Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A brain-damaged patient with an unusual perceptuomotor deficit

Abstract

WHEN interacting with objects, the pattern of movements is influenced by such object characteristics as size and position1–4. Little is known about the effect of higher level categorical encoding of objects upon movements. Here we present evidence for an approval-for-action process which takes into account such encoding. For the brain-damaged subject L.P., the ability to complete actions involving two objects in central vision is influenced by the semantic or functional relationship between the objects. Even though she perceives only one object, she can integrate two related objects into a coordinated action. If the objects are not related she is unable to integrate them into a single motor act. We propose that selection-for-action systems5 include processes which gate conceptually the behavioural disposition to action.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jeannerod, M. in Attention and Performance Vol. IX (eds Long, J. & Baddeley, A.) 153–168 (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jakobson, L. S. & Goodale, M. A. Expl Brain Res. 86, 199–208 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Castiello, U., Bennett, K. M. B. & Stelmach, G. E. Expl Brain Res. 94, 165–180 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Weir, P. L. in Insights into the Reach to Grasp Movement (eds Bennett, K. M. B. & Castiello, U.) 129–150 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Allport, A. in Perspectives on Perception and Action (eds, Heuer, H. & Sanders, A. F.) 395–419 (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kinsbourne, M. & Warrington, E. K. Brain 86, 697–702 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Coslett, H. B. & Saffran, E. Brain 114, 1523–1545 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Humphreys, G. W. & Price, C. J. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 11, 393–434 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Warrington, E. K. & Shallice, T. Brain 107, 829–853 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Laiacona, M., Barbarotto, R. & Capitani, E. Cortex 29, 727–740 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jeannerod, M., Decety, J. & Michel, F. Neuropsychologia 32, 369–380 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Milner, A. D. et al. Brain 114, 405–428 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. DeYoe, E. A. & Van Essen, D. C. Trends Neurosci. 11, 219–226 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Goodale, M. A. & Milner, A. D. Trends Neurosci. 15, 20–25 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Goldman-Rakic, P. S. A. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 137–156 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Andersen, R. A. A. Rev. Neurosci. 12, 377–403 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kinsbourne, M. & Warrington, E. K. Brain 85, 461–486 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Goodglass, H. & Kaplan, E. The Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders (Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H. & Weintraub, S. Boston Naming Test. Experimental Edition (Boston Univ. Aphasia Research Center, Boston, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Snodgrass, J. G. & Vanderwart, M. J. exp. Psychol., hum. Learn. Mem. 6, 174–215 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Warrington, E. K. & Taylor, A. M. Perception 7, 695–705 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. DeRenzi, E. in Neuropsychological Studies of Apraxia and Related Disorders (ed. Roy, E. A.) 45–64 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Perenin, M. T. & Vighetto, A. Brain 111, 643–674 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ferrigno, G. & Pedotti, A. IEEE Trans. biomed. Engng. 32, 943–950 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kelso, J. A. S., Holt, K. G., Kugler, P. N. & Turvey, M. T. in Tutorials in Motor Behavior (eds Stelmach, G. E. & Requin, J.) 49–70 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Arbib, M. A. in Handbook of Physiology, Section 1: The Nervous System, Vol. 2: Motor Control (ed. Brooks, V. B.) 1449–1480 (Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jeannerod, M. The Neural and Behavioural Organization of Goal-Directed Movements (Oxford Science Publications. No. 15, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Castiello, U., Scarpa, M. & Bennett, K. A brain-damaged patient with an unusual perceptuomotor deficit. Nature 374, 805–808 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1038/374805a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/374805a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing