Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Sodium channels need not open before they inactivate

Abstract

Most, if not all, types of voltage-gated channels inactivate. Channels that have been driven open by a depolarization will enter a non-conducting, inactivated state if the depolarization is maintained long enough. This inactivated state is different from the resting closed state because inactivated channels cannot be forced open by depolarization. Opinion about the mechanism of inactivation has ranged from Hodgkin and Huxley's original supposition that the inactivation process proceeds independently of events leading to channel opening1–3 to the more recent view that a channel normally must open before inactivating4–5. Intermediate theories suppose that activation processes—but not necessarily the actual opening of channels—are more or less tightly coupled to inactivation6–9. We now provide evidence, based on recordings of currents flowing through single sodium channels, that channel opening is not a prerequisite for inactivation to occur, and that inactivation seems to proceed independently of activation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hodgkin, A. L. & Huxley, A. F. J. Physiol., Lond. 117, 500–544 (1952).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chandler, W. K., Hodgkin, A. L. & Meves, H. J. Physiol., Lond. 180, 821–836 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gillespie, J. I. & Meves, H. J. Physiol., Lond. 299, 289–307 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Moore, L. E. & Jakobsson, E. J. theor. Biol. 33, 77–89 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bezanilla, F. & Armstrong, C. M. J. gen. Physiol. 70, 549–566 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldman, L. & Schauf, C. L. J. gen. Physiol. 61, 361–384 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Armstrong, C. M. & Bezanilla, F. J. gen. Physiol. 70, 567–590 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nonner, W. J. Physiol., Lond. 299, 573–603 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bean, B. P. Biophys. J. (in the press).

  10. Sigworth, F. J. & Neher, E. Nature 287, 447–449 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Horn, R. & Patlak, J. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 6930–6934 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horn, R., Patlak, J. & Stevens, C. Sodium channels need not open before they inactivate. Nature 291, 426–427 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1038/291426a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/291426a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing