in vivo. Cell 2002; 111: 41–50.
Zhou YD, Barnard M, Tian H, Li X, Ring HZ, Francke U, Shelton J, Richardson J, Russell DW, McKnight SL . Molecular characterization of two mammalian bHLH-PAS domain proteins selectively expressed in the central nervous system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 713–718.
Sato TK, Panda S, Miraglia LJ, Reyes TM, Rudic RD, McNamara P, Naik KA, FitzGerald GA, Kay SA, Hogenesch JB . A functional genomics strategy reveals Rora as a component of the mammalian circadian clock. Neuron 2004; 43: 527–537.
André E, Conquet F, Steinmayr M, Stratton SC, Porciatti V, Becker-André M . Disruption of retinoid-related orphan receptor beta changes circadian behavior, causes retinal degeneration and leads to vacillans phenotype in mice. EMBO J 1998; 17: 3867–3877.
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y . Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Statist Soc. B 1995; 57: 289–300.
Dehghan A, Köttgen A, Yang Q, Hwang SJ, Kao WL, Rivadeneira F, Boerwinkle E, Levy D, Hofman A, Astor BC, Benjamin EJ, van Duijn CM, Witteman JC, Coresh J, Fox CS . Association of three genetic loci with uric acid concentration and risk of gout: a genome-wide association study. Lancet 2008; 372: 1953–1961.
Shah T, Zabaneh D, Gaunt T, Swerdlow DI, Shah S, Talmud PJ, Day IN, Whittaker J, Holmes MV, Sofat R, Humphries SE, Kivimaki M, Kumari M, Hingorani AD, Casas JP . Gene-centric analysis identifies variants associated with interleukin-6 levels and shared pathways with other inflammation markers. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2013; 6: 163–170.
Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, de Bakker PI, Daly MJ, Sham PC . PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet 2007; 81: 559–575.
Chung CM, Lin TH, Chen JW, Leu HB, Yang HC, Ho H Y, Ting CT, Sheu SH, Tsai WC, Chen JH, Lin SJ, Chen YT, Pan WH . A genome-wide association study reveals a quantitative trait locus of adiponectin on CDH13 that predicts cardiometabolic outcomes. Diabetes 2011; 60: 2417–2423.
Portman MA . Molecular clock mechanisms and circadian rhythms intrinsic to the heart. Circ Res 2001; 89: 1084–1086.
Muller JE, Tofler GH, Stone PH . Circadian variation and triggers of onset of acute cardiovascular disease. Circulation 1989; 79: 733–743.
Ko CH, Takahashi JS . Molecular components of the mammalian circadian clock. Hum Mol Genet 2006; 15: R271–R277.
Albrecht U, Eichele G . The mammalian circadian clock. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2003; 13: 271–277.
Preitner N, Damiola F, Lopez-Molina L, Zakany J, Duboule D, Albrecht U, Schibler U . The orphan nuclear receptor REV-ERBalpha controls circadian transcription within the positive limb of the mammalian circadian oscillator. Cell 2002; 110: 251–260.
Triqueneaux G, Thenot S, Kakizawa T, Antoch MP, Safi R, Takahashi JS, Delaunay F, Laudet V . The orphan receptor Rev-erbalpha gene is a target of the circadian clock pacemaker. J Mol Endocrinol 2004; 33: 585–608.
Laposky A, Easton A, Dugovic C, Walisser J, Bradfield C, Turek F . Deletion of the mammalian circadian clock gene BMAL1/Mop3 alters baseline sleep architecture and the response to sleep deprivation. Sleep 2005; 28: 395–409.
Kuo TB, Lai CJ, Shaw FZ, Lai CW, Yang CC . Sleep-related sympathovagal imbalance in SHR. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2004; 286: H1170–H1176.
Vukolic A, Antic V, Van Vliet BN, Yang Z, Albrecht U, Montani JP . Role of mutation of the circadian clock gene Per2 in cardiovascular circadian rhythms. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2010; 298: R627–R634.
Rudic RD, Fulton DJ . Pressed for time: the circadian clock and hypertension. J Appl Physiol 2009; 107: 1328–1338.
Barclay JL, Husse J, Bode B, Naujokat N, Meyer-Kovac J, Schmid SM, Lehnert H, Oster H . Circadian desynchrony promotes metabolic disruption in a mouse model of shiftwork. PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e37150.
Burgueño A, Gemma C, Gianotti TF, Sookoian S, Pirola CJ . Increased levels of resistin in rotating shift workers: a potential mediator of cardiovascular risk associated with circadian misalignment. Atherosclerosis 2010; 210: 625–629.
Sookoian S, Gemma C, Fernández Gianotti T, Burgueño A, Alvarez A, González CD, Pirola CJ . Effects of rotating shift work on biomarkers of metabolic syndrome and inflammation. J Intern Med 2007; 261: 285–292.
Plutzky J . The PPAR-RXR transcriptional complex in the vasculature: energy in the balance. Circ Res 2011; 108: 1002–1016.
Canaple L, Rambaud J, Dkhissi-Benyahya O, Rayet B, Tan NS, Michalik L, Delaunay F, Wahli W, Laudet V . Reciprocal regulation of brain and muscle Arnt-like protein 1 and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha defines a novel positive feedback loop in the rodent liver circadian clock. Mol Endocrinol 2006; 20: 1715–1727.
Oishi K, Shirai H, Ishida N . PPARalpha is involved in photoentrainment of the circadian clock. Neuroreport 2008; 19: 487–489.
Wang N, Yang G, Jia Z, Zhang H, Aoyagi T, Soodvilai S, Symons JD, Schnermann JB, Gonzalez FJ, Litwin SE, Yang T . Vascular PPARgamma controls circadian variation in blood pressure and heart rate through Bmal1. Cell Metab 2008; 8: 482–491.
Fontaine C, Dubois G, Duguay Y, Helledie T, Vu-Dac N, Gervois P, Soncin F, Mandrup S, Fruchart JC, Fruchart-Najib J, Staels B . The orphan nuclear receptor Rev-Erbalpha is a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma target gene and promotes PPARgamma-induced adipocyte differentiation. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 37672–37680.
Schmutz I, Ripperger JA, Baeriswyl-Aebischer S, Albrecht U . The mammalian clock component PERIOD2 coordinates circadian output by interaction with nuclear receptors. Genes Dev 2010; 24: 345–357.
Grimaldi B, Bellet MM, Katada S, Astarita G, Hirayama J, Amin RH, Granneman JG, Piomelli D, Leff T, Sassone-Corsi P . PER2 controls lipid metabolism by direct regulation of PPARγ. Cell Metab 2010; 12: 509–520.
Tsai YS, Xu L, Smithies O, Maeda N . Genetic variations in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma expression affect blood pressure. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 19084–19089.
Anan F, Masaki T, Fukunaga N, Teshima Y, Iwao T, Kaneda K, Umeno Y, Okada K, Wakasugi K, Yonemochi H, Eshima N, Saikawa T, Yoshimatsu H . Pioglitazone shift circadian rhythm of blood pressure from non-dipper to dipper type in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Eur J Clin Invest 2007; 37: 709–714.
Cheurfa N, Reis AF, Dubois-Laforgue D, Bellanné-Chantelot C, Timsit J, Velho G . The Gly482Ser polymorphism in the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator-1 gene is associated with hypertension in type 2 diabetic men. Diabetologia 2004; 47: 1980–1983.
Ylihärsilä H, Eriksson JG, Forsén T, Laakso M, Uusitupa M, Osmond C, Barker DJ . Interactions between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma 2 gene polymorphisms and size at birth on blood pressure and the use of antihypertensive medication. J Hypertens 2004; 22: 1283–1287.
Stanton A, Atkins N, O'Brien E, O'Malley K . Antihypertensive therapy and circadian blood pressure profiles: a retrospective analysis utilising cumulative sums. Blood Press 1993; 2: 289–295.
Quyyumi AA, Wright C, Mockus L, Fox KM . Effect of partial agonist activity in beta blockers in severe angina pectoris: a double blind comparison of pindolol and atenolol. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984; 289: 951–953.
Lemmer B . The importance of circadian rhythms on drug response in hypertension and coronary heart disease—from mice and man. Pharmacol Ther. 2006; 111: 629–651.
Burioka N, Fukuoka Y, Takata M, Endo M, Miyata M, Chikumi H, Tomita K, Kodani M, Touge H, Takeda K, Sumikawa T, Yamaguchi K, Ueda Y, Nakazaki H, Suyama H, Yamasaki A, Sano H, Igishi T, Shimizu E . Circadian rhythms in the CNS and peripheral clock disorders: function of clock genes: influence of medication for bronchial asthma on circadian gene. J Pharmacol Sci 2007; 103: 144–149.
Florez JC, Jablonski KA, Bayley N, Pollin TI, de Bakker PI, Shuldiner AR, Knowler WC, Nathan DM, Altshuler D, Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. TCF7L2 polymorphisms and progression to diabetes in the Diabetes Prevention Program. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 241–250.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the National Science Council (99-2314-B-075-042-MY2, 99-2628-B-010-015-MY3 and 101-2314-B-075-071).
Author contributions: H-BL, C-MC, W-HP and J-WC participated in the design of the study and in the manuscript preparation; CSJF, Y-TC, W-HP and J-WC conceived of the study and participated in its design and coordination; S-JL, K-MC, H-YH, C-TT, T-HL, S-HS, W-CT, J-HC, W-HY, T-YC and C-LC participated in the collection and management of data; and H-CY, C-LC and CSJF participated in the analysis and interpretation of the data. The authors have approved the final manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leu, HB., Chung, CM., Lin, SJ. et al. Association of circadian genes with diurnal blood pressure changes and non-dipper essential hypertension: a genetic association with young-onset hypertension. Hypertens Res 38, 155–162 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/hr.2014.152
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hr.2014.152
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Association of BMAL1 clock gene polymorphisms with fasting glucose in children
Pediatric Research (2023)
-
Age of Hypertension Onset: Overview of Research and How to Apply in Practice
Current Hypertension Reports (2020)
-
The adrenal gland circadian clock exhibits a distinct phase advance in spontaneously hypertensive rats
Hypertension Research (2019)
-
Genome-wide association study of nocturnal blood pressure dipping in hypertensive patients
BMC Medical Genetics (2018)
-
Genetic risk factors influence nighttime blood pressure and related cardiovascular complications in patients with coronary heart disease
Hypertension Research (2018)