Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Devastation of prey diversity by experimentally introduced predators in the field

Abstract

HISTORICAL ecology contains various examples of how predators introduced onto islands by man have apparently exterminated native prey species1–6. Conversely, a pioneering experiment7 showed an increase in number of species with predator presence. Subsequent experiments have shown both increases and decreases in prey diversity8–10. Here we investigate how predator introduction affects one aspect of prey diversity (number of species or species richness), and prey abundance. We ran a seven-year experiment on an entirely natural system of small islands, using the commonest local lizard as the predator and web spiders as prey. Lizard introduction caused rapid and devastating effects on spider diversity and abundance: within two years, islands onto which lizards had been introduced became almost identical to islands with natural lizard populations. The proportion of species becoming extinct was 12.6 times higher on lizard-introduction' islands than on islands without lizards. Locally common and rare species were both reduced by the introduction of lizards, but nearly all of the latter became permanently extinct.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Diamond, J. & Case, T. J. in Community Ecology (eds Diamond, J. & Case, T. J.) 65–79 (Harper & Row, New York, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mooney, H. A. & Drake, J. A. (eds) Ecology of Biological Invasions (Springer, New York, 1986).

  3. Case, T. J., Bolger, D. T. & Richman, A. D. in Conservation Biology: The Theory and Practice of Nature Conservation, Preservation and Management (eds Fiedler, P. L & Jain, S. K.) 91–125 (Chapman & Hall, New York, 1992).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Pimm, S. L. The Balance of Nature? (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Holt, R. D. & Lawton, J. H. A. Rev. Ecot. Syst. 25, 495–520 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Simberloff, D. in Encyclopedia of Environmental Sciences Vol. 2 (ed. Nierenberg, W. A.) 323–336 (Academic, London, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Paine, R. T. Am. Nat. 100, 65–75 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sih, A., Crowley, P., McPeek, M., Petranka, J. & Strohmeier, J. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16, 269–311 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fuentes, E. R. & Jaksić, F. M. Oikos 53, 139–143 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hixon, M. A. in Contemporary Studies on Fish Feeding (eds Simenstad, C. A. & Cailliet, G. M.) 235–257 (Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, 1986).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Spiller, D. A. & Schoener, T. W. in Food Webs: Integration of Patterns and Dynamics (ed. Polls, G. & Winemiller, K.) 160–169 (Chapman & Hall, London, 1996).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Schoener, T. W. & Spiller, D. A. Science 236, 949–952 (1987).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Spiller, D. A. & Schoener, T. W. Ecol. Monogr. 58, 51–77 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Spiller, D. A. & Schoener, T. W. Oecologia 83, 150–161 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Spiller, D. A. & Schoener, T. W. Ecology 75, 182–196 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schoener, T. W. & Spiller, D. A. Am. Nat. 139, 1176–1207 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Losos, J. B., Marks, J. C. & Schoener, T. W. Oecologia 95, 525–532 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schoener, T. W., Spiller, D. A. & Morrison, L. W. Acta Oecologica 16, 103–121 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schoener, T. W. & Spiller, D. A. Nature 330, 474–477 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schoener, T. W. Acta Oecologica 12, 53–75 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rice, W. R. Evolution 43, 223–225 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Roughgarden, J. & Feldman, M. Ecology 56, 489–492 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schoener, T. W. Am. Scient 70, 586–595 (1982).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Holt, R. D. Oikos 50, 276–290 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mittelbach, G. G. & Chesson, P. L. in Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities (eds Kerfoot, W. C. & Sih, A.) 315–322 (Univ. Press of New England, Hanover, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schoener, T. W. & Schoener, A. J. Anim. Ecol. 49, 19–53 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pimm, S. L. & Lawton, J. H. Nature 275, 542–544 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schoener, T. W. Ecology 49, 704–726 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Polis, G. A., Myers, C. A. & Holt, R. D. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20, 297–330 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schoener, T. W. & Spiller, D. A. Science 267, 1811–1813 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schoener, T., Spiller, D. Devastation of prey diversity by experimentally introduced predators in the field. Nature 381, 691–694 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/381691a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/381691a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing