Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Spatial Heterogeneity and Population Stability

Abstract

THE ability of populations to absorb perturbations is often investigated theoretically by some variant on the prey-predator, Lotka–Volterra, equations. Usually the treatment is in terms of linearised equations and thus deals with very small perturbations from a steady state. Recently, May1 has enlarged the scope of investigation by considering perturbations from limit cycles rather than divergence from the simple steady state. This theoretical approach assumes populations uniform in space if not in time, but much of the variability found in nature is not only in large temporal cycles but in smaller-scale spatial patchiness. This variability may be handled statistically to give, for some specified area, a mean and variance for the populations. These can be used for ‘sensitivity analysis’ of the output from a theory or computer model, or as a basis for stochastic treatment. In either case this variability, as a function of changes in space, is not an intrinsic part of the model. Yet much experimental work shows that populations of prey or predator with limited abilities to disperse can produce spatially heterogeneous patterns, and the scale and complexity of these patterns may have some effect on persistence of these populations2,3.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. May, R. M., Science, N.Y., 177, 900 (1972).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Huffaker, C. B., Hilgardia, 27, 343 (1958).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Simberloff, D. S., and Wilson, E. O., Ecology, 50, 278 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cushing, D. H., and Tungate, D. S., J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., 43, 327 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Joseph, J., and Sendner, H., Dt. hydrog. Z., 11, 49 (1958).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kierstead, H., and Slobodkin, L. B., J. mar. Res., 12, 141 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pielou, E. C., An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology (Wiley-Interscience, London, 1969).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Bartlett, M. S., Biometrika, 44, 29 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Holling, C. S., Mem. ent. Soc. Can., 45, 5 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

STEELE, J. Spatial Heterogeneity and Population Stability. Nature 248, 83 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1038/248083a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/248083a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing