Abstract
Fundamental considerations predict that macroscopic quantum systems such as superfluids and the electrons in superconductors will undergo oscillatory motion when forced through a small constriction. Here we induce these oscillations in superfluid helium-4 (4He) by pushing it through an array of nanometre-sized apertures. The oscillations, which are detected as an audible whistling sound, obey the so-called Josephson frequency relation and occur coherently among all the apertures. The discovery of this property in 4He at the relatively high temperature of 2 K (2,000 times higher than the temperature at which a related but different phenomenon occurs in 3He) may pave the way for a new class of practical rotation sensors of unprecedented precision.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
The Josephson effects in superconductors have received attention both as an aid to scientific understanding and for their technological importance1. Analogous effects, including Josephson oscillations, have been observed2,3 in superfluid 3He below 1 mK. However, detection of oscillations at the Josephson frequency in superfluid 4He has remained elusive until now, despite almost four decades of attempts4.
Superconductors and superfluids are both described by a macroscopic wave function that includes amplitude and phase, φ. A chemical-potential difference, Δµ=µ2−µ1, between two baths of superfluid separated by an aperture causes the phase difference, Δφ=φ2−φ1, to change in accordance with the Josephson–Anderson phase-evolution equation
where ħ is Planck's constant (h) divided by 2π and where Δµ/m4=ΔP/ρ−SΔT (and m4 is the mass of the 4He atom, ΔP is the pressure difference, ρ is the mass density, S is the entropy per unit mass, and ΔT is the temperature difference). A non-zero Δφ results in a superfluid current, I(Δφ), through the aperture. If I(Δφ) is periodic for 2π, a constant Δµ causes current to oscillate through the aperture at the Josephson frequency fj=Δµ/h. The periodicity in I(Δφ) can occur if the aperture acts like an ideal weak link3,5, in which case I(Δφ)∝sin(Δφ), or by the generation of 2π phase slips6, in which case I(Δφ) is expected to follow a sawtooth waveform.
The experimental set-up is shown in Fig. 1a (for methods, see supplementary information). We used an electrostatically driven diaphragm2 to apply an initial pressure step between two baths of superfluid separated by an aperture array. The array consisted of 65×65 nominally 70-nm apertures spaced on a 3-µm square lattice in a 50-nm-thick silicon nitride membrane. After the pressure step, fluid flowed through the array and the chemical-potential difference relaxed to zero. When the output of a diaphragm position sensor, which monitored fluid flow, was connected to a set of headphones, we heard a clear whistling sound that passed from high to low frequency (audio recording in supplementary information).
By using Fourier transform methods, we extracted the frequency and amplitude of this whistle as a function of time throughout the transient. Immediately after the pressure step is applied, the temperatures on either side of the aperture array are equal and the entire Δµ is determined by the initial pressure head, ΔP0. Figure 1b shows that the initial frequency is proportional to the initial chemical-potential difference. The slope of the line agrees, within the systematic error of our pressure calibration, with the Josephson frequency formula (fj=m4ΔP0/ρh).
Oscillations resulting from 2π phase slips are expected to have a velocity amplitude κ/2l, where κ=h/m4 is the circulation quantum and l is an effective length for one aperture7. If, in addition, the oscillation in each of the N apertures occurs coherently, the amplitude of the diaphragm-displacement Fourier component at fj is
where A is the area of the diaphragm, a is the area of a single aperture, and ρs is the superfluid density. The factor α would be 2/π for a sawtooth waveform, or unity for a sinusoid of the same peak amplitude. We find α≈0.6, independent of temperature in the range where, if Tλ is the superfluid transition temperature, Tλ−T is between 1.7 and 2.9 mK.
We conclude that the oscillation is a coherent phenomenon involving all the apertures in the array, and is possibly sawtooth in waveform. This coherence is remarkable, because earlier work using a single aperture showed that thermal fluctuations in the phase-slip nucleation process destroy time coherence in the rate of phase slippage, so that no Josephson oscillation exists8. However, it seems that thermal fluctuations are suppressed for an array — an observation that calls for further investigation9.
We have found that superfluid 4He in an array of small apertures behaves quantum coherently, oscillating at the Josephson frequency. Because these oscillations appear in 4He at a temperature 2,000 times higher than in superfluid 3He, it may be possible to build sensitive rotation sensors using much simpler technology than previously believed10,11,12,13. This could find application in rotational seismology, geodesy and tests of general relativity.
References
Van Duzer, T. & Turner, C. W. Superconductive Devices and Circuits 2nd edn (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1999).
Pereversev, S. V., Loshak, A., Backhaus, S., Davis, J. C. & Packard, R. E. Nature 388, 449–451 (1997).
Davis, J. C. & Packard, R. E. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 741–773 (2002).
Tilley, D. R. & Tilley, J. in Superfluidity and Superconductivity 3rd edn, Ch. 7 (Institute of Physics, Bristol and Philadelphia, 1990).
Sukhatme, K., Mukharsky, Y., Chui, T. & Pearson, D. Nature 411, 280–283 (2001).
Avenel, O. & Varoquaux, E. Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2704–2707 (1985).
Packard, R. E. & Vitale, S. Phys. Rev. B 45, 2512–2515 (1992).
Backhaus, S. & Packard, R. E. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1893–1896 (1998).
Chui, T., Holmes, W. & Penanen, K. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 085301 (2003).
Packard, R. E. & Vitale, S. Phys. Rev. B 46, 3540–3549 (1992).
Avenel, O., Hakonen, P. & Varoquaux, E. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3602–3605 (1997).
Schwab, K., Bruckner, N. & Packard, R. E. Nature 386, 585–587 (1997).
Simmonds, R. W., Marchenkov, A., Hoskinson, E., Davis, J. C. & Packard, R. E. Nature 412, 55–58 (2001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
He4QuantumWhistle.wav
An audio recording of quantum oscillations in 4He. The oscillations can be clearly heard as a whistling sound passing from high to low frequency. A detailed description can be found in the document below. (WAV 234 kb)
Supplementary Information
A PDF document containing supplementary information on the experimental methods, further description of what a linear current-phase relation with phase slips means (as opposed to ideal weak link behavior), a step-by-step derivation of the formula for the whistle amplitude, and a description of the above audio file. (PDF 212 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hoskinson, E., Packard, R. & Haard, T. Quantum whistling in superfluid helium-4. Nature 433, 376 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/433376a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/433376a
This article is cited by
-
A Continuously Operating, Flux Locked, Superfluid Interferometer
Journal of Low Temperature Physics (2013)
-
Microfluidic and Nanofluidic Cavities for Quantum Fluids Experiments
Journal of Low Temperature Physics (2012)
-
Simulations of Phase Slippage in an Aperture Array
Journal of Low Temperature Physics (2007)
-
Transition from phase slips to the Josephson effect in a superfluid 4He weak link
Nature Physics (2006)
-
Superfluid Josephson junctions
Nature Physics (2006)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.