Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A shear-strain anomaly following the Loma Prieta earthquake

Abstract

BOREHOLE tensor strain instruments deployed along the San Andreas fault for the past ten years have provided sufficient resolution and stability to sample regional tectonic processes, potentially enhancing earthquake prediction capability. Data obtained from the instrument at San Juan Bautista, in the near-field region of the 17 October 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake (Ms = 7.1) provide the first opportunity to observe shear strain processes associated with a large earthquake. We previously reported1 a prominent shear-strain anomaly in those data for more than a year before the earthquake. This anomaly ceased immediately after the earthquake, but, as we report here, a new and higher rate of fault-parallel shear accumulation (2 microstrain per year) was established about four months later and has continued to the present. Associated changes in creep rate are apparent at a number of sites on the surface trace of the fault within 30 km of the strain meter. We propose that the observed strain accumulation results from increased slip around a nearby locked section of the fault, this slip arising from loading by the failed Loma Prieta source region to the north. This model is consistent with suggestions of an increased probability of a moderate earthquake near San Juan Bautista9–10, and with evidence12 that interactions between fault regions are important in earthquake processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gladwin, M. T., Gwyther, R. L., Higbie, J. W. & Hart, R. Geophys. Res. Lett. 18, 1377–1380 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gladwin, M. T. Rev. scient. Instrum. 55, 2011–2016 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gladwin, M. T., Gwyther, R. L., Hart, R. & Francis, M. J. geophys. Res. 92, 7981–7988 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gladwin, M. T. & Hart, R. Pure appl. Geophys. 123, 59–88 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berry, D. S. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 4, 181–187 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Berry, D. S. & Fairhurst, C. Am. Soc. Testing Mat. STP 402, 190–206 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Johnston, M. J. S. & Linde, A. T. Eos 71, 1461 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Burford, R. O. Pure appl. Geophys. 126, 499–529 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wyss, M. & Burford, R. A. Nature 329, 323–325 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sylvester, A. G., Burford, R. O. & Schultz, S. S. Eos 71, 290 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lisowski, M., Prescott, W. H., Savage, J. C. & Svarc, J. L. Geophys. Res. Lett. 17, 1211–1214 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Marko, G. M. J. geophys. Res. 87, 7807–7816 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gwyther, R., Gladwin, M. & Hart, R. A shear-strain anomaly following the Loma Prieta earthquake. Nature 356, 142–144 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/356142a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/356142a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing