Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Paradoxical inhibition of T-cell function in response to CTLA-4 blockade; heterogeneity within the human T-cell population

Abstract

T-cell co-stimulation delivered by the molecules B7-1 or B7-2 through CD28 has a positive effect on T-cell activation1, whereas engagement of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) by these molecules inhibits activation2. In vivo administration to mice of blocking monoclonal antibodies or Fab fragments against CTLA-4 can augment antigen-specific T-cell responses3,4 and, thus, therapy with monoclonal antibody against CTLA-4 has potential applications for tumor therapy and enhancement of vaccine immunization5,6,7. The effects of B7-1 and B7-2 co-stimulation through CD28 depend on the strength of the signal delivered through the T-cell receptor (TCR)8,9 and the activation state of T cells during activation10,11. Thus, we sought to determine whether these factors similarly influence the effect of B7-mediated signals delivered through CTLA-4 during T-cell activation. Using freshly isolated human T cells and Fab fragments of a monoclonal antibody against CTLA-4, we demonstrate here that CTLA-4 blockade can enhance or inhibit the clonal expansion of different T cells that respond to the same antigen, depending on both the T-cell activation state and the strength of the T-cell receptor signal delivered during T-cell stimulation. Thus, for whole T-cell populations, blocking a negative signal may paradoxically inhibit immune responses. These results provide a theoretical framework for clinical trials in which co-stimulatory signals are manipulated in an attempt to modulate the immune response in human disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The effect of CTLA-4 blockade on cytokine secretion depends on the strength of signal through the TCR.
Figure 2: CTLA-4 blockade enhances Th2 cytokine secretion from PBMCs stimulated at high antigen concentrations.
Figure 3: CTLA-4 blockade differentially affects the expansion of T cells with identical specificities.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lenschow, D.J., Walunas, T.L. & Bluestone, J.A. CD28/B7 system of T cell costimulation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14, 233–258 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Thompson, C.B. & Allison, J.P. The emerging role of CTLA-4 as an immune attenuator. Immunity 7, 445–450 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Morton, P.A., Loh, D.Y., Bluestone, J.A. & Jenkins, M.K. Antigen-dependent clonal expansion of a trace population of antigen-specific CD4+ T cells in vivo is dependent on CD28 costimulation and inhibited by CTLA-4. J. Immunol. 155, 1032–1036 (1995).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Walunas, T.L. & Bluestone, J.A. CTLA-4 regulates tolerance induction and T cell differentiation in vivo. J. Immunol. 160, 3855–3860 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kwon, E.D. et al. Manipulation of T cell costimulatory and inhibitory signals for immunotherapy of prostate cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 8099–8103 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McCoy, K., Camberis, M. & Le Gros, G. Protective immunity to nematode infection is induced by CTLA-4 blockade. J. Exp. Med. 186, 183–187 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Murphy, M.L., Cotterell, S.E.J., Gorak, P.M.A., Engwerda, C.R. & Kaye, P.M. Blockade of CTLA-4 enhances host resistance to the intracellular pathogen, Leishmania donovani. J. Immunol. 161, 4153–4160 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Anderson, D.E. et al. Weak peptide agonists reveal functional differences in B7-1 and B7-2 costimulation of human T cell clones. J. Immunol. 159, 1669–1675 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fields, P.E. et al. B7.1 is a quantitatively stronger costimulus than B7.2 in the activation of naïve CD8+ TCR-transgenic T cells. J. Immunol. 161, 5268–5275 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Scholz, C., Patton, K.T., Anderson, D.E., Freeman, G.J. & Hafler, D.A. Expansion of autoreactive T cells in multiple sclerosis is independent of exogenous B7 costimulation. J. Immunol. 160, 1532–1538 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lovett- Racke, A.E. et al. Decreased dependence of myelin basic protein-reactive T cells on CD28-mediated costimulation in multiple sclerosis patients. A marker of activated/memory T cells. J. Clin. Invest. 101, 725–730 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Azuma, M. et al. B70 antigen is a second ligand for CTLA-4 and CD28. Nature 366, 76–79 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hathcock, K.S., Laszlo, G., Pucillo, C., Linsley, P., and Hodes, R.J. Comparative analysis of B7-1 and B7-2 costimulatory ligands: expression and function. J. Immunol. 180, 631–640 (1994).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jeannin, P. et al. Human effector memory T cells express CD86: a functional role in naïve T cell priming. J. Immunol. 162, 2044–2048 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Saha, B., Chattopadhyay, S., Germond, R., Harlan, D.M. & Perrin, P.J. CTLA4 (CD152) modulates the Th subset response and alters the course of experimental Leishmania major infection. Eur. J. Immunol. 28, 4213–4220 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rissoan, M.C. et al. Reciprocal control of T helper cell and dendritic cell differentiation. Science 283, 1183–1186 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bieganowska, K.D. et al. Direct ex vivo analysis of activated, fas-sensitive autoreactive T cells in human autoimmune disease. J. Exp. Med. 185, 1585–1594 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wucherpfennig K.W. et al. Structural requirements for binding of an immunodominant myelin basic protein peptide to DR2 isotypes and for its recognition by human T cell clones. J. Exp. Med. 179, 279–290 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Linsley, P.S. et al. Coexpression and functional cooperation of CTLA-4 and CD28 on activated T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 176, 1595–1604 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Metz, D.P., Farber, D.L., Taylor, T. & Bottomly, K. Differential role of CTLA-4 in regulation of resting memory versus naïve CD4 T cell activation. J. Immunol. 161, 5855–5861 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. LaSalle, J.M. and Hafler, D.A. The coexpression of CD45RA and CD45RO isoforms on T cells during the S/G2/M stages of cells cycle. Cell Immunol. 138, 197–206 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank V. Kuchroo and members of his laboratory for discussions. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases grants 1PO1A139671-03, RO1DK52127, RO1NS2424710A2 (D.A.H.), and a grant from Genetics Institute (D.A.H.). A.B. was supported by a Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada Research Fellowship and by the Clinical Investigator Training Program: Harvard/Massachusetts Institute of Technology Health Sciences and Technology–Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, in collaboration with Pfizer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, D., Bieganowska, K., Bar-Or, A. et al. Paradoxical inhibition of T-cell function in response to CTLA-4 blockade; heterogeneity within the human T-cell population. Nat Med 6, 211–214 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/72323

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/72323

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing