Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Developmental inactivity of 5S RNA genes persists when chromosomes are cut between genes

Abstract

Xenopus and other amphibians possess two major classes of 5S RNA genes1. One class, which codes for somatic-type 5S RNA, is expressed in both oocytes and somatic cells2. The other class, which is 50 times more abundant and encodes oocyte-type 5S RNA, is expressed in oocytes but not in somatic cells2–4. The oocyte-type 5S genes are located in tandem arrays of hundreds of genes at the ends of most chromosomes5, and it has been postulated that the lack of expression of oocyte-type 5S RNA genes in somatic cells is due to some general characteristic of the chromosomal region which the genes occupy6, for example, a folding into heterochromatin or higher-order structures. An alternative possibility is that the inactivity of these genes is controlled individually, and is independent of adjacent genetic material. We have now distinguished between these two possibilities by testing the transcription of oocyte-type 5S RNA genes either in their normal arrangement on intact chromosomes or after each gene has been separated from its neighbours by micrococcal nuclease digestion. Transcription was assayed by injecting intact nuclei, containing the 5S RNA genes as chromatin, into Xenopus oocytes7. We find that the developmental inactivity of oocyte-type 5S RNA genes is retained after the chromatin is cleaved into fragments the size of individual gene repeats.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown, D. D. & Sugimoto, K. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 38, 501–505 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ford, P. J. & Southern, E. M. Nature new Biol. 241, 7–12 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wegnez, M., Monier, R. & Denis, H. FEBS Lett. 25, 13–20 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Denis, H. & Wegnez, M. Devl Biol. 58, 212–217 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pardue, M. L., Brown, D. D. & Birnstiel, M. L. Chromosoma 42, 191–203 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ford, P. J. & Mathieson, T. Nature 261, 433–435 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Korn, L. J. & Gurdon, J. B. Nature 289, 461–465 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Peterson, R. C., Doering, J. L. & Brown, D. D. Cell 20, 131–141 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Federoff, N. V. & Brown, D. D. Cell 13, 701–716 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carroll, D. & Brown, D. D. Cell 7, 467–475, 477–486 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown, D. D. & Gurdon, J. B. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74, 2064–2068 (1977); 75, 2849–2853 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gurdon, J. B. & Brown, D. D. Devl Biol. 67, 346–356 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bogenhagen, D. F., Wormington, W. M. & Brown, D. D. Cell 28, 413–421 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gottesfeld, J. M. & Bloomer, L. S. Cell 28, 781–791 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gurdon, J. B. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 36, 523–540 (1976).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Thomas, P. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 5201–5205 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gurdon, J., Dingwall, C., Laskey, R. et al. Developmental inactivity of 5S RNA genes persists when chromosomes are cut between genes. Nature 299, 652–653 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1038/299652a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/299652a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing