Abstract
WE have used optical microlithography to fabricate capped quasi-two-dimensional obstacle courses in SiO2. We report here observations using epifluorescence microscopy of the electrophoresis and length fractionation of large DNA molecules confined in arrays. Simple reptation theory, based on the work of deGennes1, predicts that at low electric fields the electrophoretic mobility of a polymer of length L much greater than the persistence length p scales inversely with L (ref. 2). But elongation of the coil in the matrix at sufficiently strong electric fields3 results in a length-independent electrophoretic mobility4,5. The application of suitably timed pulsed electric fields restores the fractionating power of gels for long molecules6 but the protocols of pulsed-field electrophoresis are semi-empirical because the complex and ill-understood gel matrix plays a critical role in fractionation. Microlithographically constructed obstacle arrays, with their low dimensionality, small volume and extremely reproducible topography, will make it possible to understand the motion and fractionation of large polymer molecules in complex but well characterized topologies.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
DeGennes, P. Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics 4th edn, 223–233 (Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, New York, 1991).
Lerman, L. S. & Frisch, H. L. Biopolymers 21, 995–997 (1982).
Smith, S. B., Aldridge, P. K. & Callis, J. B. Science 243, 203–206 (1989).
Hervet, H. & Bean, C. P. Biopolymers 26, 727–742 (1987).
Lumkin, O. J., Dejardin, P. & Zimm, B. H. Biopolymers 24, 1573–1593 (1985).
Schwartz, D. C. & Cantor, C. R. Cell 37, 67–75 (1984).
Hagerman, P. J. A. Rev. Biophys. biophys. Chem. 17, 265–286 (1988).
Morikawa, K. & Yanagida, M. J. Biochem. 89, 693–696 (1981).
Bustamante, C. A. Rev. Biophys. biophys. Chem. 20, 415–446 (1991).
Schwartz, D. C. & Koval, M. Nature 338, 520–522 (1989).
Schurr, J. M. & Smith, S. B. Biopolymers 29, 1161–1165 (1990).
Holmes, D. & Stellwagen, N. Electrophoresis 11, 5–15 (1990).
Deutsch, J. M. & Madden, T. L. J. chem. Phys. 90, 2476–2485 (1989).
Manning, G. S. J. chem. Physics 51, 924–933 (1969).
Kozak, M. W. & Davis, E. J. Langmuir 6, 1585–1590 (1990).
Serwer, P. Electrophoresis 10, 327–331 (1989).
Lalande, M. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 5427–5437 (1988).
Song, L. & Maestre, M. F. J. biomolec. Struc. Sterodynamics 9, 87–99 (1991).
Wallis, G. & Pomerantz, D. I. J. appl. Phys. 40, 3946–3949 (1969).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Volkmuth, W., Austin, R. DNA electrophoresis in microlithographic arrays. Nature 358, 600–602 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/358600a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/358600a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
