Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Correlation of DNA adduct levels in human lung with cigarette smoking

Abstract

Lung cancer is the most common cancer in men in the United Kingdom and the second most common in women, accounting for between 25 and 40% of all cancer deaths1,2 Cigarette smoking is widely accepted as the major cause of lung cancer and linear relationships have been established between the number of cigarettes smoked and lung cancer risk3. Although approximately 50 carcinogenic chemicals have been identified in cigarette smoke4, a causal link between specific compounds and lung cancer has yet to be made. Studies on cigarette smokers' urine5,6, blood7–11 and placenta12 have provided indications of carcinogen exposure, and although the presence of covalently-bound adducts in human DNA provides evidence of exposure to carcinogens12–14, there have been no reports of systematic studies on the levels of DNA adducts in human lung. We report here, using the 32P-post-labelling technique15,16, that cigarette smokers have higher adduct levels than non-smokers, that there is a linear relationship between adduct levels and daily or lifetime cigarette consumption, and that people who have given up smoking for at least five years have adduct levels similar to those of non-smokers.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Doll, R. & Hill, A. B. Br. med. J. ii, 1071–1081 (1956).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yorkshire Regional Cancer Registry: Report for the Year 1985 Including Cancer Statistics for 1978–1983 (Yorkshire Regional Cancer Organisation, Leeds, 1986).

  3. Doll, R. & Hill, A. B. Br. med. J. ii, 1271–1286 (1952).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Weisburger, J. H., Cohen, L. A. & Wynder, E. L. in Origins of Human Cancer (eds Hiatt, H. H., Watson, J. D. & Winsten, J. A.) 567–602 (Cold Spring Harbor, New York, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Putzrath, R. M., Langden, D. & Eisenstadt, E. Mutat. Res. 85, 97–108 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamasaki, E. & Ames, B. N. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74, 3555–3559 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Obe, C., Vogt, H.-J., Madle, S., Fahning, A. & Heller, W. D. Mutat. Res. 92, 303–319 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Livingston, G. K. & Fineman, R. M. Mutat. Res. 119, 59–64 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Perera, F. P. et al. J. natn. Cancer Inst. 79, 449–456 (1987).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tornquivst, M. et al. Carcinogenesis (Lond.) 7, 1519–1521 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bryant, M. S., Skipper, P. L., Tannenbaum, S. R. & Maclure, M. Cancer Res. 47, 602–608 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Everson, R. B. et al. Science 231, 54–57 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Garner, R. C. Carcinogenesis (Lond.) 6, 1071–1078 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Phillips, D. H., Hemminki, H., Alhonen, A., Hewer, A. & Grover, P. L. Mutat. Res. 204, 531–541 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gupta, R. C., Reddy, M. V. & Randerath, K. Carcinogenesis (Lond.) 3, 1081–1092 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Reddy, M. V. & Randerath, K. Carcinogenesis (Lond.) 7, 1543–1551 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Randerath, E., Mittal, D. & Randerath, K. Carcinogenesis (Lond.) 9, 75–80 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Phillips, D. H., Hewer, A. & Grover, P. L. Carcinogenesis (Lond.) 7, 2071–2075 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. International Agency for Research on Cancer Monographs on the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemical to Humans Vol. 38, Tobacco Smoking (IARC, Lyon 1986).

  20. Hecht, S. S. & Hoffmann, D. Carcinogenesis (Lond.) 9, 875–884 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schoket, B., Hewer, A., Grover, P. L. & Phillips, D. H. Carcinogenesis (Lond.) 9, 1253–1258 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Everson, R. B. et al. Prog. exp. Tumor Res. 31, 86–103 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Harris, C. C. et al. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82, 6672–6676 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Perera, F. P. et al. Cancer Res. 48, 2288–2291 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Harris, C. C. et al. Cancer Res. 36, 1011–1018 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sabadie, N., Richter-Reichhelm, H. B., Saracci, R., Mohr, U. & Bartsch, H. Int. J. Cancer 27, 417–425 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pereira, M. A., Burns, F. J. & Albert, R. E. Cancer Res. 39, 2556–2559 (1979).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Doll, R. Cancer Res. 38, 3573–3583 (1978).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gupta, R. C. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81, 6943–6947 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Phillips, D., Hewer, A., Martin, C. et al. Correlation of DNA adduct levels in human lung with cigarette smoking. Nature 336, 790–792 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1038/336790a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/336790a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing