Abstract
THE profound anterograde amnesia that has been attributed in the clinical literature to damage of the hippocampal system1,2 has not been observed in animals with such damage. Hippocampal-system lesions in animals do markedly impair some forms of spatial memory3,4, but the effects on other forms of memory have generally seemed minor5,6 compared with the dramatic disorder described in man7,8. This discrepancy between the clinical and animal literature could indicate a true evolutionary shift in the functions of the hippocampus9,10, or, at the other extreme, it could simply reflect the use of incommensurate measures across species11,12. (Strong support for this second interpretation has been provided by Gaffan13.) A third possibility, however, is that the discrepancy points to inaccurate localisation of the neuropathology in man that is responsible for the profound amnesia. Support for this last alternative comes from new evidence in monkeys indicating that a striking impairment in visual memory can be produced by the combined ablation of the hippocampal formation and the amygdaloid body, but not by ablation of either of these structures alone.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barbizet, J. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat. 26, 127–135 (1963).
Brion, S. Int. J. Neural. 7, 31–43 (1968).
Mahut, H. Neuropsychologia 9, 409–424 (1971).
Olton, D. S. Scientific Amer. 236, 82–98 (1976).
Weiskrantz, L. in Cognitive Processes of Nonhuman Primates (ed. Jarrard, L. E.) (Academic, New York, 1971).
Iversen, S. D. in International Review of Neurobiology (eds Pfeiffer, C. C. & Smythies, J. R.) (Academic, New York, 1976).
Milner, B. in Amnesia (eds Whitty, C. W. M. & Zangwill, O. L.) (Butterworths, London, 1966).
Zangwill, O. L. in Amnesia (eds Whitty, C. W. M. & Zangwill, O. L.) (Butterworths, London, 1966).
Woody, C. D. & Ervin, F. R. Physiol. Behav. 1, 273–280 (1966).
Drewe, E. A., Ettlinger, G., Milner, A. D. & Passingham, R. E. Cortex 6, 129–163 (1970).
Weiskrantz, L. & Warrington, E. K. in The Hippocampus (eds Isaacson, R. L. & Pribram, K. H.) (Plenum, New York, 1975).
Gaffan, D. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 86, 1100–1109 (1974).
Gaffan, D. Q. J. exp. Psychol. 29, 504–514 (1977).
Mishkin, M. & Delacour, J. J. exp. Psychol: Anim. Behav. Proc. 1, 326–334 (1975).
Mishkin, M., Prockop, E. S. & Rosvold, H. E. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 55, 178–181 (1962).
Herzog, A. G. & Van Hoesen, G. W. Brain Res. 115, 57–69 (1976).
Turner, B. H., Mishkin, M. & Knapp, M. E. Neurosci. Abstr. 2, 398 (1976).
Van Hoesen, G. W. & Pandya, D. N. Brain Res. 95, 1–24 (1975).
Van Hoesen, G. W., Pandya, D. N. & Butters, N. Brain Res. 95, 25–38 (1975).
Van Hoesen, G. W. & Pandya, D. N. Brain Res. 95, 39–59 (1975).
Nauta, W. J. H. J. Anat. 95, 515–531 (1961).
Poletti, C. E. & Cresswell, G. J. comp. Neurol. 175, 101–128 (1977).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MISHKIN, M. Memory in monkeys severely impaired by combined but not by separate removal of amygdala and hippocampus. Nature 273, 297–298 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/273297a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/273297a0
This article is cited by
-
Synaptic tau: A pathological or physiological phenomenon?
Acta Neuropathologica Communications (2021)
-
Activation of cortical M1 muscarinic receptors and related intracellular signaling is necessary for reactivation-induced object memory updating
Scientific Reports (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
